Abstract
In vivo two-photon calcium imaging provides detailed information about the activity and response properties of individual neurons. However, in vitro methods are often required to study the underlying neuronal connectivity and physiology at the cellular and synaptic levels at high resolution. This protocol provides a fast and reliable workflow for combining the two approaches by characterizing the response properties of individual neurons in mice in vivo using genetically encoded calcium indicators (GECIs), followed by retrieval of the same neurons in brain slices for further analysis in vitro (e.g., circuit mapping). In this approach, a reference frame is provided by fluorescent-bead tracks and sparsely transduced neurons expressing a structural marker in order to re-identify the same neurons. The use of GECIs provides a substantial advancement over previous approaches by allowing for repeated in vivo imaging. This opens the possibility of directly correlating experience-dependent changes in neuronal activity and feature selectivity with changes in neuronal connectivity and physiology. This protocol requires expertise both in in vivo two-photon calcium imaging and in vitro electrophysiology. It takes 3 weeks or more to complete, depending on the time allotted for repeated in vivo imaging of neuronal activity.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Keller, G.B., Bonhoeffer, T. & Hübener, M. Sensorimotor mismatch signals in primary visual cortex of the behaving mouse. Neuron 74, 809–815 (2012).
Poort, J. et al. Learning enhances sensory and multiple non-sensory representations in primary visual cortex. Neuron 86, 1478–1490 (2015).
Li, N., Chen, T.-W., Guo, Z.V., Gerfen, C.R. & Svoboda, K. A motor cortex circuit for motor planning and movement. Nature 519, 51–56 (2015).
Pastalkova, E., Itskov, V., Amarasingham, A. & Buzsáki, G. Internally generated cell assembly sequences in the rat hippocampus. Science 321, 1322–1327 (2008).
Lisman, J. The challenge of understanding the brain: where we stand in 2015. Neuron 86, 864–882 (2015).
Falkai, P. et al. Kraepelin revisited: schizophrenia from degeneration to failed regeneration. Mol. Psychiatry 20, 671–676 (2015).
Sigurdsson, T. Neural circuit dysfunction in schizophrenia: insights from animal models. Neuroscience 321, 42–65 (2016).
White, J.G., Southgate, E., Thomson, J.N. & Brenner, S. The structure of the nervous system of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 314, 1 (1986).
Prevedel, R. et al. Simultaneous whole-animal 3D imaging of neuronal activity using light-field microscopy. Nat. Methods 11, 727–730 (2014).
Ohki, K., Chung, S., Ch'ng, Y.H., Kara, P. & Reid, R.C. Functional imaging with cellular resolution reveals precise micro-architecture in visual cortex. Nature 433, 597–603 (2005).
Denk, W., Strickler, J. & Webb, W. Two-photon laser scanning fluorescence microscopy. Science 248, 73–76 (1990).
Stosiek, C., Garaschuk, O., Holthoff, K. & Konnerth, A. In vivo two-photon calcium imaging of neuronal networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 7319–7324 (2003).
Svoboda, K. & Yasuda, R. Principles of two-photon excitation microscopy and its applications to neuroscience. Neuron 50, 823–839 (2006).
Akerboom, J. et al. Optimization of a GCaMP calcium indicator for neural activity imaging. J. Neurosci. 32, 13819–13840 (2012).
Grienberger, C. & Konnerth, A. Imaging calcium in neurons. Neuron 73, 862–885 (2012).
Rose, T., Goltstein, P.M., Portugues, R. & Griesbeck, O. Putting a finishing touch on GECIs. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 7, 88 (2014).
Goldey, G.J. et al. Removable cranial windows for long-term imaging in awake mice. Nat. Protoc. 9, 2515–2538 (2014).
Ko, H. et al. Functional specificity of local synaptic connections in neocortical networks. Nature 473, 87–91 (2011).
Ko, H. et al. The emergence of functional microcircuits in visual cortex. Nature 496, 96–100 (2013).
Cossell, L. et al. Functional organization of excitatory synaptic strength in primary visual cortex. Nature 518, 399–403 (2015).
Lien, A. & Scanziani, M. In vivo labeling of constellations of functionally identified neurons for targeted in vitro recordings. Front. Neural Circuits http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncir.2011.00016 (2011).
Peter, M. et al. Transgenic mouse models enabling photolabeling of individual neurons in vivo. PLoS One 8, e62132 (2013).
Rose, T., Jaepel, J., Hübener, M. & Bonhoeffer, T. Cell-specific restoration of stimulus preference after monocular deprivation in the visual cortex. Science 352, 1319–1322 (2016).
Driscoll, L.N., Pettit, N.L., Minderer, M., Chettih, S.N. & Harvey, C.D. Dynamic reorganization of neuronal activity patterns in parietal cortex. Cell 170, 986–999 (2017).
Kim, T.H. et al. Long-term optical access to an estimated one million neurons in the live mouse cortex. Cell Rep. 17, 3385–3394 (2016).
Karnani, M.M. et al. Cooperative subnetworks of molecularly similar interneurons in mouse neocortex. Neuron 90, 86–100 (2016).
Ringach, D.L. et al. Spatial clustering of tuning in mouse primary visual cortex. Nat. Commun. 7, 12270 (2016).
Kim, E.J. et al. Three types of cortical layer 5 neurons that differ in brain-wide connectivity and function. Neuron 88, 1253–1267 (2015).
Petreanu, L. et al. Activity in motor-sensory projections reveals distributed coding in somatosensation. Nature 489, 299–303 (2012).
Kato, H.K., Gillet, S.N. & Isaacson, J.S. Flexible sensory representations in auditory cortex driven by behavioral relevance. Neuron 88, 1027–1039 (2015).
Scott, B.B., Brody, C.D. & Tank, D.W Cellular resolution functional imaging in behaving rats using voluntary head restraint. Neuron 80, 371–384 (2013).
Huber, D. et al. Multiple dynamic representations in the motor cortex during sensorimotor learning. Nature 484, 473–478 (2012).
Goncalves, J.T., Anstey, J.E., Golshani, P. & Portera-Cailliau, C. Circuit level defects in the developing neocortex of fragile X mice. Nat. Neurosci. 16, 903–909 (2013).
Liebscher, S., Keller, G.B., Goltstein, P.M., Bonhoeffer, T. & Hübener, M. Selective persistence of sensorimotor mismatch signals in visual cortex of behaving Alzheimer's disease mice. Curr. Biol. 26, 956–964 (2016).
Hamm, J.P., Peterka, D.S., Gogos, J.A. & Yuste, R. Altered cortical ensembles in mouse models of schizophrenia. Neuron 94, 153–167 (2017).
Smith, G.B. et al. The development of cortical circuits for motion discrimination. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 252–261 (2015).
Ohki, K. et al. Highly ordered arrangement of single neurons in orientation pinwheels. Nature 442, 925–928 (2006).
Heider, B., Nathanson, J.L., Isacoff, E.Y., Callaway, E.M. & Siegel, R.M. Two-photon imaging of calcium in virally transfected striate cortical neurons of behaving monkey. PLoS One 5, e13829 (2010).
Sadakane, O. et al. Long-term two-photon calcium imaging of neuronal populations with subcellular resolution in adult non-human primates. Cell Rep. 13, 1989–1999 (2015).
Li, M., Liu, F., Jiang, H., Lee, T.S. & Tang, S. Long-term two-photon imaging in awake macaque monkey. Neuron 93, 1049–1057 (2017).
Kuhlman, S.J. et al. A disinhibitory microcircuit initiates critical-period plasticity in the visual cortex. Nature 501, 543–546 (2013).
Barnes, S.J. et al. Subnetwork-specific homeostatic plasticity in mouse visual cortex in vivo. Neuron 86, 1290–1303 (2015).
Keck, T. et al. Synaptic scaling and homeostatic plasticity in the mouse visual cortex in vivo. Neuron 80, 327–334 (2013).
Clopath, C., Bonhoeffer, T., Hübener, M. & Rose, T. Variance and invariance of neuronal long-term representations. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 372, 20160161 (2017).
Thestrup, T. et al. Optimized ratiometric calcium sensors for functional in vivo imaging of neurons and T lymphocytes. Nat. Methods 11, 175 (2014).
Mittmann, W. et al. Two-photon calcium imaging of evoked activity from L5 somatosensory neurons in vivo. Nat. Neurosci. 14, 1089–1093 (2011).
Pakan, J.M.P. et al. Behavioral-state modulation of inhibition is context-dependent and cell type specific in mouse visual cortex. eLife 5, e14985 (2016).
Resendez, S.L. et al. Visualization of cortical, subcortical and deep brain neural circuit dynamics during naturalistic mammalian behavior with head-mounted microscopes and chronically implanted lenses. Nat. Protoc. 11, 566 (2016).
Ziv, Y. et al. Long-term dynamics of CA1 hippocampal place codes. Nat. Neurosci. 16, 264–266 (2013).
Zong, W. et al. Fast high-resolution miniature two-photon microscopy for brain imaging in freely behaving mice. Nat. Methods 14, 713–719 (2017).
Hofer, S.B. et al. Differential connectivity and response dynamics of excitatory and inhibitory neurons in visual cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 14, 1045–1052 (2011).
Petreanu, L., Mao, T., Sternson, S.M. & Svoboda, K. The subcellular organization of neocortical excitatory connections. Nature 457, 1142–1145 (2009).
Yasuda, R. et al. Imaging calcium concentration dynamics in small neuronal compartments. Sci. STKE 2004, pl5 (2004).
Kisfali, M., Lőorincz, T. & Vizi, E.S. Comparison of Ca2+ transients and [Ca2+]i in the dendrites and boutons of non-fast-spiking GABAergic hippocampal interneurons using two-photon laser microscopy and high- and low-affinity dyes. J. Physiol. 591, 5541–5553 (2013).
Cadwell, C.R. et al. Electrophysiological, transcriptomic and morphologic profiling of single neurons using Patch-seq. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 199–203 (2016).
Langer, D. & Helmchen, F. Post hoc immunostaining of GABAergic neuronal subtypes following in vivo two-photon calcium imaging in mouse neocortex. Pflugers Arch. 463, 339–354 (2012).
Wekselblatt, J.B., Flister, E.D., Piscopo, D.M. & Niell, C.M. Large-scale imaging of cortical dynamics during sensory perception and behavior. J. Neurophysiol. 115, 2852–2866 (2016).
Itah, R., Gitelman, I., Tal, J. & Davis, C. Viral inoculation of mouse embryos in utero. J. Virol. Methods 120, 1–8 (2004).
Potter, H. & Heller, R. Transfection by electroporation. Curr. Protoc. Mol. Biol. 62, 9.3.1–9.3.6 (2003).
Portera-Cailliau, C., Weimer, R.M., De Paola, V., Caroni, P. & Svoboda, K. Diverse modes of axon elaboration in the developing neocortex. PLoS Biol. 3, e272 (2005).
Pinto, L. & Dan, Y. Cell-type-specific activity in prefrontal cortex during goal-directed behavior. Neuron 87, 437–450 (2015).
Dana, H. et al. Thy1-GCaMP6 transgenic mice for neuronal population imaging in vivo. PLoS One 9, e108697 (2014).
Grinvald, A. et al. In-vivo optical imaging of cortical architecture and dynamics. in Modern Techniques in Neuroscience Research (eds. Windhorst, U. & Johansson, H.) 893–969 (Springer, 1999).
Cang, J., Kalatsky, V.A., Löwel, S. & Stryker, M.P. Optical imaging of the intrinsic signal as a measure of cortical plasticity in the mouse. Vis. Neurosci. 22, 685–691 (2005).
Wang, T. & Kass, I.S. Preparation of brain slices. in Neurotransmitter Methods (ed. Rayne, R.C.) 1–14 (Springer, 1997).
Qi, G., Radnikow, G. & Feldmeyer, D. Electrophysiological and morphological characterization of neuronal microcircuits in acute brain slices using paired patch-clamp recordings. J. Vis. Exp. (95)52358 (2015).
Pologruto, T.A., Sabatini, B.L. & Svoboda, K. ScanImage: flexible software for operating laser scanning microscopes. Biomed. Eng. Online 2, 13 (2003).
Pelli, D.G. The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. Spat. Vis. 10, 437–442 (1997).
Brainard, D.H. & Vision, S. The psychophysics toolbox. Spat. Vis. 10, 433–436 (1997).
Suter, B. et al. Ephus: multipurpose data acquisition software for neuroscience experiments. Front. Neural Circuits 4, 100 (2010).
Niell, C.M. & Stryker, M.P. Highly selective receptive fields in mouse visual cortex. J. Neurosci. 28, 7520–7536 (2008).
Cuntz, H., Forstner, F., Borst, A. & Häusser, M. The TREES toolbox—probing the basis of axonal and dendritic branching. Neuroinformatics 9, 91–96 (2011).
Leinweber, M. et al. Two-photon calcium imaging in mice navigating a virtual reality environment. J. Vis. Exp. (84)e50885 (2014).
Canfield, J.G. Dry beveling micropipettes using a computer hard drive. J. Neurosci. Methods 158, 19–21 (2006).
Shepherd, G.M.G. Circuit mapping by ultraviolet uncaging of glutamate. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 2012, 998–1004 (2012).
Chen, T.-W. et al. Ultra-sensitive fluorescent proteins for imaging neuronal activity. Nature 499, 295–300 (2013).
Gökçe, O., Bonhoeffer, T. & Scheuss, V. Clusters of synaptic inputs on dendrites of layer 5 pyramidal cells in mouse visual cortex. eLife 5, e09222 (2016).
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to V. Staiger for excellent technical assistance and to M. Myoga for helping to build the in vitro setup. This study was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (CRC 870; V.S., T.B., T.R., and M.H.) and the Max Planck Society.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
S.W. and V.S. developed the idea. S.W., V.S., T.R. and M.H. planned the experiments. S.W. performed all experiments and the analysis, except for the in vivo long-term imaging experiments, which were performed by J.B. T.R. developed the viral construct and in vivo data analysis. S.W., V.S., T.R., M.H. and T.B. wrote the paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Weiler, S., Bauer, J., Hübener, M. et al. High-yield in vitro recordings from neurons functionally characterized in vivo. Nat Protoc 13, 1275–1293 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2018.026
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2018.026
This article is cited by
-
A primary sensory cortical interareal feedforward inhibitory circuit for tacto-visual integration
Nature Communications (2024)
-
Bioinspired neuron-like electronics
Nature Materials (2019)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.