The system-level identification and analysis of molecular networks in mammals can be accelerated by 'next-generation' genetics, defined as genetics that does not require crossing of multiple generations of animals in order to achieve the desired genetic makeup. We have established a highly efficient procedure for producing knock-in (KI) mice within a single generation, by optimizing the genome-editing protocol for KI embryonic stem (ES) cells and the protocol for the generation of fully ES-cell-derived mice (ES mice). Using this protocol, the production of chimeric mice is eliminated, and, therefore, there is no requirement for the crossing of chimeric mice to produce mice that carry the KI gene in all cells of the body. Our procedure thus shortens the time required to produce KI ES mice from about a year to ∼3 months. Various kinds of KI ES mice can be produced with a minimized amount of work, facilitating the elucidation of organism-level phenomena using a systems biology approach. In this report, we describe the basic technologies and protocols for this procedure, and discuss the current challenges for next-generation mammalian genetics in organism-level systems biology studies.
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $8.25 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Urnov, F.D., Rebar, E.J., Holmes, M.C., Zhang, H.S. & Gregory, P.D. Genome editing with engineered zinc finger nucleases. Nat. Rev. Genet. 11, 636–646 (2010).
Sander, J.D. & Joung, J.K. CRISPR-Cas systems for editing, regulating and targeting genomes. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 347–355 (2014).
Gaj, T., Gersbach, C.A. & Barbas, C.F. III. ZFN, TALEN, and CRISPR/Cas-based methods for genome engineering. Trends Biotechnol. 31, 397–405 (2013).
Geurts, A.M. et al. Knockout rats via embryo microinjection of zinc-finger nucleases. Science 325, 433 (2009).
Sung, Y.H. et al. Knockout mice created by TALEN-mediated gene targeting. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 23–24 (2013).
Wang, H. et al. One-step generation of mice carrying mutations in multiple genes by CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome engineering. Cell 153, 910–918 (2013).
Cong, L. et al. Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science 339, 819–823 (2013).
Sunagawa, G.A. et al. Mammalian reverse genetics without crossing reveals Nr3a as a short-sleeper gene. Cell Rep. 14, 662–677 (2016).
Tatsuki, F. et al. Involvement of Ca(2+)-dependent hyperpolarization in sleep duration in mammals. Neuron 90, 70–85 (2016).
Yang, H., Wang, H. & Jaenisch, R. Generating genetically modified mice using CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome engineering. Nat. Protoc. 9, 1956–1968 (2014).
Maruyama, T. et al. Increasing the efficiency of precise genome editing with CRISPR-Cas9 by inhibition of nonhomologous end joining. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 538–542 (2015).
Nakao, H. et al. A possible aid in targeted insertion of large DNA elements by CRISPR/Cas in mouse zygotes. Genesis 54, 65–77 (2016).
Menoret, S. et al. Homology-directed repair in rodent zygotes using Cas9 and TALEN engineered proteins. Sci. Rep. 5, 14410 (2015).
Aida, T. et al. Cloning-free CRISPR/Cas system facilitates functional cassette knock-in in mice. Genome Biol. 16, 87 (2015).
Wang, L. et al. Large genomic fragment deletion and functional gene cassette knock-in via Cas9 protein mediated genome editing in one-cell rodent embryos. Sci. Rep. 5, 17517 (2015).
Yoshimi, K. et al. ssODN-mediated knock-in with CRISPR-Cas for large genomic regions in zygotes. Nat. Commun. 7, 10431 (2016).
Nagy, A. et al. Embryonic stem cells alone are able to support fetal development in the mouse. Development 110, 815–821 (1990).
Nagy, A., Rossant, J., Nagy, R., Abramow-Newerly, W. & Roder, J.C. Derivation of completely cell culture-derived mice from early-passage embryonic stem cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90, 8424–8428 (1993).
Wang, Z.Q., Kiefer, F., Urbanek, P. & Wagner, E.F. Generation of completely embryonic stem cell-derived mutant mice using tetraploid blastocyst injection. Mech. Dev. 62, 137–145 (1997).
Schwenk, F. et al. Hybrid embryonic stem cell-derived tetraploid mice show apparently normal morphological, physiological, and neurological characteristics. Mol. Cell Biol. 23, 3982–3989 (2003).
George, S.H. et al. Developmental and adult phenotyping directly from mutant embryonic stem cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 4455–4460 (2007).
Seibler, J. et al. Rapid generation of inducible mouse mutants. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, e12 (2003).
Li, X. et al. The genetic heterozygosity and fitness of tetraploid embryos and embryonic stem cells are crucial parameters influencing survival of mice derived from embryonic stem cells by tetraploid embryo aggregation. Reproduction 130, 53–59 (2005).
Eakin, G.S., Hadjantonakis, A.K., Papaioannou, V.E. & Behringer, R.R. Developmental potential and behavior of tetraploid cells in the mouse embryo. Dev. Biol. 288, 150–159 (2005).
Lu, T.Y. & Markert, C.L. Manufacture of diploid/tetraploid chimeric mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 77, 6012–6016 (1980).
Eggan, K. et al. Hybrid vigor, fetal overgrowth, and viability of mice derived by nuclear cloning and tetraploid embryo complementation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 6209–6214 (2001).
Gertsenstein, M. et al. Efficient generation of germ line transmitting chimeras from C57BL/6N ES cells by aggregation with outbred host embryos. PLoS One 5, e11260 (2010).
Poueymirou, W.T. et al. F0 generation mice fully derived from gene-targeted embryonic stem cells allowing immediate phenotypic analyses. Nat. Biotechnol. 25, 91–99 (2007).
Huang, J. et al. Efficient production of mice from embryonic stem cells injected into four- or eight-cell embryos by piezo micromanipulation. Stem Cells 26, 1883–1890 (2008).
Johnson, M.H. & McConnell, J.M. Lineage allocation and cell polarity during mouse embryogenesis. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 15, 583–597 (2004).
Johnson, M.H., Maro, B. & Takeichi, M. The role of cell adhesion in the synchronization and orientation of polarization in 8-cell mouse blastomeres. J. Embryol. Exp. Morph. 93, 239–255 (1986).
Kiyonari, H., Kaneko, M., Abe, S. & Aizawa, S. Three inhibitors of FGF receptor, ERK, and GSK3 establishes germline-competent embryonic stem cells of C57BL/6N mouse strain with high efficiency and stability. Genesis 48, 317–327 (2010).
Susaki, E.A. et al. Whole-brain imaging with single-cell resolution using chemical cocktails and computational analysis. Cell 157, 726–739 (2014).
Tainaka, K. et al. Whole-body imaging with single-cell resolution by tissue decolorization. Cell 159, 911–924 (2014).
Wang, Y. et al. Highly efficient generation of biallelic reporter gene knock-in mice via CRISPR-mediated genome editing of ESCs. Protein Cell 7, 152–156 (2016).
Nagy, A., Nagy, K. & Gertsenstein, M. Production of mouse chimeras by aggregating pluripotent stem cells with embryos. Methods Enzymol. 476, 123–149 (2010).
Ode, K.L. et al. Knockout-rescue embryonic stem cell-derived mouse reveals circadian-period control by quality and quantity of CRY1. Mol. Cell 65, 176–190 (2017).
Sato, H., Amagai, K., Shimizukawa, R. & Tamai, Y. Stable generation of serum- and feeder-free embryonic stem cell-derived mice with full germline-competency by using a GSK3 specific inhibitor. Genesis 47, 414–422 (2009).
Sommer, D., Peters, A.E., Baumgart, A.K. & Beyer, M. TALEN-mediated genome engineering to generate targeted mice. Chromosome Res. 23, 43–55 (2015).
Vanamee, E.S., Santagata, S. & Aggarwal, A.K. FokI requires two specific DNA sites for cleavage. J. Mol. Biol. 309, 69–78 (2001).
Miller, J.C. et al. A TALE nuclease architecture for efficient genome editing. Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 143–148 (2011).
Hermann, M., Cermak, T., Voytas, D.F. & Pelczar, P. Mouse genome engineering using designer nucleases. J. Vis. Exp. 86, e50930 (2014).
Niwa, H., Yamamura, K. & Miyazaki, J. Efficient selection for high-expression transfectants with a novel eukaryotic vector. Gene 108, 193–199 (1991).
Doyle, E.L. et al. TAL effector-nucleotide targeter (TALE-NT) 2.0: tools for TAL effector design and target prediction. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, W117–W122 (2012).
Hale, C.R. et al. RNA-guided RNA cleavage by a CRISPR RNA-Cas protein complex. Cell 139, 945–956 (2009).
Mojica, F.J., Diez-Villasenor, C., Garcia-Martinez, J. & Almendros, C. Short motif sequences determine the targets of the prokaryotic CRISPR defence system. Microbiology 155, 733–740 (2009).
Ran, F.A. et al. Double nicking by RNA-guided CRISPR Cas9 for enhanced genome editing specificity. Cell 154, 1380–1389 (2013).
Shen, B. et al. Efficient genome modification by CRISPR-Cas9 nickase with minimal off-target effects. Nat. Methods 11, 399–402 (2014).
Kleinstiver, B.P. et al. Engineered CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases with altered PAM specificities. Nature 523, 481–485 (2015).
Hirano, S., Nishimasu, H., Ishitani, R. & Nureki, O. Structural basis for the altered PAM specificities of engineered CRISPR-Cas9. Mol. Cell 61, 886–894 (2016).
Bae, S., Kweon, J., Kim, H.S. & Kim, J.S. Microhomology-based choice of Cas9 nuclease target sites. Nat. Methods 11, 705–706 (2014).
Li, H.L. et al. Precise correction of the dystrophin gene in Duchenne muscular dystrophy patient induced pluripotent stem cells by TALEN and CRISPR-Cas9. Stem Cell Rep. 4, 143–154 (2015).
Nakade, S. et al. Microhomology-mediated end-joining-dependent integration of donor DNA in cells and animals using TALENs and CRISPR/Cas9. Nat. Commun. 5, 5560 (2014).
Sakuma, T. et al. Homologous recombination-independent large gene cassette knock-in in CHO cells using TALEN and MMEJ-directed donor plasmids. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 16, 23849–23866 (2015).
Sakuma, T., Nakade, S., Sakane, Y., Suzuki, K.T. & Yamamoto, T. MMEJ-assisted gene knock-in using TALENs and CRISPR-Cas9 with the PITCh systems. Nat. Protoc. 11, 118–133 (2016).
Murata, T. et al. ang is a novel gene expressed in early neuroectoderm, but its null mutant exhibits no obvious phenotype. Gene Exp. Patterns 5, 171–178 (2004).
Giraldo, P. & Montoliu, L. Size matters: use of YACs, BACs and PACs in transgenic animals. Transg. Res. 10, 83–103 (2001).
Qi, X. et al. BMP4 supports self-renewal of embryonic stem cells by inhibiting mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 6027–6032 (2004).
Takashima, Y. et al. Resetting transcription factor control circuitry toward ground-state pluripotency in human. Cell 158, 1254–1269 (2014).
Dutta, D. et al. Self-renewal versus lineage commitment of embryonic stem cells: protein kinase C signaling shifts the balance. Stem Cells 29, 618–628 (2011).
Watanabe, K. et al. A ROCK inhibitor permits survival of dissociated human embryonic stem cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 25, 681–686 (2007).
Zhang, P., Wu, X., Hu, C., Wang, P. & Li, X. Rho kinase inhibitor Y-27632 and accutase dramatically increase mouse embryonic stem cell derivation. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Anim. 48, 30–36 (2012).
Lee, J.H., Hart, S.R. & Skalnik, D.G. Histone deacetylase activity is required for embryonic stem cell differentiation. Genesis 38, 32–38 (2004).
Ware, C.B. et al. Histone deacetylase inhibition elicits an evolutionarily conserved self-renewal program in embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 4, 359–369 (2009).
Hezroni, H., Sailaja, B.S. & Meshorer, E. Pluripotency-related, valproic acid (VPA)-induced genome-wide histone H3 lysine 9 (H3K9) acetylation patterns in embryonic stem cells. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 35977–35988 (2011).
Blaschke, K. et al. Vitamin C induces Tet-dependent DNA demethylation and a blastocyst-like state in ES cells. Nature 500, 222–226 (2013).
Nakao, K., Nakagata, N & Katsuki, M. Simple and efficient vitrification procedure for cryopreservation of mouse embryos. Exp. Anim. 46, 231–234 (1997).
Cermak, T. et al. Efficient design and assembly of custom TALEN and other TAL effector-based constructs for DNA targeting. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, e82 (2011).
Abe, T. et al. Establishment of conditional reporter mouse lines at ROSA26 locus for live cell imaging. Genesis 49, 579–590 (2011).
Hohenstein, P. et al. High-efficiency Rosa26 knock-in vector construction for Cre-regulated overexpression and RNAi. PathoGenetics 1, 3 (2008).
We thank our laboratory members at RIKEN QBiC, RIKEN CLST, and the University of Tokyo, in particular, S. Morino and M. Muramatsu, for their help in maintaining the ESCs and preparing materials; J. Garçon and K. Yamanaka for producing ES mice; M. Ukai for help with the genotyping of ESCs; and M. Kaneko, M. Shigeta and M. Okugawa for help in preparing the manuscript. This work was supported by grants from AMED-CREST (H.R.U.), CREST (H.R.U.), Brain/MINDS (H.R.U.), the Basic Science and Platform Technology Program for Innovative Biological Medicine (H.R.U.), and the Cell Innovation Program (H.R.U.), KAKENHI Grants-in-Aid from JSPS (Scientific Research S, 25221004, H.R.U.; Scientific Research on Innovative Areas, 23115006, H.R.U.), and the strategic programs for R&D of RIKEN (H.R.U.), an intramural Grant-in-Aid from the RIKEN QBiC (H.R.U.), and grants from Takeda Science Foundation (H.R.U.).
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Number of pups and chimeras. (PDF 109 kb)
A video showing how to fill an injection pipette with ES cells. Move the injection pipette to the ESC drop and collect as many ESCs as needed to inject in one batch. If the pipette becomes clogged, push the ES cells out once and collect again. (MP4 29103 kb)
A video showing how ES cells are injected into 8-cell-stage embryos. Hold the 8-cell-stage embryo with a holding pipette and insert the injection pipette filled with ES cells into the embryo. Then, inject 10–30 ESCs into each embryo to fill the perivitelline space. (MP4 3764 kb)
About this article
Cite this article
Ukai, H., Kiyonari, H. & Ueda, H. Production of knock-in mice in a single generation from embryonic stem cells. Nat Protoc 12, 2513–2530 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2017.110
BMC Research Notes (2020)