Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Protocol
  • Published:

Procedures for the reconstruction, primary culture and experimental use of rainbow trout gill epithelia


This protocol describes how to reconstruct and culture the freshwater rainbow trout gill epithelium on flat permeable membrane supports within cell culture inserts. The protocol describes gill cell isolation, cultured gill epithelium formation, maintenance, monitoring and preparation for use in experimental procedures. To produce a heterogeneous gill epithelium, as seen in vivo, seeding of isolated gill cells twice over a 2-d period is required. As a consequence, this is termed the double-seeded insert technique. Approximately 5–12 d after cell isolation and seeding, preparations develop electrically tight gill epithelia that can withstand freshwater on the apical cell surface. The system can be used to study freshwater gill physiology, and it is a humane alternative for toxicity testing, bioaccumulation studies and environmental water quality monitoring.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Diagram of the primary cultured rainbow trout epithelium.
Figure 2: Summarized flow diagram of rainbow trout gill cell isolation and seeding procedures.
Figure 3: Dissection of the gills and isolation of the cells.
Figure 4: Images of the double-seeded insert epithelium.
Figure 5: Membrane development can be monitored by daily TER measurements.

Similar content being viewed by others


  1. Evans, D.H., Piermarini, P.M. & Choe, K.P The multifunctional fish gill: dominant site of gas exchange, osmoregulation, acid-base regulation, and excretion of nitrogenous waste. Physiol. Rev. 85, 97–177 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wood, C.M. Toxic responses of the gill. in: Target Organ Toxicity in Marine and Freshwater Teleosts, Vol. 1 (eds. Schlenk, D.W. & Benson, W.H.) 1–89 (Taylor & Francis, 2001).

  3. Mckim, J.M. & Erickson, R.J. Environmental impacts on the physiological mechanisms controlling xenobiotic transfer across fish gills. Physiol. Zool. 64, 39–67 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bury, N.R., Walker, P.A. & Glover, C.N. Nutritive metal uptake in teleost fish. J. Exp. Biol. 206, 11–23 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Scholz, S. et al. A European perspective on alternatives to animal testing for environmental hazard identification and risk assessment. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 67, 506–530 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fletcher, M., Kelly, S.P., Pärt, P., O'Donnell, M.J. & Wood, C.M Transport properties of cultured branchial epithelia from freshwater rainbow trout: a novel preparation with mitochondria-rich cells. J. Exp. Biol. 203, 1523–1537 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kolosov, D., Chasiotis, H. & Kelly, S.P. Tight junction protein gene expression patterns and changes in transcript abundance during development of model fish gill epithelia. J. Exp. Biol. 217, 1667–1681 (2014).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chasiotis, H., Wood, C.M. & Kelly, S.P. Cortisol reduces paracellular permeability and increases occludin abundance in cultured trout gill epithelia. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 323, 232–238 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kolosov, D. & Kelly, S.P. A role for tricellulin in the regulation of gill epithelium permeability. Am. J. Physiol. 304, R1139–R1148 (2013).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Walker, P.A., Bury, N.R. & Hogstrand, C. Influence of culture conditions on metal-induced responses in a cultured rainbow trout gill epithelium. Environ. Sci. Technol. 41, 6505–6513 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhou, B., Kelly, S.P., Ianowski, J.P. & Wood, C.M. Effects of cortisol and prolactin on Na+ and Cl transport in cultured branchial epithelia from FW rainbow trout. Am. J. Physiol. 285, R1305–R1316 (2003).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kelly, S.P. & Wood, C.M. Cortisol stimulates calcium transport across cultured gill epithelia from freshwater rainbow trout. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Anim. 44, 96–104 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Schnell, S. et al. Environmental monitoring of urban streams using a primary fish gill cell culture system (FIGCS). Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 120, 279–285 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Carlsson, C. & Pärt, P. 7-Ethoxyresorufin O-deethylase induction in rainbow trout gill epithelium cultured on permeable supports: asymmetrical distribution of substrate metabolites. Aquat. Toxicol. 54, 29–38 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hansen, H.J.M., Kelly, S.P., Grosell, M. & Wood, C.M. Studies on lipid metabolism in trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) branchial cultures. J. Exp. Zool. 293, 683–692 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kelly, S.P. & Wood, C.M. The cultured branchial epithelium of the rainbow trout as a model for diffusive fluxes of ammonia across the fish gill. J. Exp. Biol. 204, 4115–4124 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhou, B., Nichols, J., Playle, R.C. & Wood, C.M. An in vitro biotic ligand model (BLM) for silver binding to cultured gill epithelia of freshwater rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 202, 25–37 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Stott, L.C., Schnell, S., Hogstrand, C., Owen, S.F. & Bury, N.R. A primary fish gill cell culture model to assess pharmaceutical uptake and efflux: evidence for passive and facilitated transport. Aquat. Toxicol. 159, 127–137 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Minghetti, M., Schnell, S., Chadwick, M.A., Hogstrand, C. & Bury, N.R. A primary Fish Gill Cell System (FIGCS) for environmental monitoring of river waters. Aquat. Toxicol. 154, 184–192 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Walker, P.A., Kille, P., Scott, A., Bury, N.R. & Hogstrand, C. An in vitro method to assess toxicity of waterborne metals to fish Toxicol. 30, 67–77 (2008).

  21. Pärt, P., Norrgren, L., Bergström, B. & Sjöberg, P. Primary culture of epithelial cells from rainbow trout gills. J. Exp. Biol. 175, 219–232 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wood, C.M. & Pärt, P. Cultured branchial epithelia from freshwater fish gills. J. Exp. Biol. 200, 1047–1059 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kelly, S.P., Fletcher, M., Pärt, P. & Wood, C.M. Procedures for the preparation and culture of 'reconstructed' rainbow trout branchial epithelia. Methods Cell Sci. 22, 153–163 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sandbichler, A.M., Egg, M., Schwerte, T. & Pelster, B. Claudin 28b and F-actin are involved in rainbow trout gill pavement cell tight junction remodelling under osmotic stress. J. Exp. Biol. 214, 1473–1487 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Sandbacka, M., Pärt, P. & Isomaa, B. Gill epithelial cells as tools for toxicity screening—comparison between primary cultures, cells in suspension and epithelia on filters. Aquat. Toxicol. 46, 23–32 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kramer, N.I. et al. Development of a partition-controlled dosing system for cell assays. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 23, 1806–1814 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Bols, N.C. et al. Development of a cell-line from primary cultures of rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum), gill. J. Fish Dis. 6, 601–611 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Tanneberger, K. et al. Predicting fish acute toxicity using a fish gill cell line-based toxicity assay. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47, 1110–1119 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Stadnicka-Michalak, J., Schirmer, K. & Ashauer, R. Toxicology across scales: cell population growth in vitro predicts reduced fish growth. Sci. Adv. 1, e1500302 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Berthios, Y., Katzenellenbogen, J.A. & Katzenellenbogen, B.S. Phenol red in tissue culture media is a weak estrogen: implications concerning the study of estrogen-responsive cells in culture. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86, 2496–2500 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Wood, C.M., Eletti, B. & Pärt, P. New methods for the primary culture of gill epithelia from freshwater rainbow trout. Fish Physiol. Biochem. 26, 329–344 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was funded via a grant supporting S.S. from the National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement & Reduction of Animals in Research no. 26675, awarded to C.H. and N.R.B. L.C.S. was funded by a studentship from the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) co-funded Case Award (BB/J500483/1) supported by the AstraZeneca Global Environment research program to N.R.B. and C.H. C.M.W.'s research is funded by a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Discovery grant. S.P.K. is funded by an NSERC Discovery Grant. S.F.O. is an employee of AstraZeneca. AstraZeneca is a biopharmaceutical company specializing in the discovery, development, manufacturing and marketing of prescription medicines. Funding bodies had no role in the design of the study or decision to publish. The work aims to identify effective alternatives to reduce, refine and replace the use of live animals to meet environmental regulatory testing needs.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



S.S. and L.C.S. contributed equally to the manuscript and generated the data. S.S. developed the double-seeded inverted insert (DSII) technique. C.M.W., S.P.K. and P.P. developed the initial methodology. S.F.O., C.H. and N.R.B. supported the recent developments of the methods. C.H. and N.R.B. received funding for S.S. and L.C.S. that has enabled the development of the methods and expanded the use of the double-seeded insert (DSI) for the replacement of animals in toxicity testing and environmental monitoring. All authors contributed to the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Sabine Schnell, Christer Hogstrand or Nic R Bury.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Integrated supplementary information

Supplementary Figure 1 Preliminary results of the characterisation of the double seeded inverted insert (DSII)

(a) Measurements of TER in developing double-seeded inverted insert (DSII) epithelia from 3 days. Freshwater (blue points) was added (after the dotted line) to the companion well compartment (the apical cell surface, whilst the insert contained L-15 medium) on day 7 resulting in an increase in TER still evident 24 hours later on day 8 (n = 5). Values are means ± SEM. (b) The primary cultured rainbow trout gill epithelium is functionally polarised. Once the DSII epithelium has developed its signature resistance and is electrically tight (by day 10 in this case), and replacing the cell culture medium on the basolateral side (the companion well compartment) to fresh water (indicated by dotted line) causes a rapid reduction in TER (n = 3). Values are means ± SEM. (c) A scanning electron micrograph of the apical cell surface of DSII showing the irregularly shaped epithelial cells with microridges (mr) and plasma membrane (pm). Bar = 20 μm. (d) and (e) Transmission electron micrographs of DSII showing the tight junctions between epithelial cells (arrows) and the apical (AP) cell surface with glycocalyx and the basolateral cell surface (BL)) and the mitochondria rich cell (mitochondria = mc), the nucleus (n) and the intercellular space (S). In (d) bar = 200 nm and in (e) bar = 500 nm. (f) and (g) Confocal microscope images of DSI epithelia where 24 hrs before cell fixing, epithelia were exposed to (f) symmetrical conditions with L-15 medium on both sides of the epithelium or (g) asymmetrical conditions with FW in the upper compartment and L-15 medium in the companion well and cell nuclei were stained with 5 μM Hoechst (blue) and tight junctions with zonula occludens 1 antibody (green). Bar = 50 μm.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Text and Figures

Supplementary Figure 1 and Supplementary Methods (PDF 1036 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schnell, S., Stott, L., Hogstrand, C. et al. Procedures for the reconstruction, primary culture and experimental use of rainbow trout gill epithelia. Nat Protoc 11, 490–498 (2016).

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing