Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Protocol
  • Published:

A comparative cross-linking strategy to probe conformational changes in protein complexes

Abstract

Chemical cross-linking, together with mass spectrometry (MS), is a powerful combination for probing subunit interactions within static protein assemblies. To probe conformational changes in response to stimuli, we have developed a comparative cross-linking strategy, using lysine-specific deuterated and nondeuterated bis(sulfosuccinimidyl)suberate cross-linking reagents (BS3). Here we describe the experimental procedures as well as the data analysis, validation and interpretation. The protocol involves first assigning cross-linked peptides in the complex without ligand binding, or with post-translational modifications (PTMs) at natural abundance, using a standard procedure with labeled cross-linkers, proteolysis and assignment of cross-linked peptides after liquid chromatography–tandem MS (LC-MS/MS) and database searching. An aliquot of the protein complex is then exposed to a stimulus: either ligand binding or incubation with a phosphatase or kinase to bring about changes in PTMs. Two solutions—one containing the apo/untreated complex and the other containing the enzymatically modified/ligand-bound complex—are then cross-linked independently. Typically, nondeuterated BS3-d0 is used for the untreated complex and deuterated BS3-d4 is used for the experiment. The two aliquots are then incubated at equal concentrations, digested and processed as before. The ratios of labeled and unlabeled cross-linked peptides provide a direct readout of the effect of the stimulus. We exemplify our method by quantifying changes in subunit interactions induced by dephosphorylation of an ATP synthase. The protocol can also be used to determine the conformational changes in protein complexes induced by various stimuli including ligand/drug binding, oligomerization and other PTMs. Application of the established protocol takes 9 d, including protein complex purification.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Comparative cross-linking workflow.
Figure 2: Schematic of the protocol and approximate timing.
Figure 3: Comparative cross-linking to probe conformational changes.
Figure 4: Data analysis workflow.
Figure 5: Gel electrophoresis of a cross-linked protein complex.
Figure 6: Comparative cross-linking of the cATPase.
Figure 7: Summary of comparative cross-linking of phosphorylated and dephosphorylated cATPase.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Herzog, F. et al. Structural probing of a protein phosphatase 2A network by chemical cross-linking and mass spectrometry. Science 337, 1348–1352 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Leitner, A. et al. The molecular architecture of the eukaryotic chaperonin TRiC/CCT. Structure 20, 814–825 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen, Z.A. et al. Architecture of the RNA polymerase II-TFIIF complex revealed by cross-linking and mass spectrometry. EMBO J. 29, 717–726 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Rouillon, C. et al. Structure of the CRISPR interference complex CSM reveals key similarities with cascade. Mol. Cell. 52, 124–134 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Politis, A. et al. A mass spectrometry-based hybrid method for structural modeling of protein complexes. Nat. Methods 11, 403–406 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Rappsilber, J. The beginning of a beautiful friendship: cross-linking/mass spectrometry and modelling of proteins and multi-protein complexes. J. Struct. Biol. 173, 530–540 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sinz, A. Chemical cross-linking and mass spectrometry to map three-dimensional protein structures and protein-protein interactions. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 25, 663–682 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Aebersold, R. & Mann, M. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nature 422, 198–207 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Pearson, K.M., Pannell, L.K. & Fales, H.M. Intramolecular cross-linking experiments on cytochrome c and ribonuclease A using an isotope multiplet method. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 16, 149–159 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Leitner, A. et al. Probing native protein structures by chemical cross-linking, mass spectrometry, and bioinformatics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 9, 1634–1649 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Wlodawer, A., Minor, W., Dauter, Z. & Jaskolski, M. Protein crystallography for aspiring crystallographers or how to avoid pitfalls and traps in macromolecular structure determination. FEBS J. 280, 5705–5736 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bai, X.C., Fernandez, I.S., McMullan, G. & Scheres, S.H. Ribosome structures to near-atomic resolution from thirty thousand cryo-EM particles. Elife 2, e00461 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mainz, A. et al. NMR spectroscopy of soluble protein complexes at one mega-dalton and beyond. Angew Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 52, 8746–8751 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hyung, S.J. & Ruotolo, B.T. Integrating mass spectrometry of intact protein complexes into structural proteomics. Proteomics 12, 1547–1564 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhong, Y., Hyung, S.J. & Ruotolo, B.T. Ion mobility-mass spectrometry for structural proteomics. Expert Rev. Proteomics 9, 47–58 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wales, T.E. & Engen, J.R. Hydrogen exchange mass spectrometry for the analysis of protein dynamics. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 25, 158–170 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Schwarz, R. et al. Monitoring conformational changes in peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α by a genetically encoded photoamino acid, cross-linking, and mass spectrometry. J. Med. Chem. 56, 4252–4263 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Serpa, J.J. et al. Using multiple structural proteomics approaches for the characterization of prion proteins. J. Proteomics 81, 31–42 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Marcoux, J. et al. Mass spectrometry reveals synergistic effects of nucleotides, lipids, and drugs binding to a multidrug resistance efflux pump. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 9704–9709 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Politis, A., Park, A.Y., Hall, Z., Ruotolo, B.T. & Robinson, C.V. Integrative modelling coupled with ion mobility mass spectrometry reveals structural features of the clamp loader in complex with single-stranded DNA binding protein. J. Mol. Biol. 425, 4790–4801 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. van Duijn, E. et al. Native tandem and ion mobility mass spectrometry highlight structural and modular similarities in clustered-regularly-interspaced shot-palindromic-repeats (CRISPR)-associated protein complexes from Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 11, 1430–1441 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Xu, G. & Chance, M.R. Hydroxyl radical-mediated modification of proteins as probes for structural proteomics. Chem. Rev. 107, 3514–3543 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Schmidt, C. et al. Comparative cross-linking and mass spectrometry of an intact F-type ATPase suggest a role for phosphorylation. Nat. Commun. 4, 1985 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ong, S.E. et al. Stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture, SILAC, as a simple and accurate approach to expression proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 1, 376–386 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Bantscheff, M., Schirle, M., Sweetman, G., Rick, J. & Kuster, B. Quantitative mass spectrometry in proteomics: a critical review. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 389, 1017–1031 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Preston, G.W., Radford, S.E., Ashcroft, A.E. & Wilson, A.J. Analysis of amyloid nanostructures using photo-cross-linking: in situ comparison of three widely used photo-cross-linkers. ACS Chem. Biol. 9, 761–768 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Gotze, M. et al. StavroX: a software for analyzing crosslinked products in protein interaction studies. J. Am Soc. Mass Spectrom. 23, 76–87 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Walzthoeni, T. et al. False discovery rate estimation for cross-linked peptides identified by mass spectrometry. Nat. Methods 9, 901–903 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Xu, H., Hsu, P.H., Zhang, L., Tsai, M.D. & Freitas, M.A. Database search algorithm for identification of intact cross-links in proteins and peptides using tandem mass spectrometry. J. Proteome Res. 9, 3384–3393 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Rinner, O. et al. Identification of cross-linked peptides from large sequence databases. Nat. Methods 5, 315–318 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Fischer, L., Chen, Z.A. & Rappsilber, J. Quantitative cross-linking/mass spectrometry using isotope-labelled cross-linkers. J. Proteomics 88, 120–128 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Petrotchenko, E.V. & Borchers, C.H. Crosslinking combined with mass spectrometry for structural proteomics. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 29, 862–876 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Shevchenko, A., Wilm, M., Vorm, O. & Mann, M. Mass spectrometric sequencing of proteins silver-stained polyacrylamide gels. Anal. Chem. 68, 850–858 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge funding from the Wellcome Trust (WT008150 and WT099141) and the European Research Council (ERC) IMPRESS grant (ERC 268851) to C.V.R. C.V.R. is a Royal Society Professor.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

C.S. and C.V.R. designed the research; C.S. performed the experiments and analyzed the data; and C.S. and C.V.R. wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carol V Robinson.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schmidt, C., Robinson, C. A comparative cross-linking strategy to probe conformational changes in protein complexes. Nat Protoc 9, 2224–2236 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2014.144

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2014.144

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing