Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Protocol
  • Published:

Site-specific chemical modification of antibody fragments using traceless cleavable linkers

Abstract

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are promising agents for the selective delivery of cytotoxic drugs to specific cells (for example, tumors). In this protocol, we describe two strategies for the precise modification at engineered C- or N-terminal cysteines of antibodies in IgG, diabody and small immunoprotein (SIP) formats that yield homogenous ADCs. In this protocol, cemadotin derivatives are used as model drugs, as these agents have a potent cytotoxic activity and are easy to synthesize. However, other drugs with similar functional groups could be considered. In the first approach, a cemadotin derivative containing a sulfhydryl group results in a mixed disulfide linkage. In the second approach, a cemadotin derivative containing an aldehyde group is joined via a thiazolidine linkage. The procedures outlined are robust, enabling the preparation of ADCs with a defined number of drugs per antibody in a time frame between 7 and 24 h.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Site-specific conjugation of cytotoxic payloads to antibodies using traceless cleavable linkers.
Figure 2: Construction of a traceless chemically defined tumor-vascular targeting antibody-drug conjugate based on disulfide linkage.
Figure 3: Construction of a traceless chemically defined tumor-vascular targeting antibody-drug conjugate based on thiazolidine linkage.
Figure 4: Characterization of purified SIP(L19)-SS-CH2Cem.
Figure 5: Characterization of purified Db(F8)-thz-Cem.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aggarwal, S. What's fueling the biotech engine 2009–2010. Nat. Biotechnol. 28, 1165–1171 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Adamo, R. et al. Synthetically defined glycoprotein vaccines: current status and future directions. Chem. Sci. 4, 2995–3008 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Webb, S. Pharma interest surges in antibody drug conjugates. Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 297–298 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Webb, S. Back on target. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 191–193 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Younes, A. et al. Brentuximab vedotin (SGN-35) for relapsed CE30-positive lymphomas. N. Engl. J. Med. 363, 1812–1821 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Senter, P.D. & Sievers, E.L. The discovery and development of brentuximab vedotin for use in relapsed Hodgkin lymphoma and systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma. Nat. Biotechnol. 30, 631–637 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Burris, H.A. et al. Phase II study of the antibody drug conjugate trastuzumab-dm1 for the treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer after prior HER2-directed therapy. J. Clin. Oncol. 29, 398–405 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Senter, P.D. Potent antibody drug conjugates for cancer therapy. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 13, 235–244 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Chari, R.V.J. Targeted cancer therapy: conferring specificity to cytotoxic drugs. Acc. Chem. Res. 41, 98–107 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Casi, G. & Neri, D. Antibody-drug conjugates: basic concepts, examples and future perspectives. J. Control. Release 161, 422–428 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Chalker, J.M., Bernardes, G.J.L. & Davis, B.G. A, tag-and-modify, approach to site-selective protein modification. Acc. Chem. Res. 44, 730–741 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Stephanopoulos, N. & Francis, M.B. Choosing an effective protein bioconjugation strategy. Nat. Chem. Biol. 7, 876–884 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sletten, E.M. & Bertozzi, C.R. Bioorthogonal chemistry: fishing for selectivity in a sea of functionality. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48, 6974–6998 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Junutula, J.R. et al. Site-specific conjugation of a cytotoxic drug to an antibody improves the therapeutic index. Nat. Biotechnol. 26, 925–932 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Shen, B.-Q. et al. Conjugation site modulates the in vivo stability and therapeutic activity of antibody-drug conjugates. Nat. Biotechnol. 30, 184–189 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Axup, J.Y. et al. Synthesis of site-specific antibody-drug conjugates using unnatural amino acids. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 16101–16106 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Rabuka, D., Rush, J.S., deHart, G.W., Wu, P. & Bertozzi, C.R. Site-specific chemical protein conjugation using genetically encoded aldehyde tags. Nat. Protoc. 7, 1052–1067 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Carrico, I.S., Carlson, B.L. & Bertozzi, C.R. Introducing genetically encoded aldehydes into proteins. Nat. Chem. Biol. 3, 321–322 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Katz, J., Janik, J.E. & Younes, A. Brentuximab vedotin (SGN-35). Clin. Cancer Res. 17, 6428–6436 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Voynov, V. et al. Design and application of antibody cysteine variants. Bioconjug. Chem. 21, 385–392 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang, L., Amphlett, G., Blättler, W.A., Lambert, J.M. & Zhang, W. Structural characterization of the maytansinoid–monoclonal antibody immunoconjugate, huN901–DM1, by mass spectrometry. Protein Sci. 14, 2436–2446 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Bernardes, G.J.L. et al. A traceless vascular-targeting antibody–drug conjugate for cancer therapy. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51, 941–944 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Casi, G., Huguenin-Dezot, N., Zuberbühler, K., Scheuermann, Jr. & Neri, D. Site-specific traceless coupling of potent cytotoxic drugs to recombinant antibodies for pharmacodelivery. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 5887–5892 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Steiner, M. et al. Spacer length shapes drug release and therapeutic efficacy of traceless disulfide-linked ADCs targeting the tumor neovasculature. Chem. Sci. 4, 297–302 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Zuberbühler, K., Casi, G., Bernardes, G.J.L. & Neri, D. Fucose-specific conjugation of hydrazide derivatives to a vascular-targeting monoclonal antibody in igg format. Chem. Commun. 48, 7100–7102 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gerber, H.-P., Senter, P.D. & Grewal, I.S. Antibody drug-conjugates targeting the tumor vasculature: current and future developments. MAbs 1, 247–253 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sharkey, R.M., Karacay, H., Govindan, S.V. & Goldenberg, D.M. Combination radioimmunotherapy and chemoimmunotherapy involving different or the same targets improves therapy of human pancreatic carcinoma xenograft models. Mol. Cancer Ther. 10, 1072–1081 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Neri, D. & Bicknell, R. Tumour vascular targeting. Nat. Rev. Cancer 5, 436–446 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Villa, A. et al. A high-affinity human monoclonal antibody specific to the alternatively spliced EDA domain of fibronectin efficiently targets tumor neo-vasculature in vivo. Int. J. Cancer 122, 2405–2413 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Tarli, L. et al. A high-affinity human antibody that targets tumoral blood vessels. Blood 94, 192–198 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Holliger, P. & Hudson, P.J. Engineered antibody fragments and the rise of single domains. Nat. Biotechnol. 23, 1126–1136 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Borsi, L. et al. Selective targeting of tumoral vasculature: comparison of different formats of an antibody (L19) to the ED-B domain of fibronectin. Int. J. Cancer 102, 75–85 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Kim, K.M. et al. Anti-CD30 diabody-drug conjugates with potent antitumor activity. Mol. Cancer Ther. 7, 2486–2497 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Rybak, J.-N., Roesli, C., Kaspar, M., Villa, A. & Neri, D. The extra-domain a of fibronectin is a vascular marker of solid tumors and metastases. Cancer Res. 67, 10948–10957 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Pettit, G.R. et al. The isolation and structure of a remarkable marine animal antineoplastic constituent: dolastatin 10. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 109, 6883–6885 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Pettit, G.R. et al. Isolation and structure of the cytostatic linear depsipeptide dolastatin 15. J. Org. Chem. 54, 6005–6006 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Simmons, T.L., Andrianasolo, E., McPhail, K., Flatt, P. & Gerwick, W.H. Marine natural products as anticancer drugs. Mol. Cancer Ther. 4, 333–342 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Sun, X. et al. Design of antibodymaytansinoid conjugates allows for efficient detoxification via liver metabolism. Bioconjug. Chem. 22, 728–735 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Ellman, G.L. Tissue sulfhydryl groups. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 82, 70–77 (1959).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

G.J.L.B. thanks the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO) and the Novartis Foundation for generous funding. We thank N. Huguenin-Dezot and S. Trüssel for their contributions during these projects. We also thank S. Wulhfard, A. Villa and K. Schwager for their help in protein engineering and expression. Financial contributions from ETH Zürich, the Swiss National Science Foundation, SwissBridge/Stammbach Stiftung, Kommission für Technologie und Innovation (KTI), Philochem AG and Philogen SpA are gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

G.J.L.B., M.S., I.H. and G.C. carried out the experiments. G.J.L.B., G.C. and D.N. designed the research and interpreted the data. G.J.L.B., G.C. and D.N. wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dario Neri.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

G.C. is employed at Philochem AG. D.N. is a co-founder and shareholder of Philogen SpA.

Integrated supplementary information

Supplementary Figure 1 A typical analysis of a conjugation reaction by LC-MS.

The total ion chromatogram, combined ion series and deconvoluted spectra are shown for the starting material and product of the reaction of SIP(F8)-Ellman's with CemCH2-SH. Identical analyses were carried out for all the conjugation reactions performed in this work.

Supplementary Figure 2 Characterization of purified SIP(F8)-SS-CH2Cem.

a) ESI-MS spectrum; b) SDS-PAGE; M, molecular marker; 1, SIP(F8) non-reducing conditions; 2, SIP(F8) reducing conditions; 3, purified SIP(F8)-SS-Ellman's; 4, purified SIP(F8)-SS-CH2Cem c) size-exclusion chromatography; arrows indicate standard proteins (11 mL: ferritin 440 kDa; 14.1 mL: BSA 67 kDa; 15.4 mL: lactoglobulin 35 kDa); and d) Biacore analysis towards recombinant 11A12 fibronectin. Data previously described in [Bernardes, G.J.L. et al., A traceless vascular-targeting antibody–drug conjugate for cancer therapy. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51, 941-944 (2012)]. A single peak after deconvolution of the multiply-charged ions spectrum should be detected by LCMS analysis of SIP(F8)-SS-CH2Cem at 39415 Da; SDS-PAGE analysis should give a single major band at ~ 39 kDa; in some cases, SDS-PAGE shows a very minor band at 75 kDa (see TROUBLESHOOTING); a peak eluting at a retention volume of 15.3 mL corresponding to the noncovalent homodimeric form of SIP(F8)-SS-CH2Cem should be detected by gel filtration; and finally, SIP(F8)-SS-CH2Cem should remain immunoreactive towards recombinant 11A12 fibronectin as observed by direct comparison of the sensorgram profiles of modified and nonmodified antibody fragments.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Figure 1

A typical analysis of a conjugation reaction by LC-MS. (PDF 288 kb)

Supplementary Figure 2

Characterization of purified SIP(F8)-SS-CH2Cem. (PDF 372 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bernardes, G., Steiner, M., Hartmann, I. et al. Site-specific chemical modification of antibody fragments using traceless cleavable linkers. Nat Protoc 8, 2079–2089 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2013.121

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2013.121

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing