Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Protocol
  • Published:

Design and implementation of in vivo imaging of neural injury responses in the adult Drosophila wing

Abstract

Live-imaging technology has markedly advanced in the field of neural injury and axon degeneration; however, studies are still predominantly performed in in vitro settings such as cultured neuronal cells or in model organisms such as Caenorhabditis elegans in which axons lack glial wrappings. We recently developed a new in vivo model for adult-stage neural injury in Drosophila melanogaster, using the highly accessible wing of the animal. Because the Drosophila wing is translucent and dispensable for survival, it allows clear and direct visualization of injury-induced progressive responses of axons and glia highlighted by fluorescent protein (FP) markers in live animals over time. Moreover, unlike previous Drosophila models of neural injury, this procedure does not require dissection of the CNS. Thus, the key preparation steps for in vivo imaging of the neural injury response described in this protocol can be completed within 30 min.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: The neuronal and glial components of the Drosophila wing.
Figure 2: An overview of the experimental procedure.
Figure 3: The filter settings for visualization of GFP and mCherry fluorescence of the wing nerve.
Figure 4: The wing cut preparation.
Figure 5: The preparation for live-imaging of the wing nerve.
Figure 6: The preparation for quick imaging and scoring of the nerve.
Figure 7: Representative images of neural injury–induced axonal and glial responses.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wilson, J.R., Cadotte, D.W. & Fehlings, M.G. Clinical predictors of neurological outcome, functional status, and survival after traumatic spinal cord injury: a systematic review. J. Neurosurg. Spine 17, 11–26 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rosenfeld, J.V. et al. Early management of severe traumatic brain injury. Lancet 380, 1088–1098 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tuszynski, M.H. & Steward, O. Concepts and methods for the study of axonal regeneration in the CNS. Neuron 74, 777–791 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Becker, C.G. & Becker, T. Adult zebrafish as a model for successful central nervous system regeneration. Restor. Neurol. Neurosci. 26, 71–80 (2008).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, L. & Chisholm, A.D. Axon regeneration mechanisms: insights from C. elegans. Trends Cell Biol. 21, 577–584 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fang, Y. & Bonini, N.M. Axon degeneration and regeneration: insights from Drosophila models of nerve injury. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 28, 575–597 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Toomre, D. & Bewersdorf, J. A new wave of cellular imaging. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 26, 285–314 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Taylor, A.M. et al. A microfluidic culture platform for CNS axonal injury, regeneration and transport. Nat. Methods 2, 599–605 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cho, S., Wood, A. & Bowlby, M.R. Brain slices as models for neurodegenerative disease and screening platforms to identify novel therapeutics. Curr. Neuropharmacol. 5, 19–33 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hutter, H. Five-colour in vivo imaging of neurons in Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Microsc. 215, 213–218 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ghosh-Roy, A. & Chisholm, A.D. Caenorhabditis elegans: a new model organism for studies of axon regeneration. Dev. Dyn. 239, 1460–1464 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Bejjani, R.E. & Hammarlund, M. Neural regeneration in Caenorhabditis elegans. Annu. Rev. Genet. 46, 499–513 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fang, Y. et al. A novel Drosophila model of nerve injury reveals an essential role of Nmnat in maintaining axonal integrity. Curr. Biol. 22, 590–595 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lessing, D. & Bonini, N.M. Maintaining the brain: insight into human neurodegeneration from Drosophila melanogaster mutants. Nat. Rev. Genet. 10, 359–370 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Potter, C.J., Turenchalk, G.S. & Xu, T. Drosophila in cancer research. An expanding role. Trends Genet. 16, 33–39 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Keene, A.C. & Waddell, S. Drosophila olfactory memory: single genes to complex neural circuits. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 8, 341–354 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sehgal, A. et al. Molecular analysis of sleep: wake cycles in Drosophila. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 72, 557–564 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Leyssen, M. et al. Amyloid precursor protein promotes post-developmental neurite arborization in the Drosophila brain. EMBO J. 24, 2944–2955 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. MacDonald, J.M. et al. The Drosophila cell corpse engulfment receptor Draper mediates glial clearance of severed axons. Neuron 50, 869–881 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hoopfer, E.D. et al. Wlds protection distinguishes axon degeneration following injury from naturally occurring developmental pruning. Neuron 50, 883–895 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ayaz, D. et al. Axonal injury and regeneration in the adult brain of Drosophila. J. Neurosci. 28, 6010–6021 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Xiong, X. et al. Protein turnover of the Wallenda/DLK kinase regulates a retrograde response to axonal injury. J. Cell Biol. 191, 211–223 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Stone, M.C., Nguyen, M.M., Tao, J., Allender, D.L. & Rolls, M.M. Global up-regulation of microtubule dynamics and polarity reversal during regeneration of an axon from a dendrite. Mol. Biol. Cell 21, 767–777 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Garcia-Alonso, L.A. Postembryonic sensory axon guidance in Drosophila. Mol. Life Sci. 55, 1386–1398 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Brand, A.H. & Perrimon, N. Targeted gene expression as a means of altering cell fates and generating dominant phenotypes. Development 118, 401–415 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Lai, S.L. & Lee, T. Genetic mosaic with dual binary transcriptional systems in Drosophila. Nat. Neurosci. 9, 703–709 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Pfeiffer, B.D. et al. Refinement of tools for targeted gene expression in Drosophila. Genetics 186, 735–755 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Potter, C.J., Tasic, B., Russler, E.V., Liang, L. & Luo, L. The Q system: a repressible binary system for transgene expression, lineage tracing, and mosaic analysis. Cell 141, 536–548 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang, J.W., Beck, E.S. & McCabe, B.D. A modular toolset for recombination transgenesis and neurogenic analysis of Drosophila. PLoS ONE 7, e42102 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to M. Landgraf, B. White, T. Lee and the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center at Indiana University for providing transgenic flies used in this work, as well as to G. Rubin, B. Pfeiffer and N. Aijoscha for sharing unpublished reagents. We also thank X. Teng and M. Geary for their excellent technical assistance, M. Parisi for the nsyb-LexA::GAD>LexAop-rCD2-GFP recombinant fly line, and L.-Y. Hao, S.-Y. Shieh and the other members of the Bonini lab for their thoughtful discussions. N.M.B. is an investigator of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health EUREKA award (grant no. 1R01NS066312) and an Ellison Medical Foundation Senior Scholar in Aging Award to N.M.B.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Y.F., L.S. and N.M.B. conceived the project and developed the protocol; Y.F. designed and performed the experiments and analyzed the results; Y.F. and N.M.B. wrote the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nancy M Bonini.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fang, Y., Soares, L. & Bonini, N. Design and implementation of in vivo imaging of neural injury responses in the adult Drosophila wing. Nat Protoc 8, 810–819 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2013.042

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2013.042

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing