Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Protocol
  • Published:

Mass spectrometry–based detection and quantification of plasma glycoproteins using selective reaction monitoring

Abstract

Mass spectrometry–based targeted proteomics is a rapidly expanding method for quantifying proteins in complex clinical samples such as plasma. In conjunction with the stable isotope dilution method, selected reaction monitoring (SRM) assays provide unparalleled sensitivity and selectivity for detection and quantification. A crucial factor for robust SRM assays is the reduction of interference by lowering the background. This can be achieved by the selective isolation of a subproteome, such as N-glycosylated proteins, from the original sample. The present protocol includes the development and optimization of SRM assays associated with each peptide of interest and the qualification of assays in the biological matrix to establish the limits of detection and quantification. The protocol also describes the enrichment of formerly N-glycosylated peptides relying on periodate oxidation of glycan moieties attached to the proteins, their immobilization on solid supports through hydrazide chemistry, proteolysis and enzymatic release of the formerly N-glycosylated peptides.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Chemical schematic of the glyco-capture process with an example of a terminal galactose.
Figure 2: Workflow of targeted quantification of N-glycopeptides in serum samples using the LC-SRM assay.
Figure 3: Example of glycoproteins (with known plasma concentration) identified in a typical LC-MS/MS run.
Figure 4: Transition selection and CE optimization.
Figure 5: Qualification of optimized transitions in the biological matrix using heavy synthetic peptides spiked in the serum sample (Steps 20–24).
Figure 6: Dilution curve.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Surinova, S. et al. On the development of plasma protein biomarkers. J. Proteome Res. 10, 5–16 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson, N.L. & Anderson, N.G. The human plasma proteome: history, character, and diagnostic prospects. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 1, 845–867 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gallien, S., Duriez, E. & Domon, B. Selected reaction monitoring applied to proteomics. J. Mass Spectrom. 46, 298–312 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Picotti, P. et al. High-throughput generation of selected reaction-monitoring assays for proteins and proteomes. Nat. Methods 7, 43–46 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hager, J.W. & Yves Le Blanc, J.C. Product ion scanning using a Q-q-Q linear ion trap (Q TRAP) mass spectrometer. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 17, 1056–1064 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hoke, S.H. et al. Transformations in pharmaceutical research and development, driven by innovations in multidimensional mass spectrometry-based technologies. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 212, 135–196 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Keshishian, H., Addona, T., Burgess, M., Kuhn, E. & Carr, S.A. Quantitative, multiplexed assays for low abundance proteins in plasma by targeted mass spectrometry and stable isotope dilution. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 6, 2212–2229 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Pan, S. et al. Mass spectrometry based targeted protein quantification: methods and applications. J. Proteome Res. 8, 787–797 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Desiderio, D.M. & Kai, M. Preparation of stable isotope-incorporated peptide internal standards for field desorption mass spectrometry quantification of peptides in biologic tissue. Biomed. Mass Spectrom. 10, 471–479 (1983).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Anderson, L. & Hunter, C.L. Quantitative mass spectrometric multiple reaction monitoring assays for major plasma proteins. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 5, 573–588 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kiyonami, R. et al. Increased selectivity, analytical precision, and throughput in targeted proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 10, 1–11 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Barnidge, D.R., Goodmanson, M.K., Klee, G.G. & Muddiman, D.C. Absolute quantification of the model biomarker prostate-specific antigen in serum by LC-Ms/MS using protein cleavage and isotope dilution mass spectrometry. J. Proteome Res. 3, 644–652 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Domon, B. Glycosylation as means of reducing sample complexity to enable quantitative proteomics. Proteomics 9, 1488–1491 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Giron, P., Dayon, L. & Sanchez, J.C. Cysteine tagging for MS-based proteomics. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 30, 366–395.

  15. Zhang, H., Li, X.J., Martin, D.B. & Aebersold, R. Identification and quantification of N-linked glycoproteins using hydrazide chemistry, stable isotope labeling and mass spectrometry. Nat. Biotechnol. 21, 660–666 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang, H. et al. Mass spectrometric detection of tissue proteins in plasma. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 6, 64–71 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Tian, Y., Zhou, Y., Elliott, S., Aebersold, R. & Zhang, H. Solid-phase extraction of N-linked glycopeptides. Nat. Protoc. 2, 334–339 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bobbitt, J.M. Periodate oxidation of carbohydrates. Adv. Carbohydr. Chem. 48, 1–41 (1956).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ossola, R. et al. Biomarker validation in blood specimens by selected reaction monitoring mass spectrometry of N-glycosites. Methods Mol. Biol. 728, 179–194 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Stahl-Zeng, J. et al. High sensitivity detection of plasma proteins by multiple reaction monitoring of N-glycosites. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 6, 1809–1817 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Chelius, D. & Shaler, T.A. Capture of peptides with N-terminal serine and threonine: a sequence-specific chemical method for peptide mixture simplification. Bioconjug. Chem. 14, 205–211 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Chen, R. et al. Development of glycoprotein capture based label-free method for the high-throughput screening of differential glycoproteins in hepatocellular carcinoma. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 10, M110.006445 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kettenbach, A.N., Rush, J. & Gerber, S.A. Absolute quantification of protein and post-translational modification abundance with stable isotope-labeled synthetic peptides. Nat. Protoc. 6, 175–186 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Jones, P. et al. PRIDE: new developments and new datasets. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, D878–D883 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Fusaro, V.A., Mani, D.R., Mesirov, J.P. & Carr, S.A. Prediction of high-responding peptides for targeted protein assays by mass spectrometry. Nat. Biotechnol. 27, 190–198 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Mallick, P. et al. Computational prediction of proteotypic peptides for quantitative proteomics. Nat. Biotechnol. 25, 125–131 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. de Graaf, E.L., Altelaar, A.F., van Breukelen, B., Mohammed, S. & Heck, A.J. Improving SRM assay development: a global comparison between triple quadrupole, ion trap, and higher energy CID peptide fragmentation spectra. J. Proteome Res. 10, 4334–4341 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Prakash, A. et al. Expediting the development of targeted SRM assays: using data from shotgun proteomics to automate method development. J. Proteome Res. 8, 2733–2739 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Cham Mead, J.A., Bianco, L. & Bessant, C. Free computational resources for designing selected reaction monitoring transitions. Proteomics 10, 1106–1126 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by FNR (Luxembourg Fonds National de la Recherche) via a PEARL grant and by the Ministry of Higher Education and Research of Luxembourg via the PPM program. We thank S.-Y. Kim for bioinformatics help.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Y.J.K. designed the experiments, analyzed data and wrote the manuscript. Z.Z.-A. performed the N-glycopeptide enrichment experiment. S.G. performed the SRM assay development, quantitative data analyses and prepared the manuscript. B.D. directed and supervised the project.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruno Domon.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Table 1

Number of N-X-S/T tryptic peptides. (PPT 86 kb)

Supplementary Table 2

Set of reference peptides for retention time correction. (PPT 118 kb)

Supplementary Figure 1

MS/MS spectra of isotopically labeled synthetic peptide, AYLLPAPPAPGnASESEEDR* (n = asparagine with deamidation, R* = arginine with 13C/15N label. (a) Peptide fragmentation using collision induced dissociation (CID) in ion trap. (b) Peptide fragmentation using higher energy collision dissociation (HCD). (PPT 94 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, Y., Zaidi-Ainouch, Z., Gallien, S. et al. Mass spectrometry–based detection and quantification of plasma glycoproteins using selective reaction monitoring. Nat Protoc 7, 859–871 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2012.023

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2012.023

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing