Protocol | Published:

In situ localization of small RNAs in plants by using LNA probes

Nature Protocols volume 7, pages 533541 (2012) | Download Citation

Abstract

Small RNAs have crucial roles in numerous aspects of plant biology. Despite our current understanding of their biogenesis and mechanisms of action, the biological function of small RNAs, particularly miRNAs, remains largely unknown. To decipher small RNA function, knowledge about their spatiotemporal patterns of expression is essential. Here we report an in situ hybridization method for the precise localization of small RNAs in plants by using locked nucleic acid (LNA) oligonucleotide probes. This method has been adapted from protocols used to detect messenger RNAs in formaldehyde-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissue sections, but it includes essential optimizations in key prehybridization, hybridization and posthybridization steps. Most importantly, optimization of probe concentration and hybridization temperature is required for each unique LNA probe. We present the detailed protocol starting from sectioned tissues, and we include troubleshooting tips and recommended controls. This method has been used successfully in several plant species and can be completed within 2–6 d.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    , & MicroRNAs and their regulatory roles in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 57, 19–53 (2006).

  2. 2.

    , , & Regulation and functional specialization of small RNA-target nodes during plant development. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 12, 622–627 (2009).

  3. 3.

    , , & Small RNAs as big players in plant abiotic stress responses and nutrient deprivation. Trends Plant Sci. 12, 301–309 (2007).

  4. 4.

    et al. Elucidation of the small RNA component of the transcriptome. Science 309, 1567–1569 (2005).

  5. 5.

    Detection of small RNAs and microRNAs using deep sequencing technology. Methods Mol. Biol. 732, 55–68 (2011).

  6. 6.

    , , , & microRNA-mediated repression of rolled leaf1 specifies maize leaf polarity. Nature 428, 84–88 (2004).

  7. 7.

    , , , & Two small regulatory RNAs establish opposing fates of a developmental axis. Genes Dev. 21, 750–755 (2007).

  8. 8.

    et al. Regulation of small RNA accumulation in the maize shoot apex. PLoS Genet. 5, e1000320 (2009).

  9. 9.

    et al. Pattern formation via small RNA mobility. Genes Dev. 23, 549–554 (2009).

  10. 10.

    et al. The ARGONAUTE10 gene modulates shoot apical meristem maintenance and leaf polarity establishment by repressing miR165/166 in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 58, 27–40 (2009).

  11. 11.

    , , , & On reconciling the interactions between APETALA2, miR172 and AGAMOUS with the ABC model of flower development. Development 137, 3633–3642 (2010).

  12. 12.

    et al. Regulation of LANCEOLATE by miR319 is required for compound-leaf development in tomato. Nat. Genet. 39, 787–791 (2007).

  13. 13.

    , , & The maize SBP-box transcription factor encoded by tasselsheath4 regulates bract development and the establishment of meristem boundaries. Development 137, 1243–1250 (2010).

  14. 14.

    et al. A conserved microRNA module exerts homeotic control over Petunia hybrida and Antirrhinum majus floral organ identity. Nat. Genet. 39, 901–905 (2007).

  15. 15.

    et al. ragged seedling2 Encodes an ARGONAUTE7-like protein required for mediolateral expansion, but not dorsiventrality, of maize leaves. Plant Cell 22, 1441–1451 (2010).

  16. 16.

    et al. MicroRNAs in the shoot apical meristem of soybean. J. Exp. Bot. 62, 2495–2506 (2011).

  17. 17.

    et al. miR390, Arabidopsis TAS3 tasiRNAs, and their AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR targets define an autoregulatory network quantitatively regulating lateral root growth. Plant Cell 22, 1104–1117 (2010).

  18. 18.

    , , & Non-cell-autonomous microRNA165 acts in a dose-dependent manner to regulate multiple differentiation status in the Arabidopsis root. Development 138, 2303–2313 (2011).

  19. 19.

    , , , & In vivo investigation of the transcription, processing, endonucleolytic activity, and functional relevance of the spatial distribution of a plant miRNA. Genes Dev. 18, 2237–2242 (2004).

  20. 20.

    , , & Transitivity in Arabidopsis can be primed, requires the redundant action of the antiviral Dicer-like 4 and Dicer-like 2, and is compromised by viral-encoded suppressor proteins. RNA 13, 1268–1278 (2007).

  21. 21.

    et al. Genome-wide analysis of the RNA-DEPENDENT RNA POLYMERASE6/DICER-LIKE4 pathway in Arabidopsis reveals dependency on miRNA- and tasiRNA-directed targeting. Plant Cell 19, 926–942 (2007).

  22. 22.

    et al. Cell signalling by microRNA165/6 directs gene dose-dependent root cell fate. Nature 465, 316–321 (2010).

  23. 23.

    , , & MicroRNA expression profiling using microarrays. Nat. Protoc. 3, 563–78 (2008).

  24. 24.

    , , , & The quantification of tomato microRNAs response to viral infection by stem-loop real-time RT-PCR. Gene 437, 14–21 (2009).

  25. 25.

    , , & Direct detection of small RNAs using splinted ligation. Nat. Protoc. 3, 279–87 (2008).

  26. 26.

    & In situ hybridization as a tool to study the role of microRNAs in plant development. Methods Mol. Biol. 342, 159–179 (2006).

  27. 27.

    A microRNA as a translational repressor of APETALA2 in Arabidopsis flower development. Science 303, 2022–2025 (2004).

  28. 28.

    , , , & In situ detection of miRNAs in animal embryos using LNA-modified oligonucleotide probes. Nat. Methods 3, 27–29 (2006).

  29. 29.

    , , , & In situ hybridization for mRNA detection in Arabidopsis tissue sections. Nat. Protoc. 1, 1462–1467 (2006).

  30. 30.

    In situ hybridization in plants. in Molecular Plant Pathology: A Practical Approach (eds. Bowles, D.J., Gurr, S.J. & McPherson, M.) 163–174 (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1991).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank F. Nogueira and D. Chitwood for their initial contributions to the development of this protocol; M. Scanlon and K. Petsch for helpful suggestions and A. Husbands for the critical review of the manuscript. Research in the laboratory of M.C.P.T. is supported by grants DBI-0820610 and IOS-1022102 from the US National Science Foundation.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, USA.

    • Marie Javelle
    •  & Marja C P Timmermans

Authors

  1. Search for Marie Javelle in:

  2. Search for Marja C P Timmermans in:

Contributions

M.J. developed the protocol and performed all experiments. M.J. and M.C.P.T. contributed to the design and analysis of experiments and wrote the paper.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marja C P Timmermans.

About this article

Publication history

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2012.006

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.