Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Protocol
  • Published:

Direct live monitoring of heterotypic axon-axon interactions in vitro

Abstract

This protocol describes an optimized method for direct in vitro monitoring of homo- and heterotypic axon-axon interactions involved in the developmental assembly of neural circuits. The assay exploits a classical example of heterotypic axonal interactions by modeling the sequential extension of spinal motor and somatosensory neuron axons, but the procedure should be readily adaptable to other neuron types. The protocol is based on the rapid isolation and primary culture of genetically identified motor neurons combined with straightforward vital dye labeling and culture of dorsal root ganglion sensory neurons. Subsequently, axonal interactions are directly monitored via live fluorescence microscopy, whereas axon type identities can be unambiguously delineated throughout the experiments. Through chemical compound application or by using neurons derived from genetically engineered mice, the protocol facilitates the dissection of molecular pathways driving the axonal interactions that are crucial for neural pathway and circuit assembly. The whole procedure can be completed in 3 d.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2: Procedure for performing MN explant culture from E12.5 Hb9eGFP transgenic embryo.
Figure 3: Procedure for DRG culture from E12.5 embryo.
Figure 4: Examples of flash-fixed MN-DRG explant cocultures.
Figure 5: Imaging setup based on the Olympus cell^M IX81/Yokogawa DSU-based spinning-disk system used in our laboratory.
Figure 6: Homotypic or heterotypic growth cones interactions in MN-DRG explant cocultures traced by live axon imaging.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Taylor, A.C. Selectivity of nerve fibers from the dorsal and ventral roots in the development of the frog limb. J. Exp. Zool. 96, 159–185 (1944).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bate, C.M. Pioneer neurones in an insect embryo. Nature 260, 54–56 (1976).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kuwada, J.Y. Cell recognition by neuronal growth cones in a simple vertebrate embryo. Science 233, 740–746 (1986).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sakano, H. Neural map formation in the mouse olfactory system. Neuron 67, 530–542 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Luo, L. & Flanagan, J.G. Development of continuous and discrete neural maps. Neuron 56, 284–300 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Komiyama, T. & Luo, L. Development of wiring specificity in the olfactory system. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 16, 67–73 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hamburger, V. Experimentelle Beiträge zur Entwicklungsphysiologie der Nervenbahnen in der Forschextremität. Rouxs. Arch. Dev. Biol. 119, 47–99 (1929).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Landmesser, L. & Honig, M.G. Altered sensory projections in the chick hind limb following the early removal of motoneurons. Dev. Biol. 118, 511–531 (1986).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Honig, M.G., Lance-Jones, C. & Landmesser, L. The development of sensory projection patterns in embryonic chick hindlimb under experimental conditions. Dev. Biol. 118, 532–548 (1986).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Scott, S.A. Skin sensory innervation patterns in embryonic chick hindlimbs deprived of motoneurons. Dev. Biol. 126, 362–374 (1988).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Swanson, G.J. & Lewis, J. Sensory nerve routes in chick wing buds deprived of motor innervation. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 95, 37–52 (1986).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tosney, K.W. & Hageman, M.S. Different subsets of axonal guidance cues are essential for sensory neurite outgrowth to cutaneous and muscle targets in the dorsal ramus of the embryonic chick. J. Exp. Zool. 251, 232–244 (1989).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Landmesser, L.T., O'Donovan, M.J. & Honig, M. The response of avian hindlimb motor and sensory neurons to an altered periphery. Prog. Clin. Biol. Res. 110 Part A: 207–216 (1983).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kapfhammer, J.P. & Raper, J.A. Interactions between growth cones and neurites growing from different neural tissues in culture. J. Neurosci. 7, 1595–1600 (1987).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Kapfhammer, J.P., Grunewald, B.E. & Raper, J.A. The selective inhibition of growth cone extension by specific neurites in culture. J. Neurosci. 6, 2527–2534 (1986).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Bray, D., Wood, P. & Bunge, R.P. Selective fasciculation of nerve fibres in culture. Exp. Cell Res. 130, 241–250 (1980).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Marquardt, T. et al. Coexpressed EphA receptors and ephrin-A ligands mediate opposing actions on growth cone navigation from distinct membrane domains. Cell 121, 127–139 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Shirasaki, R., Lewcock, J.W., Lettieri, K. & Pfaff, S.L. FGF as a target-derived chemoattractant for developing motor axons genetically programmed by the LIM code. Neuron 50, 841–853 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gallarda, B.W. et al. Segregation of axial motor and sensory pathways via heterotypic trans-axonal signaling. Science 320, 233–236 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Bai, G. et al. Presenilin-dependent receptor processing is required for axon guidance. Cell 144, 106–118 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Lee, S.K., Jurata, L.W., Funahashi, J., Ruiz, E.C. & Pfaff, S.L. Analysis of embryonic motoneuron gene regulation: derepression of general activators function in concert with enhancer factors. Development 131, 3295–3306 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. deLapeyriere, O. et al. GFR alpha 1 is required for development of distinct subpopulations of motoneuron. J. Neurosci. 20, 4992–5000 (2000).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Nurcombe, V., Hill, M.A., Eagleson, K.L. & Bennett, M.R. Motor neuron survival and neuritic extension from spinal cord explants induced by factors released from denervated muscle. Brain Res. 291, 19–28 (1984).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Heaton, M.B. & Paiva, M. The influence of target tissue age on neurite outgrowth from chick embryo trigeminal motor nucleus explants. Dev. Biol. 116, 314–318 (1986).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Heaton, M.B. & Wayne, D.B. Specific responsiveness of chick trigeminal motor nucleus explants to target-conditioned media. J. Comp. Neurol. 243, 381–387 (1986).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Guthrie, S. & Pini, A. Chemorepulsion of developing motor axons by the floor plate. Neuron 14, 1117–1130 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Thomson, C.E., Hunter, A.M., Griffiths, I.R., Edgar, J.M. & McCulloch, M.C. Murine spinal cord explants: a model for evaluating axonal growth and myelination in vitro. J. Neurosci. Res. 84, 1703–1715 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang, L., Klein, R., Zheng, B. & Marquardt, T. Anatomical coupling of sensory and motor nerve trajectory via axon tracking. Neuron 71, 263–277 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wiese, S. et al. Isolation and enrichment of embryonic mouse motoneurons from the lumbar spinal cord of individual mouse embryos. Nat. Protoc. 5, 31–38 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Taylor, A.R., Robinson, M.B. & Milligan, C.E. In vitro methods to prepare astrocyte and motoneuron cultures for the investigation of potential in vivo interactions. Nat. Protoc. 2, 1499–1507 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Calof, A.L. & Reichardt, L.F. Motoneurons purified by cell sorting respond to two distinct activities in myotube-conditioned medium. Dev. Biol. 106, 194–210 (1984).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Buchman, V.L. & Davies, A.M. Different neurotrophins are expressed and act in a developmental sequence to promote the survival of embryonic sensory neurons. Development 118, 989–1001 (1993).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Malin, S.A., Davis, B.M. & Molliver, D.C. Production of dissociated sensory neuron cultures and considerations for their use in studying neuronal function and plasticity. Nat. Protoc. 2, 152–160 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Pearce, R., Galdzicki, Z. & Rapoport, S.I. Decreased sensitivity to nerve growth factor of dorsal root ganglion neurons cultured from mouse trisomy-16, a model of Down's syndrome. Brain Res. 680, 108–116 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Arakawa, Y., Sendtner, M. & Thoenen, H. Survival effect of ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF) on chick embryonic motoneurons in culture: comparison with other neurotrophic factors and cytokines. J. Neurosci. 10, 3507–3515 (1990).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Bataille, S., Portalier, P., Coulon, P. & Ternaux, J.P. Influence of acetylcholinesterase on embryonic spinal rat motoneurones growth in culture: a quantitative morphometric study. Eur. J. Neurosci. 10, 560–572 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Camu, W. & Henderson, C.E. Purification of embryonic rat motoneurons by panning on a monoclonal antibody to the low-affinity NGF receptor. J. Neurosci. Methods 44, 59–70 (1992).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Sendtner, M. et al. Isolation and enrichment of embryonic mouse motoneurons from the lumbar spinal cord of individual mouse embryos. Nat. Protoc. 5, 31–38 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Lemmon, V., Burden, S.M., Payne, H.R., Elmslie, G.J. & Hlavin, M.L. Neurite growth on different substrates: permissive versus instructive influences and the role of adhesive strength. J. Neurosci. 12, 818–826 (1992).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank A. Klusowski and E. Ling for technical assistance and Olympus-Germany for providing the DSU. This work was supported by the Emmy Noether Program of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG), as well as the DFG Research Center for Molecular Physiology of the brain. The ENI-G is a cooperation of the University of Göttingen Medical School and the Max Planck Gesellschaft.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

L.W. designed and executed experiments and analyzed the data. T.M. devised the protocol and supervised the experiments. L.W. and T.M. co-wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Till Marquardt.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Movie 1

Example of a sensory growth cone crossing an interjecting sensory axon. Total duration of movie sequence: 56 min (see Fig. 6a). (AVI 3714 kb)

Supplementary Movie 2

Sensory growth cone (DiI: red) encountering an interjecting motor axon (GFP: green). This encounter leads to reorientation of the sensory axon trajectory, and tracking of the sensory growth cone along the length of the motor axon shaft (see Fig. 6b). Note: tracking is typically accompanied by numerous transient sensory growth cone filopodial-motor axon membrane contacts. Total duration of movie sequence: 189 min. (AVI 12636 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, L., Marquardt, T. Direct live monitoring of heterotypic axon-axon interactions in vitro. Nat Protoc 7, 351–363 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2011.442

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2011.442

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing