Protocol | Published:

Quantifying spatial correlations of fluorescent markers using enhanced background reduction with protein proximity index and correlation coefficient estimations

Nature Protocols volume 6, pages 15541567 (2011) | Download Citation

Abstract

Interactions of proteins are examined by detecting their overlap using fluorescent markers. The observed overlap is then quantified to serve as a measure of spatial correlation. A major drawback of this approach is that it can produce false values because of the properties of the image background. To remedy this, we provide a protocol to reduce the contribution of image background and then apply a protein proximity index (PPI) and correlation coefficient to estimate colocalization. Background heterogeneity is reduced by the median filtering procedure, comprising two steps, to reduce random noise and background, respectively. Alternatively, background can be reduced by advanced thresholding. PPI provides separate values for each channel to characterize the contribution of each protein, whereas correlation coefficient determines the overall colocalization. The protocol is demonstrated using computer-simulated and real biological images. It minimizes human bias and can be universally applied to various cell types in which there is a need to understand protein-protein interactions. Background reductions require 3–5 min per image. Quantifications take <1 min. The entire procedure takes approximately 15–30 min.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    & The origin of protein interactions and allostery in colocalization. Nature 450, 983–990 (2007).

  2. 2.

    et al. FRET-CLSM and double-labeling indirect immunofluorescence to detect close association of proteins in tissue sections. Lab. Invest. 86, 853–864 (2006).

  3. 3.

    Multicolor imaging: the important question of co-localization. BioTechniques 30, 1240–1242, 1244–1246 (2001).

  4. 4.

    & Recent advances in quantitative colocalization analysis: focus on neuroscience. Prog. Histochem. Cytochem. 44, 125–172 (2009).

  5. 5.

    , & Measurement of co-localization of objects in dual-colour confocal images. J. Microsc. 169, 375–382 (1993).

  6. 6.

    & A guided tour into subcellular colocalization analysis in light microscopy. J. Microsc. 224, 213–232 (2006).

  7. 7.

    & Quantitative colocalization analysis of confocal fluorescence microscopy images. Curr. Protoc. Cell Biol. Chapter 4 Unit 4 19 (2008).

  8. 8.

    , , , & Colocalization of fluorescent markers in confocal microscope images of plant cells. Nat. Protoc. 3, 619–628 (2008).

  9. 9.

    Accuracy and precision in quantitative fluorescence microscopy. J. Cell Biol. 185, 1135–1148 (2009).

  10. 10.

    et al. Quantitative comparison of anti-fading media for confocal laser scanning microscopy. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 49, 305–312 (2001).

  11. 11.

    & Colocalization analysis yields superior results after image restoration. Microsc. Res. Tech. 64, 103–112 (2004).

  12. 12.

    , , , & Ethanol consumption alters expression and colocalization of bile salt export pump and multidrug resistance protein 2 in the rat. Histochem. Cell Biol. 127, 503–512 (2007).

  13. 13.

    & The point spread function of confocal microscope: its measurement and use in deconvolution. J. Microsc. 163, 151–165 (1991).

  14. 14.

    et al. Quantitative determination of spatial protein-protein correlations in fluorescence confocal microscopy. Biophys. J. 98, 493–504 (2010).

  15. 15.

    & Putting super-resolution fluorescence microscopy to work. Nat. Methods 6, 21–23 (2009).

  16. 16.

    The Handbook: A Guide to Fluorescent Probes and Labeling Technologies 10th edn (Invitrogen, Inc., 2005).

  17. 17.

    et al. Immunofluorescence in brain sections: simultaneous detection of presynaptic and postsynaptic proteins in identified neurons. Nat. Protoc. 1, 1887–1897 (2006).

  18. 18.

    & Quantifying colocalization by correlation: the Pearson correlation coefficient is superior to the Mander's overlap coefficient. Cytometry A 77, 733–742 (2010).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was partially supported by National Institutes of Health grant no. HL088640 and the American Heart Association Postdoctoral Fellowship no. 10POST4230081. We thank M. Celio (Fribourg University) for help in organizing the study.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Kochi University, Faculty of Medicine, Kochi, Japan.

    • Vadim Zinchuk
  2. Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Molecular Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.

    • Yong Wu
    •  & Enrico Stefani
  3. Unit of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.

    • Olga Grossenbacher-Zinchuk

Authors

  1. Search for Vadim Zinchuk in:

  2. Search for Yong Wu in:

  3. Search for Olga Grossenbacher-Zinchuk in:

  4. Search for Enrico Stefani in:

Contributions

V.Z. conceived and organized the study, designed and conducted experiments and wrote the paper; Y.W. conducted experiments and contributed to writing, O.G.-Z. designed and conducted experiments and contributed to writing; and E.S. helped to organize the study.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vadim Zinchuk.

Supplementary information

Image files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Fig. 1

    Pair 1: 0% colocalization. Red channel.

  2. 2.

    Supplementary Fig. 2

    Pair 1: 0% colocalization. Green channel.

  3. 3.

    Supplementary Fig. 3

    Pair 2: 25% colocalization. Red channel.

  4. 4.

    Supplementary Fig. 4

    Pair 2: 25% colocalization. Green channel.

  5. 5.

    Supplementary Fig. 5

    Pair 3: 50% colocalization. Red channel.

  6. 6.

    Supplementary Fig. 6

    Pair 3: 50% colocalization. Green channel.

  7. 7.

    Supplementary Fig. 7

    Pair 4: 75% colocalization. Red channel.

  8. 8.

    Supplementary Fig. 8

    Pair 4: 75% colocalization. Green channel.

About this article

Publication history

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2011.384

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.