Protocol | Published:

A standardized protocol for repeated social defeat stress in mice

Nature Protocols volume 6, pages 11831191 (2011) | Download Citation

  • A Corrigendum to this article was published on 26 March 2015

This article has been updated

Abstract

A major impediment to novel drug development has been the paucity of animal models that accurately reflect symptoms of affective disorders. In animal models, prolonged social stress has proven to be useful in understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying affective-like disorders. When considering experimental approaches for studying depression, social defeat stress, in particular, has been shown to have excellent etiological, predictive, discriminative and face validity. Described here is a protocol whereby C57BL/6J mice that are repeatedly subjected to bouts of social defeat by a larger and aggressive CD-1 mouse results in the development of a clear depressive-like syndrome, characterized by enduring deficits in social interactions. Specifically, the protocol consists of three important stages, beginning with the selection of aggressive CD-1 mice, followed by agonistic social confrontations between the CD-1 and C57BL/6J mice, and concluding with the confirmation of social avoidance in subordinate C57BL/6J mice. The automated detection of social avoidance allows a marked increase in throughput, reproducibility and quantitative analysis. This protocol is highly adaptable, but in its most common form it requires 3–4 weeks for completion.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Change history

  • 17 December 2014

     In the version of this article initially published, there was some confusion over the interpretation of the sentence "Further, defeats should be run under constant veterinary evaluation and with full approval of all necessary institutional review boards and standards." For added clarity, the sentence was changed to read "Further, defeats should be run with full approval of all necessary institutional review boards and standards." The error has been corrected in the HTML and PDF versions of the article.

References

  1. 1.

    et al. The economic burden of depression in the United States: how did it change between 1990 and 2000? J. Clin. Psychiatry 64, 1465–1475 (2003).

  2. 2.

    & Linking molecules to mood: new insight into the biology of depression. Am. J. Psychiatry 167, 1305–1320 (2008).

  3. 3.

    & The molecular neurobiology of depression. Nature 455, 894–902 (2008).

  4. 4.

    & Animal models of neuropsychiatric disorders. Nat. Neurosci. 13, 1161–1169 (2010).

  5. 5.

    et al. mTOR-dependent synapse formation underlies the rapid antidepressant effects of NMDA antagonists. Science 329, 959–964 (2010).

  6. 6.

    , , & Developing an agenda for translational studies of resilience and vulnerability following trauma exposure. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1071, 379–396 (2006).

  7. 7.

    , & St John's wort, hypericin, and imipramine: a comparative analysis of mRNA levels in brain areas involved in HPA axis control following short-term and long-term administration in normal and stressed rats. Mol. Psychiatry 6, 547–564 (2001).

  8. 8.

    et al. Pharmacological validation of a chronic social stress model of depression in rats: effects of reboxetine, haloperidol and diazepam. Behav. Pharmacol. 19, 183–196 (2008).

  9. 9.

    , , , & Social stress in rats and mice. Acta. Physiol. Scand. Suppl. 640, 69–72 (1997).

  10. 10.

    , & Social model of depression in mice of C57BL/6J strain. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 38, 315–320 (1991).

  11. 11.

    , & Social stress, therapeutics and drug abuse: preclinical models of escalated and depressed intake. Pharmacol. Ther. 120, 102–128 (2008).

  12. 12.

    Mammalian behavior and the adrenal cortex. A review. Behav. Biol. 7, 453–477 (1972).

  13. 13.

    & Social stress in tree shrews: effects on physiology, brain function, and behavior of subordinate individuals. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 73, 247–258 (2002).

  14. 14.

    , , , & Effects of fluoxetine on behavioral deficits evoked by chronic social stress in rats. Behav. Brain. Res. 174, 188–192 (2006).

  15. 15.

    et al. Citalopram counteracts depressive-like symptoms evoked by chronic social stress in rats. Behav. Pharmacol. 17, 19–29 (2006).

  16. 16.

    et al. Anhedonia and motivational deficits in rats: impact of chronic social stress. Behav. Brain. Res. 162, 127–134 (2005).

  17. 17.

    et al. Essential role of BDNF in the mesolimbic dopamine pathway in social defeat stress. Science 311, 864–868 (2006).

  18. 18.

    & Long-term impairment of autonomic circadian rhythms after brief intermittent social stress. Physiol. Behav. 53, 983–993 (1993).

  19. 19.

    & Intense cocaine self-administration after episodic social defeat stress, but not after aggressive behavior: dissociation from corticosterone activation. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 183, 331–340 (2005).

  20. 20.

    & New approaches to antidepressant drug discovery: beyond monoamines. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 7, 137–151 (2006).

  21. 21.

    et al. Molecular adaptations underlying susceptibility and resistance to social defeat in brain reward regions. Cell 131, 391–404 (2007).

  22. 22.

    , & Comparative analysis of anxiety-like behavior in partition and plus-maze tests after agonistic interactions in mice. Physiol. Behav. 61, 37–43 (1997).

  23. 23.

    et al. The orexigenic hormone ghrelin defends against depressive symptoms of chronic stress. Nat. Neurosci. 11, 752–753 (2008).

  24. 24.

    et al. Chronic social defeat stress disrupts regulation of lipid synthesis. J. Lipid Res. 51, 1344–1353 (2010).

  25. 25.

    et al. A beta3-adrenergic-leptin-melanocortin circuit regulates behavioral and metabolic changes induced by chronic stress. Biol. Psychiatry 67, 1075–1082 (2010).

  26. 26.

    et al. Orexin signaling mediates the antidepressant-like effect of calorie restriction. J. Neurosci. 28, 3071–3075 (2008).

  27. 27.

    et al. Sustained hippocampal chromatin regulation in a mouse model of depression and antidepressant action. Nat. Neurosci. 9, 519–525 (2006).

  28. 28.

    et al. Glutamate N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists rapidly reverse behavioral and synaptic deficits caused by chronic stress exposure. Biol. Psychiatry 69, 754–761 (2011).

  29. 29.

    et al. Antidepressant actions of histone deacetylase inhibitors. J. Neurosci. 29, 11451–11460 (2009).

  30. 30.

    et al. Imipramine treatment and resiliency exhibit similar chromatin regulation in the mouse nucleus accumbens in depression models. J. Neurosci. 29, 7820–7832 (2009).

  31. 31.

    et al. [Delta]FosB in brain reward circuits mediates resilience to stress and antidepressant responses. Nat. Neurosci. 13, 745–752 (2010).

  32. 32.

    et al. IkappaB kinase regulates social defeat stress-induced synaptic and behavioral plasticity. J. Neurosci. 31, 314–321 (2011).

  33. 33.

    , & Regulation of hippocampal glucocorticoid receptor gene expression by psychosocial conflict. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 746, 429–430 (1994).

  34. 34.

    et al. Visible burrow system as a model of chronic social stress: behavioral and neuroendocrine correlates. Psychoneuroendocrinology 20, 117–134 (1995).

  35. 35.

    , , , & Coping with stress in rats and mice: differential peptidergic modulation of the amygdala-lateral septum complex. Prog. Brain Res. 119, 437–448 (1998).

  36. 36.

    & Interactions between social stress and morphine in the periaqueductal gray: effects on affective vocal and reflexive pain responses in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 146, 153–161 (1999).

  37. 37.

    et al. Neurobiology of depression. Neuron 34, 13–25 (2002).

  38. 38.

    Social conflict models: can they inform us about human psychopathology? Horm. Behav. 50, 640–646 (2006).

  39. 39.

    et al. Vulnerability to chronic subordination stress-induced depression-like disorders in adult 129SvEv male mice. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry (17 November 2010).

  40. 40.

    et al. Strain-specific outcomes of repeated social defeat and chronic fluoxetine treatment in the mouse. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 97, 566–576 (2010).

  41. 41.

    , , , & Different susceptibility to social defeat stress of BALB/c and C57BL6/J mice. Behav. Brain Res. 216, 100–108 (2010).

  42. 42.

    , , & Behavior and stress reactivity in mouse strains with mitochondrial DNA variations. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1153, 131–138 (2009).

  43. 43.

    , , & Knockout of the norepinephrine transporter and pharmacologically diverse antidepressants prevent behavioral and brain neurotrophin alterations in two chronic stress models of depression. J. Neurochem. 111, 403–416 (2009).

  44. 44.

    et al. Antidepressant effect of optogenetic stimulation of the medial prefrontal cortex. J. Neurosci. 30, 16082–16090 (2010).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank D. Christoffel for his helpful review of this manuscript. We also acknowledge the intrepid efforts of the Mount Sinai School of Medicine animal facility personnel. This research was supported by US National Institute of Mental Health grant 1R01MH090264-01A1.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Fishberg Department of Neuroscience, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.

    • Sam A Golden
    •  & Scott J Russo
  2. Friedman Brain Institute, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.

    • Sam A Golden
    •  & Scott J Russo
  3. Department of Psychology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

    • Herbert E Covington III
  4. The Duke Institute for Brain Sciences, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

    • Herbert E Covington III
  5. Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania Medical School, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

    • Olivier Berton

Authors

  1. Search for Sam A Golden in:

  2. Search for Herbert E Covington in:

  3. Search for Olivier Berton in:

  4. Search for Scott J Russo in:

Contributions

S.A.G., H.E.C., O.B. and S.J.R. contributed to study design, data collection, analysis and writing.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Scott J Russo.

About this article

Publication history

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2011.361

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.