Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Protocol
  • Published:

Analysis of epigenetic modifications of chromatin at specific gene loci by native chromatin immunoprecipitation of nucleosomes isolated using hydroxyapatite chromatography

Abstract

Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) is routinely used to examine epigenetic modification of histones at specific genomic locations. However, covalent modifications of histone tails can serve as docking sites for chromatin regulatory factors. As such, association of these regulatory factors with chromatin could cause steric hindrance for antibody recognition, resulting in an underestimation of the relative enrichment of a given histone modification at specific loci. To overcome this problem, we have developed a native ChIP protocol to study covalent modification of histones that takes advantage of hydroxyapatite (HAP) chromatography to wash away chromatin-associated proteins before the immunoprecipitation of nucleosomes. This fast and simple procedure consists of five steps: nuclei isolation from cultured cells; fragmentation of chromatin using MNase; purification of nucleosomes using HAP; immunoprecipitation of modified nucleosomes; and qPCR analysis of DNA associated with modified histones. Nucleosomes prepared in this manner are free of contaminating proteins and permit an accurate evaluation of relative abundance of different covalent histone modifications at specific genomic loci. Completion of this protocol requires 1.5 d.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2: Analysis of loci representation in chromatin eluted from HAP column.
Figure 3: Analysis of nucleosomes isolated by hydroxyapatite chromatography.
Figure 4: Distribution of H3K4me2 and H3K4me3 across the Myog locus.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hebbes, T.R., Thorne, A.W. & Crane-Robinson, C. A direct link between core histone acetylation and transcriptionally active chromatin. EMBO J. 7, 1395–1402 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. O'Neill, L.P. & Turner, B.M. Immunoprecipitation of native chromatin: NChIP. Methods 31, 76–82 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. O'Neill, L.P., VerMilyea, M.D. & Turner, B.M. Epigenetic characterization of the early embryo with a chromatin immunoprecipitation protocol applicable to small cell populations. Nat. Genet. 38, 835–841 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Weber, M. et al. Chromosome-wide and promoter-specific analyses identify sites of differential DNA methylation in normal and transformed human cells. Nat. Genet. 37, 853–862 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dorbic, T. & Wittig, B. Isolation of oligonucleosomes from active chromatin using HMG17-specific monoclonal antibodies. Nucleic Acids Res. 14, 3363–3376 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Solomon, M.J., Larsen, P.L. & Varshavsky, A. Mapping protein–DNA interactions in vivo with formaldehyde: evidence that histone H4 is retained on a highly transcribed gene. Cell 53, 937–947 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Orlando, V., Strutt, H. & Paro, R. Analysis of chromatin structure by in vivo formaldehyde cross-linking. Methods 11, 205–214 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dhalluin, C. et al. Structure and ligand of a histone acetyltransferase bromodomain. Nature 399, 491–496 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Santos-Rosa, H. et al. Methylation of histone H3 K4 mediates association of the isw1p ATPase with chromatin. Mol. Cell 12, 1325–1332 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wysocka, J. et al. A PHD finger of NURF couples histone H3 lysine 4 trimethylation with chromatin remodelling. Nature 442, 86–90 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Strahl, B.D. & Allis, C.D. The language of covalent histone modifications. Nature 403, 41–45 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ruthenburg, A.J., Allis, C.D. & Wysocka, J. Methylation of lysine 4 on histone H3: intricacy of writing and reading a single epigenetic mark. Mol. Cell 25, 15–30 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Vermeulen, M. et al. Selective anchoring of TFIID to nucleosomes by trimethylation of histone H3 lysine 4. Cell 131, 58–69 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bernardi, G. Chromatography of nucleic acids on hydroxyapatite. Nature 206, 779–783 (1965).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Thorne, A.W., Cary, P.D. & Crane-Robinson, C. Extraction and separation of core histone and non-histone chromosomal proteins. in Chromatin: A Practical Approach Vol. 9 (ed. Gould, H.) 35–57 (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rampalli, S. et al. p38 MAPK signaling regulates recruitment of Ash2L-containing methyltransferase complexes to specific genes during differentiation. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 14, 1150–1156 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ren, B. et al. Genome-wide location and function of DNA binding proteins. Science 290, 2306–2309 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee, T.I., Johnstone, S.E. & Young, R.A. Chromatin immunoprecipitation and microarray-based analysis of protein location. Nat. Protoc. 1, 729–748 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Mikkelsen, T.S. et al. Genome-wide maps of chromatin state in pluripotent and lineage-committed cells. Nature 448, 553–560 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hager, G.L. & Fragoso, G. Analysis of nucleosome positioning in mammalian cells. Methods Enzymol. 304, 626–638 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lomvardas, S. & Thanos, D. Modifying gene expression programs by altering core promoter chromatin architecture. Cell 110, 261–271 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sambrook, J. & Russell, D.W. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual (Cold Spring Laboratory Press, New York, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Muscular Dystrophy Association and the Stem Cell Network (to F.J.D.); and Terry Fox Foundation/National Cancer Institute of Canada, and Human Frontiers Science Program (to M.B.). F.J.D. holds a Canadian Research Chair in Epigenetic Regulation of Transcription. M.B. holds a Canadian Research Chair in the Regulation of Gene Expression.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Marjorie Brand or F Jeffrey Dilworth.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brand, M., Rampalli, S., Chaturvedi, CP. et al. Analysis of epigenetic modifications of chromatin at specific gene loci by native chromatin immunoprecipitation of nucleosomes isolated using hydroxyapatite chromatography. Nat Protoc 3, 398–409 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2008.8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2008.8

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing