Protocol | Published:

L-Measure: a web-accessible tool for the analysis, comparison and search of digital reconstructions of neuronal morphologies

Nature Protocols volume 3, pages 866876 (2008) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

L-Measure (LM) is a freely available software tool for the quantitative characterization of neuronal morphology. LM computes a large number of neuroanatomical parameters from 3D digital reconstruction files starting from and combining a set of core metrics. After more than six years of development and use in the neuroscience community, LM enables the execution of commonly adopted analyses as well as of more advanced functions. This report illustrates several LM protocols: (i) extraction of basic morphological parameters, (ii) computation of frequency distributions, (iii) measurements from user-specified subregions of the neuronal arbors, (iv) statistical comparison between two groups of cells and (v) filtered selections and searches from collections of neurons based on any Boolean combination of the available morphometric measures. These functionalities are easily accessed and deployed through a user-friendly graphical interface and typically execute within few minutes on a set of 20 neurons. The tool is available at http://krasnow.gmu.edu/cn3 for either online use on any Java-enabled browser and platform or download for local execution under Windows and Linux.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    , , & Generation, description and storage of dendritic morphology data. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 356, 1131–1145 (2001).

  2. 2.

    & Increased dendritic extent in hippocampal CA1 neurons from aged F344 rats. Neurobiol. Aging 17, 601–611 (1996).

  3. 3.

    et al. Changes in dendritic structure and function following hippocampal lesions: correlations with developmental events? Prog. Neurobiol. 55, 641–650 (1998).

  4. 4.

    , & Dendrites of classes of hippocampal neurons differ in structural complexity and branching patterns. J. Comp. Neurol. 413, 619–633 (1999).

  5. 5.

    Neuroanatomical algorithms for dendritic modelling. Network 13, 247–260 (2002).

  6. 6.

    , & Signal propagation in oblique dendrites of CA1 pyramidal cells. J. Neurophysiol. 94, 4145–4155 (2005).

  7. 7.

    , & Web-based neuronal archives: neuronal morphometric and electrotonic analysis. in Neuroscience Databases (ed. Kotter, R.) 81–98 (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, Massachusetts, 2002).

  8. 8.

    Mobilizing the base of neuroscience data: the case of neuronal morphologies. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 7, 318–324 (2006).

  9. 9.

    , , & An on-line archive of reconstructed hippocampal neurons. J. Neurosci. Methods 84, 49–54 (1998).

  10. 10.

    , & Quantitative, three-dimensional analysis of granule cell dendrites in the rat dentate gyrus. J. Comp. Neurol. 302, 206–219 (1990).

  11. 11.

    , & Dendritic morphology and its effects on the amplitude and rise-time of synaptic signals in hippocampal CA3 pyramidal cells. J. Comp. Neurol. 369, 331–344 (1996).

  12. 12.

    , & A quantitative analysis of the dendritic organization of pyramidal cells in the rat hippocampus. J. Comp. Neurol. 362, 17–45 (1995).

  13. 13.

    , , , & Dendritic properties of hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons in the rat: intracellular staining in vivo and in vitro. J. Comp. Neurol. 391, 335–352 (1998).

  14. 14.

    , , , & Morphometric and electrical properties of reconstructed hippocampal CA3 neurons recorded in vivo. J. Comp. Neurol. 356, 580–594 (1995).

  15. 15.

    & Algorithmic extraction of morphological statistics from electronic archives of neuroanatomy. Lect. Notes Comp. Sci. 2084, 30–37 (2001).

  16. 16.

    , & NeuroMorpho.Org: a central resource for neuronal morphologies. J. Neurosci. 27, 9247–9251 (2007).

  17. 17.

    , & Quantitative morphometry of hippocampal pyramidal cells: differences between anatomical classes and reconstructing laboratories. J. Comp. Neurol. 473, 177–193 (2004).

  18. 18.

    , & Effects of β-catenin on dendritic morphology and simulated firing patterns in cultured hippocampal neurons. Biol. Bull. 211, 31–43 (2006).

  19. 19.

    , , & Developmental changes in spinal motoneuron dendrites in neonatal mice. J. Comp. Neurol. 483, 304–317 (2005).

  20. 20.

    , , , & Morphological characterization of electrophysiologically identified basal forebrain neurons: cholinergic vs. neuropeptide Y-containing neurons. Brain Struct. Funct. 1, 55–73 (2007).

  21. 21.

    , , & A cross-platform freeware tool for digital reconstruction of neuronal arborizations from image stacks. Neuroinformatics 3, 343–360 (2005).

  22. 22.

    & Algorithmic reconstruction of complete axonal arborizations in rat hippocampal neurons. Neurocomputing 65–66, 15–22 (2005).

  23. 23.

    & Local diameter fully constrains dendritic size in basal but not apical trees of CA1 pyramidal neurons. J. Comput. Neurosci. 19, 223–238 (2005).

  24. 24.

    & Statistical determinants of dendritic morphology in hippocampal pyramidal neurons: a hidden Markov model. Hippocampus 15, 166–183 (2005).

  25. 25.

    , , & Rayburst sampling, an algorithm for automated three-dimensional shape analysis from laser scanning microscopy images. Nat. Protoc. 1, 2152–2161 (2006).

  26. 26.

    , , & Non-curated distributed databases for experimental data and models in neuroscience. Network 13, 415–428 (2002).

  27. 27.

    et al. Classification of HIV-1-mediated neuronal dendritic and synaptic damage using multiple criteria linear programming. Neuroinformatics 2, 303–326 (2004).

  28. 28.

    & Modeling morphological changes in spinal motoneurons following spinal cord injury to explore changes in electrical behavior. BMC Neurosci. 8 (suppl.), 1471–2202 (2007).

  29. 29.

    et al. Differential effects of corticosterone on the sAHP in the basolateral amygdala and CA1 region: possible role of calcium channel subunits. J. Neurophysiol. 99, 958–968 (2008).

  30. 30.

    & Measures for quantifying dendritic arborizations. Network 13, 397–414 (2002).

  31. 31.

    , , & Total number and ratio of excitatory and inhibitory synapses converging onto single interneurons of different types in the CA1 area of the rat hippocampus. J. Neurosci. 19, 10082–10097 (1999).

  32. 32.

    , , & Interneurons of the dentate-hilus border of the rat dentate gyrus: morphological and electrophysiological heterogeneity. J. Neurosci. 17, 3990–4005 (1997).

  33. 33.

    et al. Cluster analysis–based physiological classification and morphological properties of inhibitory neurons in layers 2–3 of monkey dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 94, 3009–3022 (2005).

  34. 34.

    , , & Correlation between axonal morphologies and synaptic input kinetics of interneurons from mouse visual cortex. Cereb. Cortex 17, 81–91 (2007).

  35. 35.

    , , & Diversity of ganglion cells in the mouse retina: unsupervised morphological classification and its limits. J. Comp. Neurol. 489, 293–310 (2005).

  36. 36.

    , & Morphology of ganglion cells in the neotenous tiger salamander retina. J. Comp. Neurol. 352, 535–559 (1995).

  37. 37.

    & Automatic characterization and classification of ganglion cells from the salamander retina. J. Comp. Neurol. 404, 33–51 (1999).

  38. 38.

    , & Dendritic architecture of the von Economo neurons. Neuroscience 141, 1107–1112 (2006).

  39. 39.

    & Magnopyramidal neurons in the anterior motor speech region. Dendritic features and interhemispheric comparisons. Arch. Neurol. 53, 1277–1283 (1996).

  40. 40.

    & Quantitative Golgi study of the rat cerebellar molecular layer interneurons using principal component analysis. J. Comp. Neurol. 393, 353–373 (1998).

  41. 41.

    & Neuronal firing sensitivity to morphologic and active membrane parameters. PLoS Comput. Biol. 4, e11 (2008).

  42. 42.

    , & Propagation of action potentials in dendrites depends on dendritic morphology. J. Neurophysiol. 85, 926–937 (2001).

  43. 43.

    , & Dichotomy of action-potential backpropagation in CA1 pyramidal neuron dendrites. J. Neurophysiol. 86, 2998–3010 (2001).

  44. 44.

    , , , & Comparison of the morphological and electrotonic properties of Renshaw cells, Ia inhibitory interneurons, and motoneurons in the cat. J. Neurophysiol. 90, 2900–2918 (2003).

  45. 45.

    & β-Catenin is critical for dendritic morphogenesis. Nat. Neurosci. 6, 1169–1177 (2003).

  46. 46.

    , , & Chronic stress induces contrasting patterns of dendritic remodeling in hippocampal and amygdaloid neurons. J. Neurosci. 22, 6810–6818 (2002).

  47. 47.

    , , & Experience-dependent changes in basal dendritic branching of layer 2/3 pyramidal neurons during a critical period for developmental plasticity in rat barrel cortex. Cereb. Cortex 14, 655–664 (2004).

  48. 48.

    & Simulation of motoneuron morphology in three dimensions. I. Building individual dendritic trees. J. Comp. Neurol. 503, 685–700 (2007).

  49. 49.

    , , & Automated algorithms for multiscale morphometry of neuronal dendrites. Neural Comput. 16, 1353–1383 (2004).

  50. 50.

    Dendritic organization in the neurons of the visual and motor cortices of the cat. J. Anat. 87, 387–406 (1953).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by NIH R01 grant NS39600 jointly funded by National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institute for the Mentally Handicapped and National Science Foundation under the Human Brain Project.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Krasnow Institute for Advanced Study, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia 22030, USA.

    • Ruggero Scorcioni
    • , Sridevi Polavaram
    •  & Giorgio A Ascoli
  2. Neuroscience Program, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia 22030, USA.

    • Sridevi Polavaram
    •  & Giorgio A Ascoli
  3. Department of Molecular Neuroscience, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia 22030, USA.

    • Giorgio A Ascoli

Authors

  1. Search for Ruggero Scorcioni in:

  2. Search for Sridevi Polavaram in:

  3. Search for Giorgio A Ascoli in:

Contributions

R.S. and S.P. contributed equally to this work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giorgio A Ascoli.

About this article

Publication history

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2008.51

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.