Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Protocol
  • Published:

Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) coupled to detection by quantitative real-time PCR to study transcription factor binding to DNA in Caenorhabditis elegans

Abstract

In order to determine how signaling pathways differentially regulate gene expression, it is necessary to identify the interactions between transcription factors (TFs) and their cognate cis-regulatory DNA elements. Here, we have outlined a chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) protocol for use in whole Caenorhabditis elegans extracts. We discuss optimization of the procedure, including growth and harvesting of the worms, formaldehyde fixation, TF immunoprecipitation and analysis of bound sequences through real-time PCR. It takes 10–12 d to obtain the worm culture for ChIP; the ChIP procedure is spaced out over a period of 2.5 d with two overnight incubations.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3: Optimization of the crosslinking time.
Figure 4: Optimization of the input amount needed for chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP).
Figure 5: Western blot to determine the quality of the polyclonal Ab against DAF-16.
Figure 6: Optimization of the Ab amount for efficient chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP).
Figure 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Walhout, A.J. Unraveling transcription regulatory networks by protein-DNA and protein–protein interaction mapping. Genome Res. 16, 1445–1454 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Collas, P. & Dahl, J.A. Chop it, ChIP it, check it: the current status of chromatin immunoprecipitation. Front. Biosci. 13, 929–943 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Das, P.M., Ramachandran, K., vanWert, J. & Singal, R. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assay. Biotechniques 37, 961–969 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Mukherjee, S. et al. Rapid analysis of the DNA-binding specificities of transcription factors with DNA microarrays. Nat. Genet. 36, 1331–1339 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Meng, X., Brodsky, M.H. & Wolfe, S.A. A bacterial one-hybrid system for determining the DNA-binding specificity of transcription factors. Nat. Biotechnol. 23, 988–994 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Deplancke, B., Dupuy, D., Vidal, M. & Walhout, A.J. A gateway-compatible yeast one-hybrid system. Genome Res. 14, 2093–2101 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Deplancke, B. et al. A gene-centered C. elegans protein-DNA interaction network. Cell 125, 1193–1205 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Johnson, D.S., Mortazavi, A., Myers, R.M. & Wold, B. Genome-wide mapping of in vivo protein-DNA interactions. Science 316, 1497–1502 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Dickmeis, T. & Müller, F. The identification and functional characterisation of conserved regulatory elements in developmental genes. Brief Funct. Genomic Proteomic 3, 332–350 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ji, H. & Wong, W.H. Computational biology: toward deciphering gene regulatory information in mammalian genomes. Biometrics 62, 645–663 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Grishok, A. & Sharp, P.A. Negative regulation of nuclear divisions in Caenorhabditis elegans by retinoblastoma and RNA interference-related genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 17360–17365 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Whetstine, J.R. et al. Regulation of tissue-specific and extracellular matrix-related genes by a class I histone deacetylase. Mol. Cell 18, 483–490 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee, M.H., Hook, B., Lamont, L.B., Wickens, M. & Kimble, J. LIP-1 phosphatase controls the extent of germline proliferation in Caenorhabditis elegans. EMBO J. 25, 88–96 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ercan, S. et al. X chromosome repression by localization of the C. elegans dosage compensation machinery to sites of transcription initiation. Nat. Genet. 39, 403–408 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Oh, S.W. et al. Identification of direct DAF-16 targets controlling longevity, metabolism and diapause by chromatin immunoprecipitation. Nat. Genet. 38, 251–257 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rand, J.B. & Johnson, C.D. Genetic pharmacology: interactions between drugs and gene products in Caenorhabditis elegans. Methods Cell Biol. 48, 187–204 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bustin, S.A., Benes, V., Nolan, T. & Pfaffl, M.W. Quantitative real-time RT-PCR—a perspective. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 34, 597–601 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Nolan, T., Hands, R.E. & Bustin, S.A. Quantification of mRNA using real-time RT-PCR. Nat. Protoc. 1, 1559–1582 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ginzinger, D.G. Gene quantification using real-time quantitative PCR: an emerging technology hits the mainstream. Exp. Hematol. 30, 503–512 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Breslauer, K.J., Frank, R., Blocker, H. & Marky, L.A. Predicting DNA duplex stability from the base sequence. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83, 3746–3750 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Murphy, C.T. et al. Genes that act downstream of DAF-16 to influence the lifespan of Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 424, 277–283 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Honda, Y. & Honda, S. The daf-2 gene network for longevity regulates oxidative stress resistance and Mn-superoxide dismutase gene expression in Caenorhabditis elegans. FASEB J. 13, 1385–1393 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. McElwee, J.J., Schuster, E., Blanc, E., Thomas, J.H. & Gems, D. Shared transcriptional signature in Caenorhabditis elegans Dauer larvae and long-lived daf-2 mutants implicates detoxification system in longevity assurance. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 44533–44543 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Lin, K., Dorman, J.B., Rodan, A. & Kenyon, C. daf-16: An HNF-3/forkhead family member that can function to double the life-span of Caenorhabditis elegans. Science 278, 1319–1322 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Lin, K., Hsin, H., Libina, N. & Kenyon, C. Regulation of the Caenorhabditis elegans longevity protein DAF-16 by insulin/IGF-1 and germline signaling. Nat. Genet. 28, 139–145 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Lee, R.Y., Hench, J. & Ruvkun, G. Regulation of C. elegans DAF-16 and its human ortholog FKHRL1 by the daf-2 insulin-like signaling pathway. Curr. Biol. 11, 1950–1957 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Henderson, S.T. & Johnson, T.E. daf-16 integrates developmental and environmental inputs to mediate aging in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Curr. Biol. 11, 1975–1980 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

H.A.T. is a William Randolph Hearst Young Investigator. This project was funded in part by a Burroughs Wellcome Career Award in the Biomedical Sciences to H.A.T., an endowment from the William Randolph Hearst Foundation, and grants from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK068429 to A.J.M.W.) and National Institute of Aging (AG25891 to H.A.T.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

A.M. and B.D. contributed equally to the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heidi A Tissenbaum.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mukhopadhyay, A., Deplancke, B., Walhout, A. et al. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) coupled to detection by quantitative real-time PCR to study transcription factor binding to DNA in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nat Protoc 3, 698–709 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2008.38

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2008.38

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing