Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Protocol
  • Published:

Preparative scale Baeyer–Villiger biooxidation at high concentration using recombinant Escherichia coli and in situ substrate feeding and product removal process

Nature Protocols volume 3, pages 546–554 (2008)Cite this article

Abstract

An efficient biocatalytic process based on the use of adsorbent resin (in situ substrate feeding and product removal) makes experiments at high substrate concentration possible by overcoming limitations due to substrate and product inhibition. This process was successfully applied to the preparative scale Baeyer–Villiger biooxidation of (−)-(1S,5R)-bicyclo[3.2.0]hept-2-en-6-one (25 g). Whole cells of recombinant E. coli (1 liter) overexpressing cyclohexanone monooxygenase were used as a biocatalyst and the substrate was preloaded onto the adsorbent resin. The corresponding lactone was obtained in 75–80% yield. Time for cell growth and biotransformation is about 24 h each and oxygen supply can be improved by using a tailor-made bubble column.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8: Kinetic profile of the BV oxidation of 25 g of (−)-(1S,5R)-1 in the 1-liter bubble column over two cycles: exchange of biocatalyst after 10 h.
Figure 9: GC analysis (Chirasil-Dex column, 110 °C, 1.2 bar He) of (−)-(1R,5S)-2 after bulb-to-bulb distillation.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pollard, D.J. & Liese, A. in Industrial Biotransformations 2nd edn. (eds. Liese, A., Seelbach, K. & Wandrey, C.) (Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pollard, D.J. & Woodley, J.M. Biocatalysis for pharmaceutical intermediates: the future is now. Trends Biotechnol. 25, 66–73 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Blaser, H.U . & Schmidt, E. Asymmetric Catalysis on an Industrial Scale (Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wohlgemuth, R. Interfacing biocatalysis and organic synthesis. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 82, 1055–1062 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim, P.-Y., Pollard, D.J. & Woodley, J.M. Substrate supply for effective biocatalysis. Biotechnol. Prog. 23, 74–82 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Zambianchi, F. et al. Comparison of cyclohexanone monooxygenase as an isolated enzyme and whole cell biocatalyst for the enantioselective oxidation of 1,3-dithiane. J. Mol. Catal., B Enzym. 31, 4–6 (2004)and references herein.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Vicenzi, J.T. et al. Large-scale stereoselective enzymatic ketone reduction with in situ product removal via polymeric adsorbent resins. Microb. Technol. 20, 494–499 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. D'Arrigo, P., Lattanzio, M., Fantoni, G.P. & Servi, S. Chemo-enzymatic synthesis of the active enantiomer of the anorressant 2-benzylmorpholine. Tetrahedron Asymmetry 9, 4021–4026 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Nakamura, K., Tanekada, K., Fuji, M. & Ida, Y. Asymmetric synthesis of both enantiomers of secondary alcohols by reduction with a single microbe. Tetrahedron Lett. 43, 3629–3631 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Conceiçao, G.J.A., Moran, P.J.S. & Rodrigues, J.A.R. Highly efficient extractive biocatalysis in the asymmetric reduction of an acyclic enone by the yeast Pichia stipitis. Tetrahedron Asymmetry 14, 43–45 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hilker, I., Alphand, V., Wohlgemuth, R. & Furstoss, R. Microbial transformations 56. Preparative scale asymmetric Baeyer–Villiger oxidation using a highly productive 'two-in-one' resin-based in situ SFPR concept. Adv. Synth. Catal. 346, 203–214 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rudroff, F., Alphand, V., Furstoss, R. & Mihovilovic, M.D. Optimizing fermentation conditions of recombinant E. coli expressing cyclopentanone monooxygenase. Org. Process Res. Dev. 10, 599–604 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. ten Brink, G.-J., Arends, I.W.C.E. & Sheldon, R.A. The Baeyer–Villiger reaction: new developments toward greener procedures. Chem. Rev. 104, 4105–4123 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mihovilovic, M.D. Enzyme mediated Baeyer–Villiger oxidations. Curr. Org. Chem. 10, 1265–1287 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wohlgemuth, R. Modular and scalable biocatalytic tools for practical safety, health, and environmental improvements in the production of specialty chemicals. Biocat. Biotrans. 25, 178–185 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kamerbeek, N.M., Janssen, D.B., van Berkel, W.J.H. & Fraaije, M.W. Baeyer–Villiger monooxygenases, an emerging family of flavin-dependent biocatalysts. Adv. Synth. Catal. 345, 667–678 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. de Gonzalo, G., Ottolina, G., Zambianchi, F., Fraaije, M.W. & Carrea, G. Biocatalytic properties of Baeyer–Villiger monooxygenases in aqueous–organic media. J. Mol. Catal., B Enzym. 39, 91–97 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Riva, S., Fassi, P., Allegrini, P. & Razzetti, G. A process for the preparation of (−)-modafinil (dipharma). European Patent Application, EP 1777295 (2007).

  19. Alphand, V., Carrea, G., Wohlgemuth, R., Furstoss, R. & Woodley, J.M. Towards large-scale synthetic applications of Baeyer–Villiger monooxygenases. Trends Biotechnol. 21, 318–323 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Simpson, H.D., Alphand, V. & Furstoss, R. Asymmetric biocatalysed Baeyer–Villiger oxidation: improvement using a recombinant Escherichia coli whole cell biocatalyst in the presence of an adsorbent resin. J. Mol. Catal., B Enzym. 16, 101–108 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hilker, I., Gutierrez, M.C., Alphand, V., Wohlgemuth, R. & Furstoss, R. Microbiological transformations 57. Facile and efficient resin-based in situ SFPR preparative scale synthesis of an enantiopure 'unexpected' lactone regioisomer via a Baeyer–Villiger oxidation process. Org. Lett. 6, 1955–1958 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hilker, I., Alphand, V., Wohlgemuth, R. & Furstoss, R. Microbial transformations 59. First kilogram scale asymmetric microbial Baeyer–Villiger oxidation with optimized productivity using a resin-based in situ SFPR strategy. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 92, 702–710 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Delhi, J.R. & Gotor, V. Parallel kinetic resolution of racemic mixtures: a new strategy for the preparation of enantiopure compounds? Chem. Soc. Rev. 31, 365–370 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Andrau, L. et al. An integrated chemoenzymatic synthesis of enantiopure (−)-(1R,5S)-cyclosarkomycin: a sarkomycin precursor. Tetrahedron Lett. 38, 825–826 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Lebreton, J., Alphand, V. & Furstoss, R. A short chemoenzymatic synthesis of (+)-multifidene and (+)-viridiene. Tetrahedron Lett. 37, 1011–1014 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Baldwin, C. & Woodley, J. On oxygen limitation in a whole-cell biocatalytic Baeyer–Villiger oxidation process. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 95, 362–369 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Hilker, I. et al. On the influence of oxygen and cell concentration in an in situ SFPR whole-cell biocatalytic Baeyer–Villiger oxidation process. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 93, 1138–1144 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Berezina, N., Kozma, E., Furstoss, R. & Alphand, V. Asymmetric Baeyer–Villiger biooxidation of α-substituted cyanocyclohexanones: influence of the substituent length on regio- and enantioselectivity. Adv. Synth. Catal. 349, 2049–2053 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by European Community Fifth Framework Program (QLK3-CT2001-00403). The Swiss Federal Office for Education and Science (BBW) and the Foundation Ramón Areces are acknowledged for postdoctoral fellowships.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Biosciences CNRS 3005, Aix-Marseille Université, Avenue Escadre Normandie-Niemen, Marseille, 13397, France

    Iris Hilker, Maria C Gutiérrez, Roland Furstoss & Véronique Alphand

  2. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University College of London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK

    John Ward

  3. Research Specialties, Sigma-Aldrich, Industriestrasse 25, Buchs, CH-9470, Switzerland

    Roland Wohlgemuth

Authors
  1. Iris Hilker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Maria C Gutiérrez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Roland Furstoss
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. John Ward
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Roland Wohlgemuth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Véronique Alphand
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Véronique Alphand.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

One of the authors (RW) is employed by Sigma Aldrich Ldt. Another one (IH) was employed at that time. We collaborated via a European “demonstration” program (EC Framework 5). This company also provided us with most of chemicals and resins.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hilker, I., Gutiérrez, M., Furstoss, R. et al. Preparative scale Baeyer–Villiger biooxidation at high concentration using recombinant Escherichia coli and in situ substrate feeding and product removal process. Nat Protoc 3, 546–554 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2007.532

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2007.532

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing