Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Protocol
  • Published:

Labeling, detection and identification of newly synthesized proteomes with bioorthogonal non-canonical amino-acid tagging

Nature Protocols volume 2, pages 532–540 (2007)Cite this article

Abstract

A major aim of proteomics is the identification of proteins in a given proteome at a given metabolic state. This protocol describes the step-by-step labeling, purification and detection of newly synthesized proteins in mammalian cells using the non-canonical amino acid azidohomoalanine (AHA). In this method, metabolic labeling of newly synthesized proteins with AHA endows them with the unique chemical functionality of the azide group. In the subsequent click chemistry tagging reaction, azide-labeled proteins are covalently coupled to an alkyne-bearing affinity tag. After avidin-based affinity purification and on-resin trypsinization, the resulting peptide mixture is subjected to tandem mass spectrometry for identification. In combination with deuterated leucine-based metabolic colabeling, candidate proteins can be immediately validated. Bioorthogonal non-canonical amino-acid tagging can be combined with any subcellular fractionation, immunopurification or other proteomic method to identify specific subproteomes, thereby reducing sample complexity and enabling the identification of subtle changes in a proteome. This protocol can be completed in 5 days.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: The BONCAT strategy for labeling, detection and identification of newly synthesized proteins.
Figure 2: Dot blot analysis of AHA versus Met-treated samples.
Figure 3: Western blot analysis of AHA versus Met-treated sample purification fractions.
Figure 4: Structure of AHA-based modifications.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pandey, A. & Mann, M. Proteomics to study genes and genomes. Nature 405, 837–846 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. de Godoy, L. et al. Status of complete proteome analysis by mass spectrometry: SILAC labeled yeast as a model system. Genome Biol. 7, R50 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mootha, V.K. et al. Integrated analysis of protein composition, tissue diversity, and gene regulation in mouse mitochondria. Cell 115, 629–640 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Andersen, J.S. et al. Nucleolar proteome dynamics. Nature 433, 77–83 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Collins, M.O. et al. Molecular characterization and comparison of the components and multiprotein complexes in the postsynaptic proteome. J. Neurochem. 97 (suppl. 1): 16–23 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Schrimpf, S.P. et al. Proteomic analysis of synaptosomes using isotope-coded affinity tags and mass spectrometry. Proteomics 5, 2531–2541 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gavin, A.C. et al. Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes. Nature 415, 141–147 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ho, Y. et al. Systematic identification of protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by mass spectrometry. Nature 415, 180–183 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Chang, E.J., Archambault, V., McLachlin, D.T., Krutchinsky, A.N. & Chait, B.T. Analysis of protein phosphorylation by hypothesis-driven multiple-stage mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 76, 4472–4483 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Garcia, B.A., Shabanowitz, J. & Hunt, D.F. Analysis of protein phosphorylation by mass spectrometry. Methods 35, 256–264 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Peters, E.C., Brock, A. & Ficarro, S.B. Exploring the phosphoproteome with mass spectrometry. Mini Rev. Med. Chem. 4, 313–324 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Mann, M. & Jensen, O.N. Proteomic analysis of post-translational modifications. Nat. Biotechnol. 21, 255–261 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Xu, P. & Peng, J. Dissecting the ubiquitin pathway by mass spectrometry. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1764, 1940–1947 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Freeman, W.M. & Hemby, S.E. Proteomics for protein expression profiling in neuroscience. Neurochem. Res. 29, 1065–1081 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lilley, K.S. & Friedman, D.B. All about DIGE: quantification technology for differential-display 2D-gel proteomics. Expert Rev. Proteomics 1, 401–409 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Gygi, S.P. et al. Quantitative analysis of complex protein mixtures using isotope-coded affinity tags. Nat. Biotechnol. 17, 994–999 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ross, P.L. et al. Multiplexed protein quantitation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using amine-reactive isobaric tagging reagents. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 3, 1154–1169 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Washburn, M.P., Ulaszek, R., Deciu, C., Schieltz, D.M. & Yates, J.R., 3rd . Analysis of quantitative proteomic data generated via multidimensional protein identification technology. Anal. Chem. 74, 1650–1657 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ong, S.E. et al. Stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture, SILAC, as a simple and accurate approach to expression proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 1, 376–386 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Dieterich, D.C., Link, A.J., Graumann, J., Tirrell, D.A. & Schuman, E.M. Selective identification of newly synthesized proteins in mammalian cells using bioorthogonal noncanonical amino acid tagging (BONCAT). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 9482–9487 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Prescher, J.A. & Bertozzi, C.R. Chemistry in living systems. Nat. Chem. Biol. 1, 13–21 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Griffin, R.J. The medicinal chemistry of the azido group. Prog. Med. Chem. 31, 121–232 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kho, Y. et al. A tagging-via-substrate technology for detection and proteomics of farnesylated proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 12479–12484 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kiick, K.L., Saxon, E., Tirrell, D.A. & Bertozzi, C.R. Incorporation of azides into recombinant proteins for chemoselective modification by the Staudinger ligation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 19–24 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Link, A.J. & Tirrell, D.A. Cell surface labeling of Escherichia coli via copper(I)-catalyzed [3+2] cycloaddition. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125, 11164–11165 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Link, A.J., Vink, M.K. & Tirrell, D.A. Presentation and detection of azide functionality in bacterial cell surface proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 10598–10602 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Luchansky, S.J., Goon, S. & Bertozzi, C.R. Expanding the diversity of unnatural cell-surface sialic acids. Chembiochem 5, 371–374 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Luchansky, S.J. et al. Constructing azide-labeled cell surfaces using polysaccharide biosynthetic pathways. Methods Enzymol. 362, 249–272 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Mahal, L.K., Yarema, K.J. & Bertozzi, C.R. Engineering chemical reactivity on cell surfaces through oligosaccharide biosynthesis. Science 276, 1125–1128 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Saxon, E. et al. Investigating cellular metabolism of synthetic azidosugars with the Staudinger ligation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124, 14893–14902 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Rostovtsev, V.V., Green, L.G., Fokin, V.V. & Sharpless, K.B. A stepwise huisgen cycloaddition process: copper(I)-catalyzed regioselective “ligation” of azides and terminal alkynes. Angew Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 41, 2596–2599 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Mangold, J.B., Mischke, M.R. & LaVelle, J.M. Azidoalanine mutagenicity in Salmonella: effect of homologation and alpha-methyl substitution. Mutat. Res. 216, 27–33 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Wang, Q. et al. Bioconjugation by copper(I)-catalyzed azide-alkyne [3 + 2] cycloaddition. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125, 3192–3193 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Eng, J., McCormack, A.L. & Yates, A.J. An approach to correlate tandem mass spectral data of peptides with amino acid sequences in a protein database. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 5, 976–989 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Perkins, D.N., Pappin, D.J., Creasy, D.M. & Cottrell, J.S. Probability-based protein identification by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data. Electrophoresis 20, 3551–3567 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Craig, R. & Beavis, R.C. TANDEM: matching proteins with tandem mass spectra. Bioinformatics 20, 1466–1467 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Fenyo, D. & Beavis, R.C. A method for assessing the statistical significance of mass spectrometry-based protein identifications using general scoring schemes. Anal. Chem. 75, 768–774 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Tabb, D.L., McDonald, W.H. & Yates, J.R., 3rd . DTASelect and contrast: tools for assembling and comparing protein identifications from shotgun proteomics. J. Proteome Res. 1, 21–26 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Keller, A., Nesvizhskii, A.I., Kolker, E. & Aebersold, R. Empirical statistical model to estimate the accuracy of peptide identifications made by MS/MS and database search. Anal. Chem. 74, 5383–5392 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Nesvizhskii, A.I., Keller, A., Kolker, E. & Aebersold, R. A statistical model for identifying proteins by tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 75, 4646–4658 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Link, A.J. et al. Direct analysis of protein complexes using mass spectrometry. Nat. Biotechnol. 17, 676–682 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Washburn, M.P., Wolters, D. & Yates, J.R., 3rd . Large-scale analysis of the yeast proteome by multidimensional protein identification technology. Nat. Biotechnol. 19, 242–247 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Schieltz, D.M. & Washburn, M.P. Analysis of complex protein mixtures using multidimensional protein identification technology (MuDPIT). Cold Spring Harbor Protocols 2006 (10.1101/pdb.prot4555).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank S.A. Kim and E.H. Friedrich for critical reading of the manuscript. This work was supported by the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, the Beckman Institute at the California Institute of Technology and NIH (R21DA020589 to E.M.S.). MS analysis was performed at the MS facility of the laboratory of R.J. Deshaies (Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Caltech), which is supported by the Beckman Institute at Caltech and a grant from the Department of Energy to R.J.D. and Barbara J. Wold. D.C.D. is supported by the German Academy for Natural Scientists Leopoldina (BMBF-LPD9901/8-95). J.G. was supported by R.J. Deshaies through Howard Hughes Medical Institute funds. A.J.L. was supported by a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship.

Author information

Author notes

  1. A James Link & Johannes Graumann

    Present address: Present address: Department of Chemical Engineering and Institute for Cellular and Molecular Biology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, USA (A.J.L). Department of Proteomics and Signal Transduction, Max-Planck-Institute for Biochemistry, Martinsried 82152, Germany (J.G.).,

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Biology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, 91125, California, USA

    Daniela C Dieterich, Jennifer J Lee, Johannes Graumann & Erin M Schuman

  2. Division of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, 91125, California, USA

    A James Link & David A Tirrell

Authors
  1. Daniela C Dieterich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jennifer J Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Johannes Graumann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. David A Tirrell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Erin M Schuman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniela C Dieterich.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dieterich, D., Lee, J., Link, A. et al. Labeling, detection and identification of newly synthesized proteomes with bioorthogonal non-canonical amino-acid tagging. Nat Protoc 2, 532–540 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2007.52

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2007.52

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing