Lithium remains the gold standard in treating bipolar disorder but has unwanted toxicity and side effects. We previously reported that ebselen inhibits inositol monophosphatase (IMPase) and exhibits lithium-like effects in animal models through lowering of inositol. Ebselen has been tested in clinical trials for other disorders, enabling us to determine for the first time the effect of a blood–brain barrier-penetrant IMPase inhibitor on human central nervous system (CNS) function. We now report that in a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with healthy participants, acute oral ebselen reduced brain myo-inositol in the anterior cingulate cortex, consistent with CNS target engagement. Ebselen decreased slow-wave sleep and affected emotional processing by increasing recognition of some emotions, decreasing latency time in the acoustic startle paradigm, and decreasing the reinforcement of rewarding stimuli. In summary, ebselen affects the phosphoinositide cycle and has CNS effects on surrogate markers that may be relevant to the treatment of bipolar disorder that can be tested in future clinical trials.
Bipolar disorder affects 1–3% of the world population and is one of the biggest disease burdens in industrialized countries (Lopez et al, 2006). Lithium is the most effective treatment for bipolar disorder, as it controls both mania and depression and decreases suicide (BALANCE investigators and collaborators et al, 2010), but the therapeutic window is small, and it has several unwanted side effects (McKnight et al, 2012), some medically serious. Other drugs such as anticonvulsants and antipsychotics used to treat bipolar disorder are not as effective in stabilizing mood and preventing suicide as lithium (McKnight et al, 2012). Indeed, no agent has been specifically developed as a mood stabilizer for bipolar disorder on the basis of an understanding of the illness or mechanism of action of effective treatments (Conn and Roth, 2008).
Rational design of a mood stabilizer could be pursued based on the mechanism of action of lithium, but its therapeutic target remains unknown (Quiroz et al, 2004). Based on clinically relevant lithium concentrations (0.6–1.2 mM), the two most likely targets are glycogen synthase kinase 3 and inositol monophosphatase (IMPase) (Agam et al, 2009; O’Brien and Klein, 2009). Evidence for and against both targets comes from animal studies employing genetic and pharmacological manipulations (Agam et al, 2009; O’Brien and Klein, 2009). However, as certain animal models are reported to be poor predictors of clinical efficacy (Conn and Roth, 2008; Harmer et al, 2011), both therapeutic mechanism and target validation must be evaluated ultimately in humans. In this regard, surrogate efficacy markers in healthy volunteers are emerging as a promising bridge to efficacy studies (Harmer et al, 2011).
Berridge’s ‘inositol depletion hypothesis’ has provided an attractive mechanistic explanation for the action of lithium and a rationale for testing it by predicting a lowering in myo-inositol levels (Berridge et al, 1989). This hypothesis proposes that lithium normalizes signaling in overactive neurons by inhibiting IMPase and depleting myo-inositol. As inositol is poorly blood–brain barrier penetrant, brain cells depend largely on recycling and de novo synthesis rather than uptake, making the central nervous system (CNS) uniquely sensitive to IMPase inhibition (Berridge et al, 1989). The location of IMPase in inositol metabolism enables it to exert control of several diverging downstream pathways including cytosolic calcium, protein kinase C, protein kinase B, and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (Figure 1a). The hypothesis has been tested by measuring myo-inositol levels in animals and humans, but with mixed results possibly because of a combination of compensatory changes during the ramp up to pharmaceutical concentrations in the CNS and lithium inhibition of multiple targets (Davanzo et al, 2003; Moore et al, 1999; Patel et al, 2008; Sharma et al, 1992; Silverstone et al, 2005; Silverstone and McGrath, 2009). The only known selective IMPase inhibitor, L-690,330, developed by Merck, Sharpe, and Dohme, affects the inositol cycle in mouse brain but required high doses (mmol/kg) because of its high polarity and lack of membrane permeability (Atack et al, 1993).
Evaluation of IMPase in humans has not been possible because of the lack of a bioavailable, blood–brain barrier-penetrant inhibitor. Recently, we reported that ebselen inhibited IMPase and caused lithium-like neuropharmacological effects in mice (Singh et al, 2013). Ebselen is a bioavailable antioxidant drug that has been tested in humans for other diseases but has not been marketed (Lynch and Kil, 2009; Parnham and Sies, 2013; Yamaguchi et al, 1998) and can therefore be ‘rescued’ for a new disorder (Cavalla, 2009). We have now used ebselen to determine the effect of IMPase inhibition on CNS function in humans.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The studies were overseen by the Oxford University Clinical Trials and Research Governance team and sponsored by the University of Oxford. Ethical approval was granted from the National Research Ethics Service Committee South Central. Informed consent was obtained from each participant. A safety-monitoring group collated adverse events.
Study Design and Participants
The sleep and inositol study involved 16 healthy participants (6 females and 10 males) in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover design (Figure 1b). Ebselen capsules and identical matching placebo (containing Avicel microcrystalline cellulose) capsules were purchased from Shasun Pharmaceuticals. Ebselen was administered as 3 × 200 mg capsules. The day before the test day, the first dose was administered (by the participant themselves) at 1300 h and then again 2 h before bed. The following morning, within 20 min of waking, participants completed the Leeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (Parrott and Hindmarch, 1980) and side-effects profile using a subjective 4-point rating scale. Participants administered the third dose at 1300 h and were scanned at the Oxford Centre for Clinical Magnetic Resonance Research (OCMR), University of Oxford, at 1500 h. A blood sample was collected at 1615 h and the participants were then fitted with the ambulatory Embla Titanium sleep recorder (Natus Neurology, Middleton, WI) and returned home to sleep as usual. The final dose was administered 2 h before sleeping. The following morning, participants completed the Leeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire and side-effects profile. The study was repeated a week later with the alternative treatment. On completion, participants were asked to guess on which occasion they had taken the ebselen and placebo.
The emotional processing study involved 40 healthy participants, 20 per group, in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group design (Figure 2b). The group demographics and results from baseline screening questionnaires are given in Table 1. The day before the test day, ∼15 min before the administration of the first dose of ebselen/placebo (3 × 200 mg) at ∼0930 h, participants were asked to complete a set of baseline questionnaires: positive and negative affective schedule (Watson et al, 1988), the Befindlichkeit mood and energy questionnaire (Von Zerssen, 1986), the Beck depression inventory, visual analog scales (Bond and Lader, 1974), and a state-anxiety questionnaire (Spielberger et al, 1970). Participants were asked to take the second dose (3 × 200 mg) at ∼2130 h. On the test day, participants took the final dose (3 × 200 mg) at 0915 h in the department. At 1115 h, the participants again completed the above questionnaires as well as one for side effects (a 4-point rating scale) to reveal any drug-related effects. Testing began at 1130 h and was carried out in the same order and by the same researcher, in all cases.
Participant Exclusion Criteria
The exclusion criteria were as follows: history of any axis I psychiatric disorder (determined at screening using the Standard Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Health Disorders-fourth edition); pregnancy or lactation; current usage of any other prescription medication, except the oral contraceptive; any other medical condition; and heavy smokers. Specific exclusion criteria for the sleep and inositol study included fulfilling safety requirements to allow admittance to the scanner, any current or past sleep disorder and claustrophobia, and, for the emotional processing study, prior exposure to the battery of psychological tests, dyslexia, and poor spoken or written English. Participants were asked to abstain from alcohol while participating in the study.
Emotional Processing Tasks
Full details of the tasks are provided in the Supplementary Information Subjects and Methods. The first task was the Auditory Verbal Learning Task (Rey, 1964), interspersed with the Reward and Punishment Learning Task (described in detail below). This was followed by the Emotional Testing Battery conducted as described previously (Harmer et al, 2009; Murphy et al, 2008) that constituted the Facial Emotion Recognition Task, the Emotional Categorization, the Dot Probe Task, the Emotional Recall, and the Emotional Recognition Task. The final task was the Emotion Potentiated Startle Task (Lang et al, 1993). The testing was usually complete in ∼2 h and participants were given breaks at certain designated times. At the end of the study the participants were asked to report whether they thought they were on placebo or ebselen.
Reward and Punishment Learning Task
This computer-based cognitive task is a within-subject assessment of probabilistic learning from negative and positive feedback. It is divided into two separate reward and punishment conditions of 100 trials each. Every participant undertakes both conditions, and the order of presentation of conditions is randomized. In each condition, the 100 trials are divided into blocks of 25 trials (4 blocks of 25 trials per condition). In the reward condition, the person gains points for making the most winning choice, and in the punishment condition, the person does not lose points for making the least losing choice. On each trial, the subject is presented with four decks of cards, each with probabilities of 50%, 60%, 70%, and 80%, respectively, of gaining reward (reward condition) or of generating punishment (punishment condition). One deck of the four will have the most optimal deck of cards. This deck will be the most winning in the reward condition, and the least losing in the punishment condition. Three other nonoptimal decks of cards were presented with the optimal deck. In each trial, the participant is asked to choose one of the four decks with the expectation that over time, the participant will learn which of the four decks is the most optimal deck.
In the reward condition, the participant starts with a score of 0 and is asked to choose the ‘best’ deck, which in this case is the deck with 80% probability of gain. The choice of the optimal deck yields in positive feedback by the addition of 10 points, otherwise nothing. The participant is expected to continue selecting the optimal stimulus after learning it, despite the lack of positive feedback in some of the trials.
In the punishment condition, the participant is asked to avoid the ‘worst deck’ or the deck with the highest probability of punishment. They start with a score of 1000 and if the deck chosen yields punishment, they lose points. The optimal deck in this condition is the 50% probability of loss. Again, the participant is expected to continue selecting the optimal deck after learning it, despite the negative feedback in some of the trials.
The optimal choices for reward (best deck=80% probability of gain) and for loss (best deck=50% probability of loss) are rewarded one point each and added to calculate the total optimal choice accuracy. Learning is calculated by subtracting the total optimal choices made in block 1 from the total optimal choices made in block 4 for each condition.
On each study night, polysomnograms were recorded as each participant slept at home, using the Embla titanium recording system (Natus Neurology Incorporated). Participants retired and rose at their usual time, and this was kept constant for all study nights and all preceding nights. The industry standard montage was used that comprised six electroencephalogram channels (C3-M2, C4-M1, O1-M2, O2-M1, F3-M2, and F4-M1), two electrooculogram channels (E1-M2 and E2-M2), and submentalis electromyogram channels using three electrodes. Polysomnograms were staged in 30-s epochs using the Embla RemLogic sleep diagnostic software (Natus Neurology). RemLogic adheres to the American Academy of Sleep Medicine scoring criteria. In addition, an experienced sleep physiologist who was blind to the treatment status analyzed the polysomnograms.
Proton Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
Spectra were measured using the Siemens Trio 3-Tesla whole body MRI scanner and a 32-channel coil at the OCMR (University of Oxford). A high-resolution T1-weighted MP RAGE (Brant-Zawadzki et al, 1992) image was acquired for accurate MRS voxel placement and subsequent structural analyses (TR=2040 ms, TE=4.7 ms, flip angle=8°, 192 transverse slices, 1-mm isotropic voxels). B0 shimming was achieved using a GRESHIM (Shah et al, 2009), available as a work-in-progress package on the Siemens system. Spectra were measured with a semiadiabatic localization by adiabatic selective refocusing (SEMI-LASER) sequence (TE=28 ms; TR=4s; 64 averages) with variable power radiofrequency pulses with optimized relaxation delays (VAPOR) water suppression and outer volume saturation (Deelchand et al, 2014). Unsuppressed water spectra acquired from the same voxel were used to remove residual eddy current effects and to reconstruct the phased array spectra (Natt et al, 2005). Data were acquired in single-shot mode, that is, a single free induction decay was saved separately. Single-shot spectra were frequency and phase corrected before averaging over 64 scans.
Metabolites were quantified with LCModel (Provencher, 1993) using the unsuppressed water signal as reference. T1-weighted structural images were brain extracted and tissue-type segmented using the Brain Extraction Tool of FMRIB Software Library (FSL) (Smith, 2002) and Automated Segmentation Tool of FMRIB (Zhang et al, 2011). The percentage of gray matter, white matter, and cerebrospinal fluid within the MRS voxel was calculated from the resulting images and used to correct metabolite concentrations for cerebrospinal fluid fraction.
We used two-tailed t-test to compare two means and analysis of variance to compare more than two means followed by Bonferroni post hoc test or t-tests corrected for multiple comparisons. Where possible, actual p-values are provided rather than a cutoff to declare significance or not. For data in which an underlying relationship was evident, we used regression and global nonlinear curve fitting as this provides more statistical power (Motulsky and Christopoulos, 2003).
Ebselen Reduces Myo-Inositol in the Anterior Cingulate Cortex
In studies using mice, ebselen decreased myo-inositol in brain extracts (Singh et al, 2013). To determine whether ebselen inhibits IMPase in vivo in humans, we used proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) to quantify myo-inositol in healthy participants. In a double-blind, randomized crossover experimental design (Figure 1b and Table 1), ebselen reduced myo-inositol in the anterior cingulate cortex but not the occipital cortex (Figure 1c–e). In addition to myo-inositol, we also used MRS to quantify several other metabolites, and although some trends were observed such as an increase in combined glutamine and glutamate and a decrease in ascorbate, creatine, and choline, no changes were significant after correction for multiple comparisons (Supplementary Figure S1). Total creatine (creatine plus phosphocreatine) levels positively correlated with myo-inositol in both the placebo and ebselen groups (Figure 1f).
Ebselen Decreases Slow-Wave Sleep
Many psychotropic drugs used to treat mood disorders, including lithium and antidepressants, have defined effects on sleep (Friston et al, 1989; Sharpley et al, 1994). Lithium extends slow-wave sleep, also termed stage N3 sleep, through a mechanism thought to involve the 5-HT2 receptors (Friston et al, 1989), possibly through inhibition of IMPase. To determine the effects of ebselen on sleep architecture, we monitored sleep in the same healthy participants as in the MRS study (Figure 1b). Ebselen decreased slow-wave sleep (Figure 1g) by reducing the number of slow-wave sleep episodes (p=0.058) rather than the duration of each slow-wave sleep episode (Supplementary Table S1). Ebselen produced no other significant effects on sleep (Supplementary Table S1), and the decrease in slow-wave sleep did not affect either the total sleep time (Supplementary Table S1) or total sleep quality, as reported by the Leeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (Parrott and Hindmarch, 1980) (Supplementary Figure S2). No correlation between the effect of ebselen on slow-wave sleep and myo-inositol was observed (r=0.38, p=0.14; Figure 1h). Taken together, these data show that ebselen decreases slow-wave sleep.
Oral Ebselen is Bioavailable and Well Tolerated
Plasma selenium concentrations have been shown to correlate with plasma levels of ebselen (Fischer et al, 1988; Lynch and Kil, 2009). Using selenium as a surrogate measure of ebselen and its metabolites, we found higher selenium in plasma of the participants taking ebselen than placebo (Figure 1i), demonstrating both compliance with dosing and the bioavailability of oral ebselen in humans, as reported previously (Fischer et al, 1989; Lynch and Kil, 2009; Yamaguchi et al, 1998). In our parallel arm experimental design (Figure 1b), participants who received ebselen then placebo 1 week later would have a predicted remaining amount of ebselen of 0.006% of the initial dose calculated from a reduction of ~14 half-lives (Lynch and Kil, 2009), which should be a sufficient washout time. Plasma selenium levels correlated with the magnitude of decrease in slow-wave sleep (p=0.017; r=0.36), but not with myo-inositol levels (p=0.70). The participants consistently reported the same low number and low intensity of side effects with ebselen as the placebo (Figure 1j), consistent with the acceptable tolerability of ebselen as reported previously (Lynch and Kil, 2009; Parnham and Sies, 2013; Yamaguchi et al, 1998). Although mood questionnaires were administered, ebselen did not induce any changes relative to the placebo (Table 1), but this is not surprising because the dose was acute and even validated antidepressants taken acutely do not alter mood ratings (Harmer et al, 2011). Moreover, participants were healthy volunteers with low levels of negative affect and therefore may be relatively insensitive to change in subjective state.
Ebselen Decreases Reward Stimulus Reinforcement
Many neuropsychiatric disorders, including mania, are associated with an increase in poor decision making because of increased impulsivity and a hypersensitivity to reward (Whitton et al, 2015). As probing such functions invokes tasks that implicitly measure optimal choices made over time, we used a randomized, parallel-arm, experimental design (Figure 2a). To determine the effect of ebselen on decision making and learning, we used a task that tests the ability to distinguish between stimuli (decks of cards) with different probabilistic values of gain or loss, and the influence of learning from positive and negative reinforcement (Figure 2b). The task is divided into two conditions: the reward condition and the punishment condition. Each time the person has to chose one out of four decks of cards where they are likely to gain the most, that is, add points in the reward paradigm or not lose points in the punishment paradigm.
Ebselen had no overall discernable effect on the total correct choices made, when both the reward and loss paradigms were combined together (Figure 2c). However, when the correct choices made for rewarding stimulus and punishing stimulus were analyzed separately, ebselen significantly decreased the total correct reward choices made (p=0.034; Figure 2d), although no significant increase in total correct loss choices made (p=0.14; Figure 2e) was observed. This interaction was further corroborated through a learning measure that showed a significant interaction between the reward and loss paradigms and ebselen (p=0.01), whereby ebselen decreases reward reinforcement and increases punishment reinforcement (p=0.01; Figure 2f). Taken together, these data show that ebselen decreases learning through reward reinforcement.
Ebselen Increases Recognition of Disgust and Happiness in Emotional Processing Tasks
In mood disorders there are alterations in neural circuits regulating emotional processing, emotional regulation, and reward processing (Phillips and Swartz, 2014). Moreover, many psychotropic drugs affect tasks involving these processes (Phillips and Swartz, 2014), and certain emotional processing tasks in healthy participants respond to drugs in a manner that is predictive of clinical effect, suggesting such tasks might provide insight into the ultimate efficacy of new drugs (Harmer et al, 2011). To determine whether ebselen alters emotional processing, we used a battery of computerized tasks designed to tap basic emotional processing and mood responses to positive and negative emotional material. As the tasks have significant learning effects we used naive participants in a randomized parallel experimental design (Figure 2a).
In the facial emotion recognition task, participants are shown randomized pictures of varying degrees (40 for each emotion, 4 per degree) of the emotions anger, disgust, happiness, fear, sadness, and surprise, as well as 10 neutral faces (Figure 3a). Participants given ebselen showed a significant difference in the way they perceived some of these emotional faces (p=0.045; Figure 3b). Ebselen did not affect miscalculations (p=0.10) or sensitivity (p=0.078; Figure 3b). Looking at the recognition of faces over different intensities, clear trends were evident with degrees of emotion (Figure 3c). As statistical power can be gained by fitting data to relationships that are not accounted for in analysis of variance, we applied a curve-fitting analysis using a four-parameter logistic equation (Motulsky and Christopoulos, 2003). Based on this analysis ebselen increased the recognition of anger (p=0.018), disgust (p<0.0001), and happiness (p=0.003), but only disgust and happiness are deemed significant if a Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons (p<0.008) is applied. No differences were found in the recognition of sadness, fear, and surprise between the two groups (Figure 3b and c). Importantly, there was no difference in reaction time observed between the participants on placebo and those on ebselen (Figure 3b). Taken together, these results demonstrate that ebselen affected emotional processes in healthy participants. Ebselen did not affect performance in the Dot Probe (attentional bias), the emotional memory tasks (Supplementary Figure S3), or the Auditory Verbal Learning Task (Supplementary Figure S4).
Ebselen Decreases Latency in the Emotion Potentiated Acoustic Startle Task
Another way of investigating emotional processing is through the effect of emotion on the startle response, one of the most basic and primitive sensory responses to threatening external stimuli (Perry, 1999). Startle is largely modulated by the brain stem, though the emotional modulation might involve the limbic areas (Perry, 1999). To determine whether ebselen affected an emotional potentiated startle response, we monitored the effect of viewing pictures that elicit positive, negative, or neutral emotions on the amplitude and latency of the eye-blink component of the startle response (Figure 4a) (Lang et al, 1993). The participants and study design were the same as in the reward–loss and emotional processing tasks (Figure 2a). Ebselen did not affect the amplitude of response (p=0.51; Figure 4b). The valence of the emotion (pleasant, neutral, and unpleasant) affected the amplitude of the response (p=0.009; Figure 4b), consistent with previous reports (Murphy et al, 2008), and validates the experimental setup. Interestingly, ebselen decreased the latency of response (p=0.012; Figure 4b) to the acoustic stimulus and the decrease in latency associated with ebselen was independent of the emotional valence of the picture (treatment × emotion interaction, p=0.443).
We conducted an experimental medicine study of ebselen in humans with two interrelated goals: first, to determine whether it is warranted to progress the development of ebselen as a possible treatment for bipolar disorder by determining the effect of ebselen on CNS function, and, second, to gain insight into the mechanism of action of ebselen as a putative lithium mimetic. With regard to our first goal, ebselen is well tolerated and exhibited effects on emotional processing, thereby providing a validation step between animal models and trials for clinical efficacy, justifying continued study of ebselen as a potential treatment for bipolar disorder. Importantly, with regard to side effects and toxicity, none have been reported to date for ebselen at the administered doses (Lynch and Kil, 2009; Parnham and Sies, 2013; Yamaguchi et al, 1998), in marked contrast to lithium (McKnight et al, 2012). With regard to our second goal, the data are consistent with ebselen reducing myo-inositol in vivo, thereby indicating target engagement with IMPase.
We identified ebselen through a drug repurposing or rescue approach in which we screened for IMPase inhibitors (Singh et al, 2013). Underlying this approach is that all small molecules exhibit polypharmacology, meaning they affect multiple targets. Ebselen’s polypharmacology (Parnham and Sies, 2013) is a double-edged sword with regard to our goals. As a possible treatment for bipolar disorder, ebselen’s polypharmacology (Parnham and Sies, 2013) is desired as it inhibits two targets shared with lithium and suggested to be therapeutically relevant including IMPase (Berridge et al, 1989; Quiroz et al, 2004) and protein kinase C (Zarate and Manji, 2009). Moreover, ebselen is an antioxidant, inhibits several of the proinflammatory enzymes, and, like lithium, is a neuroprotectant (Parnham and Sies, 2013). In terms of a novel drug for treating bipolar disorder, the most important things are safety and efficacy. Safety seems excellent based on all animal and human studies to date including the current one. Efficacy for bipolar disorder can be tested, and our results show that this is worthwhile as ebselen has effects in emotional processing tasks that are surrogate markers for efficacy (Harmer et al, 2011).
With regard to our second goal of gaining insight into the therapeutic target and mechanism of lithium, ebselen’s polypharmacology complicates definitive conclusions regarding mechanism. All drugs have multiple targets, but insight can be gained by analyzing targets that are shared or unique. Ebselen is ∼20-fold selective for inhibition of IMPase over glycogen synthase kinase-3β (Singh et al, 2013). The main contenders for the therapeutic target of lithium are glycogen synthase kinase-3β and IMPase (Quiroz et al, 2004). As lithium and ebselen affect several targets but IMPase is the known shared target, the most parsimonious explanation for similar effects of lithium and ebselen is inhibition of IMPase. Moreover, using similar logic, it is likely that the side effects and acute toxicity of lithium (McKnight et al, 2012) and its effects on slow-wave sleep (Friston et al, 1989; Sharpley et al, 1994) originate not through IMPase inhibition but through one of its other targets (Quiroz et al, 2004).
That we observed changes in myo-inositol in the anterior cingulate cortex but not the occipital cortex is consistent with the relevance of these regions with regard to bipolar disorder and changes in these regions in response to lithium (Davanzo et al, 2003; Moore et al, 1999; Sharma et al, 1992). Indeed, in studies with lithium where changes in myo-inositol were observed, changes were in the frontal lobes, which are associated with emotional regulation and linked to mood disorders, and not in the occipital, parietal, or temporal regions (Moore et al, 1999). Indeed, this is why we chose to make our measurements in these two regions. As myo-inositol decreases precede and may be predictive of clinical improvement in bipolar disorder (Davanzo et al, 2003; Moore et al, 1999), ebselen may have clinical utility. In comparison, previous studies with lithium in which myo-inositol levels were measured in humans, both in bipolar patients and healthy participants, have yielded mixed results (Davanzo et al, 2003; Moore et al, 1999; Patel et al, 2008; Sharma et al, 1992; Silverstone et al, 2005; Silverstone and McGrath, 2009). Ebselen may have a more immediate and pronounced effect compared with lithium, as it does not have to be slowly titrated to achieve therapeutic concentrations while avoiding toxicity. In addition, we expressed myo-inositol in absolute terms (standardized to cerebrospinal fluid fraction in the voxel), avoiding the influence of possible changes in other metabolites such as creatine that can change with treatment (Silverstone et al, 2005; Silverstone and McGrath, 2009). The magnitude of the decrease in myo-inositol is modest, but steady-state levels might equate to much larger changes in actual metabolic flux. In addition, although we tested a very specific hypothesis relating to whether ebselen was inhibiting IMPase and causing a reduction in brain myo-inositol, alternative explanations exist and could be tested in future experiments such as ebselen inducing a change in kidney function that affected plasma osmolality that would then result in a change in brain myo-inositol where it functions as an osmolyte (Häussinger et al, 1994).
A well-known difficulty in screening novel drugs for their effects on mood is that even with drugs of validated efficacy, it can take several weeks for the effects to manifest (Harmer et al, 2011). This has stimulated an interest in identifying surrogate markers that would show detectable and quantifiable changes after an acute dosing. Even if no mechanistic explanation exists, a reliable surrogate marker can serve as a valuable step in screening compounds, as it would be fast and inexpensive relative to a clinical trial designed to probe efficacy in a given disorder. A particularly promising area for surrogate markers that respond to drugs with validated long-term efficacy in the treatment of mood disorder but show a rapid, reproducible, and quantifiable response is emotional processing (Harmer et al, 2004, 2009, 2011; Murphy et al, 2008; Rock et al, 2010). These tests are designed to tap into the neuronal circuits postulated to be altered in patients with mood disorder and manifest as negative emotional bias in tasks such as recognizing the mood in faces (Harmer et al, 2011). For example, depressed patients demonstrate negative emotional bias in the facial recognition task by being less likely to recognize happiness and more likely to recognize sadness. The utility of these tasks is potentially great because even in healthy subjects, drugs can predictably alter emotional bias and which correlates with the known long-term efficacy of the drugs in treating depression (Harmer et al, 2011).
Ebselen affected emotional processing in healthy participants. The effect sizes are in the moderate range based on Cohen’s d and consistent with the effect size induced by other drugs used in the treatment of mood disorder (Harmer et al, 2004, 2009, 2011; Murphy et al, 2008; Rock et al, 2010). These results provide good evidence to suggest that ebselen is having effects on pathways known to be modulated by drugs currently in use to treat mood disorders. Several of the observed responses to ebselen can be taken as promising in relation to using it in the treatment of bipolar disorder. For example, that ebselen decreases learning through reward reinforcement may be relevant to bipolar disorder given that patients, especially in the manic or hypomanic phases, have an increased tendency to make impulsive decisions, gamble, and are hyperresponsive to rewarding stimuli (Whitton et al, 2015). Ebselen may increase the caution with which a choice is being made that might reduce reckless behavior in bipolar patients or patients with increased impulsivity. Similarly, ebselen increases the recognition of happy faces (positive expression) as well as disgusted faces (negative expression). Antidepressants also show significant effects in this task, but typically increase the relative processing of positive rather than negative facial expressions (Harmer et al, 2004). The effect of ebselen to increase recognition of disgust is intriguing because previous studies with the same task revealed the same trend in medicated euthymic bipolar patients (Harmer et al, 2002). Moreover, untreated students at risk of mood disorders are less able to identify ‘disgust’ accurately (Rock et al, 2010).
A crisis exists in drug development for mental health with industry abandoning research and development on psychiatric disorders because of the lack of both mechanistic understanding and validated targets (Conn and Roth, 2008). This has opened opportunities for academics to pursue strategies such as finding new uses for old drugs termed repurposing for marketed drugs or rescuing for abandoned drugs (Cavalla, 2009; Conn and Roth, 2008). The major promise of these strategies is that they can facilitate the rapid translation of results into humans because the compounds have cleared the early hurdles of drug development. However, development of a marketed drug for a new disease is often prevented by commercial, regulatory, and reimbursement challenges (Cavalla, 2009). In contrast, development of a nonmarketed drug like ebselen for bipolar disorder is more attractive because of enforceable market exclusivity based on a ‘use’ patent (Cavalla, 2009).
Ebselen decreases myo-inositol in brain regions associated with emotional processing consistent with inhibition of IMPase as proposed by the inositol depletion hypothesis (Berridge et al, 1989). These results highlight the potential for developing more selective inhibitors of IMPase or other targets in the phosphoinositol cycle. Ebselen affected performance in several emotional processing tasks. As these tasks are surrogate markers for affective disorders and correlate with efficacy of known mood-modulating drugs (Harmer et al, 2011), it is warranted to test ebselen for efficacy in bipolar disorder.
FUNDING AND DISCLOSURE
This work was supported by a Follow-on Fund grant (BB/J021547/1) from the Biotechnology and Biological Science and the John Fell Oxford University Press Research Fund, University of Oxford. Grant C Churchill, Sridhar R Vasudevan, and Nisha Singh hold a method-of-use patent (WO2012107735 A2) for ebselen in the treatment of bipolar disorder. The other authors declare no conflict of interest.
We thank Steven Knight (Universality of Oxford Centre for Clinical Magnetic Resonance) for expert technical assistance with the MRS.
GCC, SRV, TS, and PJC conceived the study. NS and ALS managed the project. ALS performed and analyzed the sleep studies. UEE performed the MRS studies. CM helped with recruitment. MMH and MAG developed the reward and punishment task. CJH designed the emotional processing studies that were performed and analyzed by NS. NS compiled and analyzed the data with input from all authors. NS and GCC wrote the manuscript with input from all the authors.
Supplementary Information accompanies the paper on the Neuropsychopharmacology website (http://www.nature.com/npp)