The Impact of MeCP2 Loss- or Gain-of-Function on Synaptic Plasticity

Abstract

Methyl-CpG-binding protein 2 (MeCP2) is a transcriptional regulator of gene expression that is an important epigenetic factor in the maintenance and development of the central nervous system. The neurodevelopmental disorders Rett syndrome and MECP2 duplication syndrome arise from loss-of-function and gain-of-function alterations in MeCP2 expression, respectively. Several animal models have been developed to recapitulate the symptoms of Rett syndrome and MECP2 duplication syndrome. Cell morphology, neurotransmission, and cellular processes that support learning and memory are compromised as a result of MeCP2 loss- or gain-of-function. Interestingly, loss-of-MeCP2 function and MeCP2 overexpression trigger diametrically opposite changes in synaptic transmission. These findings indicate that the precise regulation of MeCP2 expression is a key requirement for the maintenance of synaptic and neuronal homeostasis and underscore its importance in central nervous system function. This review highlights the functional role of MeCP2 in the brain as a regulator of synaptic and neuronal plasticity as well as its etiological role in the development of Rett syndrome and MECP2 duplication syndrome.

INTRODUCTION

Epigenetic modifications of chromatin structure can lead to rapid and enduring changes in gene expression that are important in central nervous system development. A number of studies have demonstrated that alterations in epigenetic processes are also important mediators of gene expression in postmitotic neurons suggesting that these key regulatory mechanisms are important in the brain throughout life. Recent work has shown that dysregulation of epigenetic mechanisms underlie several neurodevelopmental disorders including Rubinstein–Taybi syndrome, autism, Rett syndrome (RTT), and MECP2 duplication syndrome among others. This review will focus on the role of the epigenetic factor methyl-CpG-binding protein 2 (MECP2) that is located on the X-chromosome, the dysfunction of which underlies RTT and MECP2 duplication syndrome.

In 1999, MECP2 was identified as the gene that causes RTT (Amir et al, 1999). Patients with RTT are typically females who appear to develop normally up to 6–18 months of age and then begin to regress with the loss of social and communication skills and development of severe motor and autonomic abnormalities. Although there are hundreds of identified disease-causing MECP2 mutations, it is the loss-of-function of the MECP2 protein that is associated with RTT. Gain-of-function has also been identified in humans, typically through duplication or triplication of the MECP2 gene, and is associated with the more recently defined neurodevelopmental disorder MECP2 duplication syndrome. These bidirectional associations point to a fundamental role for MECP2 in the brain and demonstrate the importance of precisely controlled MECP2 expression for normal development and neuronal function (Chao and Zoghbi, 2012). The monogenic determinant of RTT and MECP2 duplication syndrome has allowed for successful generation of mouse models for these disorders, both of which are the subject of this review.

MeCP2 LOSS-OF-FUNCTION IS ASSOCIATED WITH RETT SYNDROME

MECP2 is a member of the methyl-binding domain family of proteins. MECP2 is well characterized as a transcription factor important for controlling gene expression through the interpretation and regulation of epigenetic markers. Initial studies identified two key functional domains—a methyl-DNA-binding domain important for MECP2's interaction with methylated cytosine residues located near target genes and a transcriptional repression domain that governs the formation of co-repressor protein complexes such as histone deactylases (Nan et al, 1998). The discovery of MECP2 target genes, however, has proven a rather daunting task. Early-on large-scale expression arrays revealed only subtle changes in gene expression (Traynor et al, 2002; Tudor et al, 2002). Additional research into alternative functions of MECP2 suggests that the protein can also influence RNA splicing as well as activate gene expression (Chahrour et al, 2008; Lasalle and Yasui, 2009; Young et al, 2005). This range of MECP2 functions indicates a complex assortment of possible mechanisms leading to neurological dysfunction in RTT and MECP2 duplication syndrome.

Significant insight into the functional consequences of MeCP2 in the brain has come from the study of transgenic mice. A number of previously written comprehensive review articles have helped consolidate the past 10+ years of research performed on Mecp2-deficient mice, the conventional animal model of RTT (Calfa et al, 2011; Moretti et al, 2006; Na and Monteggia, 2011). Studies of mice with various temporal and spatial deletions of Mecp2 have revealed numerous morphological changes and alterations in synaptic transmission and plasticity that likely underlie the observed cognitive and behavioral deficits reminiscent of human RTT. As more discoveries are made, questions are being asked as to whether the loss of Mecp2 results in neurological malfunction during development and maturity, or if perhaps MeCP2 has a more fundamental role in the maintenance of synapse function and neuronal connectivity (Guy et al, 2011).

MeCP2 KNOCKOUT MOUSE MODELS

First attempts at generating constitutive Mecp2 knockout (KO) mice resulted in early lethality, with hemizygous males dying at around 7–10 weeks (Chen et al, 2001; Guy et al, 2001). Overt phenotypes included motor deficits and respiratory abnormalities along with reduced brain weight and neuronal size, indicators that loss of MeCP2 was primarily affecting the brain. Mice as young as 2–4 weeks of age displayed reduced cortical thickness, increased neuronal density, and immature synapse formation (Fukuda et al, 2005). The severity of these neurological phenotypes promoted the generation of brain-specific Mecp2 KOs. Deletion of Mecp2 using the loxP system of recombination in which floxed MeCP2 were crossed with a Nestin-Cre mouse line specifically reduced expression of the gene in neurons and glia as early as embryonic day (E)11 (Chen et al, 2001; Guy et al, 2001). These mice developed normally for the first few weeks and then displayed similar features as constitutive KO mice, including abnormal gait, hindlimb clasping, and shortened lifespan. A Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II promoter driving Cre recombination (CamK-Cre93)-mediated conditional Mecp2 KO mouse, in which deletion occurs in forebrain neurons during early postnatal development, showed similar yet delayed and less severe symptoms. Subsequent behavioral characterization of Camk-Cre conditional Mecp2 KO mice revealed additional impairments in motor coordination, increased anxiety, abnormal social behavior, and deficits in learning and memory (Gemelli et al, 2006). Together, these mice demonstrate the necessity of MeCP2 in neurons, particularly during postnatal phases of development, indicating a possible role in neuronal maturation.

Another Mecp2 transgenic mouse was created in which the allele was truncated at amino-acid residue 308 (Mecp2308/y), similar to particular mutations observed in RTT patients. These mice appear normal up to about 6 weeks and then begin to develop many of the same neurological deficits as Mecp2 null mice (Shahbazian et al, 2002). Symptomatic Mecp2308/y phenotypes include hypoactivity, forepaw rubbing, hindlimb clasping, tremors, seizures, ataxia, and motor dysfunction. Abnormal diurnal activity, nesting, and social behavior were also observed in these mice (Moretti et al, 2006). Additional behavioral tests of learning and memory as well as electrophysiological measurements of synaptic function have been performed on Mecp2308/y mice. Contextual fear conditioning, Morris water maze, and social recognition tests revealed deficits in various hippocampal-dependent memory behaviors (Moretti et al, 2006). These data recapitulate the learning and memory deficits that are consistently seen in RTT patients and underscore the importance of MeCP2 in learning and memory processes. Thus, it logically follows that neuronal processes that underlie learning and memory may be affected by MeCP2 dysfunction.

A variety of studies have identified and explored a role for MeCP2 in specific brain areas. The anxiety and impaired motor coordination phenotypes observed in Mecp2 mutant mice point to the amygdala and cerebellum as particular regions of interest (Gemelli et al, 2006; Pelka et al, 2006). Mecp2 knockdown using viral-mediated recombination targeted specifically at the basolateral amygdala was sufficient to induce a heightened anxiety response and impair amygdala-dependent learning and memory when compared with control mice (Adachi et al, 2009). Utilizing various cell-type-specific gene promoters, several conditional Mecp2 KO mice have been generated. Sim1-Mecp2 KO mice with targeted deletion of Mecp2 in the hypothalamus displayed obesity, increased aggressive behavior, and elevated corticosterone levels in response to stress (Fyffe et al, 2008). Pet1-Mecp2 mice with gene knockdown targeted to serotonergic neurons also demonstrated increased aggression, whereas tyrosine hydroxylase-Mecp2 KO mice that have reduced Mecp2 expression in dopaminergic and noradrenergic neurons showed impaired motor abilities (Samaco et al, 2009). Finally, mice lacking MeCP2 in GABAergic neurons presented motor dysfunction, altered social behavior, and spatial memory deficits (Chao et al, 2010).

The phenotypic effects of Mecp2 mutations resemble that observed in mouse models in which MeCP2 is knocked down, indicating that general loss-of-function, regardless of how it is induced, is sufficient to recapitulate the behavioral symptoms that are characteristic of RTT: anxiety, impaired learning, and memory as well as impaired motor coordination. Although there have been many studies examining MeCP2 loss-of-function in animal models, the impact of MeCP2 overexpression in animal models is only beginning to be elucidated.

MeCP2 GAIN-OF-FUNCTION IS ASSOCIATED WITH MECP2 DUPLICATION SYNDROME

MECP2 duplication syndrome is inherited in an X-linked manner with 100% penetrance in males with carrier mothers. Females are typically asymptomatic carriers although a recent report has shown that heterozygous females display some core features of MECP2 duplication syndrome including anxiety, depression, and an autistic-like phenotype (Ramocki et al, 2009). MECP2 duplication syndrome has been associated with duplications of Xq28, which includes the MECP2 gene (Smyk et al, 2008). Clinical cases of MECP2 triplication have been documented and it is noteworthy that these patients have far more severe symptoms compared with those diagnosed with MECP2 duplication syndrome (Tang et al, 2012) indicating that symptom severity does not necessarily plateau with MECP2 duplication syndrome.

This debilitating neurodevelopmental disorder is marked by severe mental retardation, stunted motor development, early onset hypotonia, epileptic seizures, as well as progressive spasticity (Van Esch, 2012). A majority of patients diagnosed with MECP2 duplication syndrome are susceptible to severe recurrent respiratory infections, which contributes to a significantly reduced lifespan of 25 years in 50% of affected individuals (Ramocki et al, 2010; Van Esch, 2012). Other hallmark symptoms include autistic-like features, anxiety, stereotypic hand movements, and spontaneous and intermittent writhing of the arms, hands or head (Ramocki et al, 2010). Motor dysfunction is a significant core symptom of MECP2 duplication syndrome; affected patients show delays in basic developmental milestones such as sitting, crawling, and walking (Van Esch, 2012). MECP2 duplication syndrome patients also show general hypoactivity although one case of MECP2 duplication syndrome has reported hyperkinesis (Budisteanu et al, 2011). Speech development is substantially impaired in affected individuals with many patients speaking first words between the ages of 18 months and 4 years of age. Moreover, 80% of male patients regress in speech development and eventually lose all ability to communicate verbally (Ramocki et al, 2010). These cognitive and motor deficits may be the result of epileptic seizures that afflict many MECP2 duplication syndrome patients (Van Esch, 2012). The severity and early onset of these symptoms present a particular challenge to affected individuals as well as family members and thus basic research is imperative to understand the etiology of this disorder.

ANIMAL MODELS OF MECP2 DUPLICATION SYNDROME

To generate MeCP2 overexpression mice, a research study used the approach of using a large genomic clone that contained the entire human MECP2 locus (Collins et al, 2004). Four viable lines of MeCP2 overexpressing mice were created: MeCP2-TG1, MeCP2-TG3, MeCP2-TG11, and MeCP2-TG 22 all with varying levels of protein expression. The MeCP2-TG1, MeCP2-TG3, MeCP2-TG11, and MeCP2-TG22 lines expressed 2-, 7-, 1-, and 2-fold higher levels of endogenous MeCP2 protein, respectively. Interestingly, phenotype severity corresponded with protein level; mouse lines with high levels of MeCP2 displayed a more exacerbated phenotype compared with mice from lower expressing lines. Of the phenotypes reported from these mice, forepaw clasping, aggressiveness, hypoactivity, as well as kyphosis were observed. It was also found that the MeCP2-TG1 mice developed seizures that worsened with age and that corresponded to abnormal EEG patterns. The earliest lethality was observed in the highest expression line of MeCP2-TG mice with MeCP2-TG3 mice dying by 3 weeks of age while MeCP2-TG1 mice died between 20 weeks of age and 1 year. Additional experiments were conducted on MeCP2-TG1 mice because of their viability and because the MeCP2 protein levels mirrored that seen in clinical populations of MECP2 duplication syndrome. In depth behavioral characterization of MeCP2-TG1 mice demonstrated accelerated motor learning and enhanced contextual fear conditioning, with no obvious anxiety-like phenotype (Collins et al, 2004).

An exciting area of research has been examining whether restoring MeCP2 expression in the Mecp2 null animals would also rescue behavioral phenotypes. In an elegant set of experiments, it was shown that activation of MeCP2 expression reverses some of the neurological phenotypes in a MeCP2 null mouse (Guy et al, 2007). In a separate study, it was demonstrated that crossing a mouse line overexpressing MECP2 in the tau locus (Tau-Mecp2), which results in specific overexpression of MeCP2 in postmitotic neurons, with a Mecp2 null mice was able to rescue specific phenotypes (Luikenhuis et al, 2004). Collectively, these two studies indicate that the neurological deficits/phenotypes are not simply due to neurodevelopmental abnormalities but rather to a specific impairment of Mecp2 function that, when corrected, may provide a viable treatment option (Luikenhuis et al, 2004). Of note, the Tau-Mecp2 mice recapitulated aspects of MECP2 duplication syndrome, including profound motor dysfunction characterized by side-to-side swaying, tremors, and gait ataxia (Luikenhuis et al, 2004).

Our laboratory recently examined the Tau-Mecp2 mice in an array of behavioral paradigms (Na et al, 2012). A heightened anxiety-like phenotype in Tau-Mecp2 mice was demonstrated by both elevated plus maze and dark–light tests suggesting that MeCP2 overexpression is sufficient to recapitulate the anxiety phenotype observed in MECP2 duplication syndrome patients. Tau-Mecp2 mice also had deficits in motor learning reminiscent of motor impairments commonly observed in afflicted individuals. Learning and memory was also assessed in these mice and using fear conditioning paradigms it was discovered that Tau-Mecp2 mice displayed a significant increase in freezing 24h after training. Further analysis, however, revealed that these animals are not necessarily better at associative learning compared with controls, but actually have significant deficits in extinction learning. Additional studies using novel object recognition confirmed that this mouse line does indeed have impairments in multiple forms of learning and memory (Na et al, 2012). These results show that neuronal overexpression of MeCP2 has detrimental effects on learning and memory processes and produces an increased anxiety-like phenotype. Therefore, the Tau-Mecp2 mouse model may be useful for developing treatments for MECP2 duplication syndrome and could yield insight into downstream mechanisms affected by MeCP2 overexpression. Further experiments will be necessary to resolve the differences observed between the Tau-Mecp2 and the MeCP2-TG mouse lines.

LOSS- OR GAIN-OF-MeCP2 FUNCTION HAS DELETERIOUS EFFECTS ON DENDRITIC MORPHOLOGY

Alterations in MECP2 expression have been shown to impact dendritic plasticity. Post-mortem studies of RTT patients revealed lower hippocampal spine density and reductions in dendritic branching of CA1 pyramidal cells and decreased spine density in the frontal, parietal, temporal, and occipital cortices (Armstrong et al, 1995; Armstrong, 2001; Belichenko and Dahlstrom, 1995). In addition, neuronal cell size (Chen et al, 2001; Hagberg et al, 2001) and white matter volume are reduced, whereas there is also evidence of cerebellar degeneration in RTT patients (Reardon et al, 2010). Mouse models of RTT have demonstrated similar reductions in dendritic complexity and cell size (Fukuda et al, 2005; Kishi and Macklis, 2004; Kriaucionis and Bird, 2003; Zoghbi, 2003) with smaller cell size and increased density of neurons (Chen et al, 2001) and reduced brain volume in the amygdala, hippocampus, and striatum in loss-of-function models (Stearns et al, 2007).

The rare occurrence of MECP2 duplication syndrome patients has yielded limited post-mortem anatomical and morphological analysis. Nevertheless, in vitro experiments have shown that overexpression or elimination of MeCP2 levels in hippocampal and cortical cultures decreases dendritic arbor complexity and spine density (Chapleau et al, 2009; Kishi and Macklis, 2010; Zhou et al, 2006) although overexpression of MeCP2 has been shown to increase glutamateric synapse number (Chao et al, 2007). These abnormalities in dendritic branching and spine number may suggest a mechanism whereby MeCP2 dysfunction ultimately compromises CNS plasticity and as such may be a contributing factor to the learning and memory deficits that are a hallmark symptom of disorders related to Mecp2 mutations.

LOSS- OR GAIN-OF-MeCP2 FUNCTION INFLUENCES SYNAPTIC PLASTICITY

Changes in presynaptic function can be electrophysiologically assessed by paired pulse stimulation, a form of short-term plasticity that is indicative of the probability of neurotransmitter release (Citri and Malenka, 2008). In this paradigm, two stimulations are given at varying interstimulus intervals and the slope of the second response is compared with the first. A depression in the second response relative to the first response is due to either inactivation of calcium or voltage-dependent sodium channels and is indicative of an increased probability of neurotransmitter release. Conversely, a facilitation in the second response would suggest a decreased probability of neurotransmitter release therefore residual calcium from the first stimulation presumably would contribute to the magnitude of the second response (Citri and Malenka, 2008). Loss-of-Mecp2 function has been associated with reduced paired pulse ratios and faster excitatory postsynaptic response depression, measures of short-term synaptic plasticity (Asaka et al, 2006; Moretti et al, 2006; Nelson et al, 2006). Alternatively, gain-of-Mecp2 function has been shown to augment paired pulse responses (Collins et al, 2004; Na et al, 2012) suggesting a bidirectional relationship between short-term plasticity and MeCP2 levels in which MeCP2 levels directly affect either calcium concentration in the presynaptic terminal or perhaps may alter proteins involved in neurotransmitter release. Levels of synaptophysin-1, synaptotagmin-1, and synaptobrevin-2, proteins that mediate presynaptic function, are not differentially affected by MeCP2 loss-of-function (Asaka et al, 2006). These data, however, do not rule out the possibility that other presynaptic proteins are influenced by MeCP2 expression. It is clear that in general MeCP2 loss- or gain-of-function mutations alter mechanisms associated with presynaptic function.

Long-term potentiation (LTP) and long-term depression (LTD) are forms of synaptic plasticity that are believed to underlie long-term memory formation. Impairments in LTP and LTD induction and/or maintenance have been correlated with general learning and memory deficits and point to enduring alterations in synaptic plasticity/connectivity. For these reasons, the study of LTP and LTD has become a powerful tool in understanding neurobiological mechanisms affected by disruptions in MeCP2 function. Schaffer-collateral LTP and LTD are significantly attenuated in symptomatic Mecp2 null mice as well as in mice expressing disease-causing Mecp2 mutations (Asaka et al, 2006; Moretti et al, 2006; Weng et al, 2011). Impaired synaptic plasticity has also been observed in hippocampal slices from Mecp2 null mice and in cortical slices from Mecp2308/y mice (Asaka et al, 2006; Moretti et al, 2006), suggesting that these changes in synaptic plasticity consistently result from the loss of MeCP2.

Hippocampal LTP has also been examined in the MeCP2 overexpression mouse lines. The MECP2-TG1 and TG3 lines showed enhanced hippocampal LTP responses compared with littermate controls (Collins et al, 2004). In contrast, the Tau-Mecp2 mice displayed attenuated hippocampal LTP responses (Na et al, 2012). A number of likely factors may explain the phenotypic differences between the two mouse lines, including the expression pattern of MeCP2. Although there is still much work needed to explain these differences, it is evident that alterations in MeCP2 expression influence long-term synaptic plasticity Figure 1.

Figure 1
figure1

Schematic representation of the cellular effects of MeCP2 loss- or gain-of-function. Miniature excitatory postsynaptic current (mEPSC) frequency is bidirectionally affected by decreased or increased MeCP2 expression with a positive correlation between levels of MeCP2 expression and spontaneous excitatory transmission. Short-term plasticity as measured by paired pulse stimulation is also bidirectionally regulated by MeCP2 expression with decreased expression and increased expression resulting in increased and decreased neurotransmitter release probability, respectively. Dendritic spine density is significantly altered by MeCP2 levels with decreased expression associated with lower spine density and increased expression associated with greater spine density (although lower spine density has also been reported following MeCP2 overexpression (Chapleau et al, 2009)). Long-term potentiation (LTP) does not appear bidirectionally influenced by MeCP2 expression as both knockout and overexpressing mice show similar deficits in LTP magnitude and maintenance (but see also Collins et al, 2004).

PowerPoint slide

MeCP2 PHOSPHORYLATION HAS A ROLE IN NEURONAL PLASTICITY

External cues can activate specific intracellular signaling cascades and thereby impact gene expression. Recent work has shown that membrane depolarization induces de novo phosphorylation of MeCP2 at serine amino-acid residue 421 (S421) that may regulate Bdnf transcription (Chen et al, 2003; Zhou et al, 2006) although activity-dependent DNA methylation involving dissociation of the MeCP2 repression complex may also regulate Bdnf transcription (Martinowich et al, 2003). Neuronal activity induces differing phosphorylation states of MeCP2 and may be an important mechanism through which MeCP2 regulates neuronal plasticity through activity-dependent gene transcription. Tao et al (2009) have proposed that MeCP2 phosphorylation may provide a regulatory ‘switch’ such that at rest, S80 phosphorylation binds MeCP2 to chromatin but during depolarization S421 phosphorylation allows MeCP2 to dissociate from chromatin thereby providing a transcriptionally permissive state. This activity-dependent phosphorylation of MeCP2 appears to have widespread effects on synaptic plasticity (Li et al, 2011) as mice in which phosphorylation at S421 are lacking display enhancements in LTP, increased excitatory synaptogenesis, as well as improvements in hippocampal-related learning and memory tests (Li et al, 2011). Neuronal activity also triggers dephosphorylation of MeCP2 at serine amino-acid 80 (S80), which alters transcription of various genes (Tao et al, 2009). Although phosphorylation of MeCP2 is implicated as a key regulator of activity-dependent gene expression, there is still much work to do to identify the target genes involved in these critical processes. Moreover, it would not be surprising if other key phosphorylation sites on MeCP2 were identified and shown to have important roles in impacting MeCP2 activity and ultimately gene expression that mediates effects on short- and long-term synaptic plasticity as well as behavioral processes.

LOSS- OR GAIN-OF-MeCP2 EXPRESSION BIDIRECTIONALLY AFFECTS EXCITATORY NEUROTRANSMISSION

Recordings from cortical and hippocampal slices and primary hippocampal cultures prepared from Mecp2-deficient mice indicate a fundamental imbalance between excitation and inhibition (Kavalali et al, 2011). Evaluation of spontaneous and miniature postsynaptic currents and field potentials suggest decreased excitatory and increased inhibitory neurotransmission in MeCP2-deficient hippocampal cultures (Chao et al, 2007; Dani et al, 2005; Nelson et al, 2006; Tropea et al, 2009), whereas analysis of evoked excitatory postsynaptic currents and short-term synaptic plasticity indicate enhanced excitatory drive that may manifest itself through the seizures and tremors observed in Mecp2 KO mice (Asaka et al, 2006; Moretti et al, 2006; Nelson et al, 2011). These disparate findings between excitatory balance in spontaneous and evoked transmission are surprising but not without precedent (Nelson et al, 2011). An important implication of this work is that MeCP2's effect on hippocampal spontaneous transmission appears to be due to its role as a transcriptional repressor (Nelson et al, 2006). Moreover, we found that the impact of MeCP2 on the dynamics of evoked excitatory neurotransmission was similar to what is observed after loss of key histone deacetylases (histone deacetylase 1 and 2), enzymes that form a co-repressor complex with MeCP2 suggesting that alterations in transcriptional repression mediate the deficits in evoked synaptic activity (Akhtar et al, 2009).

MeCP2 overexpression also impacts excitatory neurotransmission. Overexpression of MeCP2 leads to a significant increase in excitatory miniature synaptic transmission in hippocampal cell cultures (Chao et al, 2007; Na et al, 2012). Studies have not yet examined the impact of MeCP2 overexpression on evoked neurotransmission. Collectively, the studies to date suggest that loss- or gain-of-MeCP2 function exerts bidirectional control in neurotransmission in cortical and hippocampal regions of the brain. Ongoing work is seeking to determine whether restoring the balance between excitatory/inhibitory neurotransmission may reverse some phenotypes observed in these mouse models of RTT and MECP2 duplication syndrome (ie, seizures).

FUTURE RESEARCH DIRECTIONS

Epigenetic mechanisms have important roles in brain development, synaptic plasticity, and in behavior including learning and memory and have been shown to underlie certain neurodevelopmental disorders. A wealth of evidence now substantiates the functional importance of MeCP2, an epigenetic factor, in the regulation of synaptic and neuronal plasticity. A relative lack or excess of MeCP2 levels lead to surprisingly similar behavioral and neurological phenotypes: anxiety, cognitive impairments, and motor coordination deficits. Similarly, loss and gain of MeCP2 function result in significant effects on neuronal plasticity, dendritic morphology, processes associated with short- and long-term plasticity, and in excitatory/inhibitory balance in neurotransmission. It is striking that levels of MeCP2 appear to have a bidirectional effect on excitatory neurotransmission indicating that mechanisms that regulate neurotransmission are sensitive to MeCP2 levels. The putative role of MeCP2 as a transcriptional factor suggests that dysregulation of downstream gene targets may underlie RTT and MECP2 duplication syndrome. However, possible targets of MeCP2 that contribute to the behavioral deficits observed in these disorders have been rather elusive. Potential confounds in identifying targets include the regional specificity for MeCP2's effects on specific downstream targets as well as differences between particular neuronal populations. One of the current challenges is to understand molecular and cellular downstream targets that are affected by MeCP2 dysfunction. Identifying downstream mechanisms associated with alterations in MeCP2 expression may lead to the development of promising therapeutics in the treatment of RTT and MECP2 duplication syndrome (Figure 2).

Figure 2
figure2

The role of MeCP2 in the regulation of neurotransmission. One hypothesis is that the level of MeCP2 expression titrates synaptic gene expression, which in turn alters neurotransmission in a proportional manner. (a) Our findings suggest that loss of MeCP2 increases gene expression of synaptic genes and alters neurotransmission, specifically a decrease in spontaneous excitatory neurotransmission and an increase in evoked excitatory neurotransmission. (b) The overexpression of MeCP2 suppresses the expression of synaptic genes, which augments spontaneous excitatory transmission but decreases evoked release probability.

PowerPoint slide

References

  1. Adachi M, Autry AE, Covington 3rd HE, Monteggia LM (2009). MeCP2-mediated transcription repression in the basolateral amygdala may underlie heightened anxiety in a mouse model of Rett syndrome. J Neurosci 29: 4218–4227.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Akhtar MW, Raingo J, Nelson ED, Montgomery RL, Olson EN, Kavalali ET et al (2009). Histone deacetylases 1 and 2 form a developmental switch that controls excitatory synapse maturation and function. J Neurosci 29: 8288–8297.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Amir RE, Van den Veyver IB, Wan M, Tran CQ, Francke U, Zoghti HY (1999). Rett syndrome is caused by mutations in X-linked MECP2, encoding methyl-CpG-binding protein 2. Nat Genet 23: 185–188 Identification of MeCP2 as the gene that causes Rett syndrome.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Armstrong D, Dunn JK, Antalffy B, Trivedi R (1995). Selective dendritic alterations in the cortex of Rett syndrome. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 54: 195–201.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Armstrong DD (2001). Rett syndrome neuropathology review 2000. Brain Dev 23 (Suppl 1): S72–S76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Asaka Y, Jugloff DG, Zhang L, Eubanks JH, Fitzsimonds RM (2006). Hippocampal synaptic plasticity is impaired in the Mecp2-null mouse model of Rett syndrome. Neurobiol Dis 21: 217–227. First analysis of synaptic plasticity in MeCP2 null mice.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Belichenko PV, Dahlstrom A (1995). Studies on the 3-dimensional architecture of dendritic spines and varicosities in human cortex by confocal laser scanning microscopy and Lucifer yellow microinjections. J Neurosci Methods 57: 55–61.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Budisteanu M, Papuc SM, Tutulan-Cunita A, Budisteanu B, Arghir A (2011). Novel clinical finding in MECP2 duplication syndrome. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 20: 373–375.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Calfa G, Percy AK, Pozzo-Miller L (2011). Experimental models of Rett syndrome based on Mecp2 dysfunction. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 236: 3–19.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chahrour M, Jung SY, Shaw C, Zhou X, Wong ST, Qin J et al (2008). MeCP2, a key contributor to neurological disease, activates and represses transcription. Science 320: 1224–1229.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Chao HT, Chen H, Samaco RC, Xue M, Chahrour M, Yoo J et al (2010). Dysfunction in GABA signalling mediates autism-like stereotypies and Rett syndrome phenotypes. Nature 468: 263–269. The first demonstration that deletion of MeCP2 from GABAergic neurons produces Rett-like symptoms in the form of compulsive behaviors, respiratory issues, stereotypies, and shortened life spans.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Chao HT, Zoghbi HY (2012). MeCP2: only 100% will do. Nat Neurosci 15: 176–177.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chao HT, Zoghbi HY, Rosenmund C (2007). MeCP2 controls excitatory synaptic strength by regulating glutamatergic synapse number. Neuron 56: 58–65. Analysis of the relationship between MeCP2 expression and bidirectional regulation of excitatory synaptic transmission.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Chapleau CA, Calfa GD, Lane MC, Albertson AJ, Larimore JL, Kudo S et al (2009). Dendritic spine pathologies in hippocampal pyramidal neurons from Rett syndrome brain and after expression of Rett-associated MECP2 mutations. Neurobiol Dis 35: 219–233.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen RZ, Akbarian S, Tudor M, Jaenisch R (2001). Deficiency of methyl-CpG binding protein-2 in CNS neurons results in a Rett-like phenotype in mice. Nat Genet 27: 327–331. One of the two initial papers showing MeCP2 loss of function analysis in relation to recapitulation of the Rett phenotype.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Chen WG, Chang Q, Lin Y, Meissner A, West AE, Griffith EC et al (2003). Derepression of BDNF transcription involves calcium-dependent phosphorylation of MeCP2. Science 302: 885–889. This study links MeCP2 involvement in activity-dependent gene regulation and BDNF expression.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Citri A, Malenka RC (2008). Synaptic plasticity: multiple forms, functions, and mechanisms. Neuropsychopharmacology 33: 18–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Collins AL, Levenson JM, Vilaythong AP, Richman R, Armstrong DL, Noebels JL et al (2004). Mild overexpression of MeCP2 causes a progressive neurological disorder in mice. Hum Mol Genet 13: 2679–2689.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dani VS, Chang Q, Maffei A, Turrigiano GG, Jaenisch R, Nelson SB (2005). Reduced cortical activity due to a shift in the balance between excitation and inhibition in a mouse model of Rett syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102: 12560–12565. Insightful analysis of excitation and inhibition balance of individual cortical neurons in MeCP2 knockout mice. This study formed a cellular Rosetta stone for subsequent analysis of autism-related phenotypes in mice.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fukuda T, Itoh M, Ichikawa T, Washiyama K, Goto Y (2005). Delayed maturation of neuronal architecture and synaptogenesis in cerebral cortex of Mecp2-deficient mice. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 64: 537–544.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fyffe SL, Neul JL, Samaco RC, Chao HT, Ben-Shachar S, Moretti P et al (2008). Deletion of Mecp2 in Sim1-expressing neurons reveals a critical role for MeCP2 in feeding behavior, aggression, and the response to stress. Neuron 59: 947–958.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Gemelli T, Berton O, Nelson ED, Perrotti LI, Jaenisch R, Monteggia LM (2006). Postnatal loss of methyl-CpG binding protein 2 in the forebrain is sufficient to mediate behavioral aspects of Rett syndrome in mice. Biol Psychiatry 59: 468–476. Initial detailed behavioral analysis of brain specific MeCP2 knockout mice.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Guy J, Cheval H, Selfridge J, Bird A (2011). The role of MeCP2 in the brain. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 27: 631–652.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Guy J, Gan J, Selfridge J, Cobb S, Bird A (2007). Reversal of neurological defects in a mouse model of Rett sydrome. Science 315: 1143–1147. Demonstrates that activation of MeCP2 expression reverses phenotypes of Rett syndrome in a MeCP2 null mouse.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Guy J, Hendrich B, Holmes M, Martin JE, Bird A (2001). A mouse Mecp2-null mutation causes neurological symptoms that mimic Rett syndrome. Nat Genet 27: 322–326. One of the two initial papers showing MeCP2 loss of function analysis in relation to recapitulation of the Rett phenotype.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Hagberg G, Stenbom Y, Engerstrom IW (2001). Head growth in Rett syndrome. Brain Dev 23 (Suppl 1): S227–S229.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kavalali ET, Nelson ED, Monteggia LM (2011). Role of MeCP2, DNA methylation, and HDACs in regulating synapse function. J Neurodev Disord 3: 250–256.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Kishi N, Macklis JD (2004). MECP2 is progressively expressed in post-migratory neurons and is involved in neuronal maturation rather than cell fate decisions. Mol Cell Neurosci 27: 306–321.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Kishi N, Macklis JD (2010). MeCP2 functions largely cell-autonomously, but also non-cell-autonomously, in neuronal maturation and dendritic arborization of cortical pyramidal neurons. Exp Neurol 222: 51–58.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kriaucionis S, Bird A (2003). DNA methylation and Rett syndrome. Hum Mol Genet 12 Spec No 2: R221–R227.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lasalle JM, Yasui DH (2009). Evolving role of MeCP2 in Rett syndrome and autism. Epigenomics 1: 119–130.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Li H, Zhong X, Chau KF, Williams EC, Chang Q (2011). Loss of activity-induced phosphorylation of MeCP2 enhances synaptogenesis, LTP and spatial memory. Nat Neurosci 14: 1001–1008.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Luikenhuis S, Giacometti E, Beard CF, Jaenisch R (2004). Expression of MeCP2 in postmitotic neurons rescues Rett syndrome in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101: 6033–6038.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Martinowich K, Hattori D, Wu H, Fouse S, He F, Hu Y et al (2003). DNA methylation-related chromatin remodeling in activity-dependent BDNF gene regulation. Science 302: 890–893. This study demonstrates that demethylation may regulate BDNF expression.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Moretti P, Levenson JM, Battaglia F, Atkinson R, Teague R, Antalffy B et al (2006). Learning and memory and synaptic plasticity are impaired in a mouse model of Rett syndrome. J Neurosci 26: 319–327.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Na ES, Monteggia LM (2011). The role of MeCP2 in CNS development and function. Horm Behav 59: 364–368.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Na ES, Nelson ED, Adachi M, Autry AE, Mahgoub MA, Kavalali ET et al (2012). A Mouse Model for MeCP2 Duplication Syndrome: MeCP2 Overexpression Impairs Learning and Memory and Synaptic Transmission. J Neurosci 32: 3109–3117.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Nan X, Ng HH, Johnson CA, Laherty CD, Turner BM, Eisenman RN et al (1998). Transcriptional repression by the methyl-CpG-binding protein MeCP2 involves a histone deacetylase complex. Nature 393: 386–389.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Nelson ED, Bal M, Kavalali ET, Monteggia LM (2011). Selective impact of MeCP2 and associated histone deacetylases on the dynamics of evoked excitatory neurotransmission. J Neurophysiol 106: 193–201.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Nelson ED, Kavalali ET, Monteggia LM (2006). MeCP2-dependent transcriptional repression regulates excitatory neurotransmission. Curr Biol 16: 710–716. First identification of synapse specific deficits associated with MeCP2 loss of function.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Pelka GJ, Watson CM, Radziewic T, Hayward M, Lahooti H, Christodoulou J et al (2006). Mecp2 deficiency is associated with learning and cognitive deficits and altered gene activity in the hippocampal region of mice. Brain 129 (Part 4): 887–898.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Ramocki MB, Peters SU, Tavyev YJ, Zhang F, Carvalho CM, Schaaf CP et al (2009). Autism and other neuropsychiatric symptoms are prevalent in individuals with MeCP2 duplication syndrome. Ann Neurol 66: 771–782.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Ramocki MB, Tavyev YJ, Peters SU (2010). The MECP2 duplication syndrome. Am J Med Genet A 152A: 1079–1088.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Reardon W, Donoghue V, Murphy AM, King MD, Mayne PD, Horn N et al (2010). Progressive cerebellar degenerative changes in the severe mental retardation syndrome caused by duplication of MECP2 and adjacent loci on Xq28. Eur J Pediatr 169: 941–949.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Samaco RC, Mandel-Brehm C, Chao HT, Ward CS, Fyffe-Maricich SL, Ren J et al (2009). Loss of MeCP2 in aminergic neurons causes cell-autonomous defects in neurotransmitter synthesis and specific behavioral abnormalities. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 21966–21971.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Shahbazian M, Young J, Yuva-Paylor L, Spencer C, Antalffy B, Noebels J et al (2002). Mice with truncated MeCP2 recapitulate many Rett syndrome features and display hyperacetylation of histone H3. Neuron 35: 243–254. First in vivo analysis of a disease causing mutation in mice.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Smyk M, Obersztyn E, Nowakowska B, Nawara M, Cheung SW, Mazurczak T et al (2008). Different-sized duplications of Xq28, including MECP2, in three males with mental retardation, absent or delayed speech, and recurrent infections. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 147B: 799–806.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Stearns NA, Schaevitz LR, Bowling H, Nag N, Berger UV, Berger-Sweeney J (2007). Behavioral and anatomical abnormalities in Mecp2 mutant mice: a model for Rett syndrome. Neuroscience 146: 907–921.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Tang SS, Fernandez D, Lazarou LP, Singh R, Fallon P (2012). MECP2 triplication in 3 brothers - a rarely described cause of familial neurological regression in boys. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 16: 209–212.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Tao J, Hu K, Chang Q, Wu H, Sherman NE, Martinowich K et al (2009). Phosphorylation of MeCP2 at Serine 80 regulates its chromatin association and neurological function. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 4882–4887.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Traynor J, Agarwal P, Lazzeroni L, Francke U (2002). Gene expression patterns vary in clonal cell cultures from Rett syndrome females with eight different MECP2 mutations. BMC Med Genet 3: 12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Tropea D, Giacometti E, Wilson NR, Beard C, McCurry C, Fu DD et al (2009). Partial reversal of Rett Syndrome-like symptoms in MeCP2 mutant mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 2029–2034.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Tudor M, Akbarian S, Chen RZ, Jaenisch R (2002). Transcriptional profiling of a mouse model for Rett syndrome reveals subtle transcriptional changes in the brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 15536–15541.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Van Esch H (2012). MECP2 Duplication Syndrome. Mol Syndromol 2: 128–136.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Weng SM, McLeod F, Bailey ME, Cobb SR (2011). Synaptic plasticity deficits in an experimental model of rett syndrome: long-term potentiation saturation and its pharmacological reversal. Neuroscience 180: 314–321.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Young JI, Hong EP, Castle JC, Crespo-Barreto J, Bowman AB, Rose MF et al (2005). Regulation of RNA splicing by the methylation-dependent transcriptional repressor methyl-CpG binding protein 2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102: 17551–17558.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Zhou Z, Hong EJ, Cohen S, Zhao WN, Ho HY, Schmidt L et al (2006). Brain-specific phosphorylation of MeCP2 regulates activity-dependent Bdnf transcription, dendritic growth, and spine maturation. Neuron 52: 255–269.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Zoghbi HY (2003). Postnatal neurodevelopmental disorders: meeting at the synapse? Science 302: 826–830.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by National Institute of Health Grant MH081060 (LMM), an International Rett Syndrome Foundation grant (LMM) and a NARSAD Independent Investigator Award (ESN).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lisa M Monteggia.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Dr Monteggia has been in the Speaker Bureau for Sepracor and Roche. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest.

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Na, E., Nelson, E., Kavalali, E. et al. The Impact of MeCP2 Loss- or Gain-of-Function on Synaptic Plasticity. Neuropsychopharmacol 38, 212–219 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2012.116

Download citation

Keywords

  • MeCP2 duplication syndrome
  • behavior
  • long-term potentiation
  • synaptic transmission
  • Rett syndrome

Further reading

Search

Quick links