Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

The social dimensions of invasive plants


Invasive plants pose a major environmental management issue. Research into the social dimensions of this issue has flourished over the past decade, as part of the critical examination of relations between human and nonhuman worlds. The social sciences and humanities have made substantial contributions to conceptualizing invasiveness and nativeness; understanding the perceptions, attitudes and values of diverse stakeholders; and analysing the politics and practices of invasive plant management. Cultural analysis allows areas of conflict and commonality to be identified. Social complexity must be added to ecological complexity to understand the causal relationships underlying invasions; and linear understandings of science–policy relationships are too simplistic. Productive connections have been established between recent social and natural science approaches in the context of rapid environmental change and unpredictable futures. Nonetheless, the prevalence of human exceptionalism in the ecological sciences constitutes a major point of divergence between social and natural science perspectives.

This is a preview of subscription content

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1

    McGeoch, M. A. et al. Global indicators of biological invasion: species numbers, biodiversity impact and policy responses. Divers. Distrib. 16, 95–108 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Barbour, E. & Kueppers, L. M. Conservation and management of ecological systems in a changing California. Clim. Change 111, 135–163 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Driscoll, D. A. et al. Priorities in policy and management when existing biodiversity stressors interact with climate change. Clim. Change 111, 533–557 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Capinha, C., Essl, F., Seebens, H., Moser, D. & Pereira, H. M. The dispersal of alien species redefines biogeography in the Anthropocene. Science 348, 1248–1251 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Carboneras, C., Walton, P. & Vilà, M. Capping progress on invasive species? Science 342, 930–931 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Johnson, D. S. Making waves about spreading weeds: response. Science 344, 1236–1237 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Simberloff, D., Parker, I. M. & Windle, P. N. Introduced species policy, management, and future research needs. Front. Ecol. Environ. 3, 12–20 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Klepeis, P., Gill, N. & Chisholm, L. Emerging amenity landscapes: invasive weeds and land subdivision in rural Australia. Land Use Pol. 26, 380–392 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Epanchin-Niell, R. S. et al. Controlling invasive species in complex social landscapes. Front. Ecol. Environ. 8, 210–216 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Steffen, W., Grinevald, J., Crutzen, P. & McNeill, J. The Anthropocene: conceptual and historical perspectives. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 369, 842–867 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Duit, A. & Galaz, V. Governance and complexity—emerging issues for governance theory. Governance 21, 311–335 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Lemieux, C. J., Beechey, T. J. & Gray, P. A. Prospects for Canada's protected areas in an era of rapid climate change. Land Use Pol. 28, 928–941 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Larson, D. L. et al. A framework for sustainable invasive species management: environmental, social, and economic objectives. J. Environ. Manage. 92, 14–22 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Marshall, N. A., Friedel, M., van Klinken, R. D. & Grice, A. C. Considering the social dimension of invasive species: the case of buffel grass. Environ. Sci. Pol. 14, 327–338 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Rotherham, I. D. & Lambert, R. A. Invasive and Introduced Plants and Animals: Human Perceptions, Attitudes And Approaches To Management (Earthscan, 2012).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Frawley, J. & McCalman, I. Rethinking Invasion Ecologies from the Environmental Humanities (Routledge, 2014).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Castree, N. Making Sense of Nature (Routledge, 2013).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Haraway, D. J. When Species Meet (Univ. Minnesota Press, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Bennett, N. J. et al. Conservation social science: understanding and integrating human dimensions to improve conservation. Biol. Conserv. 205, 93–108 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Sandbrook, C., Adams, W. M., Büscher, B. & Vira, B. Social research and biodiversity conservation. Conserv. Biol. 27, 1487–1490 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Boivin, N. L. et al. Ecological consequences of human niche construction: examining long-term anthropogenic shaping of global species distributions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 6388–6396 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Ellis, E. C. et al. Used planet: a global history. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 7978–7985 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Warren, C. R. Perspectives on the ‘alien’ versus ‘native’ species debate: a critique of concepts, language and practice. Prog. Human Geogr. 31, 427–446 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Richardson, D., Pysek, P., Simberloff, D., Rejmánek, M. & Mader, A. Biological invasions-the widening debate: a response to Charles Warren. Progr. Human Geogr. 32, 295 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Preston, C. D. The terms ‘native’ and ‘alien’—a biogeographical perspective. Progr. Human Geogr. 33, 702–711 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Warren, C. R. Using the native/alien classification for description not prescription: a response to Christopher Preston. Progr. Human Geogr. 33, 711–713 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Simberloff, D. Nature, natives, nativism, and management. Environ. Ethics 34, 5–25 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Davis, M. A. et al. Don’t judge species on their origins. Nature 474, 153–154 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Simberloff, D. Non-natives: 141 scientists object. Nature 475, 36 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Lockwood, J. L., Hoopes, M. F. & Marchetti, M. P. Non-natives: plusses of invasion ecology. Nature 475, 36 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Colautti, R. I. & MacIsaac, H. J. A neutral terminology to define ‘invasive’ species. Divers. Distrib. 10, 135–141 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32

    Pyšek, P. & Richardson, D. M. Invasive species, environmental change and management, and health. Annu. Rev. Environ. Res. 35, 25–55 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33

    Richardson, D. M., Pysek, P. & Carlton, J. T. in Fifty Years of Invasion Ecology: The Legacy of Charles Elton (ed. Richardson, D. M. ) 409–420 (Wiley-Blackwell, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  34. 34

    Fall, J. J. in Biosecurity: The Socio-Politics of Invasive Species and Infectious Diseases (eds Dobson, A., Barker, K. & Taylor, S. L. ) 167–181 (Routledge, 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  35. 35

    Tassin, J. & Kull, C. A. Facing the broader dimensions of biological invasions. Land Use Pol. 42, 165–169 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36

    Larson, B. M. in Body, Language and Mind (eds Ziemke, T., Zlatev, J. & Frank, R. M. ) 169–195 (Mouton De Gruyter, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  37. 37

    Barker, K. in Spaces of Security and Insecurity: Geographies of the War on Terror (eds Ingram, A. & Dodds, K. ) 165–184 (Routledge, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  38. 38

    Downey, P. O. Changing of the guard: moving from a war on weeds to an outcome-orientated weed management system. Plant Protect. Quart. 26, 86 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39

    Bean, A. R. A new system for determining which plant species are indigenous in Australia. Austral. Syst. Bot. 20, 1–43 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40

    Kull, C. A. & Rangan, H. Acacia exchanges: wattles, thorn trees, and the study of plant movements. Geoforum 39, 1258–1272 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41

    Sagoff, M. Who is the invader? Alien species, property rights, and the police power. Soc. Philos. Policy 26, 26–52 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42

    Lien, M. E. & Davison, A. Roots, rupture and remembrance the Tasmanian lives of the Monterey Pine. J. Mater. Cult. 15, 233–253 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43

    Chew, M. K. & Hamilton, A. L. in Fifty Years of Invasion Ecology: The Legacy of Charles Elton (ed. Richardson, D. M. ) 35–48 (Wiley-Blackwell, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  44. 44

    Hattingh, J. in Fifty Years of Invasion Ecology: The Legacy of Charles Elton (ed. Richardson, D. M. ) 359–375 (Wiley-Blackwell, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  45. 45

    Mastnak, T., Elyachar, J. & Boellstorff, T. Botanical decolonization: rethinking native plants. Environ. Plan. D 32, 363–380 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46

    Willis, K. J. & Birks, H. J. B. What is natural? The need for a long-term perspective in biodiversity conservation. Science 314, 1261–1265 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47

    Benediktsson, K. Floral hazards: Nootka lupin in Iceland and the complex politics of invasive life. Geogr. Annal. 97, 139–154 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  48. 48

    Jones, O. & Cloke, P. Tree Cultures: The Place of Trees and Trees in Their Place (Berg, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  49. 49

    Pyšek, P., Richardson, D. M. & Williamson, M. Predicting and explaining plant invasions through analysis of source area floras: some critical considerations. Divers. Distrib. 10, 179–187 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50

    Setten, G. in Nature, Temporality and Environmental Management: Scandinavian and Australian Perspectives on Peoples and Landscapes (eds Head, L., Saltzman, K., Setten, G. & Stenseke, M. ) 30–44 (Routledge, 2017).

    Google Scholar 

  51. 51

    Francis, R. A. & Chadwick, M. A. Urban invasions: non-native and invasive species in cities. Geography 100, 144 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  52. 52

    Gaertner, M. et al. Managing invasive species in cities: a framework from Cape Town, South Africa. Landsc. Urban Plan. 151, 1–9 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53

    Comaroff, J. & Comaroff, J. L. Naturing the nation: aliens, apocalypse, and the postcolonial state. Social Ident. 7, 233–265 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54

    Ballard, R. & Jones, G. A. Natural neighbors: indigenous landscapes and eco-estates in Durban, South Africa. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 101, 131–148 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55

    Carruthers, J. et al. A native at home and abroad: the history, politics, ethics and aesthetics of acacias. Divers. Distrib. 17, 810–821 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56

    Crosby, A. W. Ecological Imperialism (Past Present Soc., 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  57. 57

    Robbins, P. & Moore, S. A. Ecological anxiety disorder: diagnosing the politics of the Anthropocene. Cult. Geogr. 20, 3–19 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58

    Ginn, F. Extension, subversion, containment: eco-nationalism and (post)colonial nature in Aotearoa New Zealand. Trans. Inst. British Geogr. 33, 335–353 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59

    Martin, R. J. & Trigger, D. Negotiating belonging: plants, people, and indigeneity in northern Australia. J. Roy. Anthropol. Inst. 21, 276–295 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60

    Frawley, J. Containing Queensland prickly pear: buffer zones, closer settlement, whiteness. J. Austr. Studies 38, 139–156 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61

    Kull, C. A., Tassin, J. & Carrière, S. M. Approaching invasive species in Madagascar. Madagascar Conserv. Dev. 9, 60–70 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62

    Buckley, Y. M. & Han, Y. Managing the side effects of invasion control. Science 344, 975–976 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63

    Reed, M. & Curzon, R. Stakeholder mapping for the governance of biosecurity: a literature review. J. Integr. Environ. Sci. 12, 15–38 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64

    Buijs, A. E. & Elands, B. H. Does expertise matter? An in-depth understanding of people's structure of thoughts on nature and its management implications. Biol. Conserv. 168, 184–191 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65

    Ernwein, M. & Fall, J. J. Communicating invasion: understanding social anxieties around mobile species. Geogr. Ann. 97, 155–167 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66

    van Der Wal, R., Fischer, A., Selge, S. & Larson, B. M. Neither the public nor experts judge species primarily on their origins. Environ. Conserv. 42, 349–355 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67

    Fischer, A., Selge, S., van der Wal, R. & Larson, B. M. The public and professionals reason similarly about the management of non-native invasive species: a quantitative investigation of the relationship between beliefs and attitudes. PloS ONE 9, e105495 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. 68

    Young, A. M. & Larson, B. M. Clarifying debates in invasion biology: a survey of invasion biologists. Environ. Res. 111, 893–898 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69

    Lundberg, A. Conflicts between perception and reality in the management of alien species in forest ecosystems: a Norwegian case study. Landsc. Res. 35, 319–338 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70

    Hobbs, R. J. Grieving for the past and hoping for the future: balancing polarizing perspectives in conservation and restoration. Restor. Ecol. 21, 145–148 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71

    Bhattacharyya, J. & Larson, B. M. The need for indigenous voices in discourse about introduced species: insights from a controversy over wild horses. Environ. Values 23, 663–684 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72

    Trigger, D. S. Indigeneity, ferality, and what ‘belongs’ in the Australian bush: Aboriginal responses to ‘introduced’ animals and plants in a settler-descendant society. J. Roy. Anthrop. Inst. 14, 628–646 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73

    Vaarzon-Morel, P. Changes in Aboriginal perceptions of feral camels and of their impacts and management. Rangeland J. 32, 73–85 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74

    Head, L. & Atchison, J. Entangled and invasive lives: indigenous invasive plant management in northern Australia. Geogr. Ann. 97, 169–182 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75

    Bach, T. & Larson, B. Speaking about weeds: indigenous elders’ metaphors for invasives and their management. Environ. Values (in the press).

  76. 76

    Sharma, L. & Khandelwal, S. Weeds of Rajasthan and their ethno-botanical importance. Studies Ethno-Med. 4, 75–79 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. 77

    Hall, S. J. Cultural disturbances and local ecological knowledge mediate cattail (Typha domingensis) invasion in lake Pátzcuaro, México. Hum. Ecol. 37, 241–249 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. 78

    Bart, D. & Simon, M. Evaluating local knowledge to develop integrative invasive-species control strategies. Hum. Ecol. 41, 779–788 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. 79

    Jevon, T. & Shackleton, C. M. Integrating local knowledge and forest surveys to assess Lantana camara impacts on indigenous species recruitment in Mazeppa Bay, South Africa. Hum. Ecol. 43, 247–254 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. 80

    Hu, R. & Gill, N. Movement of garden plants from market to bushland: gardeners’ plant procurement and garden-related behaviour. Geogr. Res. 53, 134–144 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. 81

    Zagorski, T., Kirkpatrick, J. & Stratford, E. Gardens and the bush: gardeners’ attitudes, garden types and invasives. Australian Geogr. Studies 42, 207–220 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. 82

    Trigger, D. & Mulcock, J. Native vs exotic: cultural discourse about flora, fauna and belonging in Australia. WIT Trans. Ecol. Environ. 84, 1301–1310 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  83. 83

    Qvenild, M., Setten, G. & Skår, M. Politicising plants: dwelling and invasive alien species in domestic gardens in Norway. Norwegian J. Geogr. 68, 22–33 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  84. 84

    Sjöholm, C. & Saltzman, K. in Nature, Time and Environmental Management: Scandinavian and Australian perspectives on peoples and landscapes (eds Head, L., Saltzman, K., Setten, G. & Stenseke, M. ) 112–129 (Routledge, 2017).

    Google Scholar 

  85. 85

    Barker, K. Flexible boundaries in biosecurity: accommodating gorse in Aotearoa New Zealand. Environ. Planning A 40, 1598–1614 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. 86

    Atchison, J. & Head, L. Eradicating bodies in invasive plant management. Environ. Planning D 31, 951–968 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. 87

    Ryan, J. C. Botanical memory: exploring emotional recollections of native flora in the Southwest of Western Australia. Emotion Space Soc. 8, 27–38 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. 88

    Instone, L. Unruly grasses: affective attunements in the ecological restoration of urban native grasslands in Australia. Emotion Space Soc. 10, 79–86 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. 89

    Trudgill, S. A requiem for the British flora? Emotional biogeographies and environmental change. Area 40, 99–107 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. 90

    Hitchings, R. People, plants and performance: on actor network theory and the material pleasures of the private garden. Social Cultur. Geogr. 4, 99–114 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. 91

    Power, E. R. Human–nature relations in suburban gardens. Australian Geogr. 36, 39–53 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. 92

    Doody, B. J., Perkins, H. C., Sullivan, J. J., Meurk, C. D. & Stewart, G. H. Performing weeds: Gardening, plant agencies and urban plant conservation. Geoforum 56, 124–136 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. 93

    Head, L., Atchison, J. & Phillips, C. The distinctive capacities of plants: re-thinking difference via invasive species. Trans. Instit. British Geogr. 40, 399–413 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. 94

    Woods, M. & Moriarty, P. V. Strangers in a strange land: the problem of exotic species. Environ. Values 10, 163–191 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. 95

    Kendle, A. D. & Rose, J. E. The aliens have landed! What are the justifications for ‘native only’policies in landscape plantings? Landsc. Urban Planning 47, 19–31 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. 96

    Godden, L., Nelson, R. & Peel, J. Controlling invasive species: managing risks to Australia's agricultural sustainability and biodiversity protection. Australasian J. Environ. Manage. 13, 166–184 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. 97

    Beck, K. G. et al. Invasive species defined in a policy context: recommendations from the Federal Invasive Species Advisory Committee. Invas. Plant Sci. Manage. 1, 414–421 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. 98

    Maye, D., Dibden, J., Higgins, V. & Potter, C. Governing biosecurity in a neoliberal world: comparative perspectives from Australia and the United Kingdom. Environ. Planning A 44, 150–168 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. 99

    Clark, N. The demon-seed bioinvasion as the unsettling of environmental cosmopolitanism. Theory Cult. Soc. 19, 101–125 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  100. 100

    Keller, R. P. & Perrings, C. International policy options for reducing the environmental impacts of invasive species. BioScience 61, 1005–1012 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. 101

    Barbier, E. B., Knowler, D., Gwatipedza, J., Reichard, S. H. & Hodges, A. R. Implementing policies to control invasive plant species. BioScience 63, 132–138 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. 102

    Genovesi, P. in Issues in Bioinvasion Science: EEI 2003: A Contribution to the Knowledge on Invasive Alien Species (eds Capdevila-Arguelles, L. & Zilletti, B. ) 127–133 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  103. 103

    Schmiedel, D. et al. Evaluation system for management measures of invasive alien species. Biodivers. Conserv. 25, 357–374 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. 104

    Hulme, P. E., Pyšek, P., Nentwig, W. & Vilà, M. Will threat of biological invasions unite the European Union. Science 324, 40–41 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  105. 105

    Olwig, K. R. Natives and aliens in the national landscape. Landsc. Res. 28, 61–74 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. 106

    Liu, S. & Cook, D. Eradicate, contain, or live with it? Collaborating with stakeholders to evaluate responses to invasive species. Food Secur. 8, 49–59 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  107. 107

    Reed, M. S. Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Biol. Conserv. 141, 2417–2431 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  108. 108

    Touza, J., Pérez-Alonso, A., Chas-Amil, M. L. & Dehnen-Schmutz, K. Explaining the rank order of invasive plants by stakeholder groups. Ecol. Econ. 105, 330–341 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  109. 109

    García-Llorente, M., Martín-López, B., González, J. A., Alcorlo, P. & Montes, C. Social perceptions of the impacts and benefits of invasive alien species: implications for management. Biol. Conserv. 141, 2969–2983 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  110. 110

    Shackleton, R. T., Le Maitre, D. C., van Wilgen, B. W. & Richardson, D. M. Identifying barriers to effective management of widespread invasive alien trees: Prosopis species (mesquite) in South Africa as a case study. Glob. Environ. Change 38, 183–194 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  111. 111

    Brenner, J. C. Pasture conversion, private ranchers, and the invasive exotic buffelgrass (Pennisetum ciliare) in Mexico's Sonoran Desert. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 101, 84–106 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  112. 112

    Binimelis, R., Pengue, W. & Monterroso, I. “Transgenic treadmill”: responses to the emergence and spread of glyphosate-resistant johnsongrass in Argentina. Geoforum 40, 623–633 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  113. 113

    Graham, S. Three cooperative pathways to solving a collective weed management problem. Australasian J. Environ. Manage. 20, 116–129 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  114. 114

    Atchison, J. Experiments in co-existence: the science and practices of biocontrol in invasive species management. Environ. Planning A 47, 1697–1712 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  115. 115

    Head, L. et al. Living with invasive plants in the Anthropocene: the importance of understanding practice and experience. Conserv. Soc. 13, 311 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  116. 116

    Hawthorne, T. L. et al. Mapping non-native invasive species and accessibility in an urban forest: a case study of participatory mapping and citizen science in Atlanta, Georgia. Appl. Geogr. 56, 187–198 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  117. 117

    Head, L. & Atchison, J. Governing invasive plants: policy and practice in managing the Gamba grass (Andropogon gayanus)–bushfire nexus in northern Australia. Land Use Pol. 47, 225–234 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  118. 118

    Richardson, D. M. & Pyšek, P. Plant invasions: merging the concepts of species invasiveness and community invasibility. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 30, 409–431 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  119. 119

    Robbins, P. Comparing invasive networks: cultural and political biographies of invasive species. Geogr. Rev. 94, 139–156 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  120. 120

    Ogden, L. et al. Global assemblages, resilience, and Earth Stewardship in the Anthropocene. Front. Ecol. Environ. 11, 341–347 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  121. 121

    Hobbs, R. J. et al. Novel ecosystems: theoretical and management aspects of the new ecological world order. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 15, 1–7 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  122. 122

    Ellis, E. C. & Ramankutty, N. Putting people in the map: anthropogenic biomes of the world. Front. Ecol. Environ. 6, 439–447 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


Funding was provided by the Australian Research Council (FL0992397). I am grateful to many colleagues who have discussed these issues over the years, particularly J. Atchison, N. Gill and D. Trigger. Thanks to T. Roberts and I. Aguirre-Bielschowsky for assistance with literature searches.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lesley Head.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Head, L. The social dimensions of invasive plants. Nature Plants 3, 17075 (2017).

Download citation


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing