Invasive plants pose a major environmental management issue. Research into the social dimensions of this issue has flourished over the past decade, as part of the critical examination of relations between human and nonhuman worlds. The social sciences and humanities have made substantial contributions to conceptualizing invasiveness and nativeness; understanding the perceptions, attitudes and values of diverse stakeholders; and analysing the politics and practices of invasive plant management. Cultural analysis allows areas of conflict and commonality to be identified. Social complexity must be added to ecological complexity to understand the causal relationships underlying invasions; and linear understandings of science–policy relationships are too simplistic. Productive connections have been established between recent social and natural science approaches in the context of rapid environmental change and unpredictable futures. Nonetheless, the prevalence of human exceptionalism in the ecological sciences constitutes a major point of divergence between social and natural science perspectives.
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $5.42 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
McGeoch, M. A. et al. Global indicators of biological invasion: species numbers, biodiversity impact and policy responses. Divers. Distrib. 16, 95–108 (2010).
Barbour, E. & Kueppers, L. M. Conservation and management of ecological systems in a changing California. Clim. Change 111, 135–163 (2012).
Driscoll, D. A. et al. Priorities in policy and management when existing biodiversity stressors interact with climate change. Clim. Change 111, 533–557 (2012).
Capinha, C., Essl, F., Seebens, H., Moser, D. & Pereira, H. M. The dispersal of alien species redefines biogeography in the Anthropocene. Science 348, 1248–1251 (2015).
Carboneras, C., Walton, P. & Vilà, M. Capping progress on invasive species? Science 342, 930–931 (2013).
Johnson, D. S. Making waves about spreading weeds: response. Science 344, 1236–1237 (2014).
Simberloff, D., Parker, I. M. & Windle, P. N. Introduced species policy, management, and future research needs. Front. Ecol. Environ. 3, 12–20 (2005).
Klepeis, P., Gill, N. & Chisholm, L. Emerging amenity landscapes: invasive weeds and land subdivision in rural Australia. Land Use Pol. 26, 380–392 (2009).
Epanchin-Niell, R. S. et al. Controlling invasive species in complex social landscapes. Front. Ecol. Environ. 8, 210–216 (2010).
Steffen, W., Grinevald, J., Crutzen, P. & McNeill, J. The Anthropocene: conceptual and historical perspectives. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 369, 842–867 (2011).
Duit, A. & Galaz, V. Governance and complexity—emerging issues for governance theory. Governance 21, 311–335 (2008).
Lemieux, C. J., Beechey, T. J. & Gray, P. A. Prospects for Canada's protected areas in an era of rapid climate change. Land Use Pol. 28, 928–941 (2011).
Larson, D. L. et al. A framework for sustainable invasive species management: environmental, social, and economic objectives. J. Environ. Manage. 92, 14–22 (2011).
Marshall, N. A., Friedel, M., van Klinken, R. D. & Grice, A. C. Considering the social dimension of invasive species: the case of buffel grass. Environ. Sci. Pol. 14, 327–338 (2011).
Rotherham, I. D. & Lambert, R. A. Invasive and Introduced Plants and Animals: Human Perceptions, Attitudes And Approaches To Management (Earthscan, 2012).
Frawley, J. & McCalman, I. Rethinking Invasion Ecologies from the Environmental Humanities (Routledge, 2014).
Castree, N. Making Sense of Nature (Routledge, 2013).
Haraway, D. J. When Species Meet (Univ. Minnesota Press, 2008).
Bennett, N. J. et al. Conservation social science: understanding and integrating human dimensions to improve conservation. Biol. Conserv. 205, 93–108 (2017).
Sandbrook, C., Adams, W. M., Büscher, B. & Vira, B. Social research and biodiversity conservation. Conserv. Biol. 27, 1487–1490 (2013).
Boivin, N. L. et al. Ecological consequences of human niche construction: examining long-term anthropogenic shaping of global species distributions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 6388–6396 (2016).
Ellis, E. C. et al. Used planet: a global history. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 7978–7985 (2013).
Warren, C. R. Perspectives on the ‘alien’ versus ‘native’ species debate: a critique of concepts, language and practice. Prog. Human Geogr. 31, 427–446 (2007).
Richardson, D., Pysek, P., Simberloff, D., Rejmánek, M. & Mader, A. Biological invasions-the widening debate: a response to Charles Warren. Progr. Human Geogr. 32, 295 (2008).
Preston, C. D. The terms ‘native’ and ‘alien’—a biogeographical perspective. Progr. Human Geogr. 33, 702–711 (2009).
Warren, C. R. Using the native/alien classification for description not prescription: a response to Christopher Preston. Progr. Human Geogr. 33, 711–713 (2009).
Simberloff, D. Nature, natives, nativism, and management. Environ. Ethics 34, 5–25 (2012).
Davis, M. A. et al. Don’t judge species on their origins. Nature 474, 153–154 (2011).
Simberloff, D. Non-natives: 141 scientists object. Nature 475, 36 (2011).
Lockwood, J. L., Hoopes, M. F. & Marchetti, M. P. Non-natives: plusses of invasion ecology. Nature 475, 36 (2011).
Colautti, R. I. & MacIsaac, H. J. A neutral terminology to define ‘invasive’ species. Divers. Distrib. 10, 135–141 (2004).
Pyšek, P. & Richardson, D. M. Invasive species, environmental change and management, and health. Annu. Rev. Environ. Res. 35, 25–55 (2010).
Richardson, D. M., Pysek, P. & Carlton, J. T. in Fifty Years of Invasion Ecology: The Legacy of Charles Elton (ed. Richardson, D. M. ) 409–420 (Wiley-Blackwell, 2011).
Fall, J. J. in Biosecurity: The Socio-Politics of Invasive Species and Infectious Diseases (eds Dobson, A., Barker, K. & Taylor, S. L. ) 167–181 (Routledge, 2014).
Tassin, J. & Kull, C. A. Facing the broader dimensions of biological invasions. Land Use Pol. 42, 165–169 (2015).
Larson, B. M. in Body, Language and Mind (eds Ziemke, T., Zlatev, J. & Frank, R. M. ) 169–195 (Mouton De Gruyter, 2008).
Barker, K. in Spaces of Security and Insecurity: Geographies of the War on Terror (eds Ingram, A. & Dodds, K. ) 165–184 (Routledge, 2009).
Downey, P. O. Changing of the guard: moving from a war on weeds to an outcome-orientated weed management system. Plant Protect. Quart. 26, 86 (2011).
Bean, A. R. A new system for determining which plant species are indigenous in Australia. Austral. Syst. Bot. 20, 1–43 (2007).
Kull, C. A. & Rangan, H. Acacia exchanges: wattles, thorn trees, and the study of plant movements. Geoforum 39, 1258–1272 (2008).
Sagoff, M. Who is the invader? Alien species, property rights, and the police power. Soc. Philos. Policy 26, 26–52 (2009).
Lien, M. E. & Davison, A. Roots, rupture and remembrance the Tasmanian lives of the Monterey Pine. J. Mater. Cult. 15, 233–253 (2010).
Chew, M. K. & Hamilton, A. L. in Fifty Years of Invasion Ecology: The Legacy of Charles Elton (ed. Richardson, D. M. ) 35–48 (Wiley-Blackwell, 2011).
Hattingh, J. in Fifty Years of Invasion Ecology: The Legacy of Charles Elton (ed. Richardson, D. M. ) 359–375 (Wiley-Blackwell, 2011).
Mastnak, T., Elyachar, J. & Boellstorff, T. Botanical decolonization: rethinking native plants. Environ. Plan. D 32, 363–380 (2014).
Willis, K. J. & Birks, H. J. B. What is natural? The need for a long-term perspective in biodiversity conservation. Science 314, 1261–1265 (2006).
Benediktsson, K. Floral hazards: Nootka lupin in Iceland and the complex politics of invasive life. Geogr. Annal. 97, 139–154 (2015).
Jones, O. & Cloke, P. Tree Cultures: The Place of Trees and Trees in Their Place (Berg, 2002).
Pyšek, P., Richardson, D. M. & Williamson, M. Predicting and explaining plant invasions through analysis of source area floras: some critical considerations. Divers. Distrib. 10, 179–187 (2004).
Setten, G. in Nature, Temporality and Environmental Management: Scandinavian and Australian Perspectives on Peoples and Landscapes (eds Head, L., Saltzman, K., Setten, G. & Stenseke, M. ) 30–44 (Routledge, 2017).
Francis, R. A. & Chadwick, M. A. Urban invasions: non-native and invasive species in cities. Geography 100, 144 (2015).
Gaertner, M. et al. Managing invasive species in cities: a framework from Cape Town, South Africa. Landsc. Urban Plan. 151, 1–9 (2016).
Comaroff, J. & Comaroff, J. L. Naturing the nation: aliens, apocalypse, and the postcolonial state. Social Ident. 7, 233–265 (2001).
Ballard, R. & Jones, G. A. Natural neighbors: indigenous landscapes and eco-estates in Durban, South Africa. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 101, 131–148 (2011).
Carruthers, J. et al. A native at home and abroad: the history, politics, ethics and aesthetics of acacias. Divers. Distrib. 17, 810–821 (2011).
Crosby, A. W. Ecological Imperialism (Past Present Soc., 1986).
Robbins, P. & Moore, S. A. Ecological anxiety disorder: diagnosing the politics of the Anthropocene. Cult. Geogr. 20, 3–19 (2013).
Ginn, F. Extension, subversion, containment: eco-nationalism and (post)colonial nature in Aotearoa New Zealand. Trans. Inst. British Geogr. 33, 335–353 (2008).
Martin, R. J. & Trigger, D. Negotiating belonging: plants, people, and indigeneity in northern Australia. J. Roy. Anthropol. Inst. 21, 276–295 (2015).
Frawley, J. Containing Queensland prickly pear: buffer zones, closer settlement, whiteness. J. Austr. Studies 38, 139–156 (2014).
Kull, C. A., Tassin, J. & Carrière, S. M. Approaching invasive species in Madagascar. Madagascar Conserv. Dev. 9, 60–70 (2014).
Buckley, Y. M. & Han, Y. Managing the side effects of invasion control. Science 344, 975–976 (2014).
Reed, M. & Curzon, R. Stakeholder mapping for the governance of biosecurity: a literature review. J. Integr. Environ. Sci. 12, 15–38 (2015).
Buijs, A. E. & Elands, B. H. Does expertise matter? An in-depth understanding of people's structure of thoughts on nature and its management implications. Biol. Conserv. 168, 184–191 (2013).
Ernwein, M. & Fall, J. J. Communicating invasion: understanding social anxieties around mobile species. Geogr. Ann. 97, 155–167 (2015).
van Der Wal, R., Fischer, A., Selge, S. & Larson, B. M. Neither the public nor experts judge species primarily on their origins. Environ. Conserv. 42, 349–355 (2015).
Fischer, A., Selge, S., van der Wal, R. & Larson, B. M. The public and professionals reason similarly about the management of non-native invasive species: a quantitative investigation of the relationship between beliefs and attitudes. PloS ONE 9, e105495 (2014).
Young, A. M. & Larson, B. M. Clarifying debates in invasion biology: a survey of invasion biologists. Environ. Res. 111, 893–898 (2011).
Lundberg, A. Conflicts between perception and reality in the management of alien species in forest ecosystems: a Norwegian case study. Landsc. Res. 35, 319–338 (2010).
Hobbs, R. J. Grieving for the past and hoping for the future: balancing polarizing perspectives in conservation and restoration. Restor. Ecol. 21, 145–148 (2013).
Bhattacharyya, J. & Larson, B. M. The need for indigenous voices in discourse about introduced species: insights from a controversy over wild horses. Environ. Values 23, 663–684 (2014).
Trigger, D. S. Indigeneity, ferality, and what ‘belongs’ in the Australian bush: Aboriginal responses to ‘introduced’ animals and plants in a settler-descendant society. J. Roy. Anthrop. Inst. 14, 628–646 (2008).
Vaarzon-Morel, P. Changes in Aboriginal perceptions of feral camels and of their impacts and management. Rangeland J. 32, 73–85 (2010).
Head, L. & Atchison, J. Entangled and invasive lives: indigenous invasive plant management in northern Australia. Geogr. Ann. 97, 169–182 (2015).
Bach, T. & Larson, B. Speaking about weeds: indigenous elders’ metaphors for invasives and their management. Environ. Values (in the press).
Sharma, L. & Khandelwal, S. Weeds of Rajasthan and their ethno-botanical importance. Studies Ethno-Med. 4, 75–79 (2010).
Hall, S. J. Cultural disturbances and local ecological knowledge mediate cattail (Typha domingensis) invasion in lake Pátzcuaro, México. Hum. Ecol. 37, 241–249 (2009).
Bart, D. & Simon, M. Evaluating local knowledge to develop integrative invasive-species control strategies. Hum. Ecol. 41, 779–788 (2013).
Jevon, T. & Shackleton, C. M. Integrating local knowledge and forest surveys to assess Lantana camara impacts on indigenous species recruitment in Mazeppa Bay, South Africa. Hum. Ecol. 43, 247–254 (2015).
Hu, R. & Gill, N. Movement of garden plants from market to bushland: gardeners’ plant procurement and garden-related behaviour. Geogr. Res. 53, 134–144 (2015).
Zagorski, T., Kirkpatrick, J. & Stratford, E. Gardens and the bush: gardeners’ attitudes, garden types and invasives. Australian Geogr. Studies 42, 207–220 (2004).
Trigger, D. & Mulcock, J. Native vs exotic: cultural discourse about flora, fauna and belonging in Australia. WIT Trans. Ecol. Environ. 84, 1301–1310 (2005).
Qvenild, M., Setten, G. & Skår, M. Politicising plants: dwelling and invasive alien species in domestic gardens in Norway. Norwegian J. Geogr. 68, 22–33 (2014).
Sjöholm, C. & Saltzman, K. in Nature, Time and Environmental Management: Scandinavian and Australian perspectives on peoples and landscapes (eds Head, L., Saltzman, K., Setten, G. & Stenseke, M. ) 112–129 (Routledge, 2017).
Barker, K. Flexible boundaries in biosecurity: accommodating gorse in Aotearoa New Zealand. Environ. Planning A 40, 1598–1614 (2008).
Atchison, J. & Head, L. Eradicating bodies in invasive plant management. Environ. Planning D 31, 951–968 (2013).
Ryan, J. C. Botanical memory: exploring emotional recollections of native flora in the Southwest of Western Australia. Emotion Space Soc. 8, 27–38 (2013).
Instone, L. Unruly grasses: affective attunements in the ecological restoration of urban native grasslands in Australia. Emotion Space Soc. 10, 79–86 (2014).
Trudgill, S. A requiem for the British flora? Emotional biogeographies and environmental change. Area 40, 99–107 (2008).
Hitchings, R. People, plants and performance: on actor network theory and the material pleasures of the private garden. Social Cultur. Geogr. 4, 99–114 (2003).
Power, E. R. Human–nature relations in suburban gardens. Australian Geogr. 36, 39–53 (2005).
Doody, B. J., Perkins, H. C., Sullivan, J. J., Meurk, C. D. & Stewart, G. H. Performing weeds: Gardening, plant agencies and urban plant conservation. Geoforum 56, 124–136 (2014).
Head, L., Atchison, J. & Phillips, C. The distinctive capacities of plants: re-thinking difference via invasive species. Trans. Instit. British Geogr. 40, 399–413 (2015).
Woods, M. & Moriarty, P. V. Strangers in a strange land: the problem of exotic species. Environ. Values 10, 163–191 (2001).
Kendle, A. D. & Rose, J. E. The aliens have landed! What are the justifications for ‘native only’policies in landscape plantings? Landsc. Urban Planning 47, 19–31 (2000).
Godden, L., Nelson, R. & Peel, J. Controlling invasive species: managing risks to Australia's agricultural sustainability and biodiversity protection. Australasian J. Environ. Manage. 13, 166–184 (2006).
Beck, K. G. et al. Invasive species defined in a policy context: recommendations from the Federal Invasive Species Advisory Committee. Invas. Plant Sci. Manage. 1, 414–421 (2008).
Maye, D., Dibden, J., Higgins, V. & Potter, C. Governing biosecurity in a neoliberal world: comparative perspectives from Australia and the United Kingdom. Environ. Planning A 44, 150–168 (2012).
Clark, N. The demon-seed bioinvasion as the unsettling of environmental cosmopolitanism. Theory Cult. Soc. 19, 101–125 (2002).
Keller, R. P. & Perrings, C. International policy options for reducing the environmental impacts of invasive species. BioScience 61, 1005–1012 (2011).
Barbier, E. B., Knowler, D., Gwatipedza, J., Reichard, S. H. & Hodges, A. R. Implementing policies to control invasive plant species. BioScience 63, 132–138 (2013).
Genovesi, P. in Issues in Bioinvasion Science: EEI 2003: A Contribution to the Knowledge on Invasive Alien Species (eds Capdevila-Arguelles, L. & Zilletti, B. ) 127–133 (2005).
Schmiedel, D. et al. Evaluation system for management measures of invasive alien species. Biodivers. Conserv. 25, 357–374 (2016).
Hulme, P. E., Pyšek, P., Nentwig, W. & Vilà, M. Will threat of biological invasions unite the European Union. Science 324, 40–41 (2009).
Olwig, K. R. Natives and aliens in the national landscape. Landsc. Res. 28, 61–74 (2003).
Liu, S. & Cook, D. Eradicate, contain, or live with it? Collaborating with stakeholders to evaluate responses to invasive species. Food Secur. 8, 49–59 (2016).
Reed, M. S. Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Biol. Conserv. 141, 2417–2431 (2008).
Touza, J., Pérez-Alonso, A., Chas-Amil, M. L. & Dehnen-Schmutz, K. Explaining the rank order of invasive plants by stakeholder groups. Ecol. Econ. 105, 330–341 (2014).
García-Llorente, M., Martín-López, B., González, J. A., Alcorlo, P. & Montes, C. Social perceptions of the impacts and benefits of invasive alien species: implications for management. Biol. Conserv. 141, 2969–2983 (2008).
Shackleton, R. T., Le Maitre, D. C., van Wilgen, B. W. & Richardson, D. M. Identifying barriers to effective management of widespread invasive alien trees: Prosopis species (mesquite) in South Africa as a case study. Glob. Environ. Change 38, 183–194 (2016).
Brenner, J. C. Pasture conversion, private ranchers, and the invasive exotic buffelgrass (Pennisetum ciliare) in Mexico's Sonoran Desert. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 101, 84–106 (2011).
Binimelis, R., Pengue, W. & Monterroso, I. “Transgenic treadmill”: responses to the emergence and spread of glyphosate-resistant johnsongrass in Argentina. Geoforum 40, 623–633 (2009).
Graham, S. Three cooperative pathways to solving a collective weed management problem. Australasian J. Environ. Manage. 20, 116–129 (2013).
Atchison, J. Experiments in co-existence: the science and practices of biocontrol in invasive species management. Environ. Planning A 47, 1697–1712 (2015).
Head, L. et al. Living with invasive plants in the Anthropocene: the importance of understanding practice and experience. Conserv. Soc. 13, 311 (2015).
Hawthorne, T. L. et al. Mapping non-native invasive species and accessibility in an urban forest: a case study of participatory mapping and citizen science in Atlanta, Georgia. Appl. Geogr. 56, 187–198 (2015).
Head, L. & Atchison, J. Governing invasive plants: policy and practice in managing the Gamba grass (Andropogon gayanus)–bushfire nexus in northern Australia. Land Use Pol. 47, 225–234 (2015).
Richardson, D. M. & Pyšek, P. Plant invasions: merging the concepts of species invasiveness and community invasibility. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 30, 409–431 (2006).
Robbins, P. Comparing invasive networks: cultural and political biographies of invasive species. Geogr. Rev. 94, 139–156 (2004).
Ogden, L. et al. Global assemblages, resilience, and Earth Stewardship in the Anthropocene. Front. Ecol. Environ. 11, 341–347 (2013).
Hobbs, R. J. et al. Novel ecosystems: theoretical and management aspects of the new ecological world order. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 15, 1–7 (2006).
Ellis, E. C. & Ramankutty, N. Putting people in the map: anthropogenic biomes of the world. Front. Ecol. Environ. 6, 439–447 (2008).
Funding was provided by the Australian Research Council (FL0992397). I am grateful to many colleagues who have discussed these issues over the years, particularly J. Atchison, N. Gill and D. Trigger. Thanks to T. Roberts and I. Aguirre-Bielschowsky for assistance with literature searches.
The author declares no competing financial interests.
About this article
Cite this article
Head, L. The social dimensions of invasive plants. Nature Plants 3, 17075 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nplants.2017.75
Exploring farmers’ behavior toward individual and collective measures of Western Corn Rootworm control – A case study in south-east Austria
Journal of Environmental Management (2020)
Nature Climate Change (2020)
Conservation Biology (2020)
Journal of Environmental Management (2019)
Environmental values, knowledge and behaviour: Contributions of an emergent literature on the role of ethnicity and migration
Progress in Human Geography (2019)