Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Conserved imprinting associated with unique epigenetic signatures in the Arabidopsis genus

Abstract

In plants, imprinted gene expression occurs in endosperm seed tissue and is sometimes associated with differential DNA methylation between maternal and paternal alleles1. Imprinting is theorized to have been selected for because of conflict between parental genomes in offspring2, but most studies of imprinting have been conducted in Arabidopsis thaliana, an inbred primarily self-fertilizing species that should have limited parental conflict. We examined embryo and endosperm allele-specific expression and DNA methylation genome-wide in the wild outcrossing species Arabidopsis lyrata. Here we show that the majority of A. lyrata imprinted genes also exhibit parentally biased expression in A. thaliana, suggesting that there is evolutionary conservation in gene imprinting. Surprisingly, we discovered substantial interspecies differences in methylation features associated with paternally expressed imprinted genes (PEGs). Unlike in A. thaliana, the maternal allele of many A. lyrata PEGs was hypermethylated in the CHG context. Increased maternal allele CHG methylation was associated with increased expression bias in favour of the paternal allele. We propose that CHG methylation maintains or reinforces repression of maternal alleles of PEGs. These data suggest that the genes subject to imprinting are largely conserved, but there is flexibility in the epigenetic mechanisms employed between closely related species to maintain monoallelic expression. This supports the idea that imprinting of specific genes is a functional phenomenon, and not simply a byproduct of seed epigenomic reprogramming.

This is a preview of subscription content

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Identification of imprinted genes in A. lyrata and comparison to A. thaliana.
Figure 2: A. lyrata endosperm exhibits an unusual methylation profile.
Figure 3: A. lyrata PEGs are associated with maternal allele CHG gene body hypermethylation.
Figure 4: Conserved PEGs exhibit distinct methylation profiles between species.

References

  1. Gehring, M. Genomic imprinting: insights from plants. Annu. Rev. Genet. 47, 187–208 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Haig, D. & Westoby, M. Parent-specific gene expression and the triploid endosperm. Am. Nat. 134, 147–155 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hsieh, T.-F. et al. Regulation of imprinted gene expression in Arabidopsis endosperm. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 1755–1762 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wolff, P. et al. High-resolution analysis of parent-of-origin allelic expression in the Arabidopsis Endosperm. PLoS Genet. 7, e1002126 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gehring, M., Missirian, V. & Henikoff, S. Genomic analysis of parent-of-origin allelic expression in Arabidopsis thaliana seeds. PLoS ONE 6, e23687 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pignatta, D. et al. Natural epigenetic polymorphisms lead to intraspecific variation in Arabidopsis gene imprinting. eLife e03198 (2014).

  7. Luo, M. et al. A genome-wide survey of imprinted genes in rice seeds reveals imprinting primarily occurs in the endosperm. PLoS Genet. 7, e1002125 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Waters, A. J. et al. Parent-of-origin effects on gene expression and DNA methylation in the maize endosperm. Plant Cell 23, 4221–4233 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Xin, M. et al. Dynamic expression of imprinted genes associates with maternally controlled nutrient allocation during maize endosperm development. Plant Cell 25, 3212–3227 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang, M. et al. Extensive, clustered parental imprinting of protein-coding and noncoding RNAs in developing maize endosperm. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 20042–20047 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang, M. et al. Genome-wide high resolution parental-specific DNA and histone methylation maps uncover patterns of imprinting regulation in maize. Genome Res. 24, 167–176 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Moreno-Romero, J., Jiang, H., Santos-González, J. & Köhler, C. Parental epigenetic asymmetry of PRC2-mediated histone modifications in the Arabidopsis endosperm. EMBO J. 35, 1298–1311 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Patten, M. M. et al. The evolution of genomic imprinting: theories, predictions and empirical tests. Heredity 113, 119–128 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Waters, A. J. et al. Comprehensive analysis of imprinted genes in maize reveals allelic variation for imprinting and limited conservation with other species. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 19639–19644 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Berger, F., Vu, T. M., Li, J. & Chen, B. Hypothesis: selection of imprinted genes is driven by silencing deleterious gene activity in somatic tissues. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 77, 23–29 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kawashima, T. & Berger, F. Epigenetic reprogramming in plant sexual reproduction. Nat. Rev. Genet. 15, 613–624 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Beilstein, M. A., Nagalingum, N. S., Clements, M. D., Manchester, S. R. & Mathews, S. Dated molecular phylogenies indicate a Miocene origin for Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 18724–18728 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Morison, I. M. & Reeve, A. E. A catalogue of imprinted genes and parent-of-origin effects in humans and animals. Hum. Mol. Genet. 7, 1599–1609 (1998).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Danilevskaya, O. N. et al. Duplicated fie genes in maize: expression pattern and imprinting suggest distinct functions. Plant Cell 15, 425–438 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Matzke, M. A. & Mosher, R. A. RNA-directed DNA methylation: an epigenetic pathway of increasing complexity. Nat. Rev. Genet. 15, 394–408 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gehring, M., Bubb, K. L. & Henikoff, S. Extensive demethylation of repetitive elements during seed development underlies gene imprinting. Science 324, 1447–1451 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ibarra, C. A. et al. Active DNA demethylation in plant companion cells reinforces transposon methylation in gametes. Science 337, 1360–1364 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Du, J. et al. Dual binding of chromomethylase domains to H3K9me2-containing nucleosomes directs DNA methylation in plants. Cell 151, 167–180 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Saze, H., Shiraishi, A., Miura, A. & Kakutani, T. Control of genic DNA methylation by a jmjC domain-containing protein in Arabidopsis thaliana. Science 319, 462–465 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Rigal, M., Kevei, Z., Pélissier, T. & Mathieu, O. DNA methylation in an intron of the IBM1 histone demethylase gene stabilizes chromatin modification patterns. EMBO J. 31, 2981–2993 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Schatlowski, N. et al. Hypomethylated pollen bypasses the interploidy hybridization barrier in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 26, 3556–3568 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Deleris, A. et al. Loss of the DNA methyltransferase MET1 induces H3K9 hypermethylation at PcG target genes and redistribution of H3K27 trimethylation to transposons in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS Genet. 8, e1003062 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hu, T. T. et al. The Arabidopsis lyrata genome sequence and the basis of rapid genome size change. Nat. Genet. 43, 476–481 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kim, D. et al. TopHat2: accurate alignment of transcriptomes in the presence of insertions, deletions and gene fusions. Genome Biol. 14, R36 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Krueger, F. & Andrews, S. R. Bismark: a flexible aligner and methylation caller for Bisulfite-Seq applications. Bioinformatics 27, 1571–1572 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

M.G. thanks members of the NESCent working group on Testing Theories of Genomic Imprinting for many stimulating discussions. We thank O. Savolainen for kindly providing A. lyrata Karhumäki seeds, the Whitehead Institute Bioinformatics and Research Computing group for assistance, and P.R. Satyaki and B. Williams for comments on the manuscript. This research was funded by NSF grants MCB 1121952 and 1453459 to M.G. C.L.P. is supported by an NSF graduate research fellowship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

M.G. conceived the project, M.K. performed experiments, C.L.P. developed and implemented computational analyses, M.K., C.L.P. and M.G. analysed data and wrote the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mary Gehring.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Methods, Supplementary References, Supplementary Figure 1-10 (PDF 1904 kb)

Supplementary Table 1

mRNA-seq samples used in this study (XLSX 92 kb)

Supplementary Table 2

Read count and FPKM values for all genes in all samples (XLSX 24948 kb)

Supplementary Table 3

Endosperm imprinting statistics for all genes in all pairwise comparisons (XLSX 29931 kb)

Supplementary Table 4

Endosperm MEGs and PEGs and overlap with DMRs and Tes (XLSX 99 kb)

Supplementary Table 5

Bisulfite-seq samples used in this study and overall methylation data (XLSX 66 kb)

Supplementary Table 6

Features of DMRs and overlap with genes and TEs (XLSX 55 kb)

Supplementary Table 7

Homozygous SNPs identified between Kar and MN47 (XLSX 46 kb)

Supplementary Table 8

Primers used in this study (XLSX 14626 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Klosinska, M., Picard, C. & Gehring, M. Conserved imprinting associated with unique epigenetic signatures in the Arabidopsis genus. Nature Plants 2, 16145 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nplants.2016.145

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nplants.2016.145

Further reading

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing