Research investment implications of shifts in the global geography of wheat stripe rust

  • Nature Plants 1, Article number: 15132 (2015)
  • doi:10.1038/nplants.2015.132
  • Download Citation
Published online:


Breeding new crop varieties with resistance to the biotic stresses that undermine crop yields is tantamount to increasing the amount and quality of biological capital in agriculture. However, the success of genes that confer resistance to pests induces a co-evolutionary response that depreciates the biological capital embodied in the crop, as pests evolve the capacity to overcome the crop's new defences. Thus, simply maintaining this biological capital, and the beneficial production and economic outcomes it bestows, requires continual reinvestment in new crop defences. Here we use observed and modelled data on stripe rust occurrence to gauge changes in the geographic spread of the disease over recent decades. We document a significant increase in the spread of stripe rust since 1960, with 88% of the world's wheat production now susceptible to infection. Using a probabilistic Monte Carlo simulation model we estimate that 5.47 million tonnes of wheat are lost to the pathogen each year, equivalent to a loss of US$979 million per year. Comparing the cost of developing stripe-rust-resistant varieties of wheat with the cost of stripe-rust-induced yield losses, we estimate that a sustained annual research investment of at least US$32 million into stripe rust resistance is economically justified.

  • Subscribe to Nature Plants for full access:



Additional access options:

Already a subscriber?  Log in  now or  Register  for online access.


  1. 1.

    FAOSTAT (FAO, 2015);

  2. 2.

    & Moving matters: the effect of location on crop production. J. Econ. Hist. 75, 219–249 (2015).

  3. 3.

    & in Principles of Plant Pathology Ch. 12 (Ronald, 1957).

  4. 4.

    & in Wheat in the Third World Ch. 9 (Westview, 1982).

  5. 5.

    & (eds) Future Challenges in Crop Protection Against Fungal Pathogens (Springer, 2014).

  6. 6.

    Global status of stripe rust: a review of historical and current threats. Euphytica 179, 129–141 (2011).

  7. 7.

    & Evidence for increased aggressiveness in a recent widespread strain of Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici causing stripe rust of wheat. Phytopathology 99, 89–94 (2009).

  8. 8.

    & in The Cereal Rusts (eds Roelfs, A. P. & Bushnell, W. R.) Ch. 9 (Academic, 1985).

  9. 9.

    & Temperature adaptation in Australasian populations of Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici. Plant Path. 63, 572–580 (2014).

  10. 10.

    & Nomenclature and concepts of pathogenicity and virulence. Ann. Rev. Phytopath. 30, 47–66 (1992).

  11. 11.

    Puccinia striiformis in Australia: A review of the incursion, evolution, and adaptation of stripe rust in the period 1979–2006. Aust. J. Ag. Res. 58, 567–575 (2007).

  12. 12.

    & Challenges for sustainable rust control in South Africa. Aust. J. Ag. Res. 58, 593–601 (2007).

  13. 13.

    & Clonality and long distance migration of Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici in north-west Europe. Plant Path. 51, 24–32 (2002).

  14. 14.

    Small grain losses due to rust USDA;

  15. 15.

    & Puccinia striiformis Pest Geography (InSTePP-HarvestChoice, 2014).

  16. 16.

    & The relationship between wheat yield and stripe rust as affected by length of epidemic and temperature at the grain development stage of crop growth. Plant Path. 43, 397–405 (1994).

  17. 17.

    & Re-examining the reported rates of return to food and agricultural research and development. Am. J. Ag. Econ. 96, 1492–1504 (2014).

  18. 18.

    & Escalating threat of wheat rusts. Science 23, 369 (2010).

  19. 19.

    et al. Right-sizing stem-rust research. Science 340, 147–148 (2013).

  20. 20.

    et al. Spatial Production Allocation Model (SPAM) 2005 v2.0 (International Food Policy Research Institute, 2014);

  21. 21.

    et al. A bounds analysis of world food futures: global agriculture through to 2050. Aust. J. Ag. Resour. Econ. 58, 571–589 (2014).

Download references


We thank R. Singh for technical guidance. In addition, attendees of the Borlaug Global Rust Initiative (BGRI) meetings at New Delhi (August 2013) and Obregon, Mexico (March 2014) and the Second International Wheat Stripe Rust Symposium at Izmir, Turkey (April 2014) provided valuable comments and feedback. A substantial portion of the funding was provided by the Wheat CRP by way of the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) with additional support from the University of Minnesota's MnDRIVE Global Food Ventures Initiative and the International Science and Technology Practice and Policy (InSTePP) Center. R.F.P. and W.C. received support from the Australian Grains Research and Development Corporation.

Author information


  1. International Science and Technology Practice and Policy (InSTePP) Center in the Department of Applied Economics at the University of Minnesota, 1994 Buford Ave, 248 Ruttan Hall, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55108, USA

    • Jason M. Beddow
    • , Philip G. Pardey
    • , Yuan Chai
    • , Terrance M. Hurley
    • , Darren J. Kriticos
    •  & Tania Yonow
  2. Stakman-Bourlaug Cereal Rust Center at the University of Minnesota, 495 Borlaug Hall, 1991 Upper Buford Circle, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55108, USA

    • Jason M. Beddow
    • , Philip G. Pardey
    •  & Terrance M. Hurley
  3. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO), GPO Box 1700, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, 2601, Australia

    • Jason M. Beddow
    • , Philip G. Pardey
    • , Terrance M. Hurley
    • , Darren J. Kriticos
    •  & Tania Yonow
  4. International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), El Batán, Texcoco, Edo. de México 56237, Mexico

    • Hans-Joachim Braun
  5. Plant Breeding Institute at the University of Sydney, Private Bag 4011, Narellan, New South Wales 2567, Sydney, Australia

    • Robert F. Park
  6. New South Wales Department of Primary Industries, NSW DPI, Locked Bag 21, Orange, New South Wales 2800, Australia

    • William S. Cuddy


  1. Search for Jason M. Beddow in:

  2. Search for Philip G. Pardey in:

  3. Search for Yuan Chai in:

  4. Search for Terrance M. Hurley in:

  5. Search for Darren J. Kriticos in:

  6. Search for Hans-Joachim Braun in:

  7. Search for Robert F. Park in:

  8. Search for William S. Cuddy in:

  9. Search for Tania Yonow in:


P.G.P., J.M.B. and T.M.H. designed the study and methods; D.J.K., J.M.B., Y.C., R.F.P., H.J.B., T.Y. and W.S.C. compiled and interpreted distribution data and developed the species niche model; Y.C. and T.M.H. undertook the probabilistic assessment; J.M.B. implemented the spatial assessment; P.G.P., J.M.B., T.M.H., Y.C., R.F.P. and W.S.C. wrote the paper.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jason M. Beddow.

Supplementary information