Recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (RDEB) is a severe disorder caused by mutations to the COL7A1 gene that deactivate production of a structural protein essential for skin integrity. Haematopoietic cell transplantation can ameliorate some of the symptoms; however, significant side effects from the allogeneic transplant procedure can occur and unresponsive areas of blistering persist. Therefore, we employed genome editing in patient-derived cells to create an autologous platform for multilineage engineering of therapeutic cell types. The clustered regularly interspaced palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/Cas9 system facilitated correction of an RDEB-causing COL7A1 mutation in primary fibroblasts that were then used to derive induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). The resulting iPSCs were subsequently re-differentiated into keratinocytes, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and haematopoietic progenitor cells using defined differentiation strategies. Gene-corrected keratinocytes exhibited characteristic epithelial morphology and expressed keratinocyte-specific genes and transcription factors. iPSC-derived MSCs exhibited a spindle morphology and expression of CD73, CD90 and CD105 with the ability to undergo adipogenic, chondrogenic and osteogenic differentiation in vitro in a manner indistinguishable from bone marrow-derived MSCs. Finally, we used a vascular induction strategy to generate potent definitive haematopoietic progenitors capable of multilineage differentiation in methylcellulose-based assays. In totality, we have shown that CRISPR/Cas9 is an adaptable gene-editing strategy that can be coupled with iPSC technology to produce multiple gene-corrected autologous cell types with therapeutic potential for RDEB.
Recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (RDEB) is a monogenic disorder resulting from mutations in the type VII collagen gene (COL7A1) on chromosome 3. The mutational profile can be heterogeneic in regards to position and can encompass homozygous or compound heterozygous alterations.1 The resultant loss of the functional type VII collagen protein (C7) at the dermal-epidermal junction compromises the integrity of the attachment of the epidermis to the dermis, resulting in severe blistering, fibrosis and a predisposition to squamous cell carcinoma. Non-cutaneous manifestations, including corneal and oesophageal lesions, further contribute to a pathogenic state leading to a multi-decade decrease in life expectancy.
Treatment for RDEB includes palliative bandaging of active wounds and pain management, as well as allogeneic and autologous cellular therapy. Palliation is non-curative, and cellular therapy can include localised injection of type VII collagen-expressing cells and/or systemic infusion of haematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPCs) that repopulate the host with donor-derived cells.2 Keratinocytes and fibroblasts represent the major C7 producing cells of the skin; however, their poor in vitro proliferative and expansion properties as primary cells limit their therapeutic potential and impact. Mesenchymal stromal/stem cells (MSCs) have been used as a supportive therapy and possess wound migratory potential and the ability to actively participate in, as well as to orchestrate, healing.3,4 Similar to other primary cells, primary bone marrow-derived MSCs can senesce and lose their beneficial properties with in vitro expansion.
Towards mediating systemic effects, allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) has been employed. HCT has resulted in significant, but neither uniform nor complete, outcomes.5 For each modality, the use of allogeneic cells limits efficacy. Locally injected cells appear to persist transiently, likely due to immune clearance, necessitating repeated injections that is limiting in terms of the difficulty in long-term culture/maintenance, surface area able to be treated, and availability of allogeneic cells that can be obtained, archived and expanded for subsequent injections.6 HCT can result in graft-versus-host disease that can cause severe side effects, making the use of autologous cells highly desirous. To realise the potential of such an approach, we set out to determine whether an RDEB patient’s COL7A1 gene defect could be restored to wild-type status in a population of cells that could be utilised as a template for sustainable multilineage progeny generation.
Two major platforms exist for facilitating gene correction: gene therapy and gene editing. Gene therapy for RDEB has centred primarily on lentiviral gene transfer of a copy of the COL7A1 cDNA, expression of which is governed by exogenous regulatory elements.7,8 While this strategy meets the need for autologous cellular engineering, there are significant hurdles to this approach. The large size of the cDNA can negatively impact viral titres making manufacturing, production and efficient gene delivery rates suboptimal. Further, the integrating properties of vectors capable of long-term gene expression represent a risk for insertional mutagenic-derived adverse events. This fact is particularly relevant given that RDEB patients are at an increased risk for squamous cell carcinoma, thus potentially placing cutaneous cells in a pre-malignant state that are less tolerant to the genomic perturbation that accompanies integrating vectors.9 In addition, the artificial expression cassette components are not subject to the normal cellular gene regulatory environment. This point is highly relevant, as perturbation of ECM protein expression has been shown to impact the cellular microenvironment, and the long-term effect of supra-physiological COL7A1 expression is unknown. These considerations make gene editing the preferred methodology for autologous cell precision correction in situ that mitigates genomic toxicity and maintains the endogenous cellular gene expression command and control system.
Gene targeting at translational efficiency requires site-specific reagents that cleave the DNA helix, and there are multiple candidates capable of accomplishing this. Zinc finger nucleases and transcription activator-like effector nucleases function as dimeric proteins that co-localise at a target site and mediate a double-stranded DNA break.10,
Here we utilised the CRISPR/Cas9 system to facilitate gene repair in cells from an RDEB patient. Correction of COL7A1 fibroblasts was achieved, and these fibroblasts were used as a renewable template for patient-specific induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) derivation. To capitalise on the ease of continuous propagation and broad differentiation potential of iPSCs, they were employed in a therapeutic engineering strategy to generate keratinocytes, MSCs and haematopoietic cells. This multilineage approach represents a strategy for broad therapeutic use in support of combinatorial systemic and localised interventions.14
The overall experimental schema is detailed in Figure 1 and is a strategy that employed patient-derived fibroblasts that were precisely modified with a CRISPR/Cas9 mutation-specific reagent. Cells were induced to pluripotency with Sendai viral, footprint-free reprogramming and differentiated into effector lineages.
CRISPR/Cas9 gene correction
We generated three candidate gRNAs proximal to the 4317delC COL7A1 gene mutation characterised by a single cytosine deletion (Supplementary Figures S1a and b) for testing with the S. pyogenes Cas9 that was delivered as DNA expression cassettes (Supplementary Figures S1c and d). Using the Surveyor assay,15 all three candidates resulted in cleavage products consistent with Cas9 activity and DNA repair by non-homologous end joining (Supplementary Figures S1e and f). Because fibroblasts are a major contributor of C7 in the dermis, we deployed CRISPR/Cas9 reagents for gene correction using a targeting strategy comprised of three plasmids: Cas9 nuclease or nickase, the C7 gRNA, and an exogenous donor repair template (Figure 1c and Supplementary Figure S2a). The Cas9 nuclease generates double-stranded DNA breaks while the nickase version, due to inactivation of the Cas9 HNH domain, cleaves a single strand of DNA.16 A double-stranded DNA donor template was constructed consisting of homology arms of ~1 kb flanking a floxed puromycin drug resistance gene in such a way that it would be inserted into an adjacent intron for selection and subsequent cre-recombinase-mediated removal (Figure 1c and Supplementary Figure S2a). To allow for unambiguous determination of donor-derived HDR, we included silent polymorphisms within the right donor arm (Supplementary Figure S2a). The donor fragment and the nuclease or nickase version of Cas9 and gRNA 2 were electroporated into fibroblasts that were then puromycin-selected in bulk. The puromycin-resistant cells were screened for HDR using an ‘inside-out’ PCR strategy, with a primer inside the donor and outside of the right homology arm.
Bulk population cells were plated at low density to allow for clonal selection, expansion and screening, and 17 total clones were obtained. Four clones that received the Cas9 nickase, and eight treated with Cas9 nuclease, showed HDR at the genomic level (Figure 1d and Supplementary Figure S2b). The puromycin cassette was subsequently removed using cre-mRNA, which resulted in a small loxp footprint in the intron (Supplementary Figure S2c). Screening at the cDNA level showed gene correction and donor polymorphism presence in COL7A1 gene transcripts (Supplementary Figure S2d). These data show the ability of the CRISPR/Cas9 to mediate gene repair in primary fibroblasts obtained from an RDEB patient that, importantly, retained a normal morphology and karyotype (Supplementary Figures S3a and b).
An important consideration for the employment of programmable gene-editing reagents is their specificity for the intended gene target. Because of the presence of sequences of partial homology to the bona fide target, we utilised a predictive in silico modelling algorithm to identify potential off-target sites (Table 1). To determine whether promiscuous CRISPR/Cas9 cutting occurred, we screened the putative off-target sites using the Surveyor assay. We observed one off-target site in the ACAP3 gene (Supplementary Figure S4) that functions as a GTPase activating protein.17 Importantly, the nickase version of Cas9 that preferentially promotes HDR15 did not show any mutagenic non-homologous end joining at this locus (Supplementary Figure S4) and we therefore employed nickase-corrected clones for reprogramming to pluripotency.
RDEB gene-corrected iPSCs
Utilising Sendai virus-based reprogramming, we obtained transgene-free, gene-corrected, karytotypically normal iPSCs (Supplementary Figures S3c and d). Resultant iPSC clones were positive for pluripotent markers at the protein (Supplementary Figure S5) and gene expression levels (Supplementary Figure S6a). As further verification of successful reprogramming, the OCT4 and NANOG gene promoters were observed to be hypomethylated, and in vivo teratomas derived from gene-corrected iPSCs contained representative tissues from all three germ layers. (Supplementary Figures S6b and c).
These results demonstrate that CRISPR/Cas9 genome modification and Sendai virus reprogramming allow for precision repair and iPSC generation. We subsequently employed this population of cells to derive therapeutic cell types suitable for cellular therapies for RDEB.
Production of keratinocytes from gene-corrected iPSCs
Treatment of the chronic wounds experienced by RDEB patients could be bolstered by the localised delivery of gene-corrected keratinocytes. To demonstrate that iPSCs derived from CRISPR/Cas9 gene-corrected RDEB fibroblasts are capable of differentiating into therapeutically relevant cell populations in vitro, we utilised protocols to produce keratinocytes under fully defined, feeder-free conditions.18,
Production of MSCs from gene-corrected iPSCs
MSCs are mesoderm-derived, fibroblastic cells present within many tissues, including bone marrow and adipose. There is substantial evidence that MSCs or MSC-derived cells can enhance wound healing via modulation of wound microenvironment, immunomodulation, or by direct integration into cutaneous tissues after transplant.21,
Production of definitive haematopoietic progenitors from gene-corrected iPSCs
Although cutaneous blistering is the most apparent pathology observed in patients with RDEB, it is the systemic manifestations—including mucosal blistering—that are often the most destructive and life-threatening and which cannot be resolved by localised grafting of epidermal cell types such as keratinocytes or fibroblasts. Our group and others have previously reported the amelioration of systemic RDEB pathology by HCT that is associated with a substantial risk of morbidity and mortality during the preparative and post-transplant period.29,30 Therefore, the generation of gene-corrected HSPCs would be a highly desirable approach for autologous therapy. Although targeted gene-editing in severe combined immune deficiency-repopulating human HSPCs has been demonstrated, the efficiency is not yet robust enough for models such as RDEB that do not confer a selective or proliferative advantage to the modified cell(s).31,
RDEB is associated with a loss of the functional integrity of the dermal-epidermal junction, which results in painful erosions and blistering. The disease process is not limited to the cutaneous manifestations; therefore, a platform for combinatorial regenerative medicine must possess attributes of tissue plasticity, migratory properties and an effector lineage capable of C7 deposition. To date, infusions of allogeneic HSCs and progenitor cells, fibroblasts, keratinocytes and MSCs have all been pursued clinically. Although HCT confers a lifelong supply of donor-derived cells, the mechanism for wound repair remains poorly understood. Further, areas of the skin are often refractory to benefit from HCT, and supportive localised therapy is required for more penetrant effects. Fibroblasts and keratinocytes are the primary C7-producing cells in the skin and have been utilised for localised, supportive therapy as have MSCs, which possess the capacity to home to wounded tissue and deposit C7.42 No one cell type is endowed with each of these beneficial properties, and post-injection cellular persistence is transient in nature requiring repetitive delivery necessitating a manufacturing process reliant on long-term culture and expansion that may drive the cells towards senescence. Autologous RDEB iPSCs that are derived from patient cells represent a potential solution to this shortcoming provided that a corrected COL7A1 gene sequence is present.18,43 To maximise the potential of this approach, we coupled cellular reprogramming with precision gene correction, representing a platform for production of autologous cell types for regenerative medicine.44,
Members of our group,44 and Chamorro et al.47 have utilised transcription activator-like effector nucleases for COL7A1 gene correction in fibroblasts and keratinocytes, respectively. In a study by Izmiryan et al. meganucleases with an integrase-deficient lentiviral vector were used to mediate gene repair in keratinocytes and fibroblasts.45 Sebastiano et al.46 and Wenzel et al.48 used iPSCs as a template for gene correction without classically engineered nucleases. They used a flip recombinase in murine cells or a pro-recombinogenic corrective donor construct alone delivered on an adeno-associated viral vector in human cells, respectively.46 These studies show that the RDEB genotype and phenotype are amenable to correction by genome engineering. Building off these studies we set out to resolve two gaps in the current RDEB cellular and genome-engineering procedures: (i) integration-free derivation and subsequent feeder-free maintenance of iPSCs; and (ii) the utilisation of genetically corrected iPSCs for generation of multiple therapeutic cell types under defined conditions as proof of concept for multilineage cellular therapy (Figure 1). Towards the former, we and others have used integrating vector delivery of the iPSC reprogramming factors that either remain in the genome or require subsequent removal.43,44 In the latter, our previous work relied on in vivo teratoma formation that occurs in poorly defined conditions that are not able to be controlled ex vivo.44 Sebastiano et al. report efficient generation of minimally heterogeneic keratinocytes; however, this cell population does not represent a durable modality for broad use. As such, in the current work we describe a gene correction strategy employing the CRISPR/Cas9 system that resulted in gene correction in fibroblasts that are of immediate value for localised C7 production. We then employed the Sendai reprogramming methodology to generate iPSCs that were used for subsequent derivation of multilineage cell types with therapeutic value.
Three CRISPR/Cas9 targeting candidates were tested, with one employed for gene correction in comparative studies with the nuclease or nickase version of the S. pyogenes Cas9 (Supplementary Figure S1). Similar to previous observations, we observed a lower overall rate of HR using the nickase (4/12 clones showing HDR versus 8/12 for the nuclease); however, the preferential repair of DNA nicks by the HR pathway adds a further layer of specificity to the engineering process. This is highlighted by the observation of an off-target event at the ACAP3 gene with the nuclease, but not nickase, version of Cas9 (Table 1 and Supplementary Figure S4). The derivation of clones was facilitated by our donor design strategy that included a puromycin cassette that was knocked into an adjacent intron for subsequent removal by cre-recombinase (Figure 1 and Supplementary Figure S2). This approach allowed us to obtain a homogenous population of fibroblasts by selection, as opposed to non-selection-based strategies that have observed gene correction rates of <10%.45 This consideration is crucial given that the subsequent reprogramming process results in a sub-fraction of cells reprogrammed to pluripotency and, if the input is not uniform, extensive screening is mandated. Our target cell population was carefully considered due to the fact that fibroblasts competent for C7 protein expression have utility for localised therapy in RDEB.49 Given the comparatively diminished proliferation capacity and rate of fibroblasts compared with iPSCs, we also attempted gene correction in iPSCs due to the fact that HDR occurs in late S and G2.50,51 Surprisingly, we were unable to achieve gene correction in this patient’s iPSCs, while we obtained 12 corrected fibroblast clones. One possible explanation for this is poor accessibility due to the chromatin status of iPSCs versus fibroblasts. Given that at the resolution of western blotting we were unable to show C7 protein expression in iPSCs (Supplementary Figure S7c), and the poor ability of nucleases to modify silent or repressed genes,52 we postulate that the 4317 position of the COL7A1 locus may be refractory to gene modification as a result of chromatin state.
The Sendai virus reprogramming method is a non-integrating RNA virus platform that mediates robust reprogramming frequencies without retaining the reprogramming factors by virtue of natural loss by dilution as the cells divide.53 As such, the need for secondary factors (e.g., cre-recombinase) to remove the viral footprint is eliminated, as is the risk for adverse events associated with the random integration of viral vectors. Using this methodology, we obtained numerous clones and chose two (11-2 and 11-5) for iPSC quality assurance and control assessment. Each clone exhibited morphology consistent with pluripotency (i.e., discrete colonies with rounded edges), were karyotypically normal (Supplementary Figure S3), and expressed pluripotency-associated markers NANOG, TRA-60, −81, SSEA-3, −4 and OCT-3/4 (Supplementary Figure S5). Transcriptional profiling and promoter methylation analysis further confirmed successful reprogramming, and iPSC clones implanted into immune-deficient animals gave rise to teratomas consisting of tissues representative of all three germ layers (Supplementary Figure S6). These data demonstrate the successful reprogramming of CRISPR/Cas9 gene-corrected fibroblasts to iPSCs, which were subsequently maintained and propagated in feeder-free conditions and served as a renewable template for the generation of keratinocytes, MSCs and HPSCs.
Using defined conditions, we were able to derive epidermal cells with a morphology consistent with that of keratinocytes, and these cells expressed the keratinocyte markers KRT5, KRT14, p63, COL17A1 and COL7A1 (Figure 2). These iPSC-derived keratinocytes hold promise for localised application to chronic and/or severe wounds—either alone or in support of systemic therapy.
MSCs have shown promise as both a localised and systemic therapeutic intervention in the setting of RDEB. However, genetic correction of MSCs has not been demonstrated, leading us to pursue in vitro production of MSCs from our gene-corrected iPSCs. By exposing iPSCs to bFGF, PDGF and EGF, and utilising ROCK inhibition during the early passages, we were able consistently produce robust MSC cultures (Supplementary Figure S7). These cells were morphologically identical to bone marrow-derived MSCs (Figure 3a and Supplementary Figure S7), and were able to be expanded and propagated over multiple passages while retaining surface expression of CD73, CD105 and CD90, and the ability to undergo chondro-, osteo- and adipo-genic differentiation in a manner identical to bone marrow-derived MSCs (Figures 3b–e and Supplementary Figure S7). Importantly, from ~5×106 starting iPSCs, we were routinely able to generate >1×108 iPSC-MSCs (data not shown). Considering that a recent clinical trial using systemic delivery of MSCs for treatment of RDEB reported a dose of 1–3×106/kg3, our protocol is capable of generating clinically relevant yields of iPSC-MSCs.
A highly challenging hurdle in stem cell biology remains the in vitro conversion of iPSCs to definitive HPSCs. Despite substantial effort, there remains no robust, efficient, or clinically translatable method for converting iPSCs into HPSCs capable of long-term engraftment. Towards this goal, we sought to synergise several of the most promising advancements in this area to achieve a more robust platform for producing definitive-type HPSCs. The first improvement involved optimising the basal media composition for robust production and growth of EBs from feeder-free iPSCs under fully defined conditions. This centred on the stepwise induction of mesoderm with BMP-4 and bFGF followed by specification to haematopoiesis with vascular endothelial growth factor, stem cell factor, IL-3 and Flt-3 ligand. Further steps were small molecule inhibition of the Activin/Nodal pathway with SB431542 with augmentation of the Wnt pathway36 via inhibition of GS3Kβ with CHIR99021 to drive definitive haematopoiesis (Figures 4 and 5 and Supplementary Figure S9). Our hypothesis was that the culture conditions and modulation of the primitive and definitive fate determinant modulators with CHIR99021 and SB431542 would bias the cells away from primitive haematopoiesis and promote definitive haematopoietic commitment. However, even though EB-derived CD34+ hemogenic precursors were definitive in nature as evidenced by their capacity for T-lineage differentiation given the appropriate micro environmental cues, their intrinsic capacity for multilineage haematopoietic differentiation was limited in CFU assays. (Figure 4 and Supplementary Figure S9c). This prompted us to employ a vascular induction technique aimed at recapitulating the complicated embryonic haematopoietic niche environment ex vivo, to determine whether the instructive cues provided by the E4ORF1 transformed endothelial cells would promote maturation and expansion of EB-derived CD34+ cells to multilineage haematopoietic progenitors. In contrast to the data observed when EBs were utilised without vascular induction, the inclusion of the co-culture system resulted in the substantial increase of both the progenitor frequency and multilineage capacity (Figures 4 and 5). These data outline a robust, reproducible strategy for the in vitro production of multilineage definitive HPSCs from iPSCs.
In conjunction with our corresponding data showing the ability to correct RDEB-causing mutations and employ an engineering strategy that maximises the potential of iPSCs for therapeutic cell generation these results hold great promise for RDEB and other maladies that may benefit from regenerative medicine.
Materials and methods
Research subject and cell line derivation
Patient-derived samples were obtained following parental consent and approval from the University of Minnesota Institutional Review Board. A 4 mm skin punch biopsy was collected followed by mincing the skin tissue and submerging in complete DMEM media with 20% FBS, non-essential amino acids, antibiotics and glutamax all from Invitrogen, (Carlsbad, CA, USA). Primary fibroblasts were maintained in complete DMEM media under hypoxic (<2% O2) conditions.
NOD/SCID IL2rγcnull (NSG) mice were ordered from Jackson Laboratories (Bar Harbor, ME, USA). All animal studies were approved by the University of Minnesota Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.
CRISPR/Cas9 reagent and donor construction
The S. pyogenes hCas9 plasmid was a gift from Dr George Church (Addgene plasmid #41815),54 and the gRNAs were assembled into a plasmid with a U6 promoter and polIII termination signal.15 The donor sequence was comprised of left and right arms of homology that were assembled by amplification from the human genome with: Left arm F: 5′-CCTGACCTCTTCACCTCCTCAGGGCTTCC-3′, Left Arm R: 5′-GGGCCACACCTCACTCCCAAAGATACCAGG-3′. The Right arm was amplified with RT Arm1 F: 5′-AGGGTCATGGGGTCGTCATCTGTTTTCTAGGG-3′ and Reverse: 5′-AACTATGAAGCCCAGCACCCAACCACTGCCCCAGG-3′ that overlapped with a synthesised fragment containing the corrective base and two silent polymorphisms 5′-CTCTCCTGGGGCAGTGGTTGGGTGCTGGGCTTCATAGTTCTTGCTCATATTTTTACTCACTTCTTCCTAGGGTCTTCCTGGCAGCCCTGGACCCCAAGGCCCCGTTGGCCCCCCTGGAAAGAAAGGAGAAAAAGTAGGAAGGCTGACTTGATGATGTCCCAGTTCTGGGGTGGGAGGCTGCGTGCTGGGGGCAGCCTCCCTTCGGTCTTCCCACCCGTGTGTTTCTCCTTCAGGGTGACTC-3′. The remainder of the right donor arm was amplified with: Right Arm2 F: 5′-CACCCGTGTGTTTCTCCTTCAGGGTGACTC-3′ and reverse: 5′-GGGCAAGAAGTCAGAACCAGAAAGGGCACAGC-3′. These fragments were assembled into a plasmid containing the left donor arm followed by a floxed PGK puromycin cassette by Gibson assembly to complete the donor.55
Primary fibroblasts (200,000) were electroporated with 1 μg each of the Cas9 and gRNA plasmids and 5 μg of the donor using the following settings on the Neon Transfection System (Invitrogen): 1500 V, 20 ms pulse width, and a single pulse.44
Genomic DNA was isolated 48 h after Cas9/gRNA electroporation and amplified for with Surveyor 13F (5′-CCATGACCCTCATCACTCCT-3′) and Surveyor 708R primers (5′-TTTGGGGGTTCAGAGATTTG-3′) and incubated with the Surveyor nuclease (Integrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, IA, USA)56 and resolved on a 10% TBE PAGE gel (Invitrogen).
293T cells were transfected using Lipofectamine 2000 and the Cas9 nuclease or nickase (500 ng) and guide RNA plasmid (500 ng). Genomic DNA was isolated 72 h post gene transfer and PCR amplified with 4317 131F: 5′-TCCCAAAGTCCTTGAAATCC-3′) and 4317 777R: 5′-GCCCACCATATTCAGAATCC-3′) for on-target site amplification. Off-target sites were identified using the MIT CRISPR Design Tool (http://crispr.mit.edu/) and were amplified with following primers: ACAP3F: 5′-ACGGCCTTGTACAGAACTGG-3′, ACAP3R: 5′-GTGCTTTCGCTCCATCTCAC-3′, GRK6F: 5′-CCAGAGGAGCCTTGAGTTTG-3′, GRK6R: 5′-CTACCCAGCCCCCTTACTTC-3′, E2F2F: 5′-TGGTACGTCGAGGGTCCTAA-3′, E2F2R: 5′-CCTTGGAGGCTACTGACAGC-3′, SEC23AF: 5′-GCTACCTCTCCTCCCTCCTC-3′, and SEC23AR: 5′-CCACCGTTTTCCACATCTTT-3′, CARD10F: 5′-GGCTCATCCGTAACCTGCTA-3′, CARD10R: 5′-GGGCAACCTGGAGATACAGA-3′, SYTL1F: 5′-TTTTGTCGAGATGGGGTCTC-3′, SYTL1R: 5′-GGGGACAGTGCATAATCTGG-3′, FADS3F: 5′-AGATGAACCACATCCCCAAG-3′, FADS3R: 5′-TGGACAAGGGTAGGCATAGG-3′, FAM3DF: 5′-AAGAATCAGGAAGCCCAGGT-3′, FAM3DR: 5′-GTCTCAAACAGCCCAGCTTC-3′, MLLT1F: 5′-GAGACCAAGCTGGAAAGCAC-3′, MLLT1R: 5′-AGCTCAGAACCTCAGGACCA-3′, MYO1EF: 5′-CATTCCTCTCTGCCACCTTC-3′, MYO1ER: 5′-TGTTCGCCGATTCCTTTATT-3′, TIE1F: 5′-AGAGGTGACACAGCCCTCAT-3′, TIE1R: 5′-AGGGTCTTCTCCCAGTCAGG-3′, SHANK2F: 5′-CTTTGGGTCCCTGTTGAGAC-3′, SHANK2R: 5′-GAAGACGTGCTCCATCCCTA-3′. PCR conditions were: 94 ° C×2 min followed by 40 cycles of 94 ° C×40 s, 58 ° C×40 s, and 68 ° C×1 min with AccuPrime DNA polymerase (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). PCR products were denatured and renatured and assayed by Surveyor nuclease (Integrated DNA Technologies) and subsequent resolution on a 10% TBE PAGE gel (ThermoFisher Scientific).15,56 All gel images used the same exposure times.
Selection and HDR analysis
80% confluent fibroblasts that had undergone electroporation were exposed to 0.2 μg/ml puromycin and then plated at low density for clonal derivation. Individual cells were segregated in cloning disks and expanded for HDR analysis using an inside-out PCR. A primer inside the donor (5′-GCCACTCCCACTGTCCTTTCCT-3′) and outside the right homology arm (5′-GGGCAAGAAGTCAGAACCAG-3′) were amplified, cloned into the pCR 4 TOPO vector (Invitrogen) and sequenced by the Sanger method to confirm HDR. cDNA correction was demonstrated by amplification of a product with cDNAF: 5′-GTGACAAAGGCGATCGTG-3′ and cDNAR: 5′-GTCCCCGTGGGCCCTGC-3′ followed by sequencing.
PGK puromycin removal
Cre-recombinase mRNA (TriLink Biotechnologies, San Diego, CA, USA) was electroporated into iPSC clones at a dose of 1 μg using the conditions noted above, and excision was confirmed by PCR and Sanger sequencing.
iPSC generation and teratoma assay
Gene-corrected fibroblasts (or uncorrected cells as a control) were reprogrammed to iPSCs as described43,57 with Sendai virus delivery of the reprogramming factors.53 Karyotype, gene expression and immunofluorescence as part of quality assurance and control were also performed as detailed elsewhere.43,57 All iPSC lines were regularly tested for mycoplasma and all lines used in this study tested negative. iPSCs contained in matrigel were implanted onto the hind flank of NSG mice (n=3–5) until a palpable mass formed. Teratoma tissue was excised for histological examination following embedding and staining by haematoxylin and eosin.
Differentiation of iPSCs to keratinocytes
iPSCs were maintained feeder-free on Geltrex-coated (ThermoFisher Scientific) tissue culture plastic in TesR1 (STEMCELL Technologies, Vancouver, BC, Canada). For keratinocyte differentiation, mid-passage iPSCs at ~50% confluency in six-well plates had media changed to defined keratinocyte-SFM media supplemented with 25 ng/ml BMP-4 (Bio-Techne, Minneapolis, MN, USA) and 1 μM RA (STEMCELL Technologies) for the first 96 h, at which point the BMP4 and RA were removed, followed by media changes every 72 h thereafter until epithelial cell morphology became apparent (~10 days). At this timepoint, the media was switched to Cnt-07 (CELLnTEC, Bern, Switzerland) and the cells cultured until confluency. At this point they were pre-treated with ROCK inhibitor (Y-27632, VWR) for at least 1 h and passaged using Accutase (STEMCELL Technologies) onto 10 cm2 tissue culture plates coated with collagen I/collagen IV, where rapid attachment-mediated enrichment of Krt14+ cells was performed as previously described. Resultant iPSC-keratinocyte cultures were cultured in Cnt-07 media containing 10 μM ROCK inhibitor until first media change after plating (CELLnTEC).
Differentiation of iPSCs to MSCs
iPSCs were maintained feeder-free on Geltrex-coated tissue culture plastic in TesR1 (STEMCELL Technologies). Differentiation to MSCs was initiated by transferring mid-passage iPSCs at 50% confluency to MSC medium, which consisted of Minimal Essential Medium Alpha supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum, 5% horse serum and 10 ng/ml each of human PDGF-AB, EGF, and bFGF (all from PeproTech, Rocky Hill, NJ, USA). Media was changed every 48 h until cells with fibroblastic morphology were apparent and cultures neared confluency. At this point, MSC cultures were pre-treated with 10 μM ROCK inhibitor for at least 1 h and dissociated using a 50:50 mixture of Accutase and 0.25% Trypsin-EDTA incubated at 37 ° C. When cells had detached, the Accutase/trypsin mixture was diluted with 2× volume of PBS +1% FBS +3 mM EDTA to prevent clumping. Cells were centrifuged at 400g for 5 min and re-plated onto gelatin-coated plates in growth media plus cytokines containing 5 μM ROCK inhibitor to enhance plating efficiency. Between passages 3–5, cultures can be weaned off of ROCK inhibitor during passage. Flow cytometry analysis was performed using the following antibodies, all from eBioscience (San Diego, CA, USA): Anti-Human CD73 eFluor 450, 48-0739; anti-Human CD105 (Endoglin) PE, 12-1057; and anti-Human CD90 (Thy-1) APC, 17-0909.
Maintenance and differentiation of human iPSCs to haematopoietic progenitors
Human iPSC lines were maintained on Matrigel- or Geltrex-coated plastic ware in TesR1 (STEMCELL Technologies). For differentiation, hiPSCs were cultured at ~80–90% confluency, followed by EB generation, as described previously.37,38 Briefly, the undifferentiated hiPSCs were dissociated with Accutase (STEMCELL Technologies) treatment. Aggregates were resuspended in APEL-differentiation medium (STEMCELL Technologies), supplemented with BMP-4 (20 ng/ml) and bFGF (5 ng/ml) and cultured in non-tissue culture treated plates. After 42 h, developing EBs were collected and resuspended in APEL-differentiation media supplemented with BMP-4, bFGF, CHIR99021 (3 μM, Stemgent, Lexington, MA, USA), and SB431542 (6 μM, Selleck Chemicals, Houston, TX, USA).
After 24 h, EBs were collected and resuspended in either 60% APEL-differentiation medium +40% STEMSPAN II medium (STEMCELL Technologies) for vascular induction, or 100% APEL-differentiation medium for T-lineage differentiation; both supplemented with VEGF (20 ng/ml), bFGF (5 ng/ml), IL-3 (20 ng/ml), Flt3L (20 ng/ml) and SCF (100 ng/ml) and cultured for another 5–6 days. Cultures were maintained in a 5% CO2/5% O2/90% N2 environment. At day 8 or 9, EBs were harvested, washed once with PBS, and dissociated using Accutase and 0.25% trypsin EDTA mixture until no visible clumps observed. CD34+ cells were enriched using Easy-Sep CD34+ isolation kit (STEMCELL Technologies). Flow cytometry analysis was performed using the following antibodies, all from eBioscience: Anti-Human CD45 APC-eFluor 780, 47-0459; anti-Human CD34 APC, 17-0349-42; anti-Human CD43 PE, 12-0439; anti-Human CD73 eFluor 450, 48-0739; anti-Human CD184 (CXCR4) PE-Cy7, 25-9999-42.
For vascular induction, 1×105 purified EB-derived CD34+ cells were plated onto 85% confluent VeraVec HUVEC (Angiocrine Bioscience, San Diego, CA, USA) in StemSpan II supplemented with the following: SCF (200 ng/ml), Flt3L (10 ng/ml), TPO (30 ng/ml), IL-11 (5 ng/ml), IGF-1 (25 ng/ml), bFGF (5 ng/ml), VEGF (5 ng/ml), EPO (2 IU/ml), IL-6 (10 ng/ml), IL-3 (30 ng/ml), BMP-4 (10 ng/ml) and losartan (100 μM). Co-cultures were maintained for 7–9 days.
For T lineage differentiation, 1×105 purified CD34+ cells were plated onto confluent OP9-DLL4 cells for about 3–4 weeks and passaged every 4–5 days as described previously.35 All recombinant factors are human and were purchased from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN, USA).
Colony-forming unit assay
Cells were placed in MethoCult according to the manufacturer’s instructions (STEMCELL Technologies). Colonies were enumerated by an experienced analyst using light microscopy at low magnification (×4 objective).
Cellular lysates in RIPA lysis buffer (ThermoFisher Scientific) were electrophoresed using the XCell SureLock Mini-Cell Electrophoresis System with a NuPAGE Novex 3–8% acetate gel (ThermoFisher Scientific). Proteins were transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane and stained with the 4D2 mouse monoclonal anti-human collagen 7 antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA). Secondary staining was performed with a goat anti-mouse horseradish peroxidase conjugated antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and detection with the SuperSignal West Pico Chemiluminescent Substrate (ThermoFisher Scientific).
Statistical differences in survival were determined by Log-rank test using Prism software (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA). All other statistical analyses were performed using the Student's t-test with P values less than 0.5 being considered significant. No statistical methods were used to predetermine the sample sizes. The experiments were not randomized and the investigators were not blinded.
We are grateful to the patients, their families, and the patient support organizations that made this work possible. We are grateful to Nancy Griggs Morgan for invaluable assistance in manuscript preparation and editing. BRW is supported by NIH T32- HL007062. We are also thankful for the generosity of the Lindahl family, the Children's Cancer Research Fund and the Corrigan Family. MJO is supported by 8UL1TR000114-02. JT is supported in part by R01 AR063070 and P01 CA065493. The present work was partly supported by research funds from the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2015K1A4A3046807). Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health Award Number UL1TR000114 (MJO). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
About this article
Stem Cell Reviews and Reports (2017)