Quantum interference of photon pairs from two remote trapped atomic ions

Abstract

Trapped atomic ions are among the most attractive implementations of quantum bits for applications in quantum-information processing, owing to their long trapping lifetimes and long coherence times. Although nearby trapped ions can be entangled through their Coulomb-coupled motion1,2,3,4,5,6, it seems more natural to entangle remotely located ions through a coupling mediated by photons, eliminating the need to control the ion motion. A promising way to entangle ions via a photonic channel is to interfere two photons emitted from the ions and then detect appropriate photon coincidence events7,8,9. Here, we report the pivotal element of this scheme in the observation of quantum interference between pairs of single photons emitted from two atomic ions residing in independent traps.

Main

Remote entanglement of two ions or atoms can be achieved by subjecting two photons emitted by the particles to a Bell-state measurement and is heralded by an appropriate coincidence detection of the photons7. The essence of this Bell-state measurement is the quantum interference of two photons, which has been observed previously with photons generated in a variety of physical processes and systems, including nonlinear optical down-conversion10,11, quantum dots12, atoms in cavity quantum electrodynamics13, atomic ensembles14,15,16 and two nearby trapped neutral atoms17. We report the first observation of interference between two single photons emitted from two remote trapped atomic ions. The two Yb ions are stored in independent traps in two vacuum chambers separated by about one metre. The interference of two single photons emitted by remote ions is the only element of remote-entanglement schemes that has not previously been demonstrated. Hence, this demonstration is an essential step towards future remote-ion-entanglement experiments, which may ultimately lead to large-scale quantum networks18,19,20,21,22,23.

In the experiment, single 174Yb+ ions are trapped in two congeneric Paul traps located in separate vacuum chambers as described in detail in the Methods section. Laser cooling localizes the ions to within the resolution of the diffraction-limited imaging optics but well outside the Lamb–Dicke limit. The ions are excited with ultrafast laser pulses generated by a picosecond mode-locked Ti:sapphire laser with a centre frequency of 739 nm. Each pulse is then frequency doubled to 369.5 nm through a phase-matched lithium triborate nonlinear crystal. An electro-optic pulse picker is used to reduce the pulse repetition rate from 81 MHz to 8.1 MHz with an extinction ratio of better than 104:1. The second harmonic is filtered from the fundamental with a prism, split between the two traps using a beam splitter and aligned to arrive at the two ions within 100 ps of each other. Each pulse has a near-transform-limited pulse duration of 2 ps and excites the ions on a timescale much faster than the excited-state lifetime of 8 ns. The pulse energy can be adjusted to simultaneously excite both ions with near-unit probability.

Two re-entrant viewports at opposing sides of each trap are used to simultaneously image the ions in free space and couple light scattered from the ions into single-mode optical fibres. In free space, a telescope is used to image scattered photons on a camera to monitor loading and to verify the presence of a single 174Yb+ ion in each trap. Fibre coupling is realized from the opposite side of the trap using a second objective lens to collect spontaneously emitted photons (Fig. 1b). Each beam is focused onto a single-mode fibre using an aspheric lens. About 25% of the spontaneously emitted photons collected by the objective are transmitted through the 2 m fibre. The ion light transmitted through the single-mode fibres is collimated and mode matched on a polarization-independent beam splitter. The light emerging from the beam splitter is detected using photomultipliers. Removable polarizers and a removable λ/2 wave plate allow detection of unpolarized photons, or photons of parallel or perpendicular polarization. The arrival times of the photons at the photomultipliers are recorded using a time-to-digital converter.

Figure 1: The ytterbium set-up.
figure1

a, Relevant level scheme of 174Yb+. b, Schematic diagram of the detection system. The unpolarized light from each 174Yb+ ion is collected using a triplet lens with a numerical aperture of 0.23 and a working distance of 13 mm. It is coupled into a single-mode fused-silica fibre using an aspheric collimation lens with a numerical aperture of 0.6. About 25% of the light collected from each ion is transmitted through the 2 m fibres. The light from both fibres is collimated with a monochromatic lens and mode matched on a polarization-independent beam splitter (BS). Behind the beam splitter, two removable polarizers (PBS) can be used to select parallel polarization. Inserting a λ/2 plate allows the detection of perpendicularly polarized photons. Subsequently, the light is detected by two photon-counting photomultipliers (PMT) with a quantum efficiency of about 20% and a time resolution of about 1 ns. The photon arrival times at the photomultipliers are recorded using a time-to-digital converter with a resolution of 4 ps (PicoQuant PicoHarp300). The contrast of the interferometer is measured using 369.5 nm laser light to be better than 96%.

To demonstrate that the excitation of an ion with an ultrashort pulse leads to the emission of at most one photon, we first analyse the light scattered by a single 174Yb+ ion by blocking the fluorescence from one of the two traps. We use a repetitive sequence consisting of a 40 μs measurement interval and a 10 μs cooling interval. During the cooling interval, the ion is Doppler cooled only with continuous-wave (cw) light, whereas during the measurement interval, the ion is excited only by ultrafast laser pulses with a 124 ns pulse separation. From the arrival times of the photons at the photomultipliers, the intensity autocorrelation function, g(2)(τ), is evaluated and shown in Fig. 2. Here, τ is the detection-time delay of two photons at the two detectors. The periodic ultrafast excitation of the single ion leads to peaks at multiples of the pulse separation time. As the ion is excited on a timescale much faster than the excited-state lifetime, the spontaneously emitted photons have an exponential envelope24. Therefore, the peaks in the autocorrelation function have a two-sided exponential decay where the 1/e half width is given by the 8 ns lifetime of the excited state. In contrast to pulsed coherent or pulsed thermal light, there is no peak at zero time delay (Fig. 2). This near-perfect antibunching is highly non-classical and clearly demonstrates that at most one photon is emitted after each excitation pulse. Theoretically, the probability to scatter two photons from one ion excited with one pulse is limited by the emission probability of an excited atom during the excitation pulse (≈10−4 here). This very clean single-photon source is a good starting point for the observation of two-photon interference and is necessary for high-fidelity photon-mediated ion entanglement.

Figure 2: Intensity autocorrelation of the light emitted by a single ion excited by picosecond pulses.
figure2

a, The periodically emitted photons from the pulsed excitation lead to peaks at multiples of the 124 ns pulse repetition time. b, The near-perfect photon antibunching, revealed by the logarithmic scale, proves that at most one photon is emitted from an excitation pulse. The correlation function is evaluated from the stored photon arrival times using 2 ns binning. The probability to detect a photon from one excitation pulse is 6×10−4. The data shown were integrated for 3 h.

Two-photon interference is a purely quantum phenomenon and can be understood qualitatively by considering the four possibilities in which two photons impinging on different input ports of a beam splitter can emerge from the output ports. In two of these possibilities, the two photons leave from different ports and thus can generate a coincidence event: both photons are reflected, or both are transmitted. For two photons that have the same polarization, frequency and are spatially mode matched on the beam splitter, these two cases interfere destructively. This leads to the effect that the photons always emerge together from the beam splitter and no coincidence events are observed25. This can also be understood from the bosonic nature of the two-photon system9.

To observe two-photon interference, the single ions in both traps are excited simultaneously by picosecond laser pulses and the fluorescence photons are combined on the beam splitter. The polarizers after the beam splitter are used to measure the coincidences of parallel polarized photons. To measure coincidences of perpendicularly polarized photons in the two output ports of the beam splitter, a λ/2 wave plate is added in front of one polarizer. The resulting cross-correlation functions are shown in Fig. 3. For perpendicular polarization, the photons are distinguishable and do not interfere; thus, we find a peak at zero delay. This peak has half the area of the others, because at zero delay each ion can only contribute one photon, whereas for non-simultaneous pulses each ion can produce both photons in the correlation measurement. Integrated over photon pairs detected within 8 ns of each other (one lifetime), this peak consists of 1,087 coincidences corresponding to a coincidence detection probability of 1.4×10−8 per excitation pulse or an absolute coincidence rate of about 0.1 s−1. For parallel polarization of the two photons, the two-photon interference eliminates coincidence detections. In our case, the remaining peak at zero delay, after subtracting the dark-count background, has an amplitude of about 5% of the perpendicularly polarized signal, corresponding to a 95% contrast of the interferometer. Integrating all photon pairs that are detected within 8 ns of each other, including dark counts, we detect 14% of the photon pairs that we observe for perpendicular polarization.

Figure 3: Normalized intensity cross-correlation of photons emitted by two ions.
figure3

For perpendicular linear polarization (diamonds) the photons from the two ions are distinguishable; thus we observe a peak at zero delay. In contrast to the peaks at longer delay times, for which the two photons can be emitted by the same ion, the two photons leading to a coincidence at zero delay must be emitted by different ions. Thus, the peak at zero delay has half the area of the peaks at longer delay times. Integrating all photon pairs with a detection-time difference of |τ|<8 ns results in a coincidence detection probability of 1.4×10−8 per excitation pulse (or 2×10−8 for the photon pairs with a less than 16 ns detection-time difference). For parallel linear polarization (circles), the two-photon interference suppresses the coincidence detection of two photons on different output ports of the beam splitter. Including dark counts, the number of photon pairs with less than 8 ns and 16 ns detection-time differences is reduced by 86% and 81%, respectively. Each curve was integrated for about 4 h and evaluated using a 1 ns binning.

To use this two-photon interference to produce remote-ion entanglement, an attribute of each photon—polarization26 or frequency23— must be entangled with the internal state of its parent ion. A coincidence detection of two photons would then project the system onto the antisymmetric superposition state and herald the entanglement of the ions7,8,9. The interference contrast observed here, including dark counts, would lead to a potential entanglement fidelity of about 90%. The fidelity is limited by the ratio between photon detection events and dark counts. This ratio can be improved by lowering detector dark counts, achieving a higher detection efficiency or by collecting photons from a larger effective solid angle. The most promising way to implement this entanglement scheme with distant ytterbium ions uses the ground-state hyperfine clock states of 171Yb+ to encode the atomic qubit. To realize this experimentally, additional laser frequencies are necessary for cooling of 171Yb+. In addition, efficient state initialization and state detection in any qubit basis must be implemented to generate and verify the entanglement27.

In summary, we demonstrate a near-perfect single-photon source on the basis of the ultrafast excitation of a single trapped ion and two-photon quantum interference of photon pairs emitted by two remote trapped ions. The contrast of the observed interference in principle allows the entanglement of ions with a fidelity of about 90%, clearly surpassing the threshold needed to violate a Bell inequality. Building on this, entangling gates could provide a means to scale the probabilistic entanglement from two qubits to the generation of networks of entangled qubits and cluster states. The tremendous advantages of the trapped-ion system—extremely long storage and coherence times and high readout fidelity—should make the scalable entanglement of many qubits feasible.

Methods

The experimental apparatus consists of two congeneric radiofrequency (rf) Paul traps located in separate vacuum chambers. These four-rod linear quadrupole traps have rod spacings of 0.5 mm and end-cap spacings of 2.6 mm. The rf drive frequency is ΩT/2π≈37 MHz and the centre-of-mass secular trapping frequencies are (ωx,ωy,ωz)/2π≈(1,1,0.2) MHz. Residual micromotion at the rf drive frequency is carefully reduced by applying static offset voltages to the trap rods. Yb atoms from a thermal beam are photoionized by resonantly exciting the transition near 399 nm using a diode laser and subsequently promoting the electron to the continuum with a 369.5 nm cw laser27, which is also used to Doppler cool the ions. This 369.5 nm laser light is generated by frequency doubling the light from a cw amplified diode laser at 739 nm and is stabilized to an iodine reference at a detuning of −10 MHz from the atomic transition of 174Yb+ (linewidth ≈20 MHz) (Fig. 1a). The ions reside in a magnetic field of about 10 G to prevent pumping into dark states. From the excited state, the ion can decay to the 2D3/2 state with a probability of 0.05 (ref. 28). A diode laser near 935 nm is used to repump the ion via the 3D[3/2]1/2 state to the ground state. About once an hour the ion reaches the 2F7/2 state, which is cleared by a diode laser near 638 nm. The mean storage time of the ions in the trap is several days. All of the data presented here were obtained with the same two ions.

References

  1. 1

    Cirac, J. I. & Zoller, P. Quantum computations with cold trapped ions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 4091–4094 (1995).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Mølmer, K. & Sørensen, A. Multiparticle entanglement of hot trapped ions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1835–1838 (1999).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Milburn, G. J., Schneider, S. & James, D. F. V. Ion trap quantum computing with warm ions. Fortschr. Phys. 48, 801–810 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Sackett, C. A. et al. Experimental entanglement of four particles. Nature 404, 256–259 (2000).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Leibfried, D. et al. Creation of a six-atom ‘Schrödinger cat’ state. Nature 438, 639–642 (2005).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Häffner, H. et al. Scalable multiparticle entanglement of trapped ions. Nature 438, 643–646 (2005).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Simon, C. & Irvine, W. T. M. Robust long-distance entanglement and a loophole-free Bell test with ions and photons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 110405 (2003).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Duan, L. M., Blinov, B. B., Moehring, D. L. & Monroe, C. Scalable trapped ion quantum computation with a probabilistic ion-photon mapping. Quant. Inf. Comp. 4, 165–173 (2004).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Moehring, D. L. et al. Quantum networking with photons and trapped atoms. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 24, 300–315 (2007).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Hong, C. K., Ou, Z. Y. & Mandel, L. Measurement of subpicosecond time intervals between two photons by interference. Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 2044–2046 (1987).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Kaltenbaek, R., Blauensteiner, B., Zukowski, M., Aspelmeyer, M. & Zeilinger, A. Experimental interference of independent photons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 240502 (2006).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Santori, C., Fattal, D., Vučković, J., Solomon, G. S. & Yamamoto, Y. Indistinguishable photons from a single-photon device. Nature 419, 594–597 (2002).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Legero, T., Wilk, T., Hennrich, M., Rempe, G. & Kuhn, A. Quantum beat of two single photons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 070503 (2004).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Thompson, J. K., Simon, J., Loh, H. & Vuletic, V. A high-brightness source of narrowband, identical-photon pairs. Science 313, 74–77 (2006).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Felinto, D. et al. Conditional control of the quantum states of remote atomic memories for quantum networking. Nature Phys. 2, 844–848 (2006).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Chanelière, T. et al. Quantum interference of electromagnetic fields from remote quantum memories. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 113602 (2007).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Beugnon, J. et al. Quantum interference between two single photons emitted by independently trapped atoms. Nature 440, 779–782 (2006).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Briegel, H. J., Dür, W., Cirac, J. I. & Zoller, P. Quantum repeaters: The role of imperfect local operations in quantum communication. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5932–5935 (1998).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Raussendorf, R. & Briegel, H. J. A one-way quantum computer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5188–5191 (2001).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Barrett, S. D. & Kok, P. Efficient high-fidelity quantum computation using matter qubits and linear optics. Phys. Rev. A 71, 060310 (2005).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Duan, L. M. & Raussendorf, R. Efficient quantum computation with probabilistic quantum gates. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 080503 (2005).

    ADS  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Lim, Y. L., Beige, A. & Kwek, L. C. Repeat-until-success linear optics distributed quantum computing. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 030505 (2005).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Duan, L. M. et al. Probabilistic quantum gates between remote atoms through interference of optical frequency qubits. Phys. Rev. A 73, 062324 (2006).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Moehring, D. L. et al. Precision lifetime measurements of a single trapped ion with ultrafast laser pulses. Phys. Rev. A 73, 023413 (2006).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Mandel, L. Quantum effects in one-photon and two-photon interference. Rev. Mod. Phys. 71, S274–S282 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Blinov, B. B., Moehring, D. L., Duan, L. M. & Monroe, C. Observation of entanglement between a single trapped atom and a single photon. Nature 428, 153–157 (2004).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Balzer, C. et al. Electrodynamically trapped Yb+ ions for quantum information processing. Phys. Rev. A 73, 041407 (2006).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Yu, N. & Maleki, L. Lifetime measurements of the 4f145d metastable states in single ytterbium ions. Phys. Rev. A 61, 022507 (2000).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge discussions with L.-M. Duan. This work is supported by the National Security Agency and the Disruptive Technology Office under Army Research Office contract W911NF-04-1-0234, and the National Science Foundation Information Technology Research (ITR) and Physics at the Information Frontier (PIF) programs.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Maunz.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maunz, P., Moehring, D., Olmschenk, S. et al. Quantum interference of photon pairs from two remote trapped atomic ions. Nature Phys 3, 538–541 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys644

Download citation

Further reading