Abstract
The emerging field of plasmonics is based on exploiting the coupling between light and collective electronic excitations within conducting materials known as surface plasmons. Because the socalled surface plasmon polariton (SPP) modes that arise from this coupling are not constrained by the optical diffraction limit, it is hoped that they could enable the construction of ultracompact optical components^{1,2}. But in order that such potential can be realized, it is vital that the relatively poor light–SPP coupling be improved. This is made worse by the fact that the incident light that is conventionally used to launch SPPs in a metal film ^{3,4,5,6} is a significant source of noise, unless directed away from a region of interest, which then decreases the signal and increases the system’s size. Backside illumination of subwavelength apertures in optically thick metal films^{7,8,9,10,11,12,13} eliminates this problem but does not ensure a unique propagation direction for the SPP. We propose a novel backside slitillumination method that incorporates a periodic array of grooves carved into the front side of a thick metal film. Bragg reflection enhances the propagation of SPPs away from the array, enabling them to be unidirectionally launched from, and focused to, a localized point.
Main
A picture of the proposed surface plasmon polariton (SPP) launcher is shown in Fig. 1. A periodic array of onedimensional indentations is fabricated at the (output) metal surface close and parallel to the illuminated slit. The design of this device is based on two facts. The first one is that the reflection of SPPs by a periodic array of indentations presents maxima at the lowλ edges of the plasmonic bandgaps^{14,15,16}. For subwavelength indentations, the spectral locations of these edges can be obtained by folding the dispersion relation of SPPs for a flat metal surface into the first Brillouin zone, satisfying the following expression: where P is the period of the array, k_{p} holds for the inplane plasmon wavevector and m is the band index. Remarkably, although the reflectance maxima depend on the groove geometry (width and depth) and the number of grooves, their spectral locations do not.
The second fact is that the phase picked up by the SPP on reflection is just mπ, precisely at the condition given by equation (1), as obtained by the modal expansion developed in ref. 15. Using these two results, a very simple scheme for the efficient unidirectional launching of SPPs can be predicted. For a given frequency, by choosing P such that the condition given by equation (1) is fulfilled, an SPP emerging from the slit to the left side will be mainly backscattered. The interference of this reflected SPP with the one leaving the slit to the right can be tuned by adjusting the separation, d, between the slit and the first groove of the array (defined centre to centre). The total phase difference, φ, between the two interfering SPPs will be the phase picked on reflection plus the one associated with their different path lengths along the metal: According to equation (2), destructive or constructive interference should occur for those φ values equal to odd or even multiples of π, respectively. In these latter cases, the device would behave as an efficient source for unidirectional SPPs.
Note that equation (2) is based on two main simplifications. First, the previous discussion is based on the reflection of SPPs by a groove array, whereas the electromagnetic (EM) fields radiated by the slit are, at short distances, more complex^{15}. Second, equation (2) does not take into account the radiation from the grooves back into the slit, whereas, in principle, EM fields at all openings should be selfconsistently calculated^{17}.
To check the validity of equation (2) we have carried out numerical calculations by means of both modal expansion^{15} and finitedifference timedomain (FDTD)^{18} methods. FDTD is virtually exact for this type of onedimensional structures, as very small grid sizes can be used. On the other hand, the modal expansion treats approximately the finite conductivity of the metal but provides a very compact representation for the EM fields, favouring the physical interpretation and, in some simple cases, the calculation of analytical expressions. We characterize the efficiency of the slit+groove system as an SPP launcher by the ‘efficiency ratio’, E_{R}, defined as the quotient between the current intensity of the rightpropagating SPP (J_{R}) with and without the grooves. Strictly speaking, E_{R} provides the efficiency of the output side of the device; the total efficiency, defined as the percentage of laser beam energy transferred onto the plasmon channel, depends also on lateral beam size, substrate dielectric constant, metal film width, corrugation on the input side and so on. Note also that E_{R}>2 implies that, in the corrugated structure, the rightpropagating SPP carries more current than the total SPP current (left plus rightmoving) in the singleslit case, so some of the power radiated out of plane is redirected onto the SPP channel.
The model system is a nanoslit SPP launcher perforated on a gold film^{19}, designed to operate at a wavelength of 800 nm, inside the nearinfrared range of the EM spectrum. We consider an array of ten grooves with a period P=390 nm, obtained from equation (1) with m=1. The depth of the grooves is chosen to be w=100 nm, whereas the width of both the grooves and the slit is a=160 nm, which are typical experimental parameters. Figure 2a shows the calculated dependence of E_{R} with distance d. In this figure, the vertical lines mark the locations of maximum interference predicted by equation (2). The agreement between the modal expansion and FDTD results is excellent, except for the behaviour at very short distances (d≈2a), owing to the cross coupling between the slit and the first groove through the vertical walls, which is neglected within the modal expansion. More importantly, the locations of maximum E_{R} are accurately predicted by equation (2), which allows us to design SPP launchers without elaborate numerical calculations.
Note that E_{R} would be 4 if the whole amplitude of the leftgoing SPP could be added constructively to the rightgoing one, whereas in our simulations a smaller value is always obtained. Calculations with the modal expansion show that this is due to the outofplane scattering of the leftgoing SPP by the array of grooves. The effect on E_{R} of both damping across the flat gold surface and partial transmission across the finite array plays a very minor role for the considered parameters.
To test experimentally our proposal, several samples were prepared with a focused ion beam in 300nmthick gold films for different values for d, with all other geometrical parameters being the same as in the previous calculations. Each sample consists of a single long slit flanked by a finite periodic groove array that extends over only half of the slit length (see Fig. 1a). This sample design allows the quantitative experimental study of the SPP launching efficiency, as the ‘isolated’ slit (upper part) can be used as an inchip reference. The set of samples was imaged by a photon scanning tunnelling microscope making use of an incident focused beam illumination for frequencies in the [765,800] nm interval. Owing to specific features of the experimental setup used for measurements in the optical regime, the incident laser beam was directed on the sample (attached to a prism) under an angle of 43^{∘} with respect to the normal. However, it should be noted that the choice of angle of incidence is not critical for the spatial distribution of transmitted energy, as a subwavelength slit in an optically thick metal film transmits only in the fundamental mode. For each distance, d, a pair of images was recorded by scanning at a constant distance of about 60–80 nm from the sample surface. The first image of the pair, corresponding to the SPP launching by a single slit, is obtained by focusing the laser beam on the upper part of the slit. For the second image, the laser beam is moved to the lower part to collect the data for the slit+grating case. Image pairs for d=585 nm and for d=486 nm are shown in Fig. 2b. Figure 2b clearly shows that the grating increases the intensity of the rightpropagating SPP for d=585 nm, whereas for d=486 nm this intensity is greatly reduced. To quantify this effect, an average longitudinal crosscut of each image is obtained by using 20 longitudinal crosscuts, corresponding to different coordinates along the slit axis. Then, the relative position of the two average crosscuts composing each image pair is adjusted so that the saturated areas (that is, the signal taken right on top of the slit) are superimposed. Finally, the experimental efficiency ratio, E_{R}, is extracted by averaging the ratio between the two curves along the longitudinal crosscut. Figure 2a shows experimental results for E_{R} for the five different samples fabricated. The agreement between the experimental data and the theoretical predictions is quite remarkable (especially when taking into account that each experimental point corresponds to a different sample), showing that the presence of the grating modulates the coupling into the rightpropagating SPP.
We have also designed similar samples for efficient unidirectional SPP excitation at telecom wavelengths, upscaling the grating period and its separation from the slit. In this case, normal incidence backside illumination is allowed by the experimental setup and used in all experiments. Figure 3 (upper panel) shows a typical nearfield optical image, featuring a strong SPP beam propagating away from the slit in the direction opposite to the grating and thereby demonstrating unidirectional SPP excitation. In this wavelength range, the long SPP propagation length (≈200 μm) allows a simpler determination of E_{R} as the power ratio between the SPP beams, estimated far away (≈50 μm) from the slit, obtained from the nearfield optical images taken by focusing the laser beam at two different vertical positions.
The efficiency ratio determined in this way exhibited a significant dispersion due to inaccuracy in the illuminating laser beam adjustment. Consequently, several series of measurements were carried out, conducting independent adjustments for each sample and wavelength. Averaged results and estimated errors for the spectral dependence of E_{R} are shown in Fig. 3. As can be seen, the comparison between theory and experiments is satisfactory: for the case of the sample with d=P+P/2=1,125 nm, E_{R} decreases as the wavelength increases (with the only exception of a sharp peak at 1,520 nm), evolving from a favourable regime (E_{R}≈2) to one in which SPP coupling is clearly diminished by the grating (E_{R}<1). On the other hand, E_{R}≈2 all over the range for the sample with d=P−P/4=562 nm, as predicted by the modal expansion calculation.
Another application of the system proposed in this paper is the focusing of SPPs, creating local field enhancement (a ‘hot spot’) at a given location. Focusing of SPPs has been achieved through the interaction of SPPs with curved surface corrugations^{20,21,22,23,24}. The proposed approach for the localized unidirectional excitation of an SPP beam can be generalized to focus SPPs with an increased efficiency while blocking the propagation away from the focus. Importantly, in these curved structures, the rigorous modelling of SPP excitation needed for optimization of the focusing would be difficult, whereas the relation given by equation (2) still provides simple design rules. As a proof of principle, in this paper we present focusing at telecom wavelengths by milling a curved slit along with the corresponding grating grooves (Fig. 4a), using a similar configuration to that illustrated with the nearfield optical image shown in Fig. 3. The effect of SPP beam focusing was clearly seen already at the stage of farfield adjustment (using a microscope arrangement with an infrared chargecoupled device camera) owing to weak outofplane SPP scattering by surface roughness (Fig. 4b). The typical nearfield optical image obtained at λ=1,520 nm demonstrates efficient focusing of a launched SPP beam at the centre of slit curvature, with a spot size of 3×3 μm^{2} (estimated from the crosscuts shown in Fig. 4d). More generally, the design of other more complicated curved structures based on these principles can be predicted, allowing, for example, the excitation of SPP beams propagating in different directions and focused at different locations.
References
 1.
Barnes, W. L., Dereux, A. & Ebbesen, T. W. Surface plasmon subwavelength optics. Nature 424, 824–830 (2003).
 2.
Ozbay, E. Plasmonics: Merging photonics and electronics at nanoscale dimensions. Science 311, 189–193 (2006).
 3.
Otto, A. Exitation of nonradiative surface plasma waves in silver by the method of frustrated total reflection. Z. Phys. 216, 398–410 (1968).
 4.
Lamprecht, B. et al. Surface plasmon propagation in microscale metal stripes. Appl. Phys. Lett. 79, 51–53 (2001).
 5.
Ritchie, R. H., Arakawa, E. T., Cowan, J. J. & Hamm, R. N. Surfaceplasmon resonance effect in grating diffraction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 21, 1530–1533 (1968).
 6.
Ditlbacher, H. et al. Fluorescence imaging of surface plasmon fields. Appl. Phys. Lett. 80, 404–406 (2002).
 7.
Sönnichsen, C. et al. Launching surface plasmons into nanoholes in metal films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 76, 140–142 (2000).
 8.
Devaux, E., Ebbesen, T. W., Weeber, J. C. & Dereux, A. Launching and decoupling surface plasmons via microgratings. Appl. Phys. Lett. 83, 4936–4938 (2003).
 9.
Yin, L. et al. Surface plasmons at single nanoholes in Au films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 85, 467–469 (2004).
 10.
Popov, E. et al. Surface plasmon excitation on a single subwavelength hole in a metallic sheet. Appl. Opt. 44, 2332–2337 (2005).
 11.
Agrawal, A., Cao, H. & Nahata, A. Excitation and scattering of surface plasmonpolaritons on structured metal films and their application to pulse shaping and enhanced transmission. New J. Phys. 7, 249 (2005).
 12.
Chang, S. H., Gray, S. K. & Schatz, G. C. Surface plasmon generation and light transmission by isolated nanoholes and arrays of nanoholes in thin metal films. Opt. Express 13, 3150–3165 (2005).
 13.
Lalanne, P., Hugonin, J. P. & Rodier, C. Theory of surface plasmon generation at nanoslit apertures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 263902 (2005).
 14.
Bozhevolnyi, S. I., Boltasseva, A., Sondergaard, T., Nikolajsen, T. & Leosson, K. Photonic bandgap structures for longrange surface plasmon polaritons. Opt. Commun. 250, 328–333 (2005).
 15.
LópezTejeira, F., GarcíaVidal, F. J. & MartínMoreno, L. Scattering of surface plasmons by onedimensional periodic nanoindented surfaces. Phys. Rev. B 72, 161405(R) (2005).
 16.
González, M. U. et al. Design, nearfield characterization, and modeling of 45^{∘} surfaceplasmon Bragg mirrors. Phys. Rev. B 73, 155416 (2006).
 17.
MartínMoreno, L., GarcíaVidal, F. J., Lezec, H. J., Degiron, A. & Ebbesen, T. W. Theory of highly directional emission from a single subwavelength aperture surrounded by surface corrugations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 167401 (2003).
 18.
Taflove, A. & Hagness, S. C. Computational Electrodynamics: The FiniteDifference TimeDomain Method (Artech House, Boston, 2000).
 19.
Vial, A., Grimault, A., Macias, D., Barchesi, D. & de la Chapelle, M. Improved analytical fit of gold dispersion: Application to the modeling of extinction spectra with a finitedifference timedomain method. Phys. Rev. B 71, 085416 (2005).
 20.
Nomura, W., Ohtsu, M. & Yatsui, T. Nanodot coupler wih a surface plasmon polariton condenser for optical far/nearfield conversion. Appl. Phys. Lett. 86, 181108 (2005).
 21.
Yin, L. et al. Subwavelength focusing and guiding of surface plasmons. Nano Lett. 5, 1399–1402 (2005).
 22.
Liu, Z. et al. Focusing surface plasmons with a plasmonic lens. Nano Lett. 5, 1726–1729 (2005).
 23.
Offerhous, H. L. et al. Creating focused plasmons by noncollinear phasematching on functional gratings. Nano Lett. 5, 2144–2148 (2005).
 24.
Steele, J. M., Liu, Z., Wang, Y. & Zhang, X. Resonant and nonresonant generation and focusing of surface plasmons with circular gratings. Opt. Express 14, 5664–5670 (2006).
Acknowledgements
Financial support by the EC under Project FP62002IST1507879 (PlasmoNanoDevices) is gratefully acknowledged. We thank J. Dintinger and J.Y. Laluet for technical assistance.
Author information
Author notes
 M. U. González
Present address: ICFOInstitut de Ciències Fotòniques, Mediterranean Technology Park, E08860 Castelldefels, Barcelona, Spain
Affiliations
Departamento de Física de la Materia CondensadaICMA, Universidad de Zaragoza, E50009 Zaragoza, Spain
 F. LópezTejeira
 , Sergio G. Rodrigo
 & L. MartínMoreno
Departamento de Física Teórica de la Materia Condensada, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, E28049 Madrid, Spain
 F. J. GarcíaVidal
Laboratoire de Nanostructures, ISIS, Université Louis Pasteur, F67000 Strasbourg, France
 E. Devaux
 & T. W. Ebbesen
Institute of Physics, Karl Franzens University, Universitätsplatz 5, A8010 Graz, Austria
 J. R. Krenn
Department of Physics and Nanotechnology, Aalborg University, DK9220 Aalborg, Denmark
 I. P. Radko
 & S. I. Bozhevolnyi
Laboratoire de Physique de l’Université de Bourgogne, UMR CNRS 5027, F21078 Dijon, France
 M. U. González
 , J. C. Weeber
 & A. Dereux
Authors
Search for F. LópezTejeira in:
Search for Sergio G. Rodrigo in:
Search for L. MartínMoreno in:
Search for F. J. GarcíaVidal in:
Search for E. Devaux in:
Search for T. W. Ebbesen in:
Search for J. R. Krenn in:
Search for I. P. Radko in:
Search for S. I. Bozhevolnyi in:
Search for M. U. González in:
Search for J. C. Weeber in:
Search for A. Dereux in:
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Corresponding author
Correspondence to L. MartínMoreno.
Rights and permissions
To obtain permission to reuse content from this article visit RightsLink.
About this article
Further reading

1.
Light: Science & Applications (2018)

2.
Maximizing energy coupling to complex plasmonic devices by injecting light into eigenchannels
Scientific Reports (2017)

3.
Allplasmonic Optical Phased Array Integrated on a Thinfilm Platform
Scientific Reports (2017)

4.
Highefficiency chiralitymodulated spoof surface plasmon metacoupler
Scientific Reports (2017)

5.
Phasecontrolled propagation of surface plasmons
Light: Science & Applications (2017)