Abstract
Our modern society requires environmentally friendly solutions for energy production. Energy can be released not only from the fission of heavy nuclei but also from the fusion of light nuclei. Nuclear fusion is an important option for a clean and safe solution for our long-term energy needs. The extremely high temperatures required for the fusion reaction are routinely realized in several magnetic-fusion machines. Since the early 1990s, up to 16 MW of fusion power has been released in pulses of a few seconds, corresponding to a power multiplication close to break-even. Our understanding of the very complex behaviour of a magnetized plasma at temperatures between 150 and 200 million °C surrounded by cold walls has also advanced substantially. This steady progress has resulted in the construction of ITER, a fusion device with a planned fusion power output of 500 MW in pulses of 400 s. ITER should provide answers to remaining important questions on the integration of physics and technology, through a full-size demonstration of a tenfold power multiplication, and on nuclear safety aspects. Here we review the basic physics underlying magnetic fusion: past achievements, present efforts and the prospects for future production of electrical energy. We also discuss questions related to the safety, waste management and decommissioning of a future fusion power plant.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Change history
16 June 2016
In the version of this Review Article originally published, it was not acknowledged that Fig. 3a is courtesy of C. Brandt, IPP. This has been corrected in the online versions 16 June 2016.
References
Rebut, P.-H. et al. The JET preliminary tritium experiment. Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 34, 1749–1758 (1992).
Giruzzi, G. et al. Modelling of pulsed and steady-state DEMO scenarios. Nucl. Fusion 55, 073002 (2015).
Clery, D. A Piece of the Sun. The Quest for Fusion Energy (Overlook Duckworth, 2013).
Francis, F. C. An Indispensible Truth. How Fusion Power Can Save The Planet (Springer, 2011).
Dean, S. O. Search for the Ultimate Energy Source: A History of the U.S. Fusion Energy Program (Springer, 2013).
Mazon, D., Fenzi, C. & Sabot, R. As hot as it gets. Nature Phys. 12, 14–17 (2016).
Porkolab, M. RF heating and current drive in magnetically confined plasma: a historical perspective. AIP Conf. Proc. 933, 3 (2007).
Lawson, J. D. Some Criteria for a Useful Thermonuclear Reactor (Atomic Energy Research Establishment, 1955).
Lawson, J. D. Some criteria for a power producing thermonuclear reactor. Proc. Phys. Soc. B 70, 6–10 (1957).
Goldston, R. J. Energy confinement scaling in Tokamaks: some implications of recent experiments with Ohmic and strong auxiliary heating. Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 26, 87–103 (1984).
Kaye, S. M. & Goldston, R. J. Global energy confinement scaling for neutral-beam-heated tokamaks. Nucl. Fusion 25, 65–69 (1985).
Ryter, F. et al. Electron heat transport studies. Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 48, B453–B463 (2006).
Wagner, F. et al. Regime of improved confinement and high beta in neutral-beam-heated divertor discharges of the ASDEX tokamak. Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1408–1412 (1982).
Bickerton, R. J., Connor, J. W. & Taylor, J. B. Diffusion driven plasma currents and bootstrap tokamak. Nature 229, 110–112 (1971).
Balescu, R. Transport Processes in Plasmas Vol. 2 (Elsevier, 1988).
Fasoli, A. et al. Computational challenges in magnetic-confinement fusion physics. Nature Phys 12, 411–423 (2016).
Gusakov, E. Z. et al. Anomalous transport and multi-scale drift turbulence dynamics in tokamak ohmic discharge as measured by high resolution diagnostics and modeled by full-f gyrokinetic code. Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 55, 124034 (2013).
Dumont, R. J. et al. Interplay between fast ions and turbulence in magnetic fusion plasmas. Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 55, 124012 (2013).
Pace, D. C. et al. Keeping fusion plasmas hot. Phys. Today 68(10), 34–39 (2015).
Howard, N. T. et al. Multi-scale gyrokinetic simulation of tokamak plasmas: enhanced heat loss due to cross-scale coupling of plasma turbulence. Nucl. Fusion 56, 014004 (2016).
Staebler, G. M. & Groebner, R. J. H-mode transitions and limit cycle oscillations from mean field transport equations. Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 57, 014025 (2015).
Helander, P. Theory of plasma confinement in non-axisymmetric magnetic fields. Rep. Prog. Phys. 77, 087001 (2014).
Xanthopoulos, P. et al. Nonlinear gyrokinetic simulations of ion-temperature-gradient turbulence for the optimized Wendelstein 7-X Stellarator. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 035002 (2007).
Proll, J. H. E. et al. Resilience of quasi-isodynamic stellarators against trapped-particle instabilities. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 245002 (2012).
Zohm, H. Magnetohydrodynamic Stability of Tokamaks (Wiley, 2015).
Troyon, F. et al. MHD-Limits to plasma confinement. Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 26, 209–215 (1984).
Greenwald, M. et al. A new look at density limits in tokamaks. Nucl. Fusion 28, 2199–2207 (1988).
Zohm, H. Edge Localized Modes (ELMs). Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 38, 105–128 (1996).
Igochine, V. (ed.) Active Control of MHD Instabilities in Hot Plasmas (Springer, 2015).
Peeters, A. G. The bootstrap current and its consequences. Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 42, B231–B242 (2000).
Gorelenkov, N. et al. Energetic particle physics in fusion research in preparation for burning plasma experiments. Nucl. Fusion 54, 125001 (2014).
McCracken, G. & Stott, P. Fusion, the Energy of the Universe (Elsevier, 2005).
Knaster, J., Moeslang, A. & Muroga, T. Materials research for fusion. Nature Phys. 12, 424–434 (2016).
Kotschenreuther, M. et al. On heat loading, novel divertors, and fusion reactors. Phys. Plasmas 14, 072502 (2007).
Valanju, P. M. et al. Super-X divertors and high power density fusion devices. Phys. Plasmas 16, 056110 (2009).
Ryutov, D. D. Geometrical properties of a snowflake divertor. Phys. Plasmas 14, 064502 (2007).
Pericoli, V. et al. Preliminary 2D code simulation of the quasi-snowflake divertor configuration in the FAST tokamak. Fusion Eng. Des. 88, 1671–1681 (2013).
Ryutov, D. D. et al. A snowflake divertor: a possible solution to the power exhaust problem for tokamaks. Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 54, 124050 (2012).
Ryutov, D. D. & Umansky, M. Divertor with a third-order null of the poloidal field. Phys. Plasmas 20, 092509 (2013).
Winter, J. et al. Improved plasma performance in TEXTOR with silicon coated surfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1549–1552 (1993).
Gruber, O. et al. Observation of continuous divertor detachment in H-mode discharges in ASDEX Upgrade. Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 4217–4220 (1995).
Messiaen, A. et al. High confinement and high density with stationary plasma energy and strong edge radiation in the TEXTOR-94 tokamak. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 2487–2490 (1996).
Ongena, J. et al. Experiments with radiative mantle plasmas. Fusion Sci. Technol. 53, 943–952 (2008).
Umansky, M. V. et al. Analysis of geometric variations in high-power tokamak divertors. Nucl. Fusion 49, 075005 (2009).
Kallenbach, A. et al. Impurity seeding for tokamak power exhaust: from present devices via ITER to DEMO. Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 55, 124041 (2013).
Federici, G. et al. Plasma-material interactions in current tokamaks and their implications for next step fusion reactors. Nucl. Fusion 41, 1967–2137 (2001).
Greenwald, M. et al. 20 years of research on the Alcator C-Mod tokamak. Phys. Plasmas 21, 110501 (2014).
Neu, R. et al. The tungsten divertor experiment at ASDEX Upgrade. Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 38, A165–A179 (1996).
Romanelli, F. et al. Overview of JET results. Nucl. Fusion 55, 104001 (2015).
Höhnle, H. et al. Extension of the ECRH operational space with O2 and X3 heating schemes to control tungsten accumulation in ASDEX Upgrade. Nucl. Fusion 51, 083013 (2011).
Maisonnier, D. et al. Power plant conceptual studies in Europe. Nucl. Fusion 47, 1524–1532 (2007).
Seki, Y. et al. in Proc. 25th IAEA Fusion Energy Conf. FIP/1-1. (IAEA, 2014).
Hasegawa, A. et al. in Proc. 25th IAEA Fusion Energy Conf. MPT/1-4 (IAEA, 2014).
Zohm, H. for the ASDEX Upgrade Team and the EUROfusion MST1 Team Recent ASDEX Upgrade research in support of ITER and DEMO. Nucl. Fusion 55, 104010 (2015).
Peacock, N. J. et al. Measurement of the electron temperature by Thomson scattering in tokamak T3. Nature 224, 488–490 (1969).
Rebut, P. H. et al. JET Project – Design Proposal EUR-JET-R5 (Commission of the European Communities, 1975).
Strachan, J. et al. Fusion power production from TFTR plasmas fueled with deuterium and tritium. Phys. Rev. Lett 72, 3526–3529 (1994).
Hawryluk, R. J. et al. Confinement and heating of a deuterium–tritium plasma. Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 3530–3533 (1994).
McGuire, K. M. et al. Review of deuteriumtritium results from the Tokamak Fusion Test Reactor. Phys. Plasmas 2, 2176–2188 (1995).
Ishida, S. et al. in Proc. 16th IAEA Conference on Fusion Energy Vol. 1, 315–330 (IAEA, 1997).
Fujita, T. et al. High performance experiments in JT-60U reversed shear discharges. Nucl. Fusion 39, 1627–1636 (1999).
Keilhacker, M. et al. High fusion performance from deuterium-tritium plasmas in JET. Nucl. Fusion 39, 209–234 (1999).
Jacquinot, J. & the JET Team Deuterium-tritium operation in magnetic confinement experiments: results and underlying physics. Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 41, A13–A46 (1999).
Tokitani, M. et al. Plasma wall interaction in long-pulse helium discharge in LHD Microscopic modification of the wall surface and its impact on particle balance and impurity generation. J. Nucl. Mater. 463, 91–98 (2015).
Helander, P. et al. Stellarator and tokamak plasmas: a comparison. Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 54, 124009 (2012).
Grieger, G. et al. Physics optimization of stellarators. Phys. Fluids B 4, 2081–2091 (1992).
Bosch, H.-S. et al. Technical challenges in the construction of the steady-state stellarator Wendelstein 7-X. Nucl. Fusion 53, 126001 (2013).
Melnikov, A. V. Applied and fundamental aspects of fusion science. Nature Phys. 12, 386–390 (2016).
Interview with Bernard Bigot: building the way to fusion energy. Nature Phys. 12, 395–397 (2016).
Progress in ITER Physics Basis. Nucl. Fusion 47, S1–S414 (2007); corrigendum 48, 099801 (2008).
Vlad, G. et al. Alfvéic instabilities driven by fusion generated alpha particles in ITER scenarios. Nucl. Fusion 46, 1–16 (2006).
Giancarli, L. M. et al. Overview of the ITER TBM Program. Fusion Eng. Des. 87, 395–402 (2012).
Sborchia, C. et al. The ITER magnet systems: progress on construction. Nucl. Fusion 54, 013006 (2014).
Toigo, V. et al. in Proc. 25th IAEA Fusion Energy Conf. FIP/2-4Rc (IAEA, 2014).
Wilson, J. R. & Bonoli, P. T. Progress on ion cyclotron range of frequencies heating physics and technology in support of the International Tokamak Experimental Reactor. Phys. Plasmas 22, 021801 (2015).
Omori, T. et al. Overview of the ITER EC H&CD system and its capabilities. Fusion Eng. Des. 86, 951–954 (2011).
Hoang, G. T. et al. A lower hybrid current drive system for ITER. Nucl. Fusion 49, 075001 (2009).
Motojima, O. The ITER project construction status. Nucl. Fusion 55, 104023 (2015).
Buckingham, R. & Loving, A. Remote-handling challenges in fusion research and beyond. Nature Phys. 12, 391–393 (2016).
Summary of the ITER Final Design Report Ch. 8 (IAEA, 2001).
Pampin, R. et al. Activation analyses updating the ITER radioactive waste assessment. Fusion Eng. Des. 87, 1230–1234 (2012).
Hill, D. N. & the DIII-D team. DIII-D research towards resolving key issues for ITER and steady-state tokamaks. Nucl. Fusion 53, 104001 (2013).
Encheva, A. et al. in Proc. 25th IAEA Fusion Energy Conf. FIP/1-5 (IAEA, 2014).
Buttery, R. J. & the DIII-D team. DIII-D research to address key challenges for ITER and fusion energy. Nucl. Fusion 55, 104017 (2015).
Baylor, L. R. et al. in Proc. 25th IAEA Fusion Energy Conf. FIP/2-1 (IAEA, 2014).
Zohm, H. On the minimum size of DEMO. Fus. Sci. Technol. 58, 613–624 (2010).
Ishida, S., Barabaschi, P., Kamada, Y. & the JT-60SA Team Overview of the JT-60SA project. Nucl. Fusion 51, 094018 (2011).
Barabaschi, P. et al. in Proc. 25th IAEA Fusion Energy Conf. OV/3-2 (IAEA, 2014).
Angioni, C. et al. Density peaking, anomalous pinch, and collisionality in tokamak plasmas. Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 205003 (2003).
Warmer, F. System code analysis of helias fusion reactor and economic comparison to tokamaks. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TPS.2016.2545868 (2016).
Cowley, S. C. The quest for fusion power. Nature Phys. 12, 384–386 (2016).
Mineral Commodities Summaries (US Geological Survey, 2015); http://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/mcs/2015/mcs2015.pdf
Evans, R. K. An Abundance of Lithium (North Carolina State University, 2008); http://www.che.ncsu.edu/ILEET/phevs/lithium-availability/An_Abundance_of_Lithium.pdf
Evans, R. K. An Abundance of Lithium Part Two (EV World, 2008); http://www.evworld.com/library/KEvans_LithiumAbunance_pt2.pdf
Nuttal, W. J., Clarke, R. H. & Glowacki, B. A. Stop squandering helium. Nature 485, 573–575 (2012).
Peterson, J. B. in The Future of Helium as a Natural Resource (eds Nuttall, W. J., Clarke, R. & Glowacki, B. A.) 48–54 (Routledge, 2012).
A Conceptual Study of Commercial Fusion Power Plants; (European Fusion Development Agreement, 2005); https://www.euro-fusion.org/wpcms/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/PPCS_overall_report_final-with_annexes.pdf
Safety and Environmental Impact of Fusion (European Fusion Development Agreement, 2001); https://www.euro-fusion.org/wpcms/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/SEIF_report_25Apr01.pdf
Knaster, J. et al. IFMIF, the European-Japanese efforts under the Broader Approach Agreement towards a Li(d, xn) neutron source: current status and future options. Nucl. Mater. Energy (in the press).
Gusev, V. K., Alladio, F. & Morris, A. W. The basics of spherical tokamaks and progress in European research. Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 45, A59–A82 (2003).
Kirk, A. et al. Structure of ELMs in MAST and the implications for energy deposition. Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 47, 315 (2005).
Acknowledgements
J.O. and R.K. have the great pleasure to thank M. Van Schoor for pertinent valuable advice and discussions when writing this Review.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ongena, J., Koch, R., Wolf, R. et al. Magnetic-confinement fusion. Nature Phys 12, 398–410 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys3745
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys3745
This article is cited by
-
Complete and robust magnetic field confinement by superconductors in fusion magnets
Scientific Reports (2024)
-
Review on recent progress in ion cyclotron range of frequency systems, experiments and modelling for magnetic confinement fusion
Reviews of Modern Plasma Physics (2023)
-
Preparation of high-performance high temperature superconducting Bi-2212 wires by the spray pyrolysis powder
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics (2023)
-
Multiscale study of high energy attosecond pulse interaction with matter and application to proton–Boron fusion
Scientific Reports (2022)
-
High-Energy Ion Irradiation Induced Stepped Twins in the Ag Sheath of Bi2212 Superconductors
Journal of Superconductivity and Novel Magnetism (2022)