Abstract
The field of ‘Valleytronics’ has recently been attracting growing interest as a promising concept for the next generation electronics, because nondissipative pure valley currents with no accompanying net charge flow can be manipulated for computational use, akin to pure spin currents^{1}. Valley is a quantum number defined in an electronic system whose energy bands contain energetically degenerate but nonequivalent local minima (conduction band) or maxima (valence band) due to a certain crystal structure. Specifically, spatial inversion symmetry broken twodimensional honeycomb lattice systems exhibiting Berry curvature is a subset of possible systems that enable optical^{2,3,4,5}, magnetic^{6,7,8,9} and electrical control of the valley degree of freedom^{10,11,12}. Here we use dualgated bilayer graphene to electrically induce and control broken inversion symmetry (or Berry curvature) as well as the carrier density for generating and detecting the pure valley current. In the insulating regime, at zeromagnetic field, we observe a large nonlocal resistance that scales cubically with the local resistivity, which is evidence of pure valley current.
Main
Charge and spin are both welldefined quantum numbers in solids. Spintronics is a technology that uses the spin degree of freedom. The application range of spintronics has been largely expanded by the development of electrical techniques for generating and detecting the spin current^{1}. The valley degree of freedom in solid crystals can be handled by controlling the occupation of the nonequivalent structures in the band, providing the novel concept of socalled valleytronics.
Among various material candidates for valleytronics, twodimensional (2D) honeycomb lattice systems with broken spatial inversion symmetry, such as gapped graphene and transition metal dichalcogenide (TMDC), are predicted to be the most useful. These systems have two valleys, called K and K′. Optical^{2,3,4,5}, magnetic^{6,7,8,9} and electrical ^{10,11,12} control of the valley has been demonstrated. In particular, Berry curvature, which emerges in these honeycomb lattice systems with broken spatial inversion symmetry, enables electrical control of the valley degree of freedom.
Berry curvature acts as an outofplane pseudomagnetic field in momentum space and has opposite sign between the two valleys. Therefore, a transverse pure valley current is generated by means of the anomalous velocity, in analogy to a transverse electronic current being generated by means of the Lorentz force due to a magnetic field in real space^{13,14} (see Fig. 1d). This phenomenon is called the valley Hall effect^{10} and can be used to generate a valley current. The inverse valley Hall effect, which converts the valley current into a transverse electric field, allows the detection of the pure valley current.
The valley Hall effect was first reported for photogenerated electrons in monolayer MoS_{2} (ref. 11). However, the small intervalley scattering length in this material prevents the detection of the pure valley current, which does not accompany the electronic current. Compared to TMDC, graphene has a much larger intervalley scattering length owing to its higher crystal quality. Monolayer graphene on hBN has more recently been used to generate and detect the pure valley current, where the crystal direction of the graphene was aligned to that of the hBN such that the superlattice potential imposed by the hBN structurally breaks the spatial inversion symmetry^{12}. The valley Hall effect was analysed in detail with the carrier density as a parameter using metallic samples whose resistivity decreases as the temperature is lowered, but leaving unaddressed the insulating regime, which is more appropriate for investigating the pure valley current.
In this work we employed bilayer graphene (BLG) to generate and detect the valley current. We used a perpendicular electric field to break the spatial inversion symmetry and induce Berry curvature as well as a bandgap (see Fig. 1a). The dualgated structure seen in Fig. 1b allows electrical and independent control of the perpendicular electric field and the carrier density^{15,16,17,18,19}. This is in contrast to the monolayer graphene samples in ref. 12, where the monolayer graphene has to be structurally aligned with hBN through a process of mechanical transfer. BLG valley Hall devices therefore show greater promise in terms of tunability of the valley current and applications to electronic devices. Indeed we show that independent control of the Fermi level and the bandgap enables us to prove the existence of the valley Hall effect in the insulating regime where the local resistivity increases with decreasing temperature. The significant advantage of the insulating system is that conversion from the electric field to the valley current is less dissipative than that in the metallic regime, as a much smaller current is injected. Such a regime has not been accessible with conventional spin or valley Hall systems.
In bilayer graphene with broken spatial inversion symmetry, the Berry curvature Ω and intrinsic valley Hall conductivity σ_{xy}^{VH} are calculated as a function of the Fermi energy E_{F}(refs 10,20,21): and where τ_{z} is the valley index (τ_{z} = −1 for K and +1 for K′), m is the effective mass in BLG without broken spatial inversion symmetry, e is the elementary charge, h is the Planck constant, and ℏ = h/2π. The Berry curvature Ω is defined only for E_{F} ≥ Δ (half the bandgap, see Fig. 1a). σ_{xy}^{VH} saturates at the maximum value 4e^{2}/h when the Fermi level lies in the gap, because all occupied states in the valence band contribute to the valley Hall effect. Away from the gap—for example, when the Fermi energy lies above the gap—the conduction band, which has the opposite sign of Berry curvature to that of the valence band, contributes to reduce σ_{xy}^{VH}.
To detect the pure valley current, the nonlocal resistance R_{NL} was measured in the same scheme as is widely used in the spintronics field to detect pure spin current^{22,23,24,25,26}. We observed a value of R_{NL} at the charge neutrality point in the presence of a perpendicular electric field that was three orders of magnitude larger than the R_{NL} due to the Ohmic contribution (explained later). We also found a cubic scaling relation between R_{NL} and resistivity ρ (= 1/σ_{xx}), which is expected to appear when σ_{xx} is much larger than σ_{xy}^{VH} in the intrinsic valley Hall effect. This cubic scaling was reproduced in multiple devices. From these findings we conclude that the origin of the observed large nonlocal resistance is the transport mediated by pure bulk valley current in a gapped state with electrically induced Berry curvature.
Figure 1b, c shows the schematic of the dualgated BLG device and an AFM image of the device, respectively. BLG is encapsulated between two hBN layers^{27} (see Methods) and gated through the hBN layer from the top and from the bottom. The local and nonlocal resistance R_{L} and R_{NL} were derived from measurements of the fourterminal resistance R_{ij, kl}, which is defined by the voltage between terminals i and j divided by the charge current injected between terminals k and l (see Fig. 1c, d). Unless mentioned, R_{L} and R_{NL} denote R_{57,38} and R_{45,67}, respectively. The measurement was performed at 70 K using a lowfrequency (around 1 Hz) lockin technique, unless mentioned (see Methods and Supplementary Section I for details of the measurement).
Figure 2a, b shows the gate voltage dependence of R_{L} and R_{NL}, respectively. At the charge neutrality point (CNP), R_{L} increases with the displacement field (D) (see Fig. 2a), reflecting the bandgap opening due to inversion symmetry breaking^{15,16,17,18,19,28}. We found that R_{NL} also increases with D around the CNP.
In analogy with the spin Hall effect^{23} (Supplementary Section IX), R_{NL} arising from the valley Hall and inverse valley Hall effects is given by where σ_{xy}^{VH} and l_{v} are the valley Hall conductivity and the intervalley scattering length, respectively. W and L are the width and length of the Hall bar channel. Local conductivity σ_{xx} is minimized at the CNP and with increasing D, thus enhancing R_{NL} (equation (3)). For a given D, R_{NL} is further maximized around the CNP owing to the maximal valley Hall conductivity σ_{xy}^{VH} (equation (2)). We confirmed that R_{NL} is unchanged when swapping the measurement terminals—that is, R_{45,67} ∼ R_{67,45} (Supplementary Section II). We also consider a contribution of trivial Ohmic resistance which is due to classical diffusive charge transport to the measured nonlocal resistance. The Ohmic contribution can be calculated using the van der Pauw formula R_{NL} = ρ/πexp(−π(L/W)) (refs 12,24,25,26), where we define the resistivity ρ = R_{L}(W/L), and is compared with the measured nonlocal resistance in Fig. 2c. The measured R_{NL} is three orders of magnitude larger than the calculated Ohmic contribution. We therefore exclude the Ohmic contribution as the origin of the observed R_{NL}.
In the gapped BLG, the electron conduction mechanism depends on the temperature T. At high T it is dominated by thermal activation across the bandgap, namely band transport, whereas at low T it is dominated by hopping conduction between impurity states^{15,17,18,19}.
The temperature dependence of maximum ρ with respect to carrier density (ρ^{max}) was measured for various displacement fields D (Fig. 3a, inset). We plot 1/ρ^{max} as a function of 1/T for D = 0.55 V nm^{−1} as a typical example in Fig. 3a. The temperature dependence is strong at high T (> 79 K), reflecting band conduction, and weak at low T, reflecting hopping conduction. The temperature dependence over the whole range is reproduced well by a double exponential function: where E_{1}^{L} (E_{2}^{L}) and ρ_{1} (ρ_{2}) are the activation energy and the local resistivity, respectively for the highT (lowT) regime. 2E_{1}^{L} indicates the bandgap size, and is around 80 meV at the highest D (Supplementary Section IV). The crossover temperature T_{c} between the high and lowtemperature regions is determined by the crossing point of the first and second term of equation (4), as shown in Fig. 3a. The temperature dependence of the maximum nonlocal resistance R_{NL}^{max} was also measured (Fig. 3b, inset) and analysed with the following fitting function in the same way as for ρ^{max}, as shown in Fig. 3b: where E_{1}^{NL} (E_{2}^{NL}) is the activation energy and R_{1} (R_{2}) is a fitted proportionality factor, respectively, for the highT (lowT) regime. The temperature dependence is fairly similar to that of ρ^{max} in Fig. 3a. We also plot the crossover temperature T_{c} for both 1/ρ^{max} and 1/R_{NL}^{max} as a function of D in Fig. 3c. The T_{c} for 1/ρ^{max} divides the D–T plane into the band conduction region (light green) and the hopping conduction region (light red).
The critical temperatures T_{c} of 1/ρ^{max} and 1/R_{NL}^{max} coincide for D > 0.4 V nm^{−1}, indicating that there is correlation of the crossover behaviour between the local and nonlocal transport. However, it deviates for D < 0.4 V nm^{−1} for the following two possible reasons. The first possible reason is underestimation of the T_{c} of the nonlocal transport in the lowD region. The nonlocal voltage becomes very small at high T and low D, making precise measurement of R_{NL} difficult. In this regime, there are fewer measured points available for the fitting, resulting in the underestimation of T_{c}. The second possible reason is that the nonlocal transport by the valley current is less affected by charge puddles compared to the local transport, although we do not yet fully understand the reason for this observation.
One noticeable result is that the T_{c} of the nonlocal transport depends almost linearly on D for the entire region in Fig. 3c (see the blue curve; Supplementary Section V). This behaviour may indicate that the T_{c} is affected by the size of bandgap but less affected by the size of potential fluctuations due to charge puddles. Note that all four of the fitting parameters in equations (4) and (5) have a D dependence; therefore, obtaining an analytical relationship between D and T_{c} is not straightforward.
Another notable result is that the highT activation energy E_{1} is different between the local and nonlocal transport (Supplementary Sections IV and V, see Supplementary Figs 7 and 8). This already implies there is no linear relation between R_{NL} and ρ in our device. This observation is in contrast to a previous report on monolayer graphene^{12}, where both activation energies were similar.
We now present the scaling relation between ρ and R_{NL} at the CNP. Figure 4 is a plot of R_{NL} versus ρ obtained for various displacement fields D. The crossover behaviour between the band conduction and the hopping conduction shows up again on this plot. In the band conduction region (ρ < 7 kΩ) we observe a clear cubic scaling relation (green line), whereas we observe saturation in the hopping conduction region (ρ > 7 kΩ). Similar cubic and saturating scaling relations are obtained for different physical conditions. The ρ versus R_{NL} relation obtained for different carrier densities and temperatures at fixed displacement fields are shown in Supplementary Sections VI and VII, respectively. In addition, we observe a similar scaling relation for multiple devices (see Fig. 4 inset for one example).
By assuming a constant intervalley scattering length and replacing σ_{xx} with ρ^{−1} in equation (3), we derive the following scaling relation between R_{NL} and ρ: The cubic scaling between R_{NL} and ρ holds for the constant valley Hall conductivity which is expected when the Fermi level is in the bandgap or near the CNP (see Fig. 1a) for the intrinsic valley Hall effect, σ_{xy}^{VH} = 4e^{2}/h. The observed cubic relation for small D in Fig. 4 is therefore consistent with the theoretical expectation, providing unambiguous evidence of the valley transport. Note that, at finite temperatures, σ_{xy}^{VH} is reduced from 4e^{2}/h. However, in the range of displacement fields used here, it stays almost constant with a value close to 4e^{2}/h (see Supplementary Section X).
Using σ_{xy}^{VH} = 4e^{2}/h and substituting σ_{xx} = ρ^{−1} and the sample dimensions into equation (3), we obtain l_{v} = 1.6 μm. This is comparable to the estimated intervalley scattering length in previous works^{12,29}. By using different sets of four terminals we observed a significantly increasing decay of R_{NL} with L (Supplementary Section V), probably owing to valley relaxation due to edge scattering, as discussed in a weak localization study^{29}.
We here note that equations (3) and (6) are valid only for σ_{xx} ≫ σ_{xy}^{VH} (Supplementary Section IX). Otherwise we need to solve the conductance matrix and the diffusion equation of the entire Hall bar in a selfconsistent way. Indeed, deviation from the cubic scaling in the largeD region observed in Fig. 4 may arise owing to the inapplicability of equations (3) and (6). However, it does not account for the saturation of R_{NL} for large ρ (Supplementary Section IX). Another possible scenario to account for the saturation of R_{NL} is the crossover of the conduction mechanism, as discussed in Fig. 3c. In studies of the anomalous Hall effect, the crossover between the metallic and the hopping transport regime has been experimentally studied, and the scaling relation σ_{xy} ∝ σ_{xx}^{1.6} has been reported in a wide range of materials^{13}. If we apply this experimental rule for equation (6), we find R_{NL} to be almost constant with ρ. Here, we are again cautious about the validity of equation (6) in this argument, because in the saturation region σ_{xx} < σ_{xy}^{VH} for σ_{xy}^{VH} = 4e^{2}/h. However, by including extrinsic contributions—for example, the sidejump contribution^{10}—σ_{xy}^{VH} can be smaller than 4e^{2}/h and σ_{xx}. In such a case, we can keep the abovedescribed analogy with the anomalous Hall effect. Further experimental and theoretical investigations are needed into the valley Hall effect in the insulating regime^{30}, where conventional formulae are not applicable.
We finally exclude another scenario that might account for the R_{NL} observed here. In the gap of bilayer graphene, the presence of localized states along the edge resulting from the topological property of BLG has been predicted theoretically^{31}. This might also contribute to the nonlocal transport. With a large displacement field or large bandgap, the bulk shunting effect is small and the conduction becomes dominated by the edge transport. In such a case, R_{NL} should be proportional to the local resistance obtained by a fourterminal measurement (Supplementary Section X). This linear scaling does not fit any of the observed features (demonstrated in Fig. 4). We draw a linear scaling line in blue in Fig. 4, but this does not fit any of the observed features. Even when we consider the effect of bulk shunting, we find that the scaling is far from the cubic line (Supplementary Section X). So we exclude the possibility of edge transport as the origin of the observed R_{NL} and conclude that it comes from the bulk valley current in the gap. Also the transport through the localized states along the edge was disproved by the measurement on a Corbino geometry device^{19}.
We used a dualgated BLG in the Hall bar geometry to electrically control the broken inversion symmetry of BLG, and hence the valley degree of freedom. We observed a large nonlocal resistance in the insulating regime at 70 K and revealed a cubic scaling between the nonlocal resistance and the local conductivity as an indication of pure valley current flow. The valley current is fully controlled by electrical gating, with the bandgap, the Fermi level and broken inversion symmetry as parameters. This will allow further studies on the underlying physics of the valley current, in particular for σ_{xx} < σ_{xy}^{VH}, as well as applications for nondissipative electronic devices. While preparing the manuscript, observation of the topological valley current along an AB–BA stacking domain wall in bilayer graphene has been reported^{32}. This topological valley current along the domain wall also originates from the nonzero valley Hall conductivity (or nonzero valley Chern number) in the gap of bilayer graphene with broken spatial inversion symmetry.
Note added in proof:
We became aware that there is similar work related to valley current transport in dualgated bilayer graphene^{33}.
Methods
We used a mechanical exfoliation technique to prepare bilayer graphene (BLG) and hBN flakes. The number of layers in each graphene flake on the SiO_{2}/Si substrate was identified by optical contrast. The SiO_{2} was 285 nm thick, the Si was heavily pdoped and used for back gating. We transferred the BLG flakes onto hBN flakes prepared on SiO_{2} using the PMMA transfer technique reported in ref. 34. Then Ti/Au (10 nm/190 nm) was deposited to make Ohmic contacts. BLG was etched into a Hall bar by means of an Ar plasma. After each transfer and lithography step, except for the step between the Ohmic contact deposition and Ar plasma etching, the device was annealed at 300 °C in an Ar/H_{2} atmosphere for a few hours to remove the resist residue. However, the PMMA residue could not be completely removed by annealing, so we used a mechanical cleaning technique^{35,36,37} utilizing an AFM in tapping mode. After shaping the Hall bar, an hBN flake was transferred to the top of the BLG/hBN stacking layer. Finally, Ti/Au (10 nm/190 nm) was deposited onto the hBN/BLG/hBN stacking layer to make the top gate. The thicknesses of the top and bottom hBN layers measured by AFM were 21 nm and 35 nm, respectively.
Measurements were made using a lowfrequency (around 1 Hz) lockin technique. We found that current leakage through the input impedance of the voltage amplifiers causes an artefact in the nonlocal measurement. However, by using a simple circuit model, we confirmed that the error was not significant in this measurement (see Supplementary Section I). For the measurement shown in the inset of Fig. 4, we used homemade voltage amplifiers with a high input impedance to suppress the artefact further.
References
 1.
Jungwirth, T., Wunderlich, J. & Olejník, K. Spin Hall effect devices. Nature Mater. 11, 382–390 (2012).
 2.
Yao, W., Xiao, D. & Niu, Q. Valleydependent optoelectronics from inversion symmetry breaking. Phys. Rev. B 77, 235406 (2008).
 3.
Cao, T. et al. Valleyselective circular dichroism of monolayer molybdenum disulphide. Nature Commun. 3, 887 (2012).
 4.
Zeng, H., Dai, J., Yao, W., Xiao, D. & Cui, X. Valley polarization in MoS_{2} monolayers by optical pumping. Nature Nanotech. 7, 490–493 (2012).
 5.
Mak, K. F., He, K., Shan, J. & Heinz, T. F. Control of valley polarization in monolayer MoS_{2} by optical helicity. Nature Nanotech. 7, 494–498 (2012).
 6.
Li, Y. et al. Valley splitting and polarization by the Zeeman effect in monolayer MoSe_{2}. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 266804 (2014).
 7.
MacNeill, D. et al. Breaking of valley degeneracy by magnetic field in monolayer MoSe_{2}. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 037401 (2015).
 8.
Srivastava, A. et al. Valley Zeeman effect in elementary optical excitations of monolayer WSe_{2}. Nature Phys. 11, 141–147 (2015).
 9.
Aivazian, G. et al. Magnetic control of valley pseudospin in monolayer WSe_{2}. Nature Phys. 11, 148–152 (2015).
 10.
Xiao, D., Yao, W. & Niu, Q. Valleycontrasting physics in graphene: Magnetic moment and topological transport. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 236809 (2007).
 11.
Mak, K. F., McGill, K. L., Park, J. & McEuen, P. L. The valley Hall effect in MoS_{2} transistors. Science 344, 1489–1492 (2014).
 12.
Gorbachev, R. V. et al. Detecting topological currents in graphene superlattices. Science 346, 448–451 (2014).
 13.
Nagaosa, N., Sinova, J., Onoda, S., MacDonald, A. H. & Ong, N. P. Anomalous Hall effect. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1539–1592 (2010).
 14.
Xiao, D., Chang, M.C. & Niu, Q. Berry phase effects on electronic properties. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1959–2007 (2010).
 15.
Oostinga, J. B., Heersche, H. B., Liu, X., Morpurgo, A. F. & Vandersypen, L. M. K. Gateinduced insulating state in bilayer graphene devices. Nature Mater. 7, 151–157 (2007).
 16.
Zhang, Y. et al. Direct observation of a widely tunable bandgap in bilayer graphene. Nature 459, 820–823 (2009).
 17.
Zou, K. & Zhu, J. Transport in gapped bilayer graphene: The role of potential fluctuations. Phys. Rev. B 82, 081407 (2010).
 18.
Taychatanapat, T. & JarilloHerrero, P. Electronic transport in dualgated bilayer graphene at large displacement fields. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 166601 (2010).
 19.
Yan, J. & Fuhrer, M. S. Charge transport in dual gated bilayer graphene with Corbino geometry. Nano Lett. 10, 4521–4525 (2010).
 20.
Koshino, M. Electronic transport in bilayer graphene. New J. Phys. 11, 095010 (2009).
 21.
Zhang, F., Jung, J., Fiete, G. A., Niu, Q. & MacDonald, A. H. Spontaneous quantum Hall states in chirally stacked fewlayer graphene systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 156801 (2011).
 22.
Valenzuela, S. O. & Tinkham, M. Direct electronic measurement of the spin Hall effect. Nature 442, 176–179 (2006).
 23.
Abanin, D. A., Shytov, A. V., Levitov, L. S. & Halperin, B. I. Nonlocal charge transport mediated by spin diffusion in the spin Hall effect regime. Phys. Rev. B 79, 035304 (2009).
 24.
Brüne, C. et al. Evidence for the ballistic intrinsic spin Hall effect in HgTe nanostructures. Nature Phys. 6, 448–454 (2010).
 25.
Abanin, D. A. et al. Giant nonlocality near the Dirac point in graphene. Science 332, 328–330 (2011).
 26.
Balakrishnan, J., Koon, G. K. W., Jaiswal, M., Neto, A. H. C. & Özyilmaz, B. Colossal enhancement of spin–orbit coupling in weakly hydrogenated graphene. Nature Phys. 9, 284–287 (2013).
 27.
Dean, C. R. et al. Boron nitride substrates for highquality graphene electronics. Nature Nanotech. 5, 722–726 (2010).
 28.
Ohta, T., Bostwick, A., Seyller, T., Horn, K. & Rotenberg, E. Controlling the electronic structure of bilayer graphene. Science 313, 951–954 (2006).
 29.
Tikhonenko, F. V., Horsell, D. W., Gorbachev, R. V. & Savchenko, A. K. Weak localization in graphene flakes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 056802 (2008).
 30.
Lensky, Y. D., Song, J. C. W., Samutpraphoot, P. & Levitov, L. S. Topological valley currents in gapped Dirac materials. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 256601 (2015).
 31.
Li, J., Martin, I., Büttiker, M. & Morpurgo, A. F. Topological origin of subgap conductance in insulating bilayer graphene. Nature Phys. 7, 38–42 (2010).
 32.
Ju, L. et al. Topological valley transport at bilayer graphene domain walls. Nature 520, 650–655 (2015).
 33.
Sui, M. et al. Gatetunable topological valley transport in bilayer graphene. Nature Phys. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nphys3485 (2015).
 34.
Taychatanapat, T., Watanabe, K., Taniguchi, T. & JarilloHerrero, P. Quantum Hall effect and Landaulevel crossing of Dirac fermions in trilayer graphene. Nature Phys. 7, 621–625 (2011).
 35.
Jalilian, R. et al. Scanning gate microscopy on graphene: Charge inhomogeneity and extrinsic doping. Nanotechnology 22, 295705 (2011).
 36.
Goossens, A. M. et al. Mechanical cleaning of graphene. Appl. Phys. Lett. 100, 073110 (2012).
 37.
Lindvall, N., Kalabukhov, A. & Yurgens, A. Cleaning graphene using atomic force microscope. J. Appl. Phys. 111, 064904 (2012).
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge fruitful discussion with L. S. Levitov, J. C. W. Song, M. Koshino, M. Ezawa and N. Nagaosa. Y.S. acknowledges support from Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) Research Fellowship for Young Scientists and JSPS Program for Leading Graduate Schools (MERIT). M.Y., K.W. and T.T. acknowledge support from JSPS GrantinAid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas ‘Science of Atomic Layers’. M.Y. acknowledges support from Canon Foundation. I.V.B. acknowledges support from JSPS International Research Fellowship. K.W. and T.T. acknowledge support from the Elemental Strategy Initiative conducted by the MEXT, Japan. T.T. acknowledges support from JSPS GrantinAid for Scientific Research A (No. 26248061) and JSPS Innovative Areas ‘Nano Informatics’ (No. 25106006). S.T. acknowledges support from DFGJST joint research project ‘Topological Electronics’ and JSPS GrantinAid for Scientific Research S (No. 26220710).
Author information
Affiliations
Department of Applied Physics, University of Tokyo, Bunkyoku, Tokyo 1138656, Japan
 Y. Shimazaki
 , M. Yamamoto
 , I. V. Borzenets
 & S. Tarucha
PRESTO, JST, Kawaguchishi, Saitama 3320012, Japan
 M. Yamamoto
National Institute for Materials Science, Tsukubashi, Ibaraki 3050044, Japan
 K. Watanabe
 & T. Taniguchi
Center for Emergent Matter Science (CEMS), RIKEN, Wakoshi, Saitama 3510198, Japan
 S. Tarucha
Authors
Search for Y. Shimazaki in:
Search for M. Yamamoto in:
Search for I. V. Borzenets in:
Search for K. Watanabe in:
Search for T. Taniguchi in:
Search for S. Tarucha in:
Contributions
Y.S. conceived the experiment, designed the experiment with M.Y., fabricated the samples, conducted measurements and analysis, interpreted the data with M.Y., and wrote the manuscript with M.Y., I.V.B. and S.T. I.V.B. contributed to the measurements. T.T. and K.W. synthesized hBN samples. M.Y. and S.T. directed the research. All authors discussed the results and the manuscript.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Corresponding authors
Correspondence to M. Yamamoto or S. Tarucha.
Supplementary information
PDF files
 1.
Supplementary information
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
To obtain permission to reuse content from this article visit RightsLink.
About this article
Further reading

Topological valley transport at the curved boundary of a folded bilayer graphene
Communications Physics (2019)

Spin and ValleyDependent Electronic Structure in Silicene Under Periodic Potentials
Nanoscale Research Letters (2018)

Piezoelectricity and valley chern number in inhomogeneous hexagonal 2D crystals
npj 2D Materials and Applications (2018)

Large tunable valley splitting in edgefree graphene quantum dots on boron nitride
Nature Nanotechnology (2018)

Light–valley interactions in 2D semiconductors
Nature Photonics (2018)