In situ evidence for the structure of the magnetic null in a 3D reconnection event in the Earth's magnetotail

Abstract

Magnetic reconnection is one of the most important processes in astrophysical, space and laboratory plasmas. Identifying the structure around the point at which the magnetic field lines break and subsequently reform, known as the magnetic null point, is crucial to improving our understanding of reconnection. But owing to the inherently three-dimensional nature of this process, magnetic nulls are only detectable through measurements obtained simultaneously from at least four points in space. Using data collected by the four spacecraft of the Cluster constellation as they traversed a diffusion region in the Earth's magnetotail on 15 September 2001, we report here the first in situ evidence for the structure of an isolated magnetic null. The results indicate that it has a positive-spiral structure whose spatial extent is of the same order as the local ion inertial length scale, suggesting that the Hall effect could play an important role in 3D reconnection dynamics.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: The 4-s resolution magnetic field (B ) and plasma velocity (V ) data of C1–C4 (no V2 data) during the interval 05:03–05:04UT on 15 September 2001.
Figure 2: Positions of spacecraft C1, C2 and C4 relative to C3 in GSM coordinates and illustration of the null point surrounded by Cluster satellites.
Figure 3: The high-resolution (0.04 s) magnetic field data of four Cluster spacecraft, and the calculated Poincaré index during 05:03–05:04UT on 15 September 2001.
Figure 4: Schematic diagrams of a positive-spiral-type null and positions of satellites crossing.

References

  1. 1

    Giovanelli, R. G. A theory of chromospheric flares. Nature 158, 81–82 (1946).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Dungey, J. W. Cosmic Electrodynamics (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1958).

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Dungey, J. W. Interplanetary magnetic field and the auroral zones. Phys. Rev. Lett. 6, 47–48 (1961).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Dungey, J. W. in Geophysics, The Earth's Environment (ed. Dewitt, C.et al.) 526–531 (Gordon and Breach, New York, 1963).

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Parker, E. N. Sweet's mechanism for merging magnetic fields in conducting fluid. J. Geophys. Res. 62, 509–520 (1957).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Petschek, H. E. in The Physics of Solar Flare (ed. Hess, W. N.) 425–437 (NASA SP-50, NASA, Washington DC, 1964).

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Birn, J. et al. Geospace environmental modeling (GEM) magnetic reconnection challenge. J. Geophys. Res. 106, 3715–3719 (2001).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Phan, T. D. et al. Extended magnetic reconnection at the earth's magnetopause from detection of bi-directional jets. Nature 404, 848–850 (2000).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Deng, X. H. & Matsumoto, H. Rapid magnetic reconnection in the Earth's magnetosphere generated by whistler waves. Nature 410, 557–559 (2001).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Øieroset, M. et al. In situ detection of collisionless reconnection in the earth's magnetotail. Nature 412, 414–417 (2001).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Mozer, F. S., Bale, S. D. & Phan, T. D. Evidence of diffusion regions at a subsolar magnetopause crossing. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 015002 (2002).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Frey, H. U., Phan, T. D., Fuselier, S. A. & Mende, S. B. Continuous magnetic reconnection at Earth's magnetopause. Nature 426, 533–536 (2003).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Priest, E. R. & Titov, V. S. Magnetic reconnection at three-dimensional null points. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 354, 2951–2992 (1996).

    ADS  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Cowley, S. W. H. A qualitatively study of the reconnection between the Earth's magnetic field and an interplanetary field of arbitrary orientation. Radio Sci. 8, 903–913 (1973).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Lau, Y.-T. & Finn, J. M. Three-dimensional kinematic reconnection in the presence of field nulls and closed field lines. Astrophys. J. 350, 672 (1990).

    ADS  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Priest, E. R. & Forbes, T. G. Magnetic Reconnection: MHD Theory and Applications (Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Priest, E. R., Hornig, G. & Pontin, D. I. On the nature of three-dimensional magnetic reconnection. J. Geophys. Res. 108,(2003) doi:10.1029/2002JA009812.

  18. 18

    Buchner, J. Three-dimensional magnetic reconnection in astrophysical plasma–-kinetic approach. Astrophys. Space Sci. 264, 25–42 (1999).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Lui, A. T. Y. Critical issues on magnetic reconnection in space plasmas. Space Sci. Rev. 116, 497–521 (2005).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Arnold, V. I. Ordinary Differential Equation (Springer, Berlin, New York, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Wang, J. Vector magnetic field and magnetic activity on the Sun. Fund. Cosmic Phys. 20, 251–382 (1999).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Greene, J. M. Geometrical properties of 3D reconnecting magnetic fields with nulls. J. Geophys. Res. 93, 8583–8590 (1988).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Schindler, K., Hesse, M. & Birn, J. General reconnection, parallel electric fields and helicity. J. Geophys. Res. 93, 5547–5557 (1988).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Wang, X. G. & Bhattacharjee, A. A three-dimensional reconnection model of the magnetosphere: Geometry and kenematics. J. Geophys. Res. 101, 2641–2653 (1996).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Greene, J. M. & Miller, R. L. Proceedings of the International Symposium in Honor of Bruno Coppi (Report GAA21961) (General Atomics, San Diego, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Hu, S., Bhattacharjee, A., Dorelli, J. & Greene, J. M. The spherical tearing mode. Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, L19806 (2004).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Galsgaard, K. & Nordlund, A. Heating and activity of the solar corona: 3. Dynamics of a low-beta plasma with three-dimensional null points. J. Geophys. Res. 102, 231–248 (1997).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Lau, Y.-T. & Finn, J. M. Magnetic reconnection and the topology of interacting twisted flux tubes. Phys. Plasmas 3, 3983–3997 (1996).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Pontin, D. I., Hornig, G. & Priest, E. R. in Proceedings of the SOHO 15 Workshop–Coronal Heating (ed. Walsh, R. W.et al.) 507–523 (ESA Publications Division, Noordwijk, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Parnell, C. E., Smith, J. M., Neukirch, T. & Priest, E. R. The structure of three-dimensional magnetic neutral points. Phys. Plasmas 3, 759–770 (1996).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Filippov, B. Observation of a 3D magnetic null point in the solar corona. Sol. Phys. 185, 297–309 (1999).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32

    Aulanier, G. et al. The topology and evolution of the Bastille day flare. Astrophys. J. 540, 1126–1146 (2000).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33

    Fletcher, L. et al. Evidence for the flare trigger site and three-dimensional reconnection in multiwavelength observations of a solar flare. Astrophys. J. 554, 451–463 (2001).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34

    Zhao, H., Wang, J., Zhang, J. & Xiao, C. J. A new method of identifying 3D null points in solar vector magnetic fields. Chin. J. Astron. Astrophys. 5, 443–447 (2005).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35

    Garth, C., Tricoche, X. & Scheuermann, G. in Proceedings of IEEE Visualization '04 (ed. Rushmeier, H.et al.) 329–336 (IEEE Computer Society, Washington DC, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36

    Ding, W. X. Measurement of internal magnetic field fluctuations in a reversed-field pinch by Faraday rotation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 035002 (2003).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37

    Escoubet, C. P., Schmidt, R. & Goldstein, M. L. in The Cluster and Phoenix Missions (ed. Escoubet, C. P.et al.) 11–32 (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  38. 38

    Balogh, A. et al. in The Cluster and Phoenix Missions (ed. Escoubet, C. P.et al.) 65–92 (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39

    Reme, H. et al. in The Cluster and Phoenix Missions (ed. Escoubet, C. P.et al.) 303–350 (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  40. 40

    Greene, J. M. Locating three-dimensional roots by a bisect ion method. J. Comput. Phys. 98, 194–198 (1992).

    ADS  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41

    Cai, D. S., Li, Y. T., Ichikawai, T., Xiao, C. J. & Nishikawa, K. Visualization and criticality of magnetotail field topology in a three-dimensional particle simulation. Earth, Planets Space 53, 1011 (2001).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42

    Sonnerup, B. U. O. & Scheible, M. in Analysis Methods for Multi-Spacecraft Data. (eds Paschmann, G. & Daly, P. W.) 185–220 (ESA Publications Division, Noordwijk, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  43. 43

    Khurana, K. K. et al. Accurate determination of magnetic field gradients from four-point vector measurements-II: use of nutral constraints on vector data obtained from four spinning spacescraft. IEEE Trans. Magn. 32, 5193–5205 (1996).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44

    Chanteur, G. in Analysis Methods for Multi-Spacecraft Data (eds Paschmann, G. & Daly, P. W.) 349–369 (ESA Publications Division, Noordwijk, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  45. 45

    Xiao, C. J. et al. Multiple magnetic reconnection events observed by Cluster: current calculating. Chin. J. Geophys. 47, 635–643 (2004).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46

    Wang, X. G., Bhattacharjee, A. & Ma, Z. W. Collisionless reconnection: effects of Hall current and electron pressure gradient. J. Geophys. Res. 105, 27633 (2000).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47

    Wang, X. G., Bhattacharjee, A. & Ma, Z. W. Scaling of collisionless forced reconnection. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 265003 (2001).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the NSFC Programs (Grant Nos 40390150, 4050421, 10233050, 10575018, 40536030, 40425004, and 40228006) and the China Key Research Project (Grant No. G200000784), as well as the China Double Star-Cluster Science Team. The authors also thank D. S. Cai, E. R. Priest, and G. P. Zhou for helpful discussions and suggestions, as well as H. Schwarzl for producing the intercalibrated FGM data.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Z. Y. Pu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Xiao, C., Wang, X., Pu, Z. et al. In situ evidence for the structure of the magnetic null in a 3D reconnection event in the Earth's magnetotail. Nature Phys 2, 478–483 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys342

Download citation

Further reading

Search

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing