Article | Published:

Interpreting attoclock measurements of tunnelling times

Nature Physics volume 11, pages 503508 (2015) | Download Citation

Abstract

Resolving in time the dynamics of light absorption by atoms and molecules, and the electronic rearrangement this induces, is among the most challenging goals of attosecond spectroscopy. The attoclock is an elegant approach to this problem, which encodes ionization times in the strong-field regime. However, the accurate reconstruction of these times from experimental data presents a formidable theoretical task. Here, we solve this problem by combining analytical theory with ab initio numerical simulations. We apply our theory to numerical attoclock experiments on the hydrogen atom to extract ionization time delays and analyse their nature. Strong-field ionization is often viewed as optical tunnelling through the barrier created by the field and the core potential. We show that, in the hydrogen atom, optical tunnelling is instantaneous. We also show how calibrating the attoclock using the hydrogen atom opens the way to identifying possible delays associated with multielectron dynamics during strong-field ionization.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    et al. Delay in photoemission. Science 328, 1658–1662 (2010).

  2. 2.

    et al. Resolving the time when an electron exits a tunnelling barrier. Nature 485, 343–346 (2012).

  3. 3.

    et al. Real-time observation of valence electron motion. Nature 466, 700–702 (2010).

  4. 4.

    et al. Attosecond ionization and tunneling delay time measurements in helium. Science 322, 1525–1529 (2008).

  5. 5.

    et al. Attosecond angular streaking. Nature Phys. 4, 565–570 (2008).

  6. 6.

    et al. Breakdown of the independent electron approximation in sequential double ionization. New J. Phys. 13, 093008 (2011).

  7. 7.

    et al. Attoclock reveals natural coordinates of the laser-induced tunnelling current flow in atoms. Nature Phys. 8, 76–80 (2012).

  8. 8.

    & Universal attosecond response to the removal of an electron. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 033901 (2005).

  9. 9.

    , & Attosecond cascades and time delays in one-electron photoionization. Phys. Rev. A 86, 033423 (2012).

  10. 10.

    & Delay in atomic photoionization. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 233002 (2010).

  11. 11.

    , , , & Time delay between photoemission from the 2p and 2s subshells of neon. Phys. Rev. A 84, 061404 (2011).

  12. 12.

    et al. Probing single-photon ionization on the attosecond time scale. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 143002 (2011).

  13. 13.

    & How accurate is the attosecond streak camera? Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 213605 (2011).

  14. 14.

    , & Time-resolved photoemission on the attosecond scale: Opportunities and challenges. Faraday Discuss. 163, 353–376 (2013).

  15. 15.

    , & Introduction to attosecond delays in photoionization. J. Phys. B 45, 183001 (2012).

  16. 16.

    & Strong-field ionization of He by elliptically polarized light in attoclock configuration. Phys. Rev. A 89, 021402 (2014).

  17. 17.

    et al. Probing nonadiabatic effects in strong-field tunnel ionization. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 103003 (2013).

  18. 18.

    , & Ionization in elliptically polarized pulses: Multielectron polarization effects and asymmetry of photoelectron momentum distributions. Phys. Rev. A 85, 023428 (2012).

  19. 19.

    & Time-dependent analytical R-matrix approach for strong-field dynamics. I. One-electron systems. Phys. Rev. A 86, 043408 (2012).

  20. 20.

    et al. Time-dependent analytical R-matrix approach for strong-field dynamics. II. Many-electron systems. Phys. Rev. A 86, 043409 (2012).

  21. 21.

    & Nonadiabatic Coulomb effects in strong-field ionization in circularly polarized laser fields. Phys. Rev. A 88, 013421 (2013).

  22. 22.

    , & Time-resolving electron–core dynamics during strong-field ionization in circularly polarized fields. Phys. Rev. A 88, 053403 (2013).

  23. 23.

    An efficient propagation scheme for the time-dependent Schrödinger equation in the velocity gauge. Laser Phys. 9, 138–148 (1999).

  24. 24.

    & Photo-electron momentum spectra from minimal volumes: The time-dependent surface flux method. New J. Phys. 14, 013021 (2012).

  25. 25.

    et al. Ultrafast resolution of tunneling delay time. Optica 1, 343–349 (2014).

  26. 26.

    , , , & Strong-field tunneling without ionization. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 233001 (2008).

  27. 27.

    , , & How key periodic orbits drive recollisions in a circularly polarized laser field. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 253002 (2013).

  28. 28.

    & Elliptical polarization and probability of double ionization. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 083001 (2010).

  29. 29.

    , , & Multiconfigurational Hartree–Fock close-coupling ansatz: Application to the argon photoionization cross section and delays. Phys. Rev. A 87, 023420 (2013).

  30. 30.

    Time delay in valence shell photoionization of noble gas atoms. Phys. Rev. A 87, 063404 (2013).

  31. 31.

    t-SURFF: Fully differential two-electron photo-emission spectra. New J. Phys. 14, 085008 (2012).

  32. 32.

    et al. Signatures of bound-state-assisted nonsequential double ionization. Phys. Rev. A 80, 013412 (2009).

  33. 33.

    , & Analytical solutions for strong field-driven atomic and molecular one- and two-electron continua and applications to strong-field problems. Phys. Rev. A 77, 033407 (2008).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge stimulating discussions with U. Keller and A. Landsman. J.K., O.S. and M.I. acknowledge support of the EU Marie Curie ITN network CORINF, Grant Agreement No. 264951. F.M. and O.S. acknowledge support of the DFG project SM 292/3-1, S.S. and M.I. acknowledge support of the EPSRC Programme Grant EP/I032517/1, M.I. acknowledges the support of the United States Air Force Office of Scientific Research program No. FA9550-12-1-0482, O.S., L.T. and J.K. acknowledge support of the DFG grant SM 292/2-3. A.K. and I.I. acknowledge support of the Australian Research Council Grant DP120101805. A.Z. and A.S. acknowledge support from the DFG through excellence cluster Munich Center for Advanced Photonics (MAP) and from the Austrian Science Foundation project ViCoM (F41). O.S., M.I., F.M. and A.S. acknowledge the support of the European COST Action XLIC CM1204, H.G.M. acknowledges the hospitality of the Max Born Institute.

Author information

Author notes

    • Lisa Torlina
    •  & Felipe Morales

    These authors contributed equally to this work.

Affiliations

  1. Max-Born-Institut, Max-Born-Strasse 2A 12489 Berlin, Germany

    • Lisa Torlina
    • , Felipe Morales
    • , Jivesh Kaushal
    • , Harm Geert Muller
    • , Misha Ivanov
    •  & Olga Smirnova
  2. Research School of Physical Sciences, The Australian National University, Canberra ACT 0200, Australia

    • Igor Ivanov
    •  & Anatoli Kheifets
  3. Ludwig Maximilians University, Theresienstrasse 37 D-80333 Munich, Germany

    • Alejandro Zielinski
    •  & Armin Scrinzi
  4. Department of Physics, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London SW7 2AZ, UK

    • Suren Sukiasyan
    •  & Misha Ivanov
  5. Institute für Physik, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Newtonstrasse 15 12489 Berlin, Germany

    • Misha Ivanov

Authors

  1. Search for Lisa Torlina in:

  2. Search for Felipe Morales in:

  3. Search for Jivesh Kaushal in:

  4. Search for Igor Ivanov in:

  5. Search for Anatoli Kheifets in:

  6. Search for Alejandro Zielinski in:

  7. Search for Armin Scrinzi in:

  8. Search for Harm Geert Muller in:

  9. Search for Suren Sukiasyan in:

  10. Search for Misha Ivanov in:

  11. Search for Olga Smirnova in:

Contributions

L.T., J.K. and O.S. derived the ARM method and performed the analytical study. F.M., H.G.M., M.I., A.Z., A.S., A.K., I.I. and S.S. performed the numerical simulations and checked the convergence and consistency of the results. F.M., O.S. and M.I. analysed the origins of negative ionization times. O.S. directed and coordinated the research. L.T., M.I. and O.S. wrote the paper. All authors discussed the results and provided contributions to the text of the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olga Smirnova.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Information

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys3340

Further reading