Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Demonstration of genuine multipartite entanglement with device-independent witnesses


Entanglement in a quantum system can be demonstrated experimentally by performing the measurements prescribed by an appropriate entanglement witness. However, the unavoidable mismatch between the implementation of measurements in practical devices and their precise theoretical modelling generally results in the undesired possibility of false-positive entanglement detection. Such scenarios can be avoided by using the recently developed device-independent entanglement witnesses (DIEWs) for genuine multipartite entanglement. Similarly to Bell inequalities, the only assumption of DIEWs is that consistent measurements are performed locally on each subsystem. No precise description of the measurement devices is required. Here we report an experimental test of DIEWs on up to six entangled 40Ca+ ions. We also demonstrate genuine multipartite quantum nonlocality between up to six parties with the detection loophole closed.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Get just this article for as long as you need it


Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: State and measurement characterization for the six-qubit DIEW measurement.


  1. Briegel, H. J., Dür, W., Cirac, J. & Zoller, P. Quantum repeaters: The role of imperfect local operations in quantum communication. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5932–5935 (1998).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ekert, A. K. Quantum cryptography based on Bell’s theorem. Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 661–663 (1991).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Gisin, N., Ribordy, G., Tittel, W. & Zbinden, H. Quantum cryptography. Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 145–195 (2002).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Briegel, H. J., Browne, D. E., Dür, W., Raussendorf, R. & Van den Nest, M. Measurement-based quantum computation. Nature Phys. 5, 19 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. DiCarlo, L. et al. Preparation and measurement of three-qubit entanglement in a superconducting circuit. Nature 467, 574–578 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Neumann, P. et al. Multipartite entanglement among single spins in diamond. Science 320, 1326–1329 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Saffman, M., Walker, T. G. & Mølmer, K. Quantum information with Rydberg atoms. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 2313–2363 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Blatt, R. & Wineland, D. Entangled states of trapped atomic ions. Nature 453, 1008–1015 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gühne, O. & Tóth, G. Entanglement detection. Phys. Rep. 474, 1–75 (2009).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Yao, X-C. et al. Observation of eight-photon entanglement. Nature Photon. 6, 225–228 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gao, W-B. et al. Experimental demonstration of a hyper-entangled ten-qubit Schrödinger cat state. Nature Phys. 6, 331–335 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Monz, T. et al. 14-qubit entanglement: Creation and coherence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 130506 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Semenov, A. & Vogel, W. Fake violations of the quantum Bell-parameter bound. Phys. Rev. A 83, 032119 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rosset, D., Ferretti-Schöbitz, R., Bancal, J-D., Gisin, N. & Liang, Y-C. Imperfect measurements settings: Implications on quantum state tomography and entanglement witnesses. Phys. Rev. A 86, 062325 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Altepeter, J. B., James, D. F. V. & Kwiat, P. G. Qubit quantum state tomography. Lect. Notes Phys. 649, 113–145 (2004).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Lvovsky, A. I. Continuous-variable optical quantum-state tomography. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 299–332 (2009).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Audenaert, K. & Scheel, S. Quantum tomographic reconstruction with error bars: A Kalman filter approach. New J. Phys. 11, 023028 (2009).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Acı´n, A., Gisin, N. & Masanes, L. From Bell’s theorem to secure quantum key distribution. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 120405 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Gallego, R., Brunner, N., Hadley, C. & Acı´n, A. Device-independent tests of classical and quantum dimensions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 230501 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hendrych, M. et al. Experimental estimation of the dimension of classical and quantum systems. Nature Phys. 8, 588–591 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ahrens, J., Badziag, P., Cabello, A. & Bourennane, M. Experimental device- independent tests of classical and quantum dimensions. Nature Phys. 8, 592–595 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Bancal, J-D., Gisin, N., Liang, Y-C. & Pironio, S. Device-independent witnesses of genuine multipartite entanglement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 250404 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Pál, K. & Vértesi, T. Multisetting Bell-type inequalities for detecting genuine multipartite entanglement. Phys. Rev. A 83, 062123 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Bancal, J-D., Branciard, C., Brunner, N., Gisin, N. & Liang, Y.-C. A framework for the study of symmetric full-correlation Bell-like inequalities. J. Phys. A 45, 125301 (2012).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Silman, J., Pironio, S. & Massar, S. Device-independent randomness generation in the presence of weak cross-talk. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 100504 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. Schmidt-Kaler, F. et al. How to realize a universal quantum gate with trapped ions. Appl. Phys. B 77, 789–796 (2003).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Mølmer, K. & Sørensen, A. Multiparticle entanglement of hot trapped ions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1835–1838 (1999).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Sackett, C. A. et al. Experimental entanglement of four particles. Nature 404, 256–259 (2000).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. Collins, D., Gisin, N., Popescu, S., Roberts, D. & Scarani, V. Bell-type inequalities to detect true n-body nonseparability. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 170405 (2002).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. Seevinck, M. & Svetlichny, G. Bell-type inequalities for partial separability in N-particle systems and quantum mechanical violations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 060401 (2002).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Lavoie, J., Kaltenbaek, R. & Resch, K. J. Experimental violation of Svetlichny’s inequality. New J. Phys. 11, 073051 (2009).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank Y-C. Liang for useful discussions. We gratefully acknowledge support by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) through the SFB FoQuS (FWF Project No. F4006-N16) and by the Swiss NCCR ‘Quantum Science and Technology’, the CHIST-ERA DIQIP, and the European ERC-AG QORE. This research was funded by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity (IARPA), through the Army Research Office grant W911NF-10-1-0284. All statements of fact, opinion or conclusions contained herein are those of the authors and should not be construed as representing the official views or policies of IARPA, the ODNI, or the US Government.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



J.T.B. and J-D.B. developed the research; J.T.B., P.S. and D.N. performed the experiments; J-D.B. and N.G. provided the theoretical part; J.T.B., J-D.B., T.M. and P.S. analysed the data; J.T.B., P.S., D.N., T.M., M.H. and R.B. contributed to the experimental set-up; J.T.B. and J-D.B. wrote the manuscript, with revisions provided by P.S., T.M., N.G. and R.B; all authors contributed to the discussion of the results and manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Julio T. Barreiro or Jean-Daniel Bancal.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information (PDF 300 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barreiro, J., Bancal, JD., Schindler, P. et al. Demonstration of genuine multipartite entanglement with device-independent witnesses. Nature Phys 9, 559–562 (2013).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing