Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Few femtosecond, few kiloampere electron bunch produced by a laser–plasma accelerator


Particle accelerators driven by the interaction of ultraintense and ultrashort laser pulses with a plasma1 can generate accelerating electric fields of several hundred gigavolts per metre and deliver high-quality electron beams with low energy spread2,3,4,5, low emittance6 and up to 1 GeV peak energy7,8. Moreover, it is expected they may soon be able to produce bursts of electrons shorter than those produced by conventional particle accelerators, down to femtosecond durations and less. Here we present wide-band spectral measurements of coherent transition radiation which we use for temporal characterization. Our analysis shows that the electron beam, produced using controlled optical injection9, contains a temporal feature that can be identified as a 15 pC, 1.4–1.8 fs electron bunch (root mean square) leading to a peak current of 3–4 kA depending on the bunch shape. We anticipate that these results will have a strong impact on emerging applications such as short-pulse and short-wavelength radiation sources10,11, and will benefit the realization of laboratory-scale free-electron lasers12,13,14.


The ponderomotive force generated by the focused laser pulse is proportional to the gradient of the laser intensity. It pushes electrons out of regions of high intensity and separates them from the ions, thus creating a plasma wave that propagates in the wake of the laser pulse with a phase velocity close to c, the speed of light in vacuum. The characteristic length of the accelerating cavity that forms behind the driving laser pulse is the plasma wavelength λp. In a typical laser wakefield acceleration experiment, λp=10–30 μm for plasma densities ne=1018–1019 cm−3. The electric field changes along the length of the plasma wave, therefore, to generate an electron beam with low energy spread and low divergence, the electron bunch should reside within the focusing and accelerating phase of the wave, which has a length λp/4. These heuristic arguments indicate that one would expect the bunch duration to be ultrashort, τ<λp/4c≈10 fs (refs 9, 15). However, to the best of our knowledge, such short durations have not previously been directly measured.

Traditional techniques to measure the electron bunch duration, such as streak cameras and radio-frequency sweeping cavities, do not have the temporal resolution required for femtosecond bunches. Therefore, we have employed a method in the frequency domain and measured the coherent transition radiation (CTR) that is emitted by the electron bunch as it passes through a thin metallic foil.

CTR is an established particle beam diagnostic and has been used to diagnose micro-structures of picosecond-bunches16,17 and for benchmarking simulations of femtosecond-bunch dynamics in a multi-gigaelectronvolt radio-frequency accelerator18. CTR at terahertz frequencies was used for temporal characterization of laser-accelerated electron bunches with duration longer than 30 fs (refs 19, 20, 21). Here we employ near- to mid-infrared CTR spectroscopy for measurement of laser-accelerated bunches with durations of only a few femtoseconds.

For a monoenergetic electron beam, the angular radiation field is a hollow cone with half opening angle θ=1/γ, where is the relativistic factor and v is the electron velocity. The spectral radiation field at frequency ω and observation angle θ, is given by22

where d2w/dωdΩ is the transition radiation spectrum emitted by a single electron, Ω is the solid angle and N is the number of electrons in the bunch. The form factor is the square amplitude of the Fourier transform of the normalized electron bunch distribution, f(x), and k is the radiation wavenumber in the direction of observation. The radiation is said to be coherent if the second term in equation (1) dominates. This typically occurs only if the electron bunch length is comparable to or less than the radiation wavelength observed. In this case, electrons radiate in phase and the radiation is amplified coherently.

Equation (1) also shows that the shape of the CTR spectrum contains information on the shape of the electron bunch. By independently measuring the bunch charge, energy spectrum and transverse distribution, it is possible to fit the theoretical model to the experimental results and retrieve information on the bunch shape23.

To generate high-quality and stable electron bunches, we use the colliding pulse injection scheme9. The 30 fs (full-width at half-maximum (FWHM)) pump pulse and injection pulse collide at an angle of 135° in the centre of a 3 mm helium gas jet (see Fig. 1). The geometry of this arrangement allows a 100 μm Al foil, used for generation of transition radiation, to intercept the electron beam 15 mm from the exit of the gas jet. The accelerated electron beam is highly relativistic, stable and quasi-monoenergetic (see Methods and Supplementary Fig. S1). On average, the peak charge and peak energy are 15 pC and 84 MeV respectively. We estimate that temporal stretching during transport to the radiator due to energy spread and divergence is negligible. The beam diameter on the radiator is estimated to 90 μm (FWHM) (see Methods).

Figure 1: Experimental arrangement.

An ultrashort and ultraintense laser pulse (red) is focused on a gas jet in which a plasma wave is excited. Electrons are injected into the plasma wave during the collision with the injection pulse (green), which arrives at a relative angle of 135°. The accelerated electron beam (blue) traverses an aluminium foil and generates transition radiation in a narrow cone along the forward direction (violet). The electron beam is analysed by means of a magnetic dipole and a phosphor screen28 whereas the transition radiation exits the interaction chamber for characterization.

The forward CTR propagates along the direction of the electron beam, through a ZnSe window (which has flat transmission in the infrared) and is collected and collimated outside the interaction chamber by a 1.5 m-focal-length spherical silver mirror. The collimated radiation is then sent to three different diagnostics, measuring the infrared spectrum, visible spectrum and spatial distribution of the CTR.

First, we confirm that the measured radiation is indeed coherent. A lens is used to image the spatial distribution in an intermediate plane between the foil and the collecting mirror onto an absolutely calibrated 16-bit CCD (charged-coupled device) camera. An interference filter in front of the camera transmits a Δλ=10 nm (FWHM) spectral band, centred at λ0=546 nm. Within a 17 mrad half-angle of collection we measure a total number of Nph=2×107 photons. No CTR signal and no electron beam is observed when the injection laser is blocked. Integration of the first term of equation (1) gives the total number of incoherent photons emitted by Ne electrons. For a bunch with charge 15 pC and energy 84 MeV, the incoherent contribution to the measured number of photons is Nphinc=5×103, within the solid angle of collection of the instrument. This is more than three orders of magnitude below the measured number.

The CTR spectrum is diagnosed using two instruments. An absolutely calibrated, scanning monochromator is used to measure the spectrum in a wide infrared wavelength range, 1.4–5.5 μm, within a half angle of collection of 2 mrad (ref. 24). Up to 15 laser shots are averaged at each wavelength position. Simultaneously, on every laser shot, an imaging spectrometer measures the CTR spectrum in the wavelength range 0.55–1.0 μm, within a half angle of 17 mrad. On some shots, the spectrum is modulated. Our analysis indicates that these modulations come from the interference of CTR generated by multiple electron bunches separated by the plasma period25 (Lundh, O. et al. manuscript in preparation). Here, we wish to determine the duration of a single bunch, and consequently shots for which spectral modulations are observed on this diagnostic are rejected from the dataset.

The measured CTR spectrum, shown in Fig. 2, has a distinct peak around 3 μm which is up to seven orders of magnitude brighter than the incoherent level (grey area in the inset). The inset shows data from both the spectrometer and the monochromator, normalized to the solid angle covered by each instrument. Using the measured mean values for peak energy, bunch charge and divergence, the CTR spectrum is calculated for Gaussian bunch shapes, f(t)exp[−t2/2σ2], with different root mean square (r.m.s.) durations σ. A good agreement, in intensity and wavelength of peak intensity, is found for a bunch duration of σ=1.5 fs. For a bunch charge of 15 pC, this leads to an inferred peak current of 4 kA (for a Gaussian pulse shape).

Figure 2: Measured CTR spectrum.

Experimental spectrum using the infrared monochromator (circles) and the visible spectrometer (triangles), and analytical CTR spectra for different bunch durations (solid lines). Error bars indicate shot fluctuations and spectral range of the measurement. The bunch shape is taken to be Gaussian with r.m.s. duration, σ, as indicated by the legend. Other bunch characteristics used for the calculation are the experimentally measured mean values. Data in the inset has been divided by the solid angle of respective instrument. Grey area indicates the incoherent intensity level.

We now look into the influence of bunch shape on the CTR spectrum. As shown in equation (1), the bunch charge influences the intensity of the spectrum, but not the wavelength of peak intensity, λpk. Likewise, one can show that for highly relativistic bunches (vc) and small collection angles (θ0λ/π σr, where σr is the bunch radius on the radiator), the temporal bunch shape dominates and determines the form factor23. At the frequency corresponding to the peak intensity, ωpk=2π c/λpk, we have d2W/dλ2=0, which, for a Gaussian shape, leads to a simple frequency-duration relation: ωpkσ=1.0. This product has a relatively weak dependence on pulse shape (see Supplementary Table S1) and even for very different shapes, a global CTR peak at 3 μm corresponds to r.m.s. bunch durations of 1.4–1.8 fs. Figure 3 illustrates the relatively weak influence of pulse shape on the position of the peak in the CTR spectrum.

Figure 3: Influence of the bunch shape.

a,b, Symmetric (a) and asymmetric (b) temporal bunch shapes, with an r.m.s. duration of 1.5 fs. The curves are vertically offset for clarity. c,d, The corresponding CTR spectra all show a global peak around 3 μm. The bunch parameters used for the calculation are the measured mean values for energy, charge and divergence.

The measurement of the CTR spectrum (Fig. 2) is done using a scanning monochromator and is averaged over a large number of shots. Therefore, we need to consider in what manner fluctuations of bunch properties (for example, charge, peak energy and duration) influence the measurement and the conclusions regarding the bunch duration. To investigate this, we choose a Monte-Carlo approach and numerically generate an ensemble of 105 random electron bunches with Gaussian shape and using probability density functions, shown in Fig. 4b–d, to approximate the experimental variations. The CTR spectrum is then calculated for each bunch in the ensemble. In spite of large bunch-to-bunch fluctuations, the average of all spectra, representing the experimental measurement, has a shape that comes relatively close to the spectrum computed using the average values of bunch properties, see Fig. 4.

Figure 4: Influence of statistical fluctuations.

a, Average CTR spectrum (solid line) and 50% confidence interval (dotted lines), computed from the CTR spectra of a large set of randomly generated bunches. Spectrum computed using mean values of bunch properties (dashed line). bd, Log-normal probability density functions using hypothetical (b) and measured (c,d) mean values and variances.

We have also carefully analysed detailed effects due to accelerator dynamics (for example, beam loading) and beam transport that could influence the generation of CTR through transverse- and longitudinal phase-space correlations and bunch charge–energy-duration correlations. We have found that these effects are not likely to influence the deduced value of the bunch duration by more than 10–20% (see Supplementary Information).

Three-dimensional particle-in-cell simulations have been performed using the code CALDER (ref. 26). Parameters similar to the experiment are used, with a normalized laser vector potential a0=1.3 for the pump pulse, a1=0.3 for the injection pulse and an electron density 7.5×1018 cm−3. Figure 5a shows the phase space of electrons in the first plasma wave period, after 300 μm acceleration beyond the injection point. As the electrons are highly relativistic, the length of the bunch is not expected to change dramatically during further acceleration. Figure 5b shows the temporal profile of the bunch. In this simulation, the pulse shape is slightly asymmetric with rise- and fall times (between 10% and 90% of the peak current level) of 2 and 3 fs respectively. The bunch duration is 1.7 fs (r.m.s.) or 4.4 fs (FWHM), in good qualitative agreement with the conclusions from the measurement of the CTR spectrum. Furthermore, an independent analysis of experimental data, focusing on measured beam loading effects in an optically injected laser wakefield accelerator, indicates a bunch duration around 4 fs (ref. 27).

Figure 5: Simulation results.

a, Phase-space of optically injected and trapped electrons and longitudinal electric field. b, Temporal profile of the trapped bunch.

Finally, it should be noted that our technique has some limitations that do not allow us to exclude the existence of a longer bunch following the femtosecond bunch. Indeed, the electron energy distribution also contains a broadband component (see Supplementary Fig. S1) which might produce a longer temporal feature and emit coherent radiation at wavelengths outside the range of our detector. Our technique therefore has a limited dynamic range as longer bunches cannot be detected. In the present experiment, this component, which could be removed by an energy selective filter, contains less than 10 pC and would therefore have a much lower peak current than the femtosecond bunch.


Optically injected laser–plasma accelerator.

The experiment was carried out using the 10 Hz multi-terawatt Ti:sapphire laser in ‘salle jaune’ at Laboratoire d’Optique Appliquée (LOA), operating at a central wavelength of 820 nm. The duration of the pulses were measured to be 30 fs (FWHM) using spectral phase interferometry for direct electric-field reconstruction (SPIDER). The pump pulse, with an energy of 1.0 J, was focused using an f=1.0 m focal length on-axis spherical mirror. The focal spot was measured with a 12-bit CCD camera to be slightly elliptical, 17×22 μm at FWHM. The injection pulse, with an energy of 100 mJ, was focused using an f=80 cm focal length off-axis parabolic mirror to a 25 μm (FWHM) spot. This gave an inferred intensity of 3.6×1018 Wcm−2 for the pump pulse and 1.5×1017 Wcm−2 for the injection pulse, corresponding to normalized vector potentials of a0=1.3 and a1=0.3 respectively. The two pulses collided at an angle of 135°, 1 mm above the centre of a 3 mm diameter gas jet nozzle. Interferometric measurements of the gas jet density profile at this height revealed a 2.1 mm plateau surrounded by 700 μm gradients on each side. Helium gas was used at a backing pressure of 6 bar and provided a fully ionized plasma electron density of ne=1×1019 cm−3.

CTR generation and characterization.

Forward CTR was generated at the rear surface of a 100 μm Al foil which also served to stop the pump laser beam and prevent parasitic radiation from reaching the detection system. Before every shot, the foil was translated to provide unexposed material for the electron beam. The electron beam size on the foil was estimated to 90±24 μm from the measured beam divergence. The Al foil was positioned 0.5 m from the ZnSe chamber window and 1.5 m from the collecting Ag mirror. For the photon counting measurement, an f=200 mm focal length, f/4 achromatic doublet lens was used to illuminate 2.6×104 pixels on an absolutely calibrated 16-bit CCD camera (Andor DV420). For the spectral measurements, the CTR beam was split using a ZnSe window with a small wedge. The front Fresnel reflection was focused through the slit of a Czerny–Turner imaging spectrometer (Oriel MS127i) using an f=200 mm focal length, f/4 achromatic doublet lens. A grating with 400 lines/mm was used for dispersion and a 16-bit CCD camera (Andor DV420) was used for detection. The instrumental spectral response function was determined using a calibrated Xe lamp, a HeNe laser and a power meter. The transmission through the ZnSe exit window was measured and corrected for. The parallel CTR beam transmitted through the ZnSe beam splitter was focused using an f=100 mm off-axis Au parabolic mirror through the fully opened slit of the specially built monochromator. A ZnSe prism with an apex angle 40° was used at 51° angle of incidence for dispersion. An f=270 mm off-axis parabolic Au mirror was used for both collimation and refocusing and a retro-reflecting scanning Au mirror was used for wavelength selection. The InSb photovoltaic detector (Hamamatsu P5968) was absolutely calibrated using a laser diode and a power meter. The dispersion function was determined by using a blackbody source and a set of interference filters. The radiation propagated a total of 2.5 m in air before reaching the InSb detector. The absorption of 2.5 m of air was evaluated using HITRAN absorption data. It was below 15% for all measured wavelengths. The spectral resolution was determined by the size of the detector and was Δλ/λ≤0.1 within the range 1.4–5.5 μm.

Electron beam characterization.

The electron beam was dispersed by a round electromagnetic dipole, providing an effective magnetic field of 1.6 T over 25 mm. A doublet lens imaged the scintillation from a LANEX phosphor screen onto a 16-bit CCD camera (Andor DV434). The arrangement was absolutely calibrated and is described in detail in ref. 28. With the magnetic field turned off and the radiator foil removed from the beam path we measured a divergence of 6.0±1.6 mrad (FWHM) and a pointing fluctuation of 2.2 mrad (r.m.s.). With the radiator in the path, we measured a divergence of 15±7 mrad (FWHM). The spectral resolution was limited by the electron beam divergence. At 84 MeV it was 12% with the radiator in the path. For the shots included in the CTR study, we measured: peak energy 84±21 MeV, energy spread 21±17 MeV (FWHM), peak charge 15±7 pC, total charge 23±9 pC.


  1. 1

    Tajima, T. & Dawson, J. M. Laser electron accelerator. Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, 267–270 (1979).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Faure, J. et al. A laser–plasma accelerator producing monoenergetic electron beams. Nature 431, 541–544 (2004).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Geddes, C. G. R. et al. High-quality electron beams from a laser wakefield accelerator using plasma-channel guiding. Nature 431, 538–541 (2004).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Mangles, S. P. D. et al. Monoenergetic beams of relativistic electrons from intense laser–plasma interactions. Nature 431, 535–538 (2004).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Rechatin, C. et al. Controlling the phase-space volume of injected electrons in a laser–plasma accelerator. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 164801 (2009).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Fritzler, S. et al. Emittance measurements of a laser-wakefield-accelerated electron beam. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 165006 (2004).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Leemans, W. P. et al. GeV Electron beams from a centimetre-scale accelerator. Nature Phys. 2, 696–699 (2006).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Hafz, N. et al. Stable generation of GeV-class electron beams from self-guided laser–plasma channels. Nature Photon. 2, 571–577 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Faure, J. et al. Controlled injection and acceleration of electrons in plasma wakefields by colliding laser pulses. Nature 444, 737–739 (2006).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Schlenvoigt, H-P. et al. A compact synchrotron radiation source driven by a laser–plasma wakefield accelerator. Nature Phys. 4, 130–133 (2008).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Fuchs, M. et al. Laser-driven soft-x-ray undulator source. Nature Phys. 5, 826–829 (2009).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Grüner, F. et al. Design considerations for table-top, laser-based vuv and X-ray free electron lasers. Appl. Phys. B 86, 431–435 (2007).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Nakajima, K. Compact x-ray sources: Towards a table-top free-electron laser. Nature Phys. 4, 92–93 (2008).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Malka, V. et al. Principles and applications of compact laser–plasma accelerators. Nature Phys. 4, 447–453 (2008).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Mangles, S. P. D. et al. Laser-wakefield acceleration of monoenergetic electron beams in the first plasma-wave period. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 215001 (2006).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Liu, Y. et al. Experimental observation of femtosecond electron beam microbunching by inverse free-electron-laser acceleration. Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 4418–4421 (1998).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Tremaine, A. et al. Observation of self-amplified spontaneous-emission-induced electron-beam microbunching using coherent transition radiation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5816–5819 (1998).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Ding, Y. et al. Measurements and simulations of ultralow emittance and ultrashort electron beams in the linac coherent light source. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 254801 (2009).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Leemans, W. P. et al. Observation of terahertz emission from a laser–plasma accelerated electron bunch crossing a plasma–vacuum boundary. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 074802 (2003).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    van Tilborg, J. et al. Temporal characterization of femtosecond laser–plasma-accelerated electron bunches using terahertz radiation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 014801 (2006).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Debus, A. D. et al. Electron bunch length measurements from laser- accelerated electrons using single-shot THz time-domain interferometry. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 084802 (2010).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Shibata, Y. et al. Observation of coherent transition radiation at millimeter and submillimeter wavelengths. Phys. Rev. A 45, R8340–R8343 (1992).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Faure, J., Glinec, Y., Gallot, G. & Malka, V. Ultrashort laser pulses and ultrashort electron bunches generated in relativistic laser–plasma interaction. Phys. Plasmas 13, 056706 (2006).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Lim, J. et al. Femto-second ultrashort laser wakefield electron bunch-duration measurements: A prism-based dispersion visible-to-IR spectrometer. Proc. SPIE 7359, 735919 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Glinec, Y., Faure, J., Norlin, A., Pukhov, A. & Malka, V. Observation of fine structures in laser-driven electron beams using coherent transition radiation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 194801 (2007).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Lefebvre, E. et al. Electron and photon production from relativistic laser–plasma interactions. Nucl. Fusion 43, 629–633 (2003).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Rechatin, C. et al. Characterization of the beam loading effects in a laser plasma accelerator. New J. Phys. 12, 045023 (2010).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Glinec, Y. et al. Absolute calibration for a broad range single shot electron spectrometer. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 77, 103301 (2006).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We acknowledge the support of the European Research Council for funding the PARIS ERC project (contract 226424) and the support from EC FP7 LASERLAB-EUROPE/LAPTECH (contract 228334).

Author information




O.L., J.L., C.R., L.A., A.B-I., J-P.G. and J.F. carried out the experiment. O.L. and C.R. analysed the data. X.D. and E.L. carried out the simulations. J.L., O.L., G.G. and J.F. developed the infrared spectrometer. V.M. and J.F. guided the project.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to O. Lundh or V. Malka.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information (PDF 450 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lundh, O., Lim, J., Rechatin, C. et al. Few femtosecond, few kiloampere electron bunch produced by a laser–plasma accelerator. Nature Phys 7, 219–222 (2011).

Download citation

Further reading


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing