Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

A millisecond quantum memory for scalable quantum networks

Abstract

Scalable quantum-information processing requires the capability of storing quantum states1,2. In particular, a long-lived storable and retrievable quantum memory for single excitations is of key importance to long-distance quantum communication with atomic ensembles and linear optics3,4,5,6,7. Although atomic memories for classical light8 and continuous variables9 have been demonstrated with millisecond storage time, lifetimes of only around 10 μs have been reported for quantum memories storing single excitations10,11,12,13. Here we present an experimental investigation into extending the storage time of quantum memory for single excitations. We identify and isolate distinct mechanisms responsible for the decoherence of spin waves in atomic-ensemble-based quantum memories. By exploiting magnetic-field-insensitive states—so-called clock states—and generating a long-wavelength spin wave to suppress dephasing, we succeed in extending the storage time of the quantum memory to 1 ms. Our result represents an important advance towards long-distance quantum communication and should provide a realistic approach to large-scale quantum information processing.

Main

The quantum repeater with atomic ensembles and linear optics has attracted broad interest in recent years, as it holds promise to implement long-distance quantum communication and the distribution of entanglement over quantum networks. Following the protocol proposed in ref. 3 and the subsequent improved schemes4,5,6,7, significant experimental progress has been accomplished, including the coherent manipulation of the stored excitation in one10,11 or two14,15,16 atomic ensembles, the demonstration of memory-built-in quantum teleportation17 and the realization of a building block of the quantum repeater13,18. In these experiments, the atomic ensembles serve as the storable and retrievable quantum memory for single excitations.

Despite the advances achieved in manipulating atomic ensembles, long-distance quantum communication with atomic ensembles remains challenging owing to the short storage time of the quantum memory for single excitations. For example, for direct generation of entanglement between two memory qubits over a few hundred kilometres, we need a memory with a storage time of a few hundred microseconds. However, the longest storage time reported so far is of the order of only 10 μs (refs 10, 11, 12, 13).

It has long been believed that the short coherence time is mainly caused by the residual magnetic field19,20. Thereby, storing the collective state in the superposition of the first-order magnetic-field-insensitive states21, that is, the ‘clock states’, is suggested to inhibit this decoherence mechanism19. A numerical calculation shows that the expected lifetime is of the order of seconds in this case.

Here we report on our investigation of prolonging the storage time of the quantum memory for single excitations. In the experiment, we find that using only the ‘clock state’ is not sufficient to obtain the expected long storage time. We further analyse, isolate and identify the distinct decoherence mechanisms, and thoroughly investigate the dephasing of the spin wave (SW) by varying its wavelength. We find that the dephasing of the SW is extremely sensitive to the angle between the write beam and detection mode, especially for small angles. On the basis of this finding, by exploiting the ‘clock state’ and increasing the wavelength of the SW to suppress the dephasing, we succeed in extending the storage time from 10 μs to 1 ms.

The illustration of our experiment is depicted in Fig. 1a,b. A cold 87Rb atomic ensemble released from a magneto-optical trap at a temperature of about 100 μK serves as the quantum memory. The two ground states |g〉 and |s〉, together with the excited state |e〉, form a Λ-type system. A bias magnetic field of about 3.2 G is applied along the axial direction to define the quantization axis. Note that there are three pairs of ‘clock states’ for the ground states of the 87Rb atom, that is, (|1,1〉,|2,−1〉), (|1,0〉,|2,0〉) and (|1,−1〉,|2,1〉), where we have denoted |i,j〉=|5S1/2,F=i,mF=j〉. On a timescale of milliseconds, we can use any of them to store the collective excitation, because the decoherence of the ‘clock states’ caused by magnetic field gradience is negligible. In our experiment, we prepare the atoms in |1,0〉 to exploit the clock state (|g〉=|1,0〉,|s〉=|2,0〉). An off-resonant σ-polarized write pulse with wavevector kW is applied to the atomic ensemble along the axial direction, inducing spontaneous Raman scattering. The Stokes photon with σ-polarization and wavevector kS is collected at an angle of θ=3 relative to the write beam, as in most of the previous experiments10,13,14,15,16,20,22. The beam waist of the detection mode is about 100 μm in the atomic ensemble. Conditional on detecting a Stokes photon, a collective excited state or an SW is imprinted in the atomic ensemble3, described by

with N the number of atoms, Δk=kWkS the wavevector of the SW and rj the coordinate of the jth atom that is excited to , denoted by sj. After a controllable delay δ t, a strong σ+-polarized read pulse, counter-propagating with the write light, converts the collective excitation into an anti-Stokes photon, which is σ+ polarized and spatially mode matched to the Stokes photon directed in the opposite direction. The Stokes (anti-Stokes) photon and the write (read) light are spatially separated.

Figure 1: Schematic view of the experiment.
figure1

a, The atoms are initially prepared in |g〉. A weak σ-polarized write pulse with a detuning of Δ=20 MHz is applied to generate the SW and Stokes photon through spontaneous Raman transition |g〉→|e〉→|s〉. The Stokes photons are detected at an angle of θ relative to the write beam. After a controllable delay, a strong σ+-polarized read light with a detuning of Δ′=6 MHz induces the transition |s〉→|e〉→|g〉, converting the SW into an anti-Stokes photon. b, The structure of atomic transitions (87Rb) under a weak magnetic field. The left panel corresponds to the experiment with (|1,0〉,|2,0〉). The right one corresponds to the experiment with (|1,1〉,|2,−1〉). The photons emitted in undesired transitions are filtered by a polarization filter and a filter cell. c, Illustration of the SW dephasing induced by atomic random motion. The blue curve represents the SW initially stored in the quantum memory. The atoms randomly move along the wavevector direction, resulting in a phase fluctuation. The perturbed SW is represented by the red curve. d, The wavelength of the SW can be controlled by changing the detection configuration. In the collinear case, we have the maximum wavelength.

The quality of the quantum memory can be well characterized by the cross-correlation gS,AS=pS,AS/(pS·pAS) (see Methods section), with pS (pAS) the probability of detecting a Stokes (anti-Stokes) photon and pS,AS the coincident probability between the Stokes and anti-Stokes channels. The larger the cross-correlation is, the higher-quality single-photon source10,11 or atom–photon entanglement source18,22,23 we can acquire. In the experiment, to evaluate the coherence time of the quantum memory, we measure the cross-correlation as a function of the time delay, described by11 (see the Methods section)

with C a fitting parameter and γ(δ t) the time-dependent retrieval efficiency. Note that gS,AS>2 means that the Stokes and anti-Stokes photons are non-classically correlated19,24.

The experimental result is shown in Fig. 2. Our data show that the lifetime is longer than our previous results11, in which the lifetime is mainly limited by the residual magnetic field19, but far from the theoretical predication for the ‘clock state’. We carefully analyse the decoherence mechanism of the quantum memory and find that the short lifetime can be explained by the dephasing of the SW induced by atomic random motion12,25. This decoherence mechanism plays an important role in many previous experiments10,13,14,15,16,20,22, but it has not attracted sufficient attention.

Figure 2: Measured cross-correlation as a function of the storage time.
figure2

The cross-correlation gS,AS is measured versus the storage time δ t for (|1,0〉,|2,0〉) at θ=3. The data are fitted by using gS,AS(δ t)=1+Cexp (−δ t2/τD2). Our data give a lifetime of τD=(25±1) μs. Error bars represent ±1 standard deviation.

The dephasing can be understood as follows. As shown in Fig. 1c, assume an SW is stored in the atomic ensemble and will be retrieved after a time delay δ t. During this interval, each atom randomly moves from one point to another. The internal states or the spins of the atoms are conserved because collisions can be safely ignored at low temperature and density. However, the atomic motion leads to a perturbation on the phase of the SW. Consequently, the projection of the perturbed SW on the original one gradually decreases as the delay of the retrieval is increased. In other words, the atomic random motion leads to a random phase fluctuation in the SW and thus causes decoherence. The timescale of the dephasing can be estimated by calculating the average time for the atoms needed to cross 1/2π of the wavelength of the SW, giving a lifetime of τD(λ/2πvS), with the one-dimensional average speed, where kB is the Boltzmann constant, T the average temperature of the atoms, and λ=(2π/Δk) the wavelength of the SW. A more detailed calculation yields γ(δ t)eδt2/τD2, with a lifetime τD=(1/Δk vS) (see the Methods section). In our case, the angle θ between kW and kS determines the wavelength of the SW according to Δk=|kWkS|kWsinθ. For θ=3, a simple calculation gives λ=15 μm and then τD=25 μs. By fitting the data in Fig. 2 with gS,AS(δ t)=1+Cexp(−δ t2/τD2), we obtain a lifetime of τD=(25±1) μs, which is consistent with the theoretical calculation. Note that, besides the atomic random motion, the collisions between atoms may also affect the phase of the SW. However, the collision rate can be estimated by Γn vsσ1 Hz, where the atomic density n=1010 cm−3 and the s-wave scattering cross-section σ=8πa2 with the scattering length a=6 nm. Thus, on the timescale of milliseconds, the collisions can be safely ignored.

To further confirm that the decoherence is mainly caused by the dephasing induced by atomic motion, we increase the wavelength of the SW by decreasing the detection angle (see Fig. 1d). In this way, according to the above model, the dephasing is suppressed and the storage time will be extended. In our experiment, we select angles of θ=1.5,0.6 and 0.2 and measure the lifetime of the quantum memory for each configuration. Note that for θ=0.2 the write (read) and Stokes (anti-Stokes) lights with the same polarization cannot be spatially separated, and therefore we use another pair of ‘clock states’ (|g〉=|1,1〉,|s〉=|2,−1〉) by preparing the atoms in |1,1〉. In this case, the Stokes (anti-Stokes) photon is σ+ (σ) polarized and thus can be separated by a Glan-laser prism from the write (read) pulse.

The experimental results are shown in Fig. 3a–c. As expected, the dephasing of the SW dominates. The lifetime increases from 25 to 283 μs when reducing the angle owing to the extended wavelength of the SW. Our results clearly show that the dephasing of the SW is extremely sensitive to the small angle between the write beam and Stokes modes, and that the long-wavelength SW is robust against the dephasing induced by atomic random motion. Note that, for θ=0.2, the data are fitted taking into account the effect of loss of atoms. The measured lifetime τD is shown in Fig. 3d as a function of angle θ. The solid line is the theoretical curve τD=(1/Δk vs), with vs=0.1 m s−1 corresponding to a temperature of T100 μK. The good agreement between theory and experiment implies that our work provides an alternative approach to measure the temperature of an atomic ensemble. Moreover, as the lifetime is sensitive only to the velocity of the atoms in the interaction region, which is determined by the waist of the detection mode and is controllable, our method can also be used to measure the velocity distribution of the atomic ensemble by making measurements in different regions.

Figure 3: Lifetime measurement results at different angles.
figure3

ac, The cross-correlation gS,AS versus the storage time δ t for different angles. a,b, (|1,0〉,|2,0〉) at θ=1.5 and 0.6, respectively. The data are fitted by using gS,AS(δ t)=1+Cexp(−δ t2/τD2). c, (|1,1〉,|2,−1〉) at θ=0.2. In this case we take into account the effect of loss of atoms and fit the data by using gS,AS(δ t)=1+Cexp(−δ t2/τD2)/(1+A δ t2), with A the fitting parameter obtained from the collinear configuration. The fitted lifetime for each case is (a) τD=(61±2) μs, (b) τD=(144±9) μs, (cτD=(283±18) μs. By reducing the angle, the lifetime is increased from 25 to 283 μs, which implies that the decoherence is mainly caused by the dephasing induced by atomic random motion. d, The measured lifetime τD as a function of detection angle θ, where the horizontal error bars indicate measurement errors in the angles. The solid line is the theoretical curve with T=100 μK. The experimental results are in good agreement with the theoretical predications. The error bars indicate ±1 standard deviation.

To further suppress the dephasing and achieve a longer storage time, we use the collinear configuration (θ=0), where we have the maximum wavelength of the SW of λ4.4 cm, which yields a computed lifetime of τD=72 ms. In this case, the decoherence due to the loss of atoms, which causes a typical lifetime of a few hundred microseconds, is isolated as the principal source of decoherence. This mechanism can be estimated by calculating the average time for the atoms leaving the pencil shaped interaction region, where the thermal motion in the radial direction dominates. At temperature T, an atomic cloud with a cross-section radius r0 expands according to r2(δ t)=r02+vr2δ t2, with the average speed in the radial direction . The retrieval efficiency can be given by γ(δ t)=r02/r2(δ t)=1/(1+vr2δ t2/r02). Thereby, when γ(τL)=1/e, only a fraction 1/e of the atoms remain in the interaction region, giving a lifetime of τL(1.31r0/vr). For r0=100 μm as the waist of the detection mode and T=100 μK, a direct calculation yields τL=950 μs, which is much smaller than the dephasing time due to atomic motion and decoherence induced by the magnetic field. The experimental result is shown in Fig. 4, where the ‘clock states’ (|1,1〉,|2,−1〉) are used as well. Our data show a lifetime of τL=(1.0±0.1) ms, when the retrieval efficiency has dropped to 1/e. The experimental result is in good agreement with the theoretical estimate.

Figure 4: Lifetime at collinear configuration.
figure4

The cross-correlation gS,AS versus the storage time δ t for (|1,1〉,|2,−1〉) at θ=0, which enables a maximal-wavelength SW. The data are fitted by using gS,AS(δ t)=1+(C/1+A δ t2), with A the fitting parameter. Our data give a lifetime of τL=(1.0±0.1) ms, when the retrieval efficiency γ(δ t)=(1/1+A δ t2) has dropped to 1/e. Error bars represent ±1 standard deviation.

In our experiment, we have isolated and identified different decoherence mechanisms of the quantum memory for single excitations and thoroughly investigated the dephasing of the stored SW by varying its wavelength. Moreover, we have successfully realized a long-lived quantum memory for single collective excitation with the storage time of 1 ms, which is 30 times longer than the best result reported so far10, and is long enough for photon transmission over 100 kilometres. In our experiment, the coherence time of the quantum memory is limited by the decoherence due to loss of atoms, which can be suppressed by lowering the temperature through optical molasses. A storage time of 3 ms is achievable by reducing the temperature to 10 μK. This will be the upper limit for an atomic memory with a magneto-optical trap, because a longer storage time is prohibited by the free fall of the atoms under gravity. Further improvement might be achieved by trapping the atoms in an optical dipole trap19,26. In this case, the principal decoherence mechanism is the diffusion caused by collisions, which will give a lifetime of a few tens of milliseconds. To inhibit the collision-induced diffusion, we have to trap the atoms in a deep optical lattice27 or use solid-state systems28, where each atom is tightly confined on a single site. The optical lattice has the potential to store the collective excitation for a few tens of seconds, which is required for a robust and efficient quantum repeater with atomic ensembles29. The idea presented in this work can also be applied to quantum memory based on electromagnetically induced transparency20,30,31.

Our work opens up an exciting possibility to implement many tasks of quantum information processing. Combined with the techniques developed in recent years, we can implement a high-quality on-demand single-photon source, deterministic preparation of multiqubit entanglement, generation of entanglement between two remote atomic memory qubits over a few hundred kilometres and even construction of long-lived quantum nodes for a quantum repeater. Besides, our work also provides an approach to measure the temperature or the velocity distribution of an atomic ensemble. Furthermore, as the decoherence of the SW is controllable, we can measure certain important physical quantities by introducing additional physical mechanisms. For example, when performing experiments in an optical dipole trap, the lifetime is determined by collision between atoms25. Thereby, the s-wave scattering cross-section or scattering length might be measured using our approach.

Methods

Dephasing of spin wave induced by atomic random motion.

Assume the jth atom moves to rj(δ t)=rj+vjδ t after a storage time of δ t. The collective state or SW freely evolves to

where we have ignored the effect of magnetic field for simplicity. The retrieval efficiency is proportional to the overlap between the original SW and the perturbed one,

with f(v) the velocity distribution. Assume f(v)emv2/2kBT is a Boltzmann distribution at temperature T. Integrating over all possible velocities, we obtain γ(δ t)eδt2/τD2, with the lifetime τD=(1/Δk vs). Note that the retrieval efficiency also depends on other factors, for example the optical depth, the coupling strength and so on.

Cross-correlation function.

The quality of the quantum memory can be well characterized by the cross-correlation gS,AS=pS,AS/(pS·pAS). For gS,AS1, when the atomic ensemble is used as a single-photon source10,11, the autocorrelation of the heralded single photons can be estimated by α4/(gS,AS−1). When the atomic ensemble is exploited to prepare an atom–photon entanglement18,22,23, the violation of the Clause–Horne–Shimony–Holt-type Bell inequality, which is insensitive to the relative phase between the vacuum and the single excitation, can be approximated by . Thereby, a large cross-correlation function indicates a high-quality quantum memory. The non-classical correlation between Stokes and anti-Stokes fields is characterized by the violation of Cauchy–Schwarz inequality , with gS,S and gAS,AS the autocorrelations of Stokes and anti-Stokes fields. In the ideal case gS,S=gAS,AS=2, but in practice they are usually smaller than 2 owing to the background noise24. Thereby, we can infer that when gS,AS>2 the Stokes and anti-Stokes field are non-classically correlated19. In the experiment, we measure the decay of the cross-correlation to evaluate the lifetime of the quantum memory. By ignoring the noise in the Stokes channel, we have11 pS=χ ηS,pAS=χ γ(δ t)ηAS+B ηAS and pS,AS=χ γ(δ t)ηSηAS+pSpAS, with χ the excitation probability, γ(δ t) the time-dependent retrieval efficiency, ηS (ηAS) the overall detection efficiencies in the Stokes (anti-Stokes) channels and B the background noise in the anti-Stokes channel. Thereby the decay of the cross-correlation function can be approximated by

where C is a fitting parameter. In our experiment, pS0.003 and the cross-correlation is comparable with previous works11. For small angles and in the collinear regime, the cross-correlation is lower because of the relatively large background noise due to the write and read beams. Note that by reducing the power and waist of write and read beams, and improving the filtering techniques, a high cross-correlation of about 100 can be achieved in the collinear configuration11.

Experimental details.

In the experiment, more than 108 87Rb atoms are collected by the magneto-optical trap with an optical depth of about 5 and a temperature of about 100 μK within 20 ms at a repetition rate of 40 Hz. The trapping magnetic field and repumping beams are then quickly switched off. After 0.5 ms, the bias magnetic field is switched on, whereas the cooler beams stay on for another 0.5 ms before being switched off in order to prepare the atoms in the |5S1/2,F=1〉 ground state. Then, within another 4 ms, experimental trials (each consisting of pumping, write and read pulses) are repeated with a controllable period depending on the desired retrieval time. To optically pump the atoms to the desired sublevel, we switch on two pumping beams in each experimental trial before the write and read process: one couples all the dipole transitions of |5S1/2,F=2〉→|5P3/2,F′=2〉 for 2 μs, and the other couples the π (σ+) transition of |5S1/2,F=1〉→|5P1/2,F′=1〉 for |1,0〉 (|1,1〉) for 1.7 μs. From the experimental result, we estimate that more than 80% of the atoms are prepared in the desired state.

For θ=3,1.5 and 0.6, the Stokes (anti-Stokes) photon and the write (read) light can be spatially separated and thus we can choose any of the three pairs of ‘clock states’. Because the retrieval efficiency is proportional to the coupling strength of the transition |e〉→|g〉, we choose the clock state (|1,0〉,|2,0〉) to obtain higher retrieval efficiency, whereas for smaller angles θ=0.2 and 0, the two beams with the same polarization cannot be spatially separated, and thereby we have to use the other two ‘clock states’. In this case we choose the ‘clock state’ (|1,1〉,|2,−1〉), because the energy level |1,1〉 is lower than |1,−1〉 under the bias magnetic field and the pumping effect is better. The overall retrieval efficiencies, including the transmission efficiency of the filters and optical components, the coupling efficiency of the fibre coupler and the detector quantum efficiency, are about 2% for (|1,0〉,|2,0〉) at θ=3,1.5, and 0.6, 1% for (|1,1〉,|2,−1〉) at θ=0.2 and 0.8% for (|1,1〉,|2,−1〉) at θ=0. The retrieval efficiency at θ=0 is a little lower than that at θ=0.2 because one more etalon was used to filter the excitation beams. These correspond to 15% and 10% of the original retrieval efficiency for (|1,0〉,|2,0〉) and (|1,1〉,|2,−1〉), respectively. The low overall retrieval efficiency is caused by the transmission loss, the mode mismatch, the imperfect pumping and the imperfect polarization of the write and read light.

References

  1. 1

    Briegel, H. J., Dür, W., Cirac, J. I. & Zoller, P. Quantum repeaters: The role of imperfect local operations in quantum communication. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5932–5935 (1998).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Knill, E., Laflamme, R. & Milburn, G. J. A scheme for efficient quantum computation with linear optics. Nature 409, 46–52 (2001).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Duan, L.-M., Lukin, M. D., Cirac, J. I. & Zoller, P. Long-distance quantum communication with atomic ensembles and linear optics. Nature 414, 413–418 (2001).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Zhao, B., Chen, Z.-B., Chen, Y.-A., Schmiedmayer, J. & Pan, J.-W. Robust creation of entanglement between remote memory qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 240502 (2007).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Chen, Z.-B., Zhao, B., Chen, Y.-A., Schmiedmayer, J. & Pan, J.-W. Fault-tolerant quantum repeater with atomic ensembles and linear optics. Phys. Rev. A 76, 022329 (2007).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Jiang, L., Taylor, J. M. & Lukin, M. D. Fast and robust approach to long-distance quantum communication with atomic ensembles. Phys. Rev. A 76, 012301 (2007).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Collins, O. A., Jenkins, S. D., Kuzmich, A. & Kennedy, T. A. B. Multiplexed memory insensitive quantum repeaters. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 060502 (2007).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Liu, C., Dutton, Z., Behroozi, C. H. & Hau, L. V. Observation of coherent optical information storage in an atomic medium using halted light pulses. Nature 409, 490–493 (2001).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Julsgaard, B., Sherson, J., Cirac, J. I., Fiurášek, J. & Polzik, E. S. Experimental demonstration of quantum memory for light. Nature 432, 482–486 (2004).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Matsukevich, D. N. et al. Deterministic single photons via conditional quantum evolution. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 013601 (2006).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Chen, S. et al. Deterministic and storable single-photon source based on quantum memory. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 173004 (2006).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Simon, J., Tanji, H., Thompson, J. K. & Vuletic, V. Interfacing collective atomic excitations and single photons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 183601 (2007).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Chou, C.-W. et al. Functional quantum nodes for entanglement distribution over scalable quantum networks. Science 316, 1316–1320 (2007).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Felinto, D. et al. Conditional control of the quantum states of remote atomic memories for quantum networking. Nature Phys. 2, 844–848 (2006).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Chanelière, T. et al. Quantum interference of electromagnetic fields from remote quantum memories. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 113602 (2007).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Yuan, Z.-S. et al. Synchronized independent narrow-band single photons and efficient generation of photonic entanglement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 180503 (2007).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Chen, Y.-A. et al. Memory-built-in quantum teleportation with photonic and atomic qubits. Nature Phys. 4, 103–107 (2008).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Yuan, Z.-S. et al. Experimental demonstration of a BDCZ quantum repeater node. Nature 454, 1098–1101 (2008).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Felinto, D., Chou, C. W., de Riedmatten, H., Polyakov, S. V. & Kimble, H. J. Control of decoherence in the generation of photon pairs from atomic ensembles. Phys. Rev. A 72, 053809 (2005).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Choi, K. S., Deng, H., Laurat, J. & Kimble, H. J. Mapping photonic entanglement into and out of a quantum memory. Nature 452, 67–71 (2008).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Harber, D. M., Lewandowski, H. J., McGuirk, J. M. & Cornell, E. A. Effect of cold collisions on spin coherence and resonance shifts in a magnetically trapped ultracold gas. Phys. Rev. A 66, 053616 (2002).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Chen, S. et al. Demonstration of a stable atom–photon entanglement source for quantum repeaters. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 180505 (2007).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    de Riedmatten, H. et al. Direct measurement of decoherence for entanglement between a photon and stored atomic excitation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 113603 (2006).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Chou, C.W., Polyakov, S. V., Kuzmich, A. & Kimble, H. J. Single-photon generation from stored excitation in an atomic ensemble. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 213601 (2004).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Mewes, C. & Fleischhauer, M. Decoherence in collective quantum memories for photons. Phys. Rev. A 72, 022327 (2005).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Grimm, R., Weidemüller, M. & Ovchinnikov, Y. B. Optical dipole traps for neutral atoms. Adv. Atom. Mol. Opt. Phys. 42, 95–170 (2000).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Greiner, M., Mandel, O., Esslinger, T., Hänsch, T.W. & Bloch, I. Quantum phase transition from a superfluid to a Mott insulator in a gas of ultracold atoms. Nature 415, 39–44 (2002).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Longdell, J. J., Fraval, E., Sellars, M. J. & Manson, N. B. Stopped light with storage times greater than one second using electromagnetically induced transparency in a solid. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 063601 (2005).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Sangouard, N. et al. Robust and efficient quantum repeaters with atomic ensembles and linear optics. Phys. Rev. A 77, 062301 (2008).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Fleischhauer, M. & Lukin, M. D. Dark-state polaritons in electromagnetically induced transparency. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 5094–5097 (2000).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Chanelière, T. et al. Storage and retrieval of single photons transmitted between remote quantum memories. Nature 438, 833–836 (2005).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge M. Fleischhauer and Y. J. Deng for useful discussions. This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG), the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation, an ERC grant, the National Fundamental Research Program (grant No. 2006CB921900), the CAS and the NNSFC.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yu-Ao Chen or Jian-Wei Pan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhao, B., Chen, YA., Bao, XH. et al. A millisecond quantum memory for scalable quantum networks. Nature Phys 5, 95–99 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys1153

Download citation

Further reading

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing