Probing warm dense lithium by inelastic X-ray scattering

Article metrics


One of the grand challenges of contemporary physics is understanding strongly interacting quantum systems comprising such diverse examples as ultracold atoms in traps, electrons in high-temperature superconductors and nuclear matter1. Warm dense matter, defined by temperatures of a few electron volts and densities comparable with solids, is a complex state of such interacting matter2. Moreover, the study of warm dense matter states has practical applications for controlled thermonuclear fusion, where it is encountered during the implosion phase3, and it also represents laboratory analogues of astrophysical environments found in the core of planets and the crusts of old stars4,5. Here we demonstrate how warm dense matter states can be diagnosed and structural properties can be obtained by inelastic X-ray scattering measurements on a compressed lithium sample. Combining experiments and ab initio simulations enables us to determine its microscopic state and to evaluate more approximate theoretical models for the ionic structure.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Experimental configuration.
Figure 2: Radiation hydrodynamic simulations.
Figure 3: Best-fit analysis.
Figure 4: Calibrated scattering spectra.
Figure 5: Ion-ion structure factors.


  1. 1

    National Research Council. Frontiers in High Energy Density Physics : The X-Games of Contemporary Science (National Academies Press, 2003).

  2. 2

    Ichimaru, S. Strongly coupled plasmas: High-density classical plasmas and degenerate electron liquids. Rev. Mod. Phys. 54, 1017–1059 (1982).

  3. 3

    Lindl, J. Development of the indirect-drive approach to inertial confinement fusion and the target physics basis for ignition and gain. Phys. Plasmas 2, 3933–4024 (1995).

  4. 4

    Guillot, T. Interiors of giant planets inside and outside the solar system. Science 286, 72–76 (1999).

  5. 5

    Vocadlo, L. et al. Possible thermal and chemical stabilization of body-centered-cubic iron in the Earth’s core. Nature 424, 536–539 (2003).

  6. 6

    Koenig, M. et al. Progress in the study of warm dense matter. Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 47, B441–B449 (2005).

  7. 7

    Rygg, J. R. et al. Proton radiography of inertial fusion implosions. Science 319, 1223–1225 (2008).

  8. 8

    Glenzer, S. H. et al. Demonstration of spectrally resolved x-ray scattering in dense plasmas. Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 175002 (2003).

  9. 9

    Glenzer, S. H. et al. Observations of plasmons in warm dense matter. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 065002 (2007).

  10. 10

    Ravasio, A. et al. Direct observation of strong ion coupling in laser-driven shock-compressed targets. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 135006 (2007).

  11. 11

    Chihara, J. Difference in x-ray scattering between metallic and non-metallic liquids due to conduction electrons. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 12, 231–247 (2000).

  12. 12

    Gregori, G., Ravasio, A., Höll, A., Glenzer, S. H. & Rose, S. J. Derivation of static structure factor in strongly coupled non-equilibrium plasmas for x-ray scattering studies. High Energy Density Phys. 3, 99–108 (2007).

  13. 13

    Kresse, G. & Hafner, J. Ab-initio molecular-dynamics for liquid-metals. Phys. Rev. B 47, RC558–RC561 (1993).

  14. 14

    Kresse, G. & Hafner, J. Ab-initio molecular-dynamics simulation of the liquid-metal amorphous–semiconductor transition in germanium. Phys. Rev. B 49, 14251–14269 (1994).

  15. 15

    Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169–11186 (1996).

  16. 16

    Sawada, H. et al. Diagnosing direct-drive, shock-heated, and compressed plastic planar foils with non-collective spectrally resolved x-ray scattering. Phys. Plasmas 14, 122703 (2007).

  17. 17

    Izvekov, S., Parinello, M., Burnham, C. J. & Voth, G. A. Effective force fields for condensed phase systems from ab initio molecular dynamics simulation: A new method for force-matching. J. Chem. Phys. 120, 10896–10913 (2004).

  18. 18

    Hone, T. D., Izvekov, S. & Voth, G. A. Fast centroid molecular dynamics: A force-matching approach for the predetermination of the effective centroid forces. J. Chem. Phys. 122, 054105 (2005).

  19. 19

    Wünsch, K., Hilse, P., Schlanges, M. & Gericke, D. O. Structure of strongly coupled multicomponent plasmas. Phys. Rev. E. 77, 056404 (2008).

  20. 20

    Danson, C. N. et al. Well characterized 1019 W cm−2 operation of VULCAN—an ultra-high power Nd:glass laser. J. Mod. Opt. 45, 1653–1669 (1998).

  21. 21

    Paterson, I. J. et al. Image plate response for conditions relevant to laser–plasma interaction experiments. Meas. Sci. Technol. 19, 095301 (2008).

  22. 22

    Pak, A. et al. X-ray line measurements with high efficiency Bragg crystals. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 75, 3747–3749 (2004).

  23. 23

    Osborn, K. D. & Callcott, T. A. Two new optical designs for soft x-ray spectrometers using variable-linespace gratings. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 66, 3131–3136 (1995).

  24. 24

    MacFarlane, J. J. et al. HELIOS-CR—A 1D radiation-magnetohydrodynamics code with inline atomic kinetics modeling. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer 99, 381–397 (2006).

  25. 25

    Kresse, G. & Joubert, D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758–1775 (1999).

  26. 26

    Mermin, N. D. Thermal properties of the inhomogeneous electron gas. Phys. Rev. 137, A1441–A1443 (1965).

  27. 27

    Blöchl, P. E. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953–17979 (1994).

  28. 28

    Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).

  29. 29

    Hoover, W. G. Canonical dynamics: Equilibrium phase-space distributions. Phys. Rev. A 31, 1695–1697 (1985).

  30. 30

    Van Leuwen, J. M. J., Groenveld, J. & DeBoer, J. New method for the calculation of the pair correlation function. Physica 25, 792–808 (1959).

Download references


This work was partially supported by EPSRC grants and by the Science and Technology Facilities Council of the United Kingdom. Additional support from the US DOE and the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory is also acknowledged. We thank the Vulcan operation, engineering and target fabrication groups for their support during the experiment.

Author information

E.G.S., G.G., B.B., R.J.C., F.Y.K., M.M.N., A.P., R.L.W. and D.R. carried out the Vulcan experiment. E.G.S., G.G., S.H.G., P.N., A.P., D.P., M.R. and M.S. carried out preparatory experiments and diagnostics development at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. E.G.S., G.G., F.Y.K. and D.R. analysed the data. E.G.S., G.G. and D.O.G. wrote the paper. The simulations were carried out by D.O.G., J.V. and K.W. C.S. and G.G. designed targets used in the experiment. R.R.F., S.H.G., M.K., O.L.L., D.N., M.R. and L.v.W. provided additional experimental and theoretical support. G.G., S.H.G. and D.R. conceived the project in this paper.

Correspondence to G. Gregori.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Further reading