Article | Published:

Background suppression in fluorescence nanoscopy with stimulated emission double depletion

Nature Photonics volume 11, pages 163169 (2017) | Download Citation

Abstract

Stimulated emission depletion (STED) fluorescence nanoscopy is a powerful super-resolution imaging technique based on the confinement of fluorescence emission to the central subregion of an observation volume through de-excitation of fluorophores in the periphery via stimulated emission. Here, we introduce stimulated emission double depletion (STEDD) as a method to selectively remove artificial background intensity. In this approach, a first, conventional STED pulse is followed by a second, delayed Gaussian STED pulse that specifically depletes the central region, thus leaving only background. Thanks to time-resolved detection we can remove this background intensity voxel by voxel by taking the weighted difference of photons collected before and after the second STED pulse. STEDD thus yields background-suppressed super-resolved images as well as STED-based fluorescence correlation spectroscopy data. Furthermore, the proposed method is also beneficial when considering lower-power, less redshifted depletion pulses.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    Far-field optical nanoscopy. Science 316, 1153–1158 (2007).

  2. 2.

    & Where do we stand with super-resolution optical microscopy? J. Mol. Biol. 428, 308–322 (2016).

  3. 3.

    & Breaking the diffraction resolution limit by stimulated emission: stimulated-emission–depletion fluorescence microscopy. Opt. Lett. 19, 780–782 (1994).

  4. 4.

    , & Ultra-high resolution imaging by fluorescence photoactivation localization microscopy. Biophys. J. 91, 4258–4272 (2006).

  5. 5.

    et al. Imaging intracellular fluorescent proteins at nanometer resolution. Science 313, 1642–1645 (2006).

  6. 6.

    , & Sub-diffraction-limit imaging by stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (STORM). Nat. Methods 3, 793–795 (2006).

  7. 7.

    , & Breaking Abbe's diffraction resolution limit in fluorescence microscopy with stimulated emission depletion beams of various shapes. Phys. Rev. E 64, 066613 (2001).

  8. 8.

    , , , & Fluorescence microscopy with diffraction resolution barrier broken by stimulated emission. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 8206–8210 (2000).

  9. 9.

    Tetin, S. Y. (ed.) Fluorescence Fluctuation Spectroscopy (FFS), Parts A and B (Methods in Enzymology Series 518 & 519, Academic Press, 2013).

  10. 10.

    et al. Sharper low-power STED nanoscopy by time gating. Nat. Methods 8, 571–573 (2011).

  11. 11.

    et al. STED nanoscopy with time-gated detection: theoretical and experimental aspects. PLoS ONE 8, e54421 (2013).

  12. 12.

    , , , & STED with wavelengths closer to the emission maximum. Opt. Express 20, 5225–5236 (2012).

  13. 13.

    , & Frequency dependent detection in a STED microscope using modulated excitation light. Opt. Express 21, 210–219 (2013).

  14. 14.

    et al. A new filtering technique for removing anti-Stokes emission background in gated CW-STED microscopy. J. Biophoton. 7, 376–380 (2014).

  15. 15.

    et al. Encoding and decoding spatio-temporal information for super-resolution microscopy. Nat. Commun. 6, 6701 (2015).

  16. 16.

    et al. STED nanoscopy with fluorescent quantum dots. Nat. Commun. 6, 7127 (2015).

  17. 17.

    , , & A compact STED microscope providing 3D nanoscale resolution. J. Microsc. 236, 35–43 (2009).

  18. 18.

    et al. Monomeric garnet, a far-red fluorescent protein for live-cell STED imaging. Sci. Rep. 5, 18006 (2015).

  19. 19.

    et al. RITA, a novel modulator of Notch signalling, acts via nuclear export of RBP-J. EMBO J. 30, 43–56 (2011).

  20. 20.

    , , , & A quantitative fluorescence study of protein monolayer formation on colloidal nanoparticles. Nat. Nanotech. 4, 577–580 (2009).

  21. 21.

    , , , & Confocal optics microscopy for biochemical and cellular high-throughput screening. Drug Discov. Today 8, 1085–1093 (2003).

  22. 22.

    et al. Direct observation of the nanoscale dynamics of membrane lipids in a living cell. Nature 457, 1159–1162 (2009).

  23. 23.

    et al. Scanning STED–FCS reveals spatiotemporal heterogeneity of lipid interaction in the plasma membrane of living cells. Nat. Commun. 5, 5412 (2014).

  24. 24.

    et al. FCS in STED microscopy: studying the nanoscale of lipid membrane dynamics. Methods Enzymol. 519, 1–38 (2013).

  25. 25.

    , , & Fluorescence fluctuation spectroscopy in subdiffraction focal volumes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 178104 (2005).

  26. 26.

    , , , & Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy with a total internal reflection fluorescence STED microscope (TIRF–STED–FCS). Opt. Express 20, 5243–5263 (2012).

  27. 27.

    , & Physical properties of aqueous glycerol solutions. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 98–99, 50–60 (2012).

  28. 28.

    et al. Two-focus fluorescence correlation spectroscopy: a new tool for accurate and absolute diffusion measurements. ChemPhysChem 8, 433–443 (2007).

  29. 29.

    Solute and macromolecule diffusion in cellular aqueous compartments. Trends Biochem. Sci. 27, 27–33 (2002).

  30. 30.

    et al. Stimulated emission depletion-based raster image correlation spectroscopy reveals biomolecular dynamics in live cells. Nat. Commun. 4, 2093 (2013).

  31. 31.

    et al. Dual-color dual-focus line-scanning FCS for quantitative analysis of receptor–ligand interactions in living specimens. Sci. Rep. 5, 10149 (2015).

  32. 32.

    et al. Direct stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy with standard fluorescent probes. Nat. Protoc. 6, 991–1009 (2011).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank J. Kuhlmann for assistance with generating mGarnet fusion constructs. The authors acknowledge funding by the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology in the context of the Helmholtz programme Science and Technology of Nanosystems (STN). This work was also supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) through grants GRK 2039 and Ni 291/12-1.

Author information

Author notes

    • Peng Gao
    •  & Benedikt Prunsche

    These authors contributed equally to this work

Affiliations

  1. Institute of Nanotechnology, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, 76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany

    • Peng Gao
    • , Lu Zhou
    •  & G. Ulrich Nienhaus
  2. Institute of Applied Physics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, 76128 Karlsruhe, Germany

    • Peng Gao
    • , Benedikt Prunsche
    • , Lu Zhou
    • , Karin Nienhaus
    •  & G. Ulrich Nienhaus
  3. Institute of Toxicology and Genetics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, 76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany

    • G. Ulrich Nienhaus
  4. Department of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, USA

    • G. Ulrich Nienhaus

Authors

  1. Search for Peng Gao in:

  2. Search for Benedikt Prunsche in:

  3. Search for Lu Zhou in:

  4. Search for Karin Nienhaus in:

  5. Search for G. Ulrich Nienhaus in:

Contributions

G.U.N. supervised the project in both its conception and execution. P.G. and B.P. implemented the STEDD technique on our STED microscope, performed measurements and analysed data. L.Z. provided cell samples. G.U.N. and K.N. wrote the manuscript with input from all other authors.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Ulrich Nienhaus.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary information

    Supplementary information

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2016.279

Further reading

Newsletter Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing