Abstract

The scaling of optical quantum technologies requires efficient, on-demand sources of highly indistinguishable single photons. Semiconductor quantum dots inserted into photonic structures are ultrabright single-photon sources, yet the indistinguishability is limited by charge noise. Parametric downconversion sources provide highly indistinguishable photons but are operated at very low brightness to maintain high single-photon purity. To date, no technology has provided a bright source generating near-unity indistinguishability and pure single photons. Here, we report such devices made of quantum dots in electrically controlled cavities. Application of an electrical bias on the deterministically fabricated structures is shown to strongly reduce charge noise. Under resonant excitation, an indistinguishability of 0.9956 ± 0.0045 is demonstrated with g(2)(0) = 0.0028 ± 0.0012. The photon extraction of 65% and measured brightness of 0.154 ± 0.015 make this source 20 times brighter than any source of equal quality. This new generation of sources opens the way to new levels of complexity and scalability in optical quantum technologies.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    , & Photonic quantum technologies. Nature Photon. 3, 687–695 (2009).

  2. 2.

    & Photonic quantum simulators. Nature Phys. 8, 285–291 (2012).

  3. 3.

    , , , & Unconditional room-temperature quantum memory. Nature Phys. 7, 794–798 (2011).

  4. 4.

    , & How good must single photon sources and detectors be for efficient linear optical quantum computation? Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 060502 (2008).

  5. 5.

    , , & Single-photon sources and detectors. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 82, 071101 (2011).

  6. 6.

    , & A scheme for efficient quantum computation with linear optics. Nature 409, 46–52 (2001).

  7. 7.

    et al. Linear optical quantum computing with photonic qubits. Rev. Mod. Phys. 79, 135–174 (2007).

  8. 8.

    et al. Photonic boson sampling in a tunable circuit. Science 339, 794–798 (2013).

  9. 9.

    et al. Boson sampling on a photonic chip. Science 339, 798–801 (2013).

  10. 10.

    et al. Experimental boson sampling. Nature Photon. 7, 540–544 (2013).

  11. 11.

    et al. Experimental validation of photonic boson sampling. Nature Photon. 8, 615–620 (2014).

  12. 12.

    et al. Multiphoton entanglement and interferometry. Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 777–838 (2012).

  13. 13.

    , , , & Experimental generation of single photons via active multiplexing. Phys. Rev. A 83, 043814 (2011).

  14. 14.

    , & Full analysis of multi-photon pair effects in spontaneous parametric down conversion based photonic quantum information processing. New J. Phys. 17, 043030 (2015).

  15. 15.

    et al. Three-photon energy–time entanglement. Nature Phys. 9, 19–22 (2013).

  16. 16.

    et al. Nonlinear interaction between single photons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 173601 (2014).

  17. 17.

    , , , & Triggered single photons from a quantum dot. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 1502–1505 (2001).

  18. 18.

    et al. A quantum dot single-photon turnstile device. Science 290, 2282–2285 (2000).

  19. 19.

    et al. Efficient out-coupling of high-purity single photons from a coherent quantum dot in a photonic-crystal cavity. Phys. Rev. B 90, 155303 (2014).

  20. 20.

    et al. Bright solid-state sources of indistinguishable single photons. Nature Commun. 4, 1425 (2013).

  21. 21.

    et al. A highly efficient single-photon source based on a quantum dot in a photonic nanowire. Nature Photon. 4, 174–177 (2010).

  22. 22.

    et al. Bright single-photon sources in bottom-up tailored nanowires. Nature Commun. 3, 737 (2012).

  23. 23.

    et al. Charge noise and spin noise in a semiconductor quantum device. Nature Phys. 9, 570–575 (2013).

  24. 24.

    et al. On-demand semiconductor single-photon source with near-unity indistinguishability. Nature Nanotech. 8, 213–217 (2013).

  25. 25.

    et al. Deterministic and robust generation of single photons from a single quantum dot with 99.5% indistinguishability using adiabatic rapid passage. Nano Lett. 14, 6515–6519 (2014).

  26. 26.

    et al. Controlled light–matter coupling for a single quantum dot embedded in a pillar microcavity using far-field optical lithography. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 267404 (2008).

  27. 27.

    et al. Deterministic and electrically tunable bright single-photon source. Nature Commun. 5, 3240 (2014).

  28. 28.

    , & Measurement of subpicosecond time intervals between two photons by interference. Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 2044–2046 (1987).

  29. 29.

    , , , & Indistinguishable photons from a single-photon device. Nature 419, 594–597 (2002).

  30. 30.

    , & Quantum-dot single-photon sources: prospects for applications in linear optics quantum-information processing. Phys. Rev. A 69, 032305 (2004).

  31. 31.

    et al. Coherent control of a solid-state quantum bit with few-photon pulses. Preprint at (2015).

  32. 32.

    et al. Highly indistinguishable photons from deterministic quantum-dot microlenses utilizing three-dimensional in situ electron-beam lithography. Nature Commun. 6, 7662 (2015).

  33. 33.

    Effects of frequency correlation in linear optical entangling gates operated with independent photons. Phys. Rev. A 76, 043825 (2007).

  34. 34.

    et al. Understanding photonic quantum-logic gates: the road to fault tolerance. Preprint at (2008).

  35. 35.

    et al. Parametric downconversion and optical quantum gates: two's company, four's a crowd. J. Mod. Opt. 56, 209–214 (2009).

  36. 36.

    et al. Generalized multi-photon quantum interference. Phys. Rev. X 5, 041015 (2014).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was partially supported by European Research Council starting grant no. 277885 QD-CQED, the French Agence Nationale pour la Recherche (grant ANR QDOM), the French RENATECH network, the Labex NanoSaclay, EU FP7 grant no. 618072 (WASPS), the Centre for Engineered Quantum Systems (grant no. CE110001013), the Centre for Quantum Computation and Communication Technology (grant no. CE110001027), and the Asian Office of Aerospace Research and Development (grant FA2386-13-1-4070). J.C.L., M.P.A. and A.G.W. thank M. Ringbauer and M. Goggin for insightful discussions, and thank the team from the Austrian Institute of Technology for providing the time-tagging modules for the SPDC measurements. The LPN–CNRS authors are very thankful to A. Nowak for her help with the technology. N.D.L.K. was supported by the FP7 Marie Curie Fellowship OMSiQuD. M.P.A. acknowledges support from the Australian Research Council Discovery Early Career Awards (no. DE120101899). A.G.W. was supported by the University of Queensland Vice-Chancellor's Research and Teaching Fellowship.

Author information

Author notes

    • N. Somaschi
    • , V. Giesz
    •  & L. De Santis

    These authors contributed equally to this work

Affiliations

  1. CNRS-LPN Laboratoire de Photonique et de Nanostructures, Université Paris-Saclay, Route de Nozay, 91460 Marcoussis, France

    • N. Somaschi
    • , V. Giesz
    • , L. De Santis
    • , S. L. Portalupi
    • , C. Antón
    • , J. Demory
    • , C. Gómez
    • , I. Sagnes
    • , N. D. Lanzillotti-Kimura
    • , A. Lemaítre
    • , L. Lanco
    •  & P. Senellart
  2. Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, F-91405 Orsay, France

    • L. De Santis
  3. Centre for Engineered Quantum Systems, Centre for Quantum Computer and Communication Technology, School of Mathematics and Physics, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia

    • J. C. Loredo
    • , M. P. Almeida
    •  & A. G. White
  4. Université Grenoble Alpes, F-38000 Grenoble, France

    • G. Hornecker
    • , T. Grange
    •  & A. Auffeves
  5. CNRS, Institut Néel, ‘Nanophysique et Semiconducteurs’ Group, F-38000 Grenoble, France

    • G. Hornecker
    • , T. Grange
    •  & A. Auffeves
  6. Département de Physique, Université Paris Diderot, 4 rue Elsa Morante, 75013 Paris, France

    • L. Lanco
  7. Département de Physique, Ecole Polytechnique, Université Paris-Saclay, F-91128 Palaiseau, France

    • P. Senellart

Authors

  1. Search for N. Somaschi in:

  2. Search for V. Giesz in:

  3. Search for L. De Santis in:

  4. Search for J. C. Loredo in:

  5. Search for M. P. Almeida in:

  6. Search for G. Hornecker in:

  7. Search for S. L. Portalupi in:

  8. Search for T. Grange in:

  9. Search for C. Antón in:

  10. Search for J. Demory in:

  11. Search for C. Gómez in:

  12. Search for I. Sagnes in:

  13. Search for N. D. Lanzillotti-Kimura in:

  14. Search for A. Lemaítre in:

  15. Search for A. Auffeves in:

  16. Search for A. G. White in:

  17. Search for L. Lanco in:

  18. Search for P. Senellart in:

Contributions

Optical measurements on the QD devices were conducted primarily by V.G., N.S. and L.d.S., with help from L.L., S.L.P. and P.S. The electrically controlled samples were fabricated by N.S. with help from C.A. The sample was grown by C.G. and A.L., and the etching was performed by I.S. The measurements on the SPDC sources and analysis of that data were conducted by J.C.L. and M.P.A, with help from A.G.W. Theoretical support for the experiment was provided by G.H., T.G. and A.A. The project was conducted by P.S. with help from L.L. All authors discussed the results and participated in manuscript preparation.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Senellart.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary information

    Supplementary information

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2016.23

Further reading

Newsletter Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing