Article | Published:

Near-unity quantum efficiency of broadband black silicon photodiodes with an induced junction

Nature Photonics volume 10, pages 777781 (2016) | Download Citation

Abstract

Ideal photodiodes can detect all incoming photons independently of the wavelength, angle or intensity of the incident light. Present-day photodiodes notably suffer from optical losses and generated charge carriers are often lost via recombination. Here, we demonstrate a device with an external quantum efficiency above 96% over the wavelength range 250–950 nm. Instead of a conventional p–n junction, we use negatively charged alumina to form an inversion layer that generates a collecting junction extending to a depth of 30 µm in n-type silicon with bulk resistivity larger than 10 kΩ cm. We enhance the collection efficiency further by nanostructuring the photodiode surface, which results in higher effective charge density and increased charge-carrier concentration in the inversion layer. Additionally, nanostructuring and efficient surface passivation allow for a reliable device response with incident angles up to 70°. We expect the considered device to improve data quality, reduce the area of photodiodes as well as decrease the cost per pixel.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    & Nanostructured materials for photon detection. Nat. Nanotech. 5, 391–400 (2010).

  2. 2.

    et al. Black silicon solar cells with interdigitated back-contacts achieve 22.1% efficiency. Nat. Nanotech. 10, 624–628 (2015).

  3. 3.

    et al. Effective passivation of black silicon surfaces by atomic layer deposition. IEEE J. Photovolt. 3, 90–94 (2013).

  4. 4.

    et al. Extremely low surface recombination velocities in black silicon passivated by atomic layer deposition. Appl. Phys. Lett. 100, 191603 (2012).

  5. 5.

    et al. Black silicon: fabrication methods, properties and solar energy applications. Energy Environ. Sci. 7, 3223–3263 (2014).

  6. 6.

    & Induced junction (inversion layer) photodiode self-calibration. Appl. Opt. 23, 1940–1945 (1984).

  7. 7.

    , & Complete collection of minority carriers from the inversion layer in induced junction diodes. J. Appl. Phys. 52, 4879–4881 (1981).

  8. 8.

    Silicon UV-photodiodes using natural inversion layer. Physica Scripta 18, 471–475 (1978).

  9. 9.

    et al. Predictable quantum efficient detector: II. Characterization and confirmed responsivity. Metrologia 50, 395–401 (2013).

  10. 10.

    & Status and prospects of Al2O3-based surface passivation schemes for silicon solar cells. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 30, 040802 (2012).

  11. 11.

    & Lead sulphide nanocrystal photodetector technologies. Nat. Photon. 10, 81–92 (2016).

  12. 12.

    Effect of Radiation on Semiconductors (Springer, 1965).

  13. 13.

    Hamamatsu Photonics Si Photodiodes Ch. 2 (Hamamatsu, 2014);

  14. 14.

    , , , & Laser doping and texturing of silicon for advanced optoelectronic devices. 11th Conf. Lasers and Electro-Optics Pacific Rim (IEEE, 2015).

  15. 15.

    et al. A nanocomposite ultraviolet photodetector based on interfacial trap-controlled charge injection. Nat. Nanotech. 7, 798–802 (2012).

  16. 16.

    et al. Sensitive X-ray detectors made of methylammonium lead tribromide perovskite single crystals. Nat. Photon. 10, 333–339 (2016).

  17. 17.

    et al. Simulations of a predictable quantum efficient detector with PC1D. Metrologia 49, S130–S134 (2012).

  18. 18.

    et al. Analysis of the atomic layer deposited Al2O3 field-effect passivation in black silicon. Solar Energy Mater. Solar Cells 142, 29–33 (2015).

  19. 19.

    , , & High resolution, low energy electron detector. J. Instrument. 6, P01001 (2011).

  20. 20.

    et al. Black silicon photovoltaics. Adv. Opt. Mater. 3, 147–164 (2015).

  21. 21.

    et al. Wave optical simulation of the light trapping properties of black silicon surface textures. Opt. Express 24, A434–A445 (2016).

  22. 22.

    et al. X-ray imaging with scintillator-sensitized hybrid organic photodetectors. Nat. Photon. 9, 843–848 (2015).

  23. 23.

    , , & Methods for counting particles in microfluidic applications. Microfluidics Nanofluidics 7, 739–749 (2009).

  24. 24.

    , , & A compact optical encoder with micromachined photodetector. J. Opt. A 3, 191–195 (2001).

  25. 25.

    & X-ray detectors for digital radiography. Phys. Med. Biol. 42, 1–39 (1997).

  26. 26.

    et al. High-throughput optical screening of cellular mechanotransduction. Nat. Photon. 8, 710–715 (2014).

  27. 27.

    et al. Photovoltaic retinal prosthesis with high pixel density. Nat. Photon. 6, 391–397 (2012).

  28. 28.

    , , & All-organic optoelectronic sensor for pulse oximetry. Nat. Commun. 5, 5745 (2014).

  29. 29.

    Hamamatsu Photonics Si Photodiodes Selection Guide (Hamamatsu, 2016);

  30. 30.

    , , & High-resolution setup for measuring wavelength sensitivity of photoyellowing of translucent materials. Rev. Sci. Instrument. 86, 103103 (2015).

  31. 31.

    et al. Characterisation of optical detectors using high-accuracy instruments. Analytica Chemica Acta 380, 327–337 (1999).

  32. 32.

    , , , & COCOS (corona oxide characterization of semiconductor) non-contact metrology for gate dielectrics. AIP Conf. Proc. 550, 220–225 (2001).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge Aalto University Micronova Nanofabrication Centre for providing facilities. M.A.J. was funded through the European Metrology Research Programme (EMRP) Project SIB57 NEWSTAR. P.R. was funded through EMRP project ENG53 ThinErgy. The EMRP is jointly funded by the EMRP participating countries within EURAMET and the European Union. V.V., J.H. and D.V. were funded by the Finnish Funding Agency for Innovation TEKES through project Radi2014. The authors thank S. Juottonen for assembling sample diodes to substrates for connecting to the measurement set-ups, F. Manoocheri and A. Vaskuri for measuring the light response, V. Kübler for the angle-dependent reflectance measurements and Y. Bao for help with the electrical characterization.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Micro and Nanosciences, Aalto University, Tietotie 3, Espoo 02150, Finland

    • Mikko A. Juntunen
    • , Juha Heinonen
    • , Ville Vähänissi
    • , Päivikki Repo
    • , Dileep Valluru
    •  & Hele Savin

Authors

  1. Search for Mikko A. Juntunen in:

  2. Search for Juha Heinonen in:

  3. Search for Ville Vähänissi in:

  4. Search for Päivikki Repo in:

  5. Search for Dileep Valluru in:

  6. Search for Hele Savin in:

Contributions

M.A.J., P.R., V.V. and H.S. conceived and designed the experiments. P.R and V.V. designed the sample manufacturing process. D.V. designed the device masks together with P.R. and V.V. and performed process simulations. J.H. performed the device simulations. P.R. and D.V. manufactured the samples. M.A.J., P.R., V.V., J.H. and H.S. analysed the data and wrote the paper.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hele Savin.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary information

    Supplementary information

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2016.226

Further reading