Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Standardizing the resolution claims for coherent microscopy

The definition and reporting of spatial resolution for coherent imaging methods varies widely in the imaging community. We advocate the use of a standard spoke-pattern imaging target and the mandatory inclusion of information about underlying a priori assumptions.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: The 'Siemens star' target for characterizing resolution in a coherent microscope.
Figure 2: Simulated example of a resolution report with the Siemens star for a coherent microscope.

References

  1. 1

    Goodman, J. W. Introduction to Fourier Optics (Mcgraw-Hill, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Pawley, J. B. Handbook of Optical Microscopy 3rd edn, Ch. 11 (Springer, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Kohler, H. Opt. Acta 28, 1691–1701 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    den Dekker, A. J. & van den Boss, A. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 14, 547–557 (1997).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Zheng, G., Horstmeyer, R. & Yang, C. Nature Photon. 7, 739–745 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Mcleod, E., Luo, W., Mundanyali, O., Greenbaum, A. & Ozcan, A. Lab Chip 13, 2028–2035 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Neumann, A., Kuznetsova, Y. & Brueck, S. R. J. Opt. Express 16, 20477–20483 (2008).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Cotte, Y. et al. Nature Photon. 7, 113–117 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Chen, J., Xu, Y., Lv, X., Lai, X. & Zeng, S. Opt. Express 21, 112–121 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Wicker, K. & Heintzmann, R. Nature Photon. 8, 342–344 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Sementilli, P. J., Hunt, B. R. & Nadar, M. S. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 10, 2265–2276 (1993).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Szameit, A. et al. Nature Mater. 11, 455–459 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Candes, E. J., Romberg, J. K. & Tao, T. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 59, 1207–1223 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Candes, E. J. & Fernandez-Granda, C. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 67, 906–956 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Heintzmann, R. Micron 38, 136–144 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Cotte, Y., Toy, M. F., Pavillon, N. & Depeursinge, C. Opt. Express 18, 19462–19478 (2010).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Mehta, S. B. & Oldenbourg, R. Biomed. Opt. Express 5, 1822–1838 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Weckenmann, A., Tan, O., Hoffmann, J. & Sun, Z. Meas. Sci. Technol. 20, 065103 (2009).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Takman, P. A. C. et al. J. Microsc. 226, 175–181 (2007).

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Abbey, B. et al. Nature Phys. 4, 394–398 (2008).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Takahashi, Y. et al. Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 094102 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Oldenbourg, R. et al. in Nanofabrication and Biosystems: Integrating Materials Science, Engineering, and Biology (eds Hoch, H. C., Jelinski, L. W. & Craighead, H. G.) Ch. 8 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Coltman, J. W. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 44, 468–471 (1954).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Loebich, C., Wueller, D., Klingen, B. & Jaeger, A. Proc. SPIE 6502, 65020N (2007).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Changhuei Yang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Horstmeyer, R., Heintzmann, R., Popescu, G. et al. Standardizing the resolution claims for coherent microscopy. Nature Photon 10, 68–71 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2015.279

Download citation

Further reading

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing