Quantum-enhanced measurements can provide information about the properties of a physical system with sensitivities beyond what is fundamentally possible with conventional technologies. However, this advantage can be achieved only if quantum measurement technologies are robust against losses and real-world imperfections, and can operate in regimes compatible with existing systems. Here, we demonstrate a quantum receiver for coherent communication, the performance of which not only surpasses the standard quantum limit, but does so for input powers extending to high mean photon numbers. This receiver uses adaptive measurements and photon number resolution to achieve high sensitivity and robustness against imperfections, and ultimately shows the greatest advantage over the standard quantum limit ever achieved by any quantum receiver at power levels compatible with state-of-the-art optical communication systems. Our demonstration shows that quantum measurements can provide real and practical advantages over conventional technologies for optical communications.
Your institute does not have access to this article
Open Access articles citing this article.
npj Quantum Information Open Access 18 July 2022
npj Quantum Information Open Access 27 May 2022
npj Quantum Information Open Access 31 July 2019
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $8.25 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Gisin, N., Ribordy, G., Tittel, W. & Zbinden, H. Quantum cryptography. Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 145–195 (2002).
Gisin, N. & Thew, R. Quantum communication. Nature Photon. 1, 165–171 (2007).
Giovannetti, V., Lloyd, S. & Maccone, L. Advances in quantum metrology. Nature Photon. 5, 222–229 (2013).
Abadie, J. et al. A gravitational wave observatory operating beyond the quantum shot-noise limit. Nature Phys. 7, 962–965 (2011).
Ladd, T. D. et al. Quantum computers. Nature 464, 45–53 (2010).
Knill, E., Laflamme, R. & Milburn, G. J. A scheme for efficient quantum computation with linear optics. Nature 409, 46–52 (2001).
Helstrom, C. W. Quantum Detection and Estimation Theory, Mathematics in Science and Engineering Vol. 123 (Academic, 1976).
Proakis, J. G. Digital Communications 4th edn (McGraw-Hill, 2000).
Tsujino, K. et al. Quantum receiver beyond the standard quantum limit of coherent optical communication. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 250503 (2011).
Becerra, F. E. et al. Experimental demonstration of a receiver beating the standard quantum limit for multiple nonorthogonal state discrimination. Nature Photon. 7, 147–152 (2013).
Jinno, M., Miyamoto, Y. & Hibino, Y. Networks: optical-transport networks in 2015. Nature Photon. 1, 157–159 (2007).
Zhou, X. et al. 32 Tb/s (320 × 114 Gb/s) PDM-RZ-8QAM transmission over 580 km of SMF-28 ultra-low-loss fiber, in Proceedings of the National Fiber Optic Engineers Conference (NFOEC) paper PDPB4 (Optical Society of America, 2009).
Armbrust, M. et al. A view of cloud computing. Commun. ACM 53, 50–58 (2010).
Wang, J. et al. Terabit free-space data transmission employing orbital angular momentum multiplexing. Nature Photon. 6, 488–496 (2012).
Hillerkuss, D. et al. 26 Tbit s−1 line-rate super-channel transmission utilizing all-optical fast Fourier transform processing. Nature Photon. 5, 364–371 (2011).
Slavik, R. et al. All-optical phase and amplitude regenerator for next-generation telecommunications systems. Nature Photon. 4, 690–695 (2010).
Tong, Z. et al. Towards ultrasensitive optical links enabled by low-noise phase-sensitive amplifiers. Nature Photon. 5, 430–436 (2011).
Kakande, J. et al. Multilevel quantization of optical phase in a novel coherent parametric mixer architecture. Nature Photon. 5, 748–752 (2011).
Tsukamoto, S., Katoh, K. & Kikuchi, K. Unrepeated transmission of 20-Gb/s optical quadrature phase-shift-keying signal over 200-km standard single-mode fiber based on digital processing of homodyne-detected signal for group-velocity dispersion compensation. IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 18, 1016–1018 (2006).
Kikuchi, K. & Tsukamoto, S. Evaluation of sensitivity of the digital coherent receiver. J. Lightwave Technol. 26, 1817–1822 (2008).
Dolinar, S. J. An optimum receiver for the binary coherent state quantum channel. MIT Res. Lab. Electron. Quart. Progr. Rep. 111, 115–120 (1973).
Bondurant, R. S. Near-quantum optimum receivers for the phase-quadrature coherent-state channel. Opt. Lett. 18, 1896–1898 (1993).
Izumi, S. et al. Displacement receiver for phase-shift-keyed coherent states. Phys. Rev. A 86, 042328 (2012).
Nair, R., Guha, S. & Tan, S.-H. Realizable receivers for discriminating arbitrary coherent-state waveforms and multi-copy quantum states near the quantum limit. Phys. Rev. A 89, 032318 (2014).
Cook, R. L., Martin, P. J. & Geremia, J. M. Optical coherent state discrimination using a closed-loop quantum measurement. Nature 446, 774–777 (2007).
Chen, J., Habif, J. L., Dutton, Z., Lazarus, R. & Guha, S. Optical codeword demodulation with error rates below the standard quantum limit using a conditional nulling receiver. Nature Photon. 6, 374–379 (2012).
Wittmann, C. et al. Demonstration of near-optimal discrimination of optical coherent states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 210501 (2008).
Muller, C. et al. Quadrature phase shift keying coherent state discrimination via a hybrid receiver. New J. Phys. 14, 083009 (2012).
Becerra, F. E. et al. M-ary-state phase-shift-keying discrimination below the homodyne limit. Phys. Rev. A 84, 062324 (2011).
Izumi, S., Takeoka, M., Ema, K. & Sasaki, M. Quantum receivers with squeezing and photon-number-resolving detectors for M-ary coherent state discrimination. Phys. Rev. A 87, 042328 (2013).
Li, K., Zuo, Y. & Zhu, B. Suppressing the errors due to mode mismatch for M-ary PSK quantum receivers using photon-number-resolving detector. IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 25, 2182–2184 (2013).
Gerrits, T. et al. Generation of optical coherent-state superpositions by number-resolved photon subtraction from the squeezed vacuum. Phys. Rev. A 82, 031802 (2010).
Laiho, K., Cassemiro, K. N., Gross, D. & Silberhorn, C. Probing the negative Wigner function of a pulsed single photon point by point. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 253603 (2010).
Zhang, L. et al. Mapping coherence in measurement via full quantum tomography of a hybrid optical detector. Nature Photon. 6, 364–368 (2012).
Xiang, G. Y., Higgins, B. L., Berry, D. W., Wiseman, H. M. & Pryde, G. J. Entanglement-enhanced measurement of a completely unknown optical phase. Nature Photon. 5, 43–47 (2011).
Afek, I., Ambar, O. & Silberberg, Y. High-NOON states by mixing quantum and classical light. Science 328, 879–881 (2010).
Usuga, M. A. et al. Noise-powered probabilistic concentration of phase information. Nature Phys. 6, 767–771 (2010).
Wittmann, C., Andersen, U. L., Takeoka, M., Sych, D. & Leuchs, G. Demonstration of coherent-state discrimination using a displacement-controlled photon-number-resolving detector. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 100505 (2010).
Minář, J. c. v., de Riedmatten, H., Simon, C., Zbinden, H. & Gisin, N. Phase-noise measurements in long-fiber interferometers for quantum-repeater applications. Phys. Rev. A 77, 052325 (2008).
Banaszek, K., Radzewicz, C., Wódkiewicz, K. & Krasiński, J. S. Direct measurement of the Wigner function by photon counting. Phys. Rev. A 60, 674–677 (1999).
Odenwalder, J. P. Error Control Coding Handbook (Linkabit, 1976).
Giovannetti, V. et al. Classical capacity of the lossy bosonic channel: the exact solution. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 027902 (2004).
Yonezawa, H. et al. Quantum-enhanced optical-phase tracking. Science 377, 1514–1517 (2011).
Rosenberg, D., Kerman, A. J., Molnar, R. J. & Dauler, E. A. High-speed and high-efficiency superconducting nanowire single photon detector array. Opt. Express 21, 1440–1447 (2013).
Polyakov, S. V., Migdall, A. & Nam, S. W. Real-time data-acquisition platform for pulsed measurements. AIP Conf. Proc. 1327, 505–519 (2011).
The authors acknowledge financial support from the Physics Frontier Center at the Joint Quantum Institute. F.E.B. thanks J. Kosloski and J. Goldhar for discussions. The authors also thank S.V. Polyakov, who developed the original FPGA-based platform on which our data acquisition system was built45.
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
About this article
Cite this article
Becerra, F., Fan, J. & Migdall, A. Photon number resolution enables quantum receiver for realistic coherent optical communications. Nature Photon 9, 48–53 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2014.280
npj Quantum Information (2022)
npj Quantum Information (2022)
Quantum Information Processing (2022)
Applied Physics B (2020)
npj Quantum Information (2019)