Letter | Published:

Off-resonant magnetization dynamics phase-locked to an intense phase-stable terahertz transient

Nature Photonics volume 7, pages 720723 (2013) | Download Citation


Controlling magnetization dynamics with a femtosecond laser is attracting interest both in fundamental science and in industry because of the potential to achieve magnetic switching at ever faster speeds. Here, we report a coherent, phase-locked coupling between a high-field single-cycle terahertz transient and the magnetization of ferromagnetic cobalt films. The visualized magnetization dynamics follow the temporal terahertz field oscillation, are tightly locked to the terahertz phase and are induced in the absence of resonant excitations and energy deposition. The magnetic response occurs on the timescale of the stimulus and is thus two orders of magnitude faster than the Larmor precession response. The experimental results are excellently reproduced by the Landau–Lifshift–Gilbert semi-empirical model, indicating its applicability to ultrafast magnetization dynamics and also demonstrating the marginal effect of the co-propagating terahertz electric field. This novel phenomenon of phase-locked control of magnetization with a strong terahertz field suggests new opportunities for ultrafast data storage.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1.

    et al. Giant magnetoresistance of (001)Fe/(001)Cr magnetic superlattices. Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2472–2475 (1988).

  2. 2.

    , , & Enhanced magnetoresistance in layered magnetic structures with antiferromagnetic interlayer exchange. Phys. Rev. B 39, 4828–4830 (1989).

  3. 3.

    , , & Ultrafast spin dynamics in ferromagnetic nickel. Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 4250–4253 (1996).

  4. 4.

    , , & Ultrafast magneto-optics in nickel: magnetics or optics? Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 844–847 (2000).

  5. 5.

    , & Ultrafast optical manipulation of magnetic order. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 2731–2784 (2010).

  6. 6.

    et al. Ultrafast heating as a sufficient stimulus for magnetization reversal in a ferrimagnet. Nat. Commun. 3, 666 (2012).

  7. 7.

    , , & Nonthermal ultrafast optical control of the magnetization in garnet films. Phys. Rev. B 73, 014421 (2006).

  8. 8.

    , & Coherent ultrafast magnetism induced by femtosecond laser pulses. Nature Phys. 5, 515–520 (2009).

  9. 9.

    et al. Coherent terahertz control of antiferromagnetic spin waves. Nature Photon. 5, 31–34 (2011).

  10. 10.

    et al. Driving magnetic order in a manganite by ultrafast lattice excitation. Phys. Rev. B 84, 241104(R) (2011).

  11. 11.

    et al. Ultrafast non-thermal control of magnetization by instantaneous photomagnetic pulses. Nature 435, 655–657 (2005).

  12. 12.

    , , & Strong-field single-cycle THz pulses generated in an organic crystal. Appl. Phys. Lett. 99, 161116 (2011).

  13. 13.

    , & Spatiotemporal focusing dynamics of intense supercontinuum THz pulses. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 123902 (2013).

  14. 14.

    et al. Spin dynamics triggered by sub terahertz magnetic field pulses. J. Appl. Phys. 103, 123905 (2008).

  15. 15.

    & On the theory of the dispersion of magnetic permeability in ferromagnetic bodies. Phys. Z. Sowjetunion 8, 101–114 (1935).

  16. 16.

    et al. Microwave oscillations of a nanomagnet driven by a spin-polarized current. Nature 425, 380–383 (2003).

  17. 17.

    & OOMMF User's Guide, Version 1.0, Report no. NISTIR 6376 (National Institute of Standards and Technology, 1999).

  18. 18.

    et al. The ultimate speed of magnetic switching in granular recording media. Nature 428, 831–833 (2004).

Download references


This work was carried out at the Paul Scherrer Institute and was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant PP00P2_128493). The authors acknowledge A. Kleibert for helpful discussions and thank M. Paraliev for support. B.T. is supported by the ERASMUS Mundus program. J.L. acknowledges the DYNAVO project for financial support for upgrading the magnetron sputtering. C.P.H. acknowledges association with the National Center of Competence in Research on Molecular Ultrafast Science and Technology (NCCR-MUST).

Author information


  1. Paul Scherrer Institute, SwissFEL, 5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland

    • C. Vicario
    • , C. Ruchert
    • , F. Ardana-Lamas
    •  & C. P. Hauri
  2. Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland

    • F. Ardana-Lamas
    •  & C. P. Hauri
  3. Paul Scherrer Institute, Condensed Matter Theory Group, 5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland

    • P. M. Derlet
  4. Université Pierre et Marie Curie, LCPMR, UMR CNRS 7614, 75005 Paris, France

    • B. Tudu
    •  & J. Luning


  1. Search for C. Vicario in:

  2. Search for C. Ruchert in:

  3. Search for F. Ardana-Lamas in:

  4. Search for P. M. Derlet in:

  5. Search for B. Tudu in:

  6. Search for J. Luning in:

  7. Search for C. P. Hauri in:


C.P.H. and J.L. conceived the experiment. C.P.H. coordinated the project and wrote the manuscript, together with P.M.D. and C.V. The experiment was performed by C.V., C.R., J.L., F.A. and C.P.H., and B.T. fabricated and characterized the samples. P.M.D. performed numerical investigations of the magnetization dynamics. C.P.H., J.L., C.V., C.R. and P.M.D. contributed to data analysis.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. P. Hauri.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary information

    Supplementary information

About this article

Publication history






Further reading

Newsletter Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing