Letter | Published:

Highly efficient water splitting by a dual-absorber tandem cell

Nature Photonics volume 6, pages 824828 (2012) | Download Citation

Abstract

Photoelectrochemical water-splitting devices, which use solar energy to convert water into hydrogen and oxygen, have been investigated for decades. Multijunction designs are most efficient, as they can absorb enough solar energy and provide sufficient free energy for water cleavage. However, a balance exists between device complexity, cost and efficiency. Water splitters fabricated using triple-junction amorphous silicon1,2 or IIIV3 semiconductors have demonstrated reasonable efficiencies, but at high cost and high device complexity. Simpler approaches using oxide-based semiconductors in a dual-absorber tandem approach4,5 have reported solar-to-hydrogen (STH) conversion efficiencies only up to 0.3% (ref. 4). Here, we present a device based on an oxide photoanode and a dye-sensitized solar cell, which performs unassisted water splitting with an efficiency of up to 3.1% STH. The design relies on carefully selected redox mediators for the dye-sensitized solar cell6,7 and surface passivation techniques8 and catalysts9 for the oxide-based photoanodes.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    & High-efficiency photoelectrochemical hydrogen production using multijunction amorphous silicon photoelectrodes. Energy Fuels 12, 3–10 (1998).

  2. 2.

    et al. Wireless solar water splitting using silicon-based semiconductors and earth-abundant catalysts. Science 334, 645–648 (2011).

  3. 3.

    & A monolithic photovoltaic–photoelectrochemical device for hydrogen production via water splitting. Science 280, 425–427 (1998).

  4. 4.

    et al. p-Type Cu–Ti–O nanotube arrays and their use in self-biased heterojunction photoelectrochemical diodes for hydrogen generation. Nano Lett. 8, 1906–1911 (2008).

  5. 5.

    et al. Preparation of p-type CaFe2O4 photocathodes for producing hydrogen from water. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 17343–17345 (2010).

  6. 6.

    et al. A cobalt complex redox shuttle for dye-sensitized solar cells with high open-circuit potentials. Nature Commun. 3, 631 (2012).

  7. 7.

    et al. Porphyrin-sensitized solar cells with cobalt (II/III)-based redox electrolyte exceed 12 percent efficiency. Science 334, 629–634 (2011).

  8. 8.

    et al. Passivating surface states on water splitting hematite photoanodes with alumina overlayers. Chem. Sci. 2, 737–743 (2011).

  9. 9.

    , , & Light-induced water splitting with hematite: improved nanostructure and iridium oxide catalysis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 49, 6405–6408 (2010).

  10. 10.

    et al. Solar water splitting cells. Chem. Rev. 110, 6446–6473 (2010).

  11. 11.

    & Efficiency of splitting water with semiconducting photoelectrodes. J. Electrochem. Soc. 131, 1258–1265 (1984).

  12. 12.

    , & Photoelectrochemical decomposition of water using modified monolithic tandem cells. Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. 24, 319–325 (1999).

  13. 13.

    & Design and characterization of a robust photoelectrochemical device to generate hydrogen using solar water splitting. Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. 31, 1658–1673 (2006).

  14. 14.

    & Tandem cell for water cleavage by visible light. US patent 6,936,143 (2005).

  15. 15.

    et al. Solar hydrogen production by tandem cell system composed of metal oxide semiconductor film photoelectrode and dye-sensitized solar cell. Proc. SPIE 6650, 665003 (2007).

  16. 16.

    et al. Examining architectures of photoanode–photovoltaic tandem cells for solar water splitting. J. Mater. Res. 25, 17–24 (2010).

  17. 17.

    et al. Dynamics of photogenerated holes in nanocrystalline α-Fe2O3 electrodes for water oxidation probed by transient absorption spectroscopy. Chem. Commun. 47, 716–718 (2011).

  18. 18.

    , & A highly stable, efficient visible-light driven water photoelectrolysis system using a nanocrystalline WO3 photoanode and a methane sulfonic acid electrolyte. Nanoscale 4, 1553–1556 (2012).

  19. 19.

    & In situ formation of an oxygen-evolving catalyst in neutral water containing phosphate and Co2+. Science 321, 1072–1075 (2008).

  20. 20.

    & Photoelectrochemical water oxidation by cobalt catalyst (‘Co–Pi’)/α-Fe2O3 composite photoanodes: oxygen evolution and resolution of a kinetic bottleneck. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 4202–4207 (2010).

  21. 21.

    et al. Cathodic shift in onset potential of solar oxygen evolution on hematite by 13-group oxide overlayers. Energy Environ. Sci. 4, 2512–2515 (2011).

  22. 22.

    et al. A Ga2O3 underlayer as an isomorphic template for ultrathin hematite films toward efficient photoelectrochemical water splitting. Faraday Discuss. 155, 223–232 (2012).

  23. 23.

    , , , & A quantitative assessment of the competition between water and anion oxidation at WO3 photoanodes in acidic aqueous electrolytes. Energy Environ. Sci. 5, 5694–5700 (2012).

  24. 24.

    et al. A stable quasi-solid-state dye-sensitized solar cell with an amphiphilic ruthenium sensitizer and polymer gel electrolyte. Nature Mater. 2, 402–407 (2003).

  25. 25.

    , & Decoupling feature size and functionality in solution-processed, porous hematite electrodes for solar water splitting. Nano Lett. 10, 4155–4160 (2010).

  26. 26.

    , , & Influence of plasmonic Au nanoparticles on the photoactivity of Fe2O3 electrodes for water splitting. Nano Lett. 11, 35–43 (2011).

  27. 27.

    , , & Crystallographically oriented mesoporous WO3 films: synthesis, characterization, and applications. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123, 10639–10649 (2001).

  28. 28.

    et al. Cyclopentadithiophene bridged donor–acceptor dyes achieve high power conversion efficiencies in dye-sensitized solar cells based on the tris-cobalt bipyridine redox couple. ChemSusChem 4, 591–594 (2011).

  29. 29.

    , , , & Dye-sensitized solar cells based on poly (3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) counter electrode derived from ionic liquids. J. Mater. Chem. 20, 1654–1658 (2010).

  30. 30.

    et al. Fabrication of thin film dye sensitized solar cells with solar to electric power conversion efficiency over 10%. Thin Solid Films 14, 4613–4619 (2008).

Download references

Acknowledgements

J.B. and T.H. acknowledge funding from the Swiss Federal Office of Energy (PecHouse2, SI/50090-02). J-H.Y. acknowledges support from the Korea Foundation for International Cooperation in Science and Technology through the Global Research Lab. M.C. acknowledges Toyota Motor Corp. for financial support. The authors thank P. Comte and F. Kessler for assistance in preparing the TiO2 paste and the cobalt complex. The authors also thank NEC corporation (Japan) for providing the Y123 dye.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Institute of Chemical Sciences and Engineering, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Station 6, 1015-Lausanne, Switzerland

    • Jeremie Brillet
    • , Jun-Ho Yum
    • , Maurin Cornuz
    • , Takashi Hisatomi
    • , Michael Graetzel
    •  & Kevin Sivula
  2. Centre for New Technologies and Department of Chemistry, University of Warsaw, 02-093 Warsaw, Poland

    • Renata Solarska
    •  & Jan Augustynski

Authors

  1. Search for Jeremie Brillet in:

  2. Search for Jun-Ho Yum in:

  3. Search for Maurin Cornuz in:

  4. Search for Takashi Hisatomi in:

  5. Search for Renata Solarska in:

  6. Search for Jan Augustynski in:

  7. Search for Michael Graetzel in:

  8. Search for Kevin Sivula in:

Contributions

J.B., M.G. and K.S. conceived the experiment. K.S. directed the experimental work and J.B. performed the experiments. J-H.Y. prepared the DSC. M.C. prepared the haematite photoanodes. R.S. and J.A. prepared the WO3 photoanodes. T.H. measured the Faradaic efficiency. J.B. and K.S. wrote the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kevin Sivula.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary information

    Supplementary information

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2012.265

Further reading