Letter | Published:

Experimental realization of Shor's quantum factoring algorithm using qubit recycling

Nature Photonics volume 6, pages 773776 (2012) | Download Citation

Abstract

Quantum computational algorithms exploit quantum mechanics to solve problems exponentially faster than the best classical algorithms1,2,3. Shor's quantum algorithm4 for fast number factoring is a key example and the prime motivator in the international effort to realize a quantum computer5. However, due to the substantial resource requirement, to date there have been only four small-scale demonstrations6,7,8,9. Here, we address this resource demand and demonstrate a scalable version of Shor's algorithm in which the n-qubit control register is replaced by a single qubit that is recycled n times: the total number of qubits is one-third of that required in the standard protocol10,11. Encoding the work register in higher-dimensional states, we implement a two-photon compiled algorithm to factor N = 21. The algorithmic output is distinguishable from noise, in contrast to previous demonstrations. These results point to larger-scale implementations of Shor's algorithm by harnessing scalable resource reductions applicable to all physical architectures.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    Simulating physics with computers. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 21, 467–488 (1982).

  2. 2.

    Quantum theory, the Church–Turing principle and the universal quantum computer. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 400, 97–117 (1985).

  3. 3.

    & Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2000).

  4. 4.

    in Proceedings of the 35th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (ed. Goldwasser, S.) 124–134 (IEEE Computer Society Press, 1994).

  5. 5.

    et al. Quantum computers. Nature 464, 45–53 (2010).

  6. 6.

    et al. Experimental realization of Shor's quantum factoring algorithm using nuclear magnetic resonance. Nature 414, 883–887 (2001).

  7. 7.

    , , & Demonstration of a compiled version of Shor's quantum factoring algorithm using photonic qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 250504 (2007).

  8. 8.

    et al. Experimental demonstration of a compiled version of Shor's algorithm with quantum entanglement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 250505 (2007).

  9. 9.

    , & Shor's quantum factoring algorithm on a photonic chip. Science 325, 1221 (2009).

  10. 10.

    & Efficient factorization with a single pure qubit and logN mixed qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3049–3052 (2000).

  11. 11.

    & Lecture Notes in Computer Science Vol. 1509, 174–188 (Springer, 1999).

  12. 12.

    , , & Simulated quantum computation of molecular energies. Science 309, 1704–1707 (2005).

  13. 13.

    et al. Towards quantum chemistry on a quantum computer. Nature Chem. 2, 106–111 (2010).

  14. 14.

    & Quantum computing applied to calculations of molecular energies: CH2 benchmark. J. Chem. Phys. 133, 194106 (2010).

  15. 15.

    , & Simulation of electronic structure Hamiltonians using quantum computers. Mol. Phys. 109, 735–750 (2011).

  16. 16.

    et al. Solving quantum ground-state problems with nuclear magnetic resonance. Sci. Rep. 1, 88 (2011).

  17. 17.

    & Semiclassical Fourier transform for quantum computation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 3228–3231 (1996).

  18. 18.

    , , & Efficient networks for quantum factoring. Phys. Rev. A 54, 1034–1063 (1996).

  19. 19.

    et al. High-speed linear optics quantum computing using active feed-forward. Nature 445, 65–69 (2007).

  20. 20.

    et al. Adding control to arbitrary unknown quantum operations. Nature. Commun. 2, 413 (2011).

  21. 21.

    , , & Linear optical controlled-NOT gate in the coincidence basis. Phys. Rev. A 65, 062324 (2001).

  22. 22.

    & Quantum phase gate for photonic qubits using only beam splitters and postselection. Phys. Rev. A 66, 024308 (2001).

  23. 23.

    , , , & Demonstration of an all-optical quantum controlled-NOT gate. Nature 426, 264–267 (2003).

  24. 24.

    et al. Quantum process tomography of a controlled-NOT gate. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 080502 (2004).

  25. 25.

    , , , & Ultrabright source of polarization-entangled photons. Phys. Rev. A 60, R773–R776 (1999).

  26. 26.

    , & A scheme for efficient quantum computation with linear optics. Nature 409, 46–52 (2001).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank S. Bartlett, R. Jozsa, G. McConnell, T. Ralph, T. Rudolph and P. Shadbolt for helpful discussions. This work was supported by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), the European Research Council (ERC), PHORBITECH and the Centre for Nanoscience and Quantum Information (NSQI). J.O.B. acknowledges a Royal Society Wolfson Merit Award.

Author information

Author notes

    • Enrique Martín-López
    • , Anthony Laing
    •  & Thomas Lawson

    These authors contributed equally to this work

Affiliations

  1. Centre for Quantum Photonics, H. H. Wills Physics Laboratory & Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, University of Bristol, Merchant Venturers Building, Woodland Road, Bristol BS8 1UB, UK

    • Enrique Martín-López
    • , Anthony Laing
    • , Thomas Lawson
    • , Roberto Alvarez
    • , Xiao-Qi Zhou
    •  & Jeremy L. O'Brien

Authors

  1. Search for Enrique Martín-López in:

  2. Search for Anthony Laing in:

  3. Search for Thomas Lawson in:

  4. Search for Roberto Alvarez in:

  5. Search for Xiao-Qi Zhou in:

  6. Search for Jeremy L. O'Brien in:

Contributions

The theory was developed by T.L. and A.L. The theory was mapped to the experimental circuit by A.L., T.L., E.M.-L., X.Z. and J.O.B. Experiments were performed by E.M.-L., T.L., A.L., R.A. and X.Z. Data were analysed by A.L., E.M.-L., T.L., X.Z. and J.O.B. The manuscript was written by A.L., T.L., E.M.-L., X.Z. and J.O.B. The project was supervised by A.L. and J.O.B.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeremy L. O'Brien.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary information

    Supplementary information

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2012.259

Further reading Further reading