Letter | Published:

Hybrid semiconductor-atomic interface: slowing down single photons from a quantum dot

Nature Photonics volume 5, pages 230233 (2011) | Download Citation


Hybrid interfaces between semiconductor quantum dots and atomic systems could be of potential fundamental and technological interest, because they can combine the advantages of both constituents. Semiconductor quantum dots are tunable and deterministic sources of single1 and entangled photons2. Atomic vapours are widely used as slow-light media3,4 and quantum memories5,6. Merging both systems could enable the storage of quantum dot emission—an important step towards the implementation of quantum memories and quantum repeaters7. Here, we show a hybrid semiconductor–atomic interface for slowing down single photons emitted from a single quantum dot. We use a double absorption resonance4 in rubidium vapour to create a slow-light medium in which a single photon is stored for 15 times its temporal width. Our result is the first demonstration of non-classical light storage, where single photons are generated on demand from a semiconductor source.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1.

    et al. A quantum dot single-photon turnstile device. Science 290, 2282–2285 (2000).

  2. 2.

    et al. Entangled photon pairs from semiconductor quantum dots. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 130501 (2006).

  3. 3.

    , , & Light speed reduction to 17 metres per second in an ultracold atomic gas. Nature 397, 594–598 (1999).

  4. 4.

    , , , & Wide-bandwidth, tunable, multiple-pulse-width optical delays using slow light in cesium vapor. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 153601 (2007).

  5. 5.

    , , & Observation of coherent optical information storage in an atomic medium using halted light pulses. Nature 409, 490–493 (2001).

  6. 6.

    , , , & Storage of light in atomic vapor. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 783–786 (2001).

  7. 7.

    , , & Quantum repeaters: the role of imperfect local operations in quantum communication. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5932–5935 (1998).

  8. 8.

    , & Observation of electromagnetically induced transparency. Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 2593–2596 (1991).

  9. 9.

    et al. Storage and retrieval of single photons transmitted between remote quantum memories. Nature 438, 833–836 (2005).

  10. 10.

    et al. Electromagnetically induced transparency with tunable single-photon pulses. Nature 438, 837–841 (2005).

  11. 11.

    et al. Efficient all-optical switching using slow light within a hollow fiber. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 203902 (2009).

  12. 12.

    , , , & Spectroscopy of Rb atoms in hollow-core fibers. Phys. Rev. A 81, 053825 (2010).

  13. 13.

    et al. Slow light on a chip via atomic quantum state control. Nature Photon. 4, 776–779 (2010).

  14. 14.

    et al. Tuning single GaAs quantum dots in resonance with a rubidium vapor. Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 082103 (2010).

  15. 15.

    Electrons in artificial atoms. Nature 379, 413–419 (1996).

  16. 16.

    et al. Polarization sensitive spectroscopy of charged quantum dots. Phys. Rev. B 76, 235304 (2007).

  17. 17.

    , & Dispersive properties of electromagnetically induced transparency. Phys. Rev. A 46, R29–R32 (1992).

  18. 18.

    et al. Fine structure of neutral and charged excitons in self-assembled In(Ga)As/(Al)GaAs quantum dots. Phys. Rev. B 65, 195315 (2002).

  19. 19.

    et al. Experimental quantum teleportation. Nature 390, 575–579 (1997).

  20. 20.

    , , , & Coherent excitation of Rydberg atoms in micrometre-sized atomic vapour cells. Nature Photon. 4, 112–116 (2010).

  21. 21.

    et al. Hierarchical self-assembly of GaAs/AlGaAs quantum dots. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 166104 (2004).

Download references


The authors acknowledge U. Perinetti, M. Koole and J. van Leeuwen for their help in the early stages of the project. The authors also thank L. Kouwenhoven for support and useful discussions. O. Benson and D. Hoeckel are acknowledged for their help with the vapour cell temperature control, and E. Zallo, R. Trotta, P. Atkinson and C. Deneke for their contributions to sample preparation. This work was supported by the Dutch Organization for Fundamental Research on Matter (FOM), The Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO Veni/Vidi), the German Research Foundation (DFG FOR 730) and the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF QK_QuaHL-Rep, 01BQ1032).

Author information


  1. Kavli Institute of Nanoscience Delft, Delft University of Technology, 2628CJ Delft, The Netherlands

    • N. Akopian
    •  & V. Zwiller
  2. Institute for Integrative Nanosciences, IFW Dresden, 01069 Dresden, Germany

    • L. Wang
    • , A. Rastelli
    •  & O. G. Schmidt


  1. Search for N. Akopian in:

  2. Search for L. Wang in:

  3. Search for A. Rastelli in:

  4. Search for O. G. Schmidt in:

  5. Search for V. Zwiller in:


The experiments were conceived and designed by N.A. and V.Z. and carried out by N.A. The data were analysed and modelled by N.A. The sample was developed by L.W., A.R. and O.G.S. The manuscript was written by N.A. and V.Z. with input from A.R. and O.G.S.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. Akopian.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary information

    Supplementary information

About this article

Publication history






Further reading