Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

XFROG phase measurement of threshold harmonics in a Keldysh-scaled system

Abstract

Attosecond pulses are created (by Fourier synthesis) from a comb of odd-order high harmonics resulting from the non-perturbative interaction of intense near-visible laser light with an atomic gas1,2,3. When produced by a mid-infrared laser, harmonics can have simultaneously high order, visible wavelength, and photon energy below the ionization threshold, Ip, of the generating atom. Methods requiring photon energies greater than Ip have been developed4 that measure the spectral amplitude and phase necessary for temporal reconstruction of the harmonic radiation. Here we report the temporal characterization of below-threshold harmonics using sum frequency generation cross-correlation frequency resolved optical gating5 (SFG XFROG), a technique sensitive to the relative delay between orders6, coupled with a novel approach that makes use of the Keldysh scaling7 in strong-field physics. The results surprisingly suggest non-perturbative generation of below threshold harmonics, providing a potential alternative to existing vacuum–ultraviolet frequency comb generation methods8,9.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Spectra from the 3.6-µm/caesium scaled system.
Figure 2: Below-threshold harmonics XFROG spectrograms.
Figure 3: Reconstructed harmonics from the 3.6-µm/caesium scaled system.
Figure 4: dφ/dq for harmonic orders 5–13.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McPherson, A. et al. Studies of multiphoton production of vacuum–ultraviolet radiation in the rare gases. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 4, 595–601 (1987).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ferray, M. et al. Multiple-harmonic conversion of 1064 nm radiation in rare gases. J. Phys. B 21, L31–L35 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Agostini, P. & DiMauro, L. F. The physics of attosecond light pulses. Rep. Prog. Phys. 67, 813–855 (2004).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Quéré, F., Mairesse, Y. & Itatani, J. Temporal characterization of attosecond XUV Fields. J. Mod. Opt. 52, 339–360 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Linden, S., Giessen, H. & Kuhl, J. XFROG—a new method for amplitude and phase characterization of weak ultrashort pulses. Phys. Stat. Sol. B 206, 119–124 (1998).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Keusters, D. et al. Relative-phase ambiguities in measurements of ultrashort pulses with well-separated multiple frequency components. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 20, 2226–2237 (2003).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Keldysh, L. V. Ionization in the field of a strong electromagnetic wave. Sov. Phys. JETP 20, 1307–1314 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jones, R. J., Moll, K. D., Thorpe, M. J. & Ye, J. Phase-coherent frequency combs in the vacuum ultraviolet via high-harmonic generation inside a femtosecond enhancement cavity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 193201 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Zinkstok, R. T., Witte, S., Ubachs, W., Hogervorst, W. & Eikema, K. S. Frequency comb laser spectroscopy in the vacuum–ultraviolet region. Phys. Rev. A 73, 061801 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Schafer, K. J., Yang, B., DiMauro, L. F. & Kulander, K. C. Above threshold ionization beyond the high harmonic cutoff. Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1599–1602 (1993).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Corkum, P. B. Plasma perspective on strong field multiphoton ionization. Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1994–1997 (1993).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. L'Huillier, A., Schafer, K. J. & Kulander, K. C. Theoretical aspects of intense field harmonic generation. J. Phys. B 24, 3315–3341 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Paul, P. M. et al. Observation of a train of attosecond pulses from high harmonic generation. Science 292, 1689–1692 (2001).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Mauritsson, J. et al. Measurement and control of the frequency chirp rate of high-order harmonic pulses. Phys. Rev. A 70, 021801 (2004).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mairesse, Y. & Quéré, F. Frequency-resolved optical gating for complete reconstruction of attosecond bursts. Phys. Rev. A 71, 011401 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Agostini, P. & DiMauro, L. F. Atoms in high intensity mid-infrared pulses. Contemp. Phys. 49, 179–197 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. DeLong, K. W., Fittinghoff, D. N., Trebino, R., Kohler, B. & Wilson, K. Pulse retrieval in frequency-resolved optical gating based on the method of generalized projections. Opt. Lett. 19, 2152–2154 (1994).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Trebino, R. & Kane, D. J. Using phase retrieval to measure the intensity and phase of ultrashort pulses: frequency-resolved optical gating. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 10, 1101–1111 (1993).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang, Z., Zeek, E. & Trebino, R. Determining error bars in measurements of ultrashort laser pulses. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 20, 2400–2405 (2003).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Su, Q. & Eberly, J. H. Model atom for multiphoton physics. Phys. Rev. A 44, 5997–6008 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Schafer, K. J. & Kulander, K. C. High harmonic generation from ultrafast pump lasers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 638–641 (1997).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Börzsönyi, A., Heiner, Z., Kalashnikov, M. P., Kovács, A. P. & Osvay, K. Dispersion measurement of inert gases and gas mixtures at 800 nm. Appl. Opt. 47, 4856–4863 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Miles, R. B. & Harris, S. E. Optical third-harmonic generation in alkali metal vapors. IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 9, 470–484 (1973).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Yost, D. C. et al. Vacuum-ultraviolet frequency combs from below-threshold harmonics. Nature Phys. 5, 815–820 (2009).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Balcou, P., Dederichs, A. S., Gaarde, M. B. & L'Huillier, A. Quantum-path analysis and phase matching of high-order harmonic generation and high-order frequency mixing processes in strong laser fields. J. Phys. B 32, 2973–2989 (1999).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. Clatterbuck, T. O. et al. Yield and temporal characterization of high-order harmonics from intense midinfrared excitation of a cesium vapor. Phys. Rev. A 69, 033807 (2004).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the United States Department of Energy/Basic Energy Sciences contract no. DE-FG02-04ER15614. L.F.D. acknowledges support from the Hagenlocker Chair at OSU. We are grateful to L. Van Woerkom (Ohio State University) for the loan of the vacuum chamber and J. Tate (Louisiana State University) for useful discussions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

E.P.P. designed and performed the XFROG experiment, analysed the results and wrote the manuscript. A.M.M. and E.S. assisted with the XFROG, collected photoelectron and VUV spectra and operated the laser. F.C. performed the TDSE modelling and analysis. E.S. and F.C. wrote sections of the Methods. K.K., P.A. and L.F.D. provided experimental and theoretical advice and edited the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erik P. Power.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Power, E., March, A., Catoire, F. et al. XFROG phase measurement of threshold harmonics in a Keldysh-scaled system. Nature Photon 4, 352–356 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2010.38

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2010.38

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing