Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

A biological quarter-wave retarder with excellent achromaticity in the visible wavelength region

Nature Photonics volume 3, pages 641–644 (2009)Cite this article

Abstract

Animals make use of a wealth of optical physics to control and manipulate light, for example, in creating reflective animal colouration1,2,3 and polarized light signals4. Their precise optics often surpass equivalent man-made optical devices in both sophistication and efficiency5. Here, we report a biophysical mechanism that creates a natural full-visible-range achromatic quarter-wave retarder in the eye of a stomatopod crustacean. Analogous, man-made retardation devices are important optical components, used in both scientific research and commercial applications for controlling polarized light. Typical synthetic retarders are not achromatic, and more elaborate designs, such as, multilayer subwavelength gratings or bicrystalline constructions, only achieve partial wavelength independence6. In this work, we use both experimental measurements and theoretical modelling of the photoreceptor structure to illustrate how a novel interplay of intrinsic and form birefringence results in a natural achromatic optic that significantly outperforms current man-made optical devices.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: The eye of a stomatopod crustacean.
Figure 2: Achromatic conversion of linearly to circularly polarized light by the R8 cell.
Figure 3: Minimized refractive index and corresponding birefringence for the ideal Odontodactylus scyllarus R8 quarter-wave retarder in Fig. 2.
Figure 4: Comparative retardation between two man-made quarter-wave retarders and the R8 cell.

References

  1. Vukusic, P. & Hooper, I. Directionally controlled fluorescence emission in butterflies. Science 310, 1151 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Vukusic, P., Sambles, J. R. & Lawrence, C. R. Structural colour—colour mixing in wing scales of a butterfly. Nature 404, 457 (2000).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sutherland, R. L., Mathger, L. M., Hanlon, R. T., Urbas, A. M. & Stone, M. O. Cephalopod coloration model. I. Squid chromatophores and iridophores. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 25, 588–599 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cronin, T. W. et al. Polarization vision and its role in biological signaling. Integr. Comparat. Biol. 43, 549–558 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Vukusic, P. & Sambles, J. R. Photonic structures in biology. Nature 424, 852–855 (2003).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kikuta, H., Ohira, Y. & Iwata, K. Achromatic quarter-wave plates using the dispersion of form birefringence. Appl. Opt. 36, 1566–1572 (1997).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Morris, R. B. Iridescence from diffraction structures in the wing scales of Callophrys rubi, the green hairstreak. J. Entomol. A 49, 149–154 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Parker, A. R., Welch, V. L., Driver, D. & Martini, N. Structural colour—opal analogue discovered in a weevil. Nature 426, 786–787 (2003).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Vigneron, J. P. et al. Switchable reflector in the Panamanian tortoise beetle Charidotella egregia (Chrysomelidae:Cassidinae). Phys. Rev. E 76, 031907 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Vukusic, P., Sambles, J. R., Lawrence, C.R. & Wotton R. J. Structural colour—now you see it now you don't. Nature 410, 36 (2001).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cuthill, I. C. et al. Disruptive coloration and background pattern matching. Nature 434, 72–74 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Endler, J. A. On the measurement and classification of color in studies of animal color patterns. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 41, 315–352 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Roberts, N. W. & Needham, M. G. A mechanism of polarized light sensitivity in cone photoreceptors of the goldfish Carassius auratus. Biophys. J. 93, 3241–3248 (2007).

  14. Marshall, N. J. et al. The compound eyes of mantis shrimps (Crustacea, Hoplocarida, Stomatopoda). 1. Compound eye structure—the detection of polarized light. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. B 334, 33–56 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Marshall, N. J., Cronin, T. W., Shashar, N. & Land, M. Behavioural evidence for polarisation vision in stomatopods reveals a potential channel for communication. Curr. Biol. 9, 755–758 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chiou, T.-H. et al. Circular polarization vision in a stomatopod crustacean. Curr. Biol. 18, 429–434 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Marshall, N. J. et al. The compound eyes of mantis shrimps (Crustacea, Hoplocarida, Stomatopoda). 2. Color pigments in the eyes of stomatopod crustaceans—polychromatic vision by serial and lateral filtering. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. B 334, 57–84 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Tilsch, M. K. et al. Production scale deposition of multilayer film structures for birefringent optical components. Thin Solid Films 516, 107–113 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kirschfeld, K. & Snyder, A. W. Photoreceptor Optics 56–77 (Springer, 1975).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Bêche, B. & Gaviot, E. Matrix formalism to enhance the concept of effective dielectric constant. Opt. Commun. 219, 15–19 (2003).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Roberts, N. W. & Gleeson, H. F. The absorption of polarized light by vertebrate photoreceptors. Vision Res. 44, 2643–2652 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Roberts, N. W. The optics of vertebrate photoreceptors: anisotropy and form birefringence. Vision Res. 46, 3259–3266 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wehner, R., Bernard, G. D. & Geiger, E. Twisted and non-twisted rhabdoms and their significance for polarization detection in the bee. J. Comp. Physiol. 104, 225–245 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Snyder, A. W. & McIntyre, P. Photoreceptor Optics 338–391 (Springer, 1975).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. Yi, D. E., Yan, Y. B., Liu, H. T., Si-Lu & Jin, G. F. Broadband achromatic phase retarder by subwavelength grating. Opt. Commun. 227, 49–55 (2003).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. Gaillot, D. P. et al. Composite organic–inorganic butterfly scales: production of photonic structures with atomic layer deposition. Phys. Rev. E 78, 031922 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Valentine, J. et al. Three-dimensional optical metamaterial with a negative refractive index. Nature 455, 376–379 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Vukusic, P., Hallam, B. & Noyes, J. Brilliant whiteness in ultrathin beetle scales. Science 315, 348 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. Cronin, T. W., Marshall, N. J. & Caldwell, R. L. Visual pigment diversity in two genera of mantis shrimps implies rapid evolution (Crustacea; Stomatopoda). J. Comp. Physiol. A 179, 371–384 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Jenkins, F. A. & White, H. E. Fundamentals of Optics 4th edn, 482 (McGraw-Hill International Editions, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from the Air Force Office of Scientific Research, the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), the Asian Office of Aerospace Research and Development, the Australian Research Council and the National Science Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Photon Science Institute, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK

    N. W. Roberts

  2. School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Woodland Road, Bristol, BS8 1UG, UK

    N. W. Roberts

  3. Sensory Neurobiology Group, School of Biomedical Sciences and Queensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, 4072, Queensland, Australia

    T.-H. Chiou & N. J. Marshall

  4. Department of Biological Sciences, University of Maryland Baltimore County, 1000 Hilltop Circle, Baltimore, 21250, Maryland, USA

    T. W. Cronin

Authors
  1. N. W. Roberts
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. T.-H. Chiou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. N. J. Marshall
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. T. W. Cronin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors contributed extensively to all aspects of the work presented in this paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. W. Roberts.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roberts, N., Chiou, TH., Marshall, N. et al. A biological quarter-wave retarder with excellent achromaticity in the visible wavelength region. Nature Photon 3, 641–644 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2009.189

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2009.189

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing