Commentary | Published:

Emerging technologies and the role of NGOs

Nature Nanotechnology volume 12, pages 397400 (2017) | Download Citation

Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) are involved in policy discussions surrounding the societal implications of emerging technologies. But what practices and strategies undertaken by these organizations are most influential in anticipating the longer-term societal implications of nanotechnology?

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    Science 322, 520–521 (2008).

  2. 2.

    Science 338, 456–461 (2012).

  3. 3.

    National Nanotechnology Initiative: Strategic Plan (National Science and Technology Council, 2016).

  4. 4.

    & (eds) Managing Nano-Bio-Info-Cogno Innovations: Converging Technologies in Society (Springer, 2006).

  5. 5.

    & (eds) Handbook of Science and Technology Convergence (Springer, 2016).

  6. 6.

    The Politics of Expertise in Congress: The Rise and Fall of the Office of Technology Assessment (State Univ. of New York Press, 1996).

  7. 7.

    & (eds) Science and Technology Advice for Congress (Routledge, 2003).

  8. 8.

    & in International Handbook on Regulating Nanotechnologies (eds Hodge, G. A., Bowman, D. M. & Maynard, A. D.) 409–445 (Edward Elgar, 2010).

  9. 9.

    Assessing the Societal Implications of Emerging Technologies: Anticipatory Governance in Practice (Routledge, 2016).

  10. 10.

    , , , & Review of Safety Practices in the Nanotechnology Industry (International Council on Nanotechnology, 2006).

  11. 11.

    Nanotechnology: A Research Strategy for Assessing Risk (Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies, 2006).

  12. 12.

    Informed Public Perceptions of Nanotechnology and Trust in Government (Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies, 2005).

  13. 13.

    Managing the Effects of Nanotechnology (Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies, 2006).

  14. 14.

    New Life, Old Bottles: Regulating First-Generation Products of Synthetic Biology (Synthetic Biology Project, 2009).

  15. 15.

    Hart Research Associates Public Attitudes Regarding New Technology from Editing DNA (Synthetic Biology Project, 2015).

  16. 16.

    , , & in The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies 3rd edn (eds Hackett, E. J., Amsterdamska, O., Lynch, M., Wajcman, J.) 979–1000 (MIT Press, 2008).

  17. 17.

    Soc. Stud. Sci. 44, 218–242 (2014).

  18. 18.

    Anticipatory Governance: Practical Upgrades (Project on Forward Engagement, 2012).

  19. 19.

    , , & Nanotechnol. Law Bus. 7, 152–163 (2010).

  20. 20.

    et al. Sci. Pub. Pol. 37, 219–232 (2010).

  21. 21.

    Governance Structure and Operational Plan (International Council on Nanotechnology, 2009).

  22. 22.

    & See-through Science: Why Public Engagement Needs to Move Upstream (Demos, 2004).

  23. 23.

    & Tech. Assess. Theor. Prac. 24, 53–59 (2015).

Download references

Acknowledgements

Evan S. Michelson is a program director at the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation. This Commentary was written fully in the author's personal capacity, and the views expressed here are those of the author alone and do not reflect those of the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation or any of the Sloan Foundation's grantees. The author was previously an employee of the Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars from 2005–2007. This affiliation was acknowledged to all interviewees contacted during the course of this study. Portions of this Commentary are drawn from the author's book, Assessing the Societal Implications of Emerging Technologies: Anticipatory Governance in Practice (Routledge, 2016). The author gratefully acknowledges Taylor & Francis for their permission to re-use this material.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Evan S. Michelson is at the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, 630 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2200, New York, New York 10111, USA

    • Evan S. Michelson

Authors

  1. Search for Evan S. Michelson in:

About this article

Publication history

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2017.70

Further reading

  • Safe Innovation Approach: Towards an agile system for dealing with innovations

    • Lya G. Soeteman-Hernandez
    • , Margarita D. Apostolova
    • , Cindy Bekker
    • , Susan Dekkers
    • , Roland C. Grafström
    • , Monique Groenewold
    • , Yordan Handzhiyski
    • , Petra Herbeck-Engel
    • , Karl Hoehener
    • , Varvara Karagkiozaki
    • , Sean Kelly
    • , Annette Kraegeloh
    • , Stergios Logothetidis
    • , Christian Micheletti
    • , Penny Nymark
    • , Agnes Oomen
    • , Thies Oosterwijk
    • , Isabel Rodríguez-LLopis
    • , Stefania Sabella
    • , Araceli Sanchez Jiménez
    • , Adriënne J.A.M. Sips
    • , Blanca Suarez- Merino
    • , Isabella Tavernaro
    • , Jacqueline van Engelen
    • , Susan W.P. Wijnhoven
    •  & Cornelle W. Noorlander

    Materials Today Communications (2019)

Find nanotechnology articles, nanomaterial data and patents all in one place. Visit Nano by Nature Research