Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Commentary
  • Published:

The insurability of nanomaterial production risk

Without insurance the long-term sustainability of nanotechnology is questionable, but insurance companies are encumbered by their institutional memory of losses from the asbestos crisis and the absence of suitable actuarial models to measure the potential risks of nanotechnology. Here we propose a framework that supports the transfer of nanomaterial production risk to the insurance sector.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Control banding for underwriters.

References

  1. Schoffski, O. & Wegener, A. G. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance—Issues and Practice 24, 203–215 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ferguson, N. The Ascent of Money: A Financial History of the World (Penguin, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Roco, M. C., Mirkin, C. A. & Hersam, M. C. Nanotechnology Research Directions for Societal Needs in 2020: Retrospective and Outlook Vol. 1 (Springer, 2011).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Mangematin, V. & Walsh, S. Technovation 32, 157–160 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kahan, D. M. et al. Nature Nanotech. 4, 87–90 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chatterjee, R. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43, 1240–1241 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Murashov, V. & Howard, J. Nature Nanotech. 4, 467–470 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Malloy, T. F. ACS Nano 5, 5–12 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Murashov, V. & Howard, J. (eds) Nanotechnology Standards Ch. 9, 209–238 (Springer, 2011).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Murashov, V., Schulte, P., Geraci, C. & Howard, J. Ind. Health 49, 280–296 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hett, A. Nanotechnology: Small Matter, Many Unknowns (Risk Perception Series) (Swiss Reinsurance Company, 2004); http://go.nature.com/9Dk87t

    Google Scholar 

  12. Johnson, E., Kostic, B., Riswadka, A. & Trodella, K. Insight on Nanotechnology (Zurich Financial Services Group, 2009); http://go.nature.com/TUjuPB

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kostoff, R. et al. J. Nanopart. Res. 8, 301–321 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Baxter, D. Nanotechnology: An Insurers Perspective (2008); http://go.nature.com/ZYiFgA

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nanotechnology CRO briefing Emerging Risks Initiative (Nanowerk, 2010); http://go.nature.com/vLPh2a

  16. Monica, J. First Commercial Insurance Exclusion for Nanotechnology (Nanotechnology Law Report, 2008); http://go.nature.com/PylXW6

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fink, A. J. Proc. 2010 Nanotech Conf. 3, 583–586 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zalk, D. M., Paik, S. Y. & Swuste, P. J. Nanopart. Res. 11, 1685–1704 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. International Standards Organization ISO-TC229/TR11360:2010 Nanotechnologies—Methodology for the Classification and Categorization of Nanomaterials; http://go.nature.com/EaRazI

  20. OECD The Impacts of Nanotechnology on Companies: Policy Insights from Case Studies (OECD Working Party on Nanotechnology, 2010); http://doi.org/cq88td

  21. Singer, P. A., Salamanca-Buentello, F. & Daar, A. S. Issues Sci. Technol. 21, 57–64 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Heinemann, M. & Schäfer, H. Hum. Exp. Toxicol. 28, 407–411 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang, X. Q., Yin, L. H., Tang, M. & Pu, Y. P. Biomed. Environ. Sci. 24, 661–669 (2011).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research leading to this Commentary has received funding from the European Community's Seventh Framework Programme FP7 under grant agreement no. 280716, Sanowork (www.sanowork.eu).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Finbarr Murphy.

Additional information

The views expressed in this Commentary are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the European Commission.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mullins, M., Murphy, F., Baublyte, L. et al. The insurability of nanomaterial production risk. Nature Nanotech 8, 222–224 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2013.53

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2013.53

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing