Letter | Published:

Tunable infrared plasmonic devices using graphene/insulator stacks

Nature Nanotechnology volume 7, pages 330334 (2012) | Download Citation

Abstract

The collective oscillation of carriers—the plasmon1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17—in graphene has many desirable properties, including tunability and low loss11,12,13,14,16,17. However, in single-layer graphene, the dependence on carrier concentration of both the plasmonic resonance frequency and magnitude is relatively weak16,17, limiting its applications in photonics. Here, we demonstrate transparent photonic devices based on graphene/insulator stacks, which are formed by depositing alternating wafer-scale graphene sheets and thin insulating layers, then patterning them together into photonic-crystal-like structures18. We show experimentally that the plasmon in such stacks is unambiguously non-classical. Compared with doping in single-layer graphene, distributing carriers into multiple graphene layers effectively enhances the plasmonic resonance frequency and magnitude, which is different from the effect in a conventional semiconductor superlattice3,4 and is a direct consequence of the unique carrier density scaling law of the plasmonic resonance of Dirac fermions8,16. Using patterned graphene/insulator stacks, we demonstrate widely tunable far-infrared notch filters with 8.2 dB rejection ratios and terahertz linear polarizers with 9.5 dB extinction ratios. An unpatterned stack consisting of five graphene layers shields 97.5% of electromagnetic radiation at frequencies below 1.2 THz. This work could lead to the development of transparent mid- and far-infrared photonic devices such as detectors, modulators and three-dimensional metamaterial systems19,20.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    Plasma losses by fast electrons in thin films. Phys. Rev. 106, 874–881 (1957).

  2. 2.

    , & Observation of the two-dimensional plasmon in silicon inversion layers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 38, 980–983 (1977).

  3. 3.

    & Collective excitations in semiconductor super-lattices. Phys. Rev. B 25, 7603–7618 (1982).

  4. 4.

    , , & Plasma dispersion in a layered electron gas: a determination in GaAs–(AlGa) As heterostructures. Phys. Rev. B 25, 7867–7870 (1982).

  5. 5.

    & Absorption and emission of radiation by plasmons in two-dimensional electron-gas disks. Phys. Rev. B 34, 2450–2457 (1986).

  6. 6.

    , & Dimensional resonance of the two-dimensional electron gas in selectively doped GaAs/AlGaAs heterostructures. Phys. Rev. B 28, 4875–4877 (1983).

  7. 7.

    et al. Plasmons in strongly coupled metallic nanostructures. Chem. Rev. 111, 3913–3961 (2011).

  8. 8.

    & Collective modes of the massless Dirac plasma. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 206412 (2009).

  9. 9.

    & Plasmon modes of spatially separated double-layer graphene. Phys. Rev. B 80, 205405 (2009).

  10. 10.

    et al. Drude weight, plasmon dispersion, and ac conductivity in doped graphene sheets. Phys. Rev. B 84, 045429 (2011).

  11. 11.

    Graphene terahertz plasmon oscillators. IEEE Trans. Nanotech. 7, 91–99 (2008).

  12. 12.

    , & Graphene plasmonics: a platform for strong light–matter interactions. Nano Lett. 11, 3370–3377 (2011).

  13. 13.

    , & Complete optical absorption in periodically patterned graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 047401 (2012).

  14. 14.

    & Transformation optics using graphene. Science 332, 1291–1294 (2011).

  15. 15.

    , , & Plasmon dispersion and damping in electrically isolated two-dimensional charge sheets. Phys. Rev. B 78, 035443 (2008).

  16. 16.

    et al. Graphene plasmonics for tunable terahertz metamaterials. Nature Nanotech. 6, 630–634 (2011).

  17. 17.

    et al. Infrared nanoscopy of Dirac plasmons at the graphene–SiO2 interface. Nano Lett. 11, 4701–4705 (2011).

  18. 18.

    , , & Photonic Crystals: Molding the Flow of Light 2nd edn (Princeton Univ. Press, 2008).

  19. 19.

    et al. Three-dimensional optical metamaterial with a negative refractive index. Nature 455, 376–379 (2008).

  20. 20.

    Negative refraction makes a perfect lens. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3966–3969 (2000).

  21. 21.

    et al. Fine structure constant defines visual transparency of graphene. Science 320, 1308 (2008).

  22. 22.

    et al. Dirac charge dynamics in graphene by infrared spectroscopy. Nature Phys. 4, 532–535 (2008).

  23. 23.

    et al. Drude conductivity of Dirac fermions in graphene. Phys. Rev. B 83, 165113 (2010).

  24. 24.

    , & Seeing many-body effects in single- and few-layer graphene: observation of two-dimensional saddle-point excitons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 046401 (2011).

  25. 25.

    et al. Infrared spectroscopy of wafer-scale graphene. ACS Nano 5, 9854–9860 (2011).

  26. 26.

    et al. Giant Faraday rotation in single- and multilayer graphene. Nature Phys. 7, 48–51 (2010).

  27. 27.

    Energy gap interpretation of experiments on infrared transmission through superconducting thin films. Phys. Rev. 104, 845–846 (1956).

  28. 28.

    et al. Utilization of a buffered dielectric to achieve high field-effect carrier mobility in graphene transistors. Nano Lett. 9, 4474–4478 (2009).

  29. 29.

    & Optical far-infrared properties of a graphene monolayer and multilayer. Phys. Rev. B 76, 153410 (2007).

  30. 30.

    et al. Large-area synthesis of high-quality and uniform graphene films on copper foils. Science 324, 1312–1314 (2009).

  31. 31.

    et al. Roll-to-roll production of 30-inch graphene films for transparent electrodes. Nature Nanotech. 5, 574–578 (2010).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to B. Ek and J. Bucchignano for technical assistance and DARPA for partial financial support through the CERA programme (contract no. FA8650-08-C-7838).

Author information

Affiliations

  1. IBM Thomas J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, New York 10598, USA

    • Hugen Yan
    • , Xuesong Li
    • , Bhupesh Chandra
    • , George Tulevski
    • , Yanqing Wu
    • , Marcus Freitag
    • , Wenjuan Zhu
    • , Phaedon Avouris
    •  & Fengnian Xia

Authors

  1. Search for Hugen Yan in:

  2. Search for Xuesong Li in:

  3. Search for Bhupesh Chandra in:

  4. Search for George Tulevski in:

  5. Search for Yanqing Wu in:

  6. Search for Marcus Freitag in:

  7. Search for Wenjuan Zhu in:

  8. Search for Phaedon Avouris in:

  9. Search for Fengnian Xia in:

Contributions

F.X., P.A. and H.Y. conceived the experiments. F.X. and H.Y. fabricated the devices. H.Y. performed the measurements and data analysis. X.L. and B.C. grew the chemical vapour deposition graphene. G.T. helped with doping. M.F. helped with the experimental set-ups. Y.W. and W.Z. participated in sample fabrication and characterization. F.X. and H.Y. co-wrote the manuscript. P.A. provided suggestions, and all authors commented on the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Phaedon Avouris or Fengnian Xia.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary information

    Supplementary information

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2012.59

Further reading