Letter | Published:

The role of van der Waals forces in the performance of molecular diodes

Nature Nanotechnology volume 8, pages 113118 (2013) | Download Citation

Abstract

One of the main goals of organic and molecular electronics is to relate the performance and electronic function of devices to the chemical structure and intermolecular interactions of the organic component inside them, which can take the form of an organic thin film, a self-assembled monolayer or a single molecule1,2,3,4,5,6,7. This goal is difficult to achieve because organic and molecular electronic devices are complex physical–organic systems that consist of at least two electrodes, an organic component and two (different) organic/inorganic interfaces. Singling out the contribution of each of these components remains challenging. So far, strong ππ interactions have mainly been considered for the rational design and optimization of the performances of organic electronic devices8,9,10, and weaker intermolecular interactions have largely been ignored. Here, we show experimentally that subtle changes in the intermolecular van der Waals interactions in the active component of a molecular diode dramatically impact the performance of the device. In particular, we observe an odd–even effect as the number of alkyl units is varied in a ferrocene–alkanethiolate self-assembled monolayer. As a result of a more favourable van der Waals interaction, junctions made from an odd number of alkyl units have a lower packing energy (by 0.4–0.6 kcal mol–1), rectify currents 10 times more efficiently, give a 10% higher yield in working devices, and can be made two to three times more reproducibly than junctions made from an even number of alkyl units.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    , & Molecular rectification: why is it so rare? Chem. Phys. 281, 147–150 (2002).

  2. 2.

    & Molecular transport junctions: clearing mists. Adv. Mater. 19, 23–31 (2007).

  3. 3.

    & Molecular electronics with single molecules in solid-state devices. Nature Nanotech. 4, 551–556 (2009).

  4. 4.

    et al. Controlling single-molecule conductance through lateral coupling of π orbitals. Nature Nanotech. 6, 226–231 (2011).

  5. 5.

    & Progress with molecular electronic junctions: meeting experimental challenges in design and fabrication. Adv. Mater. 21, 4303–4322 (2009).

  6. 6.

    , & Electrical resistance of long conjugated molecular wires. Science 320, 1482–1486 (2008).

  7. 7.

    et al. Flexible molecular-scale electronic devices. Nature Nanotech. 7, 438–442 (2012).

  8. 8.

    , , & Interchain interactions in organic π-conjugated materials: impact on electronic structure, optical response, and charge transport. Adv. Mater. 13, 1053–1067 (2001).

  9. 9.

    , & Design strategies for organic semiconductors beyond the molecular formula. Nature Chem. 4, 699–704 (2012).

  10. 10.

    et al. Molecular junctions based on aromatic coupling. Nature Nanotech. 3, 569–574 (2008).

  11. 11.

    , , & Supramolecular assemblies of π-conjugated systems. Chem. Rev. 105, 1491–1546 (2005).

  12. 12.

    & From molecules to crystal engineering: supramolecular isomerism and polymorphism in network solids. Chem. Rev. 101, 1629–1658 (2001).

  13. 13.

    et al. Carbonic anhydrase as a model for biophysical and physical–organic studies of proteins and protein–ligand binding. Chem. Rev. 108, 946–1051 (2008).

  14. 14.

    et al. Molecular-scale interface engineering for polymer light-emitting diodes. Nature 404, 481–484 (2000).

  15. 15.

    & Understanding odd–even effects in organic self-assembled monolayers. Chem. Rev. 107, 1408–1453 (2007).

  16. 16.

    et al. Odd–even effects in tunneling across self-assembled monolayers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 2962–2975 (2011).

  17. 17.

    , & Eutectic gallium–indium (EGaIn): a moldable liquid metal for electrical characterization of self-assembled monolayers. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 47, 142–146. (2008).

  18. 18.

    , , , & The SAM, not the electrodes, dominates charge transport in metal-monolayer// Ga2O3/gallium-indium eutectic junctions. ACS Nano 6, 4806–4822 (2012).

  19. 19.

    , , , & Evidence for quantum interference in SAMs of arylethynylene thiolates in tunneling junctions with eutectic Ga-In (EGaIn) top-contacts J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 9556–9563 (2011).

  20. 20.

    et al. Multiscale charge injection and transport properties in self-assembled monolayers of biphenyl thiols with varying torsion angles Chem. Eur. J. 18, 10335–10347 (2012).

  21. 21.

    , , , & Charge transport and rectification in arrays of SAM-based tunneling junctions. Nano Lett. 10, 3611–3619 (2010).

  22. 22.

    et al. Statistical tools for analyzing measurements of charge transport. J. Phys. Chem. C 116, 6714–6733 (2012).

  23. 23.

    , & Self-assembled monolayers on gold of ferrocene-terminated thiols and hydroxyalkanethiols. Langmuir 18, 1288–1293 (2002).

  24. 24.

    & Molecular electronics: some views on transport junctions and beyond Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 8801–8808 (2005).

  25. 25.

    , & Redox-induced orientation change of a self-assembled monolayer of 11-ferrocenyl-1-undecanethiol on a gold electrode studied by in situ FT-IRRAS. Langmuir 13, 3157–3161 (1997).

  26. 26.

    , , , & Dependence of single-molecule junction conductance on molecular conformation. Nature 442, 904–907 (2006).

  27. 27.

    & Carbon K-shell excitation of metallocenes J. Am. Chem. Soc. 111, 5069–5075 (1989).

  28. 28.

    & Competitive self-assembly and electrochemistry of some ferrocenyl-n-alkanethiol derivatives on gold. J. Electroanal. Chem. 370, 203–211 (1994).

  29. 29.

    et al. Gradient-driven motion of multivalent ligand molecules along a surface functionalized with multiple receptors. Nature Chem. 3, 317–322 (2011).

  30. 30.

    , , & Molecular dynamics study of naturally occurring defects in self-assembled monolayer formation. ACS Nano 4, 921–932 (2010).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The Singapore National Research Foundation (NRF award no. NRF-RF2010-03 to C.A.N.) is acknowledged for supporting this research. D.T. acknowledges financial support from the Science Foundation Ireland (SFI; grant no. 11/SIRG/B2111) and the use of computing resources at Tyndall and the SFI/Higher Education Authority Irish Centre for High-End Computing (ICHEC). The authors thank Su Ying Quek for useful discussions and the technical support from the Singapore Synchrotron Light Source.

Author information

Author notes

    • Nisachol Nerngchamnong
    •  & Li Yuan

    These authors contributed equally to this work

Affiliations

  1. Department of Chemistry, National University of Singapore, 3 Science Drive 3, Singapore 117543

    • Nisachol Nerngchamnong
    • , Li Yuan
    • , Jiang Li
    •  & Christian A. Nijhuis
  2. Department of Physics, National University of Singapore, 2 Science Drive 3, Singapore, 117551, Singapore

    • Dong-Chen Qi
  3. Institute of Materials Research and Engineering, 3 Research Link, Singapore 117602, Singapore

    • Dong-Chen Qi
  4. Tyndall National Institute, University College Cork, Lee Maltings, Dyke Parade, Cork, Ireland

    • Damien Thompson
  5. Graphene Research Centre, National University of Singapore, 2 Science Drive 3, Singapore 117542, Singapore

    • Christian A. Nijhuis

Authors

  1. Search for Nisachol Nerngchamnong in:

  2. Search for Li Yuan in:

  3. Search for Dong-Chen Qi in:

  4. Search for Jiang Li in:

  5. Search for Damien Thompson in:

  6. Search for Christian A. Nijhuis in:

Contributions

N.N. synthesized the compounds and characterized the SAMs. L.Y. performed the J(V) measurements. J.L. prepared the template-stripped substrates. Q.D.C. and L.Y. recorded and analysed the NEXAFS spectra. D.T. performed the molecular dynamics simulations. C.A.N. supervised the project. All authors contributed to writing the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Damien Thompson or Christian A. Nijhuis.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary information

    Supplementary information

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2012.238

Further reading