Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Essential features for proactive risk management

We propose a proactive approach to the management of occupational health risks in emerging technologies based on six features: qualitative risk assessment; the ability to adapt strategies and refine requirements; an appropriate level of precaution; global applicability; the ability to elicit voluntary cooperation by companies; and stakeholder involvement.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type



Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout


  1. Howard, J. & Murashov, V. J. Nanopart. Res. 10.1007/s11051-009-9682-2 (2009).

  2. McGarity, T. O. & Shapiro, S. A. Workers At Risk: The Failed Promise of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (Praeger, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Shapiro, S. A. & Glicksman, R. L. Risk Regulation at Risk: Restoring a Pragmatic Approach (Stanford Univ. Press, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  4. US Occupational Safety and Health Act, 29 USC §651–678 (1970).

  5. Framework Directive 89/391/EEC Official Journal L 183, 1–8 (1989).

  6. Occupational Diseases Prevention and Control Act of the People's Republic of China (2001).

  7. Hansen, S. F., Maynard, A., Baun, A. & Tickner, J. A. Nature Nanotech. 3, 444–447 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Harremoës, P. et al. (eds) Environmental Issue Report No. 22 (European Environmental Agency, 2001); available at

    Google Scholar 

  9. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Approaches to Safe Nanotechnology: Managing the Health and Safety Concerns Associated with Engineered Nanomaterials (NIOSH, 2009); available at

  10. Morgan, M. G. & Henrion, M. Uncertainty: A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1990).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Krayer von Krauss, M. P., Casman, E. A. & Small, M. J. Risk Anal. 24, 1515–1527 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Figueira, J., Ehrgott, M. & Ehrgott, G. Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys (Springer, 2005).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Morgan, K. Risk Anal. 25, 1621–35 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Paik, S. Y., Zalk, D. M. & Swuste, P. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 52, 419–428 (2008).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Naumann, B. D. et al. Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. 57, 33–42 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. UK Health and Safety Executive COSHH Essentials

  17. Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Easy-to-use Workplace Control Scheme for Hazardous Substances (BAuA, 2006); available at

  18. Marquart, H. et al. Ann. Occ. Hyg. 52, 429–441 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  19. International Labour Organization International Chemical Control Toolkit (ILO, 2006); available at

  20. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Nanotechnology Field Research Effort (NIOSH, 2008); available at–121/.


  22. Weissinger, R. ISO Focus 4, 36–38 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sunstein, C. Laws of Fear: Beyond the Precautionary Principle (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2005).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Report of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, Annex I (UN, 1992); available at:

  25. European Commission On the Precautionary Principle (EC, 2000); available at

  26. Goldstein, B. & Carruth, R. Human Ecol. Risk Assess. 11, 209–219 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Tickner, J. A., Kriebel, D. & Wright, S. Int. J. Epidemiol. 32, 489–492 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hutchison, J. E. ACS Nano 2, 395–402 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Schulte, P. A., Rinehart, R., Okun, A., Geraci, C. & Heidel, D. S. J. Safety Res. 39, 115–121 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. United Nations Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals 2nd edn (UN, 2007); available at

  31. Marchant, G. E. & Sylvester, D. J. J. Law Med. Ethics 34, 714–725 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Organization for Economic Co-operation & Development Manufactured Nanomaterials: Work Programme 2006–2008 (OECD, 2008).

  33. Organization for Economic Co-operation & Development Preliminary Analysis of Exposure Measurement and Exposure Mitigation in Occupational Settings: Manufactured Nanomaterials (OECD, 2009); available at

  34. Murashov, V. et al. J. Nanopart. Res. 10.1007/s11051-009-9637-7 (2009).

  35. International Organization for Standardization Health and Safety Practices in Occupational Settings Relevant to Nanotechnologies ISO/TR-12885 (ISO, 2008).

  36. Murashov, V. & Howard, J. Nature Nanotech. 3, 635–636 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Linkov, I. & Satterstrom, F. K. in Real-Time and Deliberative Decision Making. (eds Linkov. I. et al.) 129–157 (Springer, 2008).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  38. ETC Group News Release (18 October 2006); available at

  39. Monica, J. C. Jr, Heintz, M. E. & Lewis, P. T. Nature Nanotech. 2, 68–70 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Davies, J. C. Nanotechnology Oversight: An Agenda for the New Administration (Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  41. European Commission Regulatory Aspects of Nanomaterials (EC, 2008); available at

  42. German Chemical Industry Association Responsible Production and Use of Nanomaterials (VCI, 2008); available at


  44. Marchant, G. E., Sylvester, D. J. & Abbott, K. W. Nanoethics 2, 43–60 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Goode, B. G. Small Times (September 2007); available at

    Google Scholar 

  46. TÜV SÜD Industrie Service GmbH CENARIOS® Certification Standard (TÜV SÜD, 2008); available at

  47. Immediate Measures to Prevent Exposures to Manufactured Nanomaterials in the Workplace (Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, 2008); available at (in Japanese).

  48. US Environmental Protection Agency Concept Paper for the Nanoscale Materials Stewardship Program Under TSCA (EPA, 2008); available at

  49. US Environmental Protection Agency Risk Management Practices for Nanoscale Materials (EPA, 2007); available at

  50. US Environmental Protection Agency Nanoscale Materials Stewardship Program: Interim Report. (EPA, 2009); available at

  51. Guidance for Handling and Use of Nanomaterials at the Workplace (BAuA/VCI, 2007); available at


  53. International Risk Governance Council Policy Brief: Nanotechnology Risk Governance: Recommendations for a Global, Coordinated Approach to the Governance of Potential Risks (IRGC, 2007); available at

Download references


The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention or the US Department of Health and Human Services.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Murashov, V., Howard, J. Essential features for proactive risk management. Nature Nanotech 4, 467–470 (2009).

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


Quick links

Find nanotechnology articles, nanomaterial data and patents all in one place. Visit Nano by Nature Research