Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Correspondence
  • Published:

How fast should nanotechnology advance?

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout


  1. Wintle, B., Burgman, M. & Fidler, F. Nature Nanotech. 2, 327 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Currall, S. C., King, E. B., Lane, N., Madera, J. & Turner, S. Nature Nanotech. 1, 153–155 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bainbridge, W. S. J. Nanopart. Res. 4, 561–570 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hart Research Report on Nanotechnology; (2006).

  5. Currall, S. C. Debunking the nanotechnology myths. (31 January 2007);

    Google Scholar 

Download references


The research discussed in this correspondence was supported in part by the National Science Foundation (award numbers EEC-0118007 and SES-0531146).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven C. Currall.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Currall, S., King, E., Lane, N. et al. How fast should nanotechnology advance?. Nature Nanotech 2, 327–328 (2007).

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing